Emek Arzı
Özet
Bu bölüm, emek arzı kararlarını klasik iktisat teorisi, davranışsal iktisat, sosyal normlar ve pandemi sonrası dönüşen işgücü yapısını çerçevesinde değerlendirmektedir. İlk bölümde, emek arzının mikroekonomik temelleri ikame ve gelir etkisi bağlamında incelenmiş; ardından tersine dönen emek arz eğrisi çeşitli örnekler aracılığıyla açıklanmıştır. Bu çerçevede, emek arz eğrisinin yalnızca bir noktada değil, ikinci kez de yön değiştirebileceğine dikkat çeken ve bireylerin ekonomik olmayan motivasyonlarla çalışmaya devam etme eğilimlerini açıklayan alternatif bir model üzerinden değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır. İkinci bölümde, emek arz esnekliği kavramı ve vergi politikalarının bu esneklik üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Marjinal vergi oranlarının sosyo-demografik gruplar üzerindeki etkileri, özellikle kadınlar ve düşük gelirli bireyler açısından detaylandırılmıştır. Üçüncü bölümde, emek arzının ücret dışı belirleyicileri olan eş geliri, çocuk bakımı, eğitim düzeyi, sağlık durumu, sosyal yardımlar ve toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri tartışılmış; kadınların işgücüne katılımındaki kırılganlık gösterilmiştir. Dördüncü bölümde, emek arzı karaları; davranışsal iktisat perspektifinden sahiplik etkisi, kayıptan kaçınma, statüko yanlılığı ve karar kaçınması gibi psikolojik önyargıların etkisi kapsamında değerlendirilmiştir. Bireysel tercih özgürlüğünü zedelemeden davranış değişimini teşvik eden politikaların, dikkat dağınıklığı ve kararsızlık gibi durumları aşmada nasıl bir işlev gördüğü irdelenmiştir. Pandeminin emek arzı üzerindeki etkileri ise son bölümde; uzaktan çalışma, dijital eşitsizlikler ve toplumsal cinsiyet kapsamında incelenmiştir. Bu çerçevede bu bölüm, emek arzı olgusunu ekonomik rasyonalite sınırlarının ötesine taşıyarak; psikolojik önyargılar, toplumsal normlar ve kriz dönemlerinde değişen işgücü dinamikleri ışığında irdeleyerek çalışma ekonomisi literatürüne kavramsal derinlik kazandırmaktadır.
This chapter examines labor supply decisions through the lenses of classical economic theory, behavioral economics, social norms, and the shifts in employment dynamics following the pandemic. The first section investigates the microeconomic underpinnings of labor supply in relation to substitution and income effects, and then illustrates the backward-bending labor supply curve with reference to various cases. Within this framework, attention is also given to an alternative model, which underlines the possibility of the curve bending a second time and shows how non-economic motivations—such as identity, status, and social meaning—can encourage individuals to remain in work. The second section analyzes the concept of labor supply elasticity alongside the influence of tax policies on this elasticity. It places particular emphasis on the impact of marginal tax rates on different socio-demographic groups, focusing especially on women and low-income earners. The third section discusses non-wage determinants of labor supply, such as spousal income, childcare, educational background, health status, welfare systems, and prevailing gender norms, while drawing attention to the vulnerable role of women within employment. The fourth section addresses labor supply from the standpoint of behavioral economics, considering how psychological biases like the endowment effect, loss aversion, status quo bias, and decision avoidance influence labor market behavior. It also examines how policy instruments that promote behavioral change—without undermining individual freedom of choice—can help overcome barriers such as distraction, procrastination, and indecision. The final section evaluates the pandemic’s impact on labor supply, with a focus on remote working practices, inequalities in digital access, and gender-related aspects. In this respect, this chapter moves the analysis of labor supply beyond the limits of pure economic rationality by addressing it through psychological biases, social norms, and the shifting labor market dynamics during periods of crisis, thereby contributing conceptual depth to the literature on labor economics.
