Bilim İletişimi ve Sosyobilimsel Konular
Özet
Referanslar
Baram‐Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Bridging science education and science communication research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 135-144.
Beniermann, A., Mecklenburg, L., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2021). Reasoning on controversial science issues in science education and science communication. Education Sciences, 11(9), 522.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal communication: Theoretical perspectives, future prospects. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 415–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02680.x
Biondi-Zoccai, G., Cazzaro, A., Cobalchin, E., D’Auria, D., Ardizzone, G., Giordano, S., Mirzoyev, U., Seferovic, P. M., Bajraktari, G., & Muraru, D. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Tools for Scientific Writing: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Top Italian Scientists Journal, 2(1).
Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of communication, 51(3), 477-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x
Brossard D., Lewenstein B. V. (2010). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. Kahlor L., Stout P. (Eds.), Communicating science: New agendas in communication içinde (s. 11-39). New York, NY: Routledge.
Burakgazi, S. G. (2017). Kritik olaylar, politik dokümanlar, raporlar ve araştırmalar ışığında Türkiye’de bilim iletişimi. Selçuk İletişim, 10(1), 232-261.
Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183-202.
Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing students’communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1-27.
Dönmez, İ. (2023). Newspapers in science communication: A content analysis on science and technology news. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 93-112.
Dunnwald, M., DeLeon, V. B., & Burrows, A. M. (2025). The importance of science communication and public engagement to professional associations. Anatomical Sciences Education, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70017
Fischer, H. E., Boone, W. J., & Neumann, K. (2023). Quantitative research designs and approaches. Handbook of research on science education içinde (s. 28-59). Routledge.
Gregory, J. (2009). Scientists communicating. R. Holliman, J. Thomas, S. Smidt, E. Scanlon ve E. Whitelegg (Eds.), Practising science communication in the information age: Theorising professional practices içinde (s. 3-19). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3-19.
Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). The public understanding of science. A. Wilson (Ed.), Handbook of science communication içinde (s. 3-16). CRC Press.
Hanganu-Bresch, C., Zerbe, M. J., Cutrufello, G., & Maci, S. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication. Routledge.
Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E., & Whitelegg, L. (2009). Practising science communication in the information age: Theorising professional practices. Oxford University Press. http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199552672
Howk, A., McMillan, R., & Kelp, N. (2025). Utilizing of Q methodology to delineate STEM student perspectives regarding science communication about scientific uncertainty in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1-18.
Kahan, D. M. (2015a). What is the 'science of science communication'?. Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), 1-10.
Kahan, D. M. (2015b). Climate‐science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36, 1-43.
Kappel, K., & Holmen, S. J. (2019). Why science communication, and does it work? A taxonomy of science communication aims and a survey of the empirical evidence. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 55.
Kinskey, M. (2025). Leveraging a community of practice to prepare elementary preservice teachers for instruction with socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 1-29.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resource for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 181-201.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. The Free Press.
Ozdemir, S., & Koçer, D. N. (2020). 21. yüzyılda Türkiye’nin bilim iletişimi uygulamaları üzerine bir çalışma. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(Özel Sayı), 373-392.
Pessoa, P., de Lima, J., Piacentini, V., Realdon, G., Jeffries, A., Ometto, L., Lopez, J. B., Zeidler, D. L., Fonseca, M. J, Sousa, B., Pinto, A., & Sá-Pinto, X. (2025). A framework to identify opportunities to address socioscientific issues in the elementary school curricula: A case study from England, Italy, and Portugal. PloS one, 20(3), e0308901.
Reincke, C. M., Bredenoord, A. L., & van Mil, M. H. (2020). From deficit to dialogue in science communication: the dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists. EMBO reports, 21(9), e51278. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051278
Rosewater, L. (2024). The 4 core models of science communication (and how they differ). https://www.pitchscience.com.au/blog/the-4-core-models-of-science-communication-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-differ?
Stine, E. M. (2021). Considerations for science communications in a changing media landscape [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. University of Nebraska.
Tayeebwa, D. W., Wendo, D. C., & Nakiwala, D. A. S. (2022). Theories and models of science communication. Science Communication Skills for Journalists: A Resource Book for Universities in Africa içinde (s. 14-22). GB: CABI.
Trench, B. (2008). Towards and analytical framework of science communication models. D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, S. Shi (Eds), Communicating science in social contexts. New models, new practices içinde (s. 119–135). Springer, New York,
URL-2: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmet_Mete_I%C5%9F%C4%B1kara
Volk, S. C., Schäfer, M. S., Lombardi, D., Mahl, D., & Yan, X. (2025). How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments. Public Understanding of Science, 34(2), 132-153.
