Bilimin Doğası ve Öğretimi Dersinin Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarına Etkisi

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). The evolving landscape related to assessment of nature of science. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol. 2, pp. 621-650). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044

Akerson, V. L., Carter, I. S., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of science in the early years: Research and practice. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Nature of science for social justice (pp. 17–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-08208-4_2

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.

Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53-62.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Deneysel Desenler: Öntest-Sontest Kontrol Grubu Desen ve Veri Analizi (2. baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. AERA (American Educational Research Association).

https://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Campbell&Stanley-1959-Exptl&QuasiExptlDesignsForResearch.pdf

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis fort he behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellance, & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51-76). Bloomington, IN:Solution Tree Press.

Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9057-4

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722

Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (PNAS) 118(15), e1912436117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117

Höttecke D., & Allchin D. (2020). Reconceptualizing nature-of-science education in the age of social media. Science Education, 104, 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21575

Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7-8), 591-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4

Khishfe, R. and Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002), Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 39: 551-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., pp. 600–620). Routledge.

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2020). Avoiding de-natured science: Integrating nature of science into science instruction. In w. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 295–326). Springer.

Matthews, M. R. (2014). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science (2nd ed.). Routledge.

McComas, W. F. (2020). Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies. Springer.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.

Özgelen, S. (2013). Bilimin Doğası Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(2), 711-736.

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In: N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 697–726). New York: Routledge.