Referanslar
Axelrad, H., Luski, I., & Malul, M. (2016). Behavioral characteristics and the labor supply of older people: The importance of “expected” employment status. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 62, 26–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.03.007
Berulava, G., & Chikava, G. (2011). The determinants of household labor supply: A comparative study. Economics Education and Research Consortium, Working Paper No. 11/13E.
Bhalotra, S., & Fernández, C. (2018). The motherhood penalty and female employment dynamics in developing countries (IZA Discussion Paper No. 11417).
Bick, A., Fuchs-Schündeln, N., & Lagakos, D. (2021). Taxation and labor supply of married couples across countries. Review of Economic Studies, 89(1), 25–67.
Blomquist, S., & Selin, H. (2010). Hourly wage rate and taxable labor income responsiveness to changes in marginal tax rates. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11–12), 878–889.
Blundell, R. (1992). Labour supply and taxation: A survey. Fiscal Studies, 13(3), 15–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24437358
Blundell, R., & MaCurdy, T. (1999). Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 3A, pp. 1559–1695). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30009-0
Borjas, G. J. (2013). Labor economics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Böckerman, P., Kortelainen, M., & Salokangas, H. (2025). A family affair? Long-term economic and mental health effects of spousal cancer. Journal of Population Economics, 1–15.
Colonna, F., & Marcassa, S. (2015). Taxation and female labor supply in Italy. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-015-0030-0
Egebark, J. (2015). Taxes, nudges, and conformity: Essays in labor and behavioral economics (IFAU Dissertation Series 2015:1). Stockholm University.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Smith, R. S. (2006). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy (9th ed.). Pearson Addison Wesley.
Fernandez, R., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1146–1155.
Hagen, J., Hallberg, D., & Sjögren Lindquist, G. (2021). A nudge to quit? The effect of a change in pension information on annuitisation, labour supply and retirement choices among older workers. The Economic Journal, 132(643), 1060–1094. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab060
Haider, S. J., & Loughran, D. (2001). Elderly labor supply: Work or play? Center for Retirement Research Working Paper 2001-04.
Hennecke, J. (2024). Internal locus of control and female labor supply (IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 16819). Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
Jayachandran, S. (2020). Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries (NBER Working Paper No. 27449). https://www.nber.org/papers/w27449
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.
Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 341–365.
Kalugina, E., Greenan, N., & Niang, M. M. (2025). Work organization, gender and workforce transition to non-employment in OECD countries. Eurasian Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-025-00297-8
Kaufman, B. E., & Hotchkiss, J. L. (2003). The economics of labor markets (6th ed.). Thomson South-Western.
Keane, M. P. (2011). Labor supply and taxes: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4), 961–1075. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.4.961
Mankiw, N. G. (2008). Principles of economics (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
McClelland, R., & Mok, S. (2012). A review of recent research on labor supply elasticities (Working Paper No. 2012-12). Congressional Budget Office. http://go.usa.gov/ULE
Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. (2022). The endowment effect revisited. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.010
Nennstiel, R., & Becker, R. (2025). Equal educational qualifications but unequal labor market outcomes: Gender disparities in occupational status over five decades. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 98, 101070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101070
Prasch, R. E. (2000). Revising the labor supply curve: A theoretical and empirical critique. Review of Political Economy, 12(4), 585–600.
Şengür, M. (2020). Tersine dönen emek arz eğrisi: Türkiye sınaması / Backward bending supply of labor: Case of Turkey. Journal of Yasar University, 15(58), 304–312.
Taylor, M. P. (2000). What determines the labor supply of older workers? In S. W. Polachek (Ed.), Worker Well-Being and Public Policy (Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 95–131). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9121(00)19005-4
Taylor, R. M. (2025). Nudging consumer financial decisions: A behavioral economics and policy perspective. NHS Journal of Consumer Studies, February 3.
Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach (8th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Wu, C., & Krueger, D. (2021). Consumption insurance against wage and employment risk using the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey. Journal of Monetary Economics, 118, 311–330.
Yu, X. (2023). Analysis of individual behaviour based on status quo bias. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/6/20220442
Ziliak, J. P., & Kniesner, T. J. (1999). Estimating life cycle labor supply tax effects. Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), 326–359. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/250062
