Zihin Yetersizliği ve Bütünleştirme
Özet
ZY olan öğrencilerin eğitimi, günümüzde fırsat eşitliği, insan hakları ve kapsayıcı eğitim anlayışları doğrultusunda akranlarıyla birlikte eğitim almalarını esas alan bütünleştirme uygulamalarına yönelmiştir. Araştırmalar, uygun destekler sağlandığında ZY olan öğrencilerin akademik ve sosyal açıdan önemli kazanımlar elde edebildiğini göstermektedir. ZY, zihinsel işlevler ve uyumsal davranışlarda görülen anlamlı sınırlılıklarla karakterize edilen nörogelişimsel bir yetersizliktir. Günümüzde ZY, yalnızca zekâ puanı temelinde değil, bireyin işlevselliği ve destek gereksinimleri dikkate alınarak değerlendirilmektedir. Genetik ve çevresel etkenlerin etkileşimi sonucunda ortaya çıkan ZY; Down sendromu, Frajil X sendromu, Rett sendromu ve fenilketonüri gibi genetik durumlar ile gebelik dönemindeki çeşitli risk faktörleriyle ilişkilendirilmektedir. ZY olan öğrenciler özellikle bellek, yürütücü işlevler ve akademik öğrenme alanlarında güçlük yaşayabilmektedir. Bununla birlikte sistematik ve kanıta dayalı öğretim uygulamalarının akademik becerilerin geliştirilmesinde etkili olduğu, sosyal uyum alanındaki güçlüklerin ise uygun desteklerle azaltılabildiği bildirilmektedir. Dünya genelinde ZY, önemli bir eğitim ve toplum sağlığı konusu olmayı sürdürmektedir. Yaygınlık oranları azalma eğilimi gösterse de düşük sosyo-demografik gelişmişlik düzeyine sahip bölgelerde daha yüksek oranlarda görülmektedir. Bu durum, koruyucu sağlık hizmetleri, erken müdahale uygulamaları ve kapsayıcı eğitim politikalarının önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bütünleştirme uygulamalarında temel amaç, öğrencilerin en az kısıtlayıcı ortam ilkesine uygun biçimde genel eğitim sınıflarında desteklenmesidir. Bu süreçte öğretimsel uyarlamalar, davranışsal destekler, akran aracılı uygulamalar, teknoloji destekli araçlar ve aile katılımı önemli rol oynamaktadır. Sonuç olarak, ZY olan öğrencilerin bütünleştirme ortamlarında başarılı olabilmeleri; bireysel gereksinimlere uygun öğretimsel düzenlemelerin yapılmasına, aile ve uzman iş birliğinin sağlanmasına ve kapsayıcı uygulamaların sürdürülmesine bağlıdır. Bu koşullar sağlandığında öğrencilerin akademik ve sosyal gelişimleri desteklenebilmekte ve toplumsal yaşama katılımları artırılabilmektedir.
Referanslar
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities [AAIDD]. (t.y.). Defining criteria for intellectual disability. https://www.aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition
Abu-Alghayth, K., & Alshahrani, B. F. (2024). Inclusion of students with intellectual disability in Saudi universities: understanding the gap between theory and practice. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12633
Alfawzan, S. K. (2025). Perspectives of teachers of students with intellectual disabilities on the role of educational policies and systems in using Universal Design for Learning: A qualitative study. Plos One, 20(9), e0333432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333432
Algahtani, F. (2020). The effectiveness of computer-based learning in developing academic skills for children with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Childhood Counselling and Special Education, 1(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.31559/ccse2020.1.1.5
Alvarenga, K. A. F. de, Alcântara, W. L. de, & Miranda, D. M. de. (2023). What has been done to improve learning for intellectual disability? An umbrella review of published meta‐analyses and systematic reviews. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36(3), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13072
Barron, K. (2024). A dangerous conflation. Yu-Write Journal of Graduate Student Research in Education, 3(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.25071/28169344.82
Crosland, K., & Dunlap, G. (2012). Effective strategies for the inclusion of children with autism in general education classrooms. Behavior Modification, 36(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512442682
Davis, L. L., Spooner, F., & Saunders, A. (2022). Efficacy of peer-delivered mathematical problem-solving instruction to students with extensive support needs. Exceptional Children, 89(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221098764
Donoghue, S. E., ve Amor, D. J. (2024). Intellectual disability: A potentially treatable condition. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 60(7), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16598
Dwivedi, C., & Gautam, D. (2024). Empowering education: Addressing intellectual disability through tailored interventions and supportive environments. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.13917
Erb, E. M., & Lee, G. T. (2025). Scoping review: Using virtual or augmented reality to teach children on the autism spectrum with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.70036
Fletcher, J. M., & Miciak, J. (2024). Assessment of specific learning disabilities and intellectual disabilities. Assessment, 31(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231194992
Gee, K., Burnette, K., Walker, V. L., Ryndak, D. L., Fisher, M. A., Baker, D., & Clausen, A. (2024). Access for students with extensive support needs to state-adopted grade-level standards and curriculum in general education classes: A content analysis of the literature. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 50(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241281031
Hou, K., ve Zheng, X. (2024). A 10-year review on advancements in identifying and treating intellectual disability caused by genetic variations. Genes, 15(9), 1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091118
Ismailov, M., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Catering to ınclusion and diversity with universal design for learning in asynchronous online education: A self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819884
Jdaitawi, M., & Kan’an, A. (2021). A decade of research on the effectiveness of augmented reality on students with special disability in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep332. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11369
Jean-Pierre, J. (2025). Overlooked and underserved: How inclusive education oversights exclude Black students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 25(4), 1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70036
Jimenez, B., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & DiBiase, W. J. (2012). Inclusive ınquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800303
Jung, S., & Lansey, K. R. (2026). Academic ıntervention effectiveness in ınclusive education settings for students with extensive support needs: A systematic review. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 61(1), 68–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/21541647261440540
Kang, Y., & Chang, Y. (2019). Using a motion‐controlled game to teach four elementary school children with intellectual disabilities to improve hand hygiene. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(4), 942–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12587