Ziman, J. M. (1987). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge University Press.
Referanslar
Baram‐Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Bridging science education and science communication research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 135-144.
Beniermann, A., Mecklenburg, L., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2021). Reasoning on controversial science issues in science education and science communication. Education Sciences, 11(9), 522.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal communication: Theoretical perspectives, future prospects. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 415–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02680.x
Biondi-Zoccai, G., Cazzaro, A., Cobalchin, E., D’Auria, D., Ardizzone, G., Giordano, S., Mirzoyev, U., Seferovic, P. M., Bajraktari, G., & Muraru, D. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Tools for Scientific Writing: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Top Italian Scientists Journal, 2(1).
Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of communication, 51(3), 477-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x
Brossard D., Lewenstein B. V. (2010). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. Kahlor L., Stout P. (Eds.), Communicating science: New agendas in communication içinde (s. 11-39). New York, NY: Routledge.
Burakgazi, S. G. (2017). Kritik olaylar, politik dokümanlar, raporlar ve araştırmalar ışığında Türkiye’de bilim iletişimi. Selçuk İletişim, 10(1), 232-261.
Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183-202.
Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing students’communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1-27.
Dönmez, İ. (2023). Newspapers in science communication: A content analysis on science and technology news. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 93-112.
Dunnwald, M., DeLeon, V. B., & Burrows, A. M. (2025). The importance of science communication and public engagement to professional associations. Anatomical Sciences Education, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70017
Fischer, H. E., Boone, W. J., & Neumann, K. (2023). Quantitative research designs and approaches. Handbook of research on science education içinde (s. 28-59). Routledge.
Gregory, J. (2009). Scientists communicating. R. Holliman, J. Thomas, S. Smidt, E. Scanlon ve E. Whitelegg (Eds.), Practising science communication in the information age: Theorising professional practices içinde (s. 3-19). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3-19.
Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). The public understanding of science. A. Wilson (Ed.), Handbook of science communication içinde (s. 3-16). CRC Press.
Hanganu-Bresch, C., Zerbe, M. J., Cutrufello, G., & Maci, S. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication. Routledge.
Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E., & Whitelegg, L. (2009). Practising science communication in the information age: Theorising professional practices. Oxford University Press. http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199552672
Howk, A., McMillan, R., & Kelp, N. (2025). Utilizing of Q methodology to delineate STEM student perspectives regarding science communication about scientific uncertainty in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1-18.
Kahan, D. M. (2015a). What is the 'science of science communication'?. Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), 1-10.
Kahan, D. M. (2015b). Climate‐science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36, 1-43.
Kappel, K., & Holmen, S. J. (2019). Why science communication, and does it work? A taxonomy of science communication aims and a survey of the empirical evidence. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 55.
Kinskey, M. (2025). Leveraging a community of practice to prepare elementary preservice teachers for instruction with socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 1-29.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resource for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 181-201.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. The Free Press.
Ozdemir, S., & Koçer, D. N. (2020). 21. yüzyılda Türkiye’nin bilim iletişimi uygulamaları üzerine bir çalışma. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(Özel Sayı), 373-392.
Pessoa, P., de Lima, J., Piacentini, V., Realdon, G., Jeffries, A., Ometto, L., Lopez, J. B., Zeidler, D. L., Fonseca, M. J, Sousa, B., Pinto, A., & Sá-Pinto, X. (2025). A framework to identify opportunities to address socioscientific issues in the elementary school curricula: A case study from England, Italy, and Portugal. PloS one, 20(3), e0308901.
Reincke, C. M., Bredenoord, A. L., & van Mil, M. H. (2020). From deficit to dialogue in science communication: the dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists. EMBO reports, 21(9), e51278. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051278
Rosewater, L. (2024). The 4 core models of science communication (and how they differ). https://www.pitchscience.com.au/blog/the-4-core-models-of-science-communication-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-differ?
Stine, E. M. (2021). Considerations for science communications in a changing media landscape [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. University of Nebraska.
Tayeebwa, D. W., Wendo, D. C., & Nakiwala, D. A. S. (2022). Theories and models of science communication. Science Communication Skills for Journalists: A Resource Book for Universities in Africa içinde (s. 14-22). GB: CABI.
Trench, B. (2008). Towards and analytical framework of science communication models. D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, S. Shi (Eds), Communicating science in social contexts. New models, new practices içinde (s. 119–135). Springer, New York,
URL-2: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmet_Mete_I%C5%9F%C4%B1kara
Volk, S. C., Schäfer, M. S., Lombardi, D., Mahl, D., & Yan, X. (2025). How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments. Public Understanding of Science, 34(2), 132-153.
Ziman, J. M. (1987). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge University Press.