Kim, G., Joo, S., Kurth, J. A., & Tuck, K. N. (2025). A meta-analysis of interventions to support elementary students with intellectual disability in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities., 50(4), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969251328662
Kryukova, N. I., Rastorgueva, N. E., Popova, E. O., Zakharova, V. L., Aytuganova, J. I., & Bikbulatova, G. I. (2023). Examining the implementations related to teaching science to students with disabilities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2306. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13427
Kuntz, E. M., & Carter, E. W. (2019). Review of ınterventions supporting secondary students with ıntellectual disability in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 44(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919847483
Lee, K., Cascella, M., ve Marwaha, R. (2023). Intellectual disability. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547654/
Lepore, T., Hlusko, L. J., Armstrong, L. B., Frank, T., Tseng, Z. J., Schmitt, C. A., Rizk, O. T., & Baranger, A. M. (2025). The tangible benefits of disability and accessibility awareness in evolutionary biology college courses centered in Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Cbe—Life Sciences Education, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-12-0295
Lin, P.-Y. (2024). Do computer-based accommodations matter? An evaluation of bundled accommodations for secondary students with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241262236
Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., Reeve, A., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., Spitalnik, D. M., Spreat, S., & Tassé, M. J. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10. Basım). American Association on Mental Retardation.
Mallidis-Malessas, P., Iatraki, G., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2021). Teaching physics to students with intellectual disabilities using digital learning objects. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(4), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211054441
Mansouri, M. C., Kurth, J. A., Turner, E. L., Zimmerman, K. N., & Frick, T. A. (2022). Comparison of academic and social outcomes of students with extensive support needs across placements. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 47(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221101792
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Iatraki, G. (2022). Digital technology supports science education for students with disabilities: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 3911–3935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11317-9
Moodley, D. Eva. (2024). Universal Design for Learning and writing centres in South African higher education. Perspectives in Education, 42(2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v42i2.7830
Nair, R., Chen, M., Dutt, A. S., Hagopian, L., Singh, A., & Du, M. (2022). Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: A systematic analysis of GBD 2019. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 31, e91.
Niure, D. P., & Shrestha, M. K. (2023a). Strategies for ıncluding the excluded in education: A case of children with intellectual disabilities. Education Quarterly, 4(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.3126/jeqtu.v4i1.57243
Niure, D. P., & Shrestha, M. K. (2023b). Strengthening ınclusive education: unraveling prerequisites for children with intellectual disabilities. Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 8(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.3126/ire.v8i2.60232
Okaba, A. M., Akpana, U. F., Iye, E. P., & Nneka, M. L. (2024). teachers’ classroom management strategies and education of pupils with mild ıntellectual disability ın calabar municipality of Cross River State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Educational Research, 23(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v23i4.11
O'Donovan, M., Wedgwood, N., Westermann, G., Rillotta, F., & Aitken, T. (2025). Personal, social and vocational outcomes of inclusive university for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 69(12), 1448–1473. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70042
Özaydın, M. M. (2025). Hafif düzey zihin yetersizliği bulunan öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama becerisine SQ4R tekniğinin etkileri. Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(22), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1795193
Powers, R. A., Simmons, A., Hayes, B. E., Weller, K., McKingsley, L. A., Maher, C. A., & Burckley, J. (2025). Building inclusive academic and disability community research partnerships: methodological insights for engaging victims with ıntellectual and developmental disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 518-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.70000
Rathnakumar, D. (2019). Enhancement of learning science among students with mild ıntellectual disability employing accessible technology: Feasible or a Challenge? Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i2.331
Rodríguez-Ferrer, J. M., León, A. M., García-Roca, A., & Soler-Delgado, R. (2024). Embark on the adventure! Advancing inclusive secondary education through narrative game learning for students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 29(4), 1033–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241302400
Sajewicz-Radtke, U., Łada-Maśko, A., Olech, M., Leoniak, K. J., & Radtke, B. M. (2025). Declarative memory profiles in children with non-specific intellectual disability: A cluster analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1581144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1581144
Schaefer, J. M., Cannella‐Malone, H. I., & Carter, E. W. (2016). The place of peers in peer-mediated interventions for students with intellectual disability. Remedial and Special Education, 37(6), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516629220
Storm, M. M. C., van Eldik, W. M., Nooteboom, L. A., & Vermeiren, R. R. J. M. (2025). Social determinants associated with mental health problems in youth with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(12), 3697–3711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02794-7
Travers, H. E., & Carter, E. W. (2022). A portrait of peers within peer-mediated interventions: a literature review. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 37(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576211073698
Xie, Y., Shao, Y., Li, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, B., Wu, J., Jiang, C., & Wu, H. (2025). Global trends in developmental disabilities in children and adolescents 1990–2021: Sex- and sociodemographic Index-stratified analysis of Global Burden of Disease 2021. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2025.2581660
Vergunst, R., McKenzie, J., & Hansen, A. (2021). Capacity building for quality care and education for children with severe to profound intellectual disabilities in South Africa. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 26(3), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295211018584
