Correcting Misconceptions About Atoms and Molecules in Primary and Secondary School Students Using Modeling Techniques
Özet
Referanslar
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon B.S. and Silberstein, E. (1986) Revision of course materials on the basis of research on conceptual difficulties, J. Chem. Educ. 63 (1), p 64. DOI: 10.1021/ed063p64.
Bilir V., Digilli B.A. & Karaçam, S. (2018) Atomic theories that preservice science teachers confuse andunderlying reasons. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19 (1), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.331368
Brook, A., Briggs M. and Driver R. (1984). Aspects of Secondary Students Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter. Leeds: Univercity of Leeds Chidren’s Learning in Science Project. Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Cardoso, P. S. S., Nunes, M. C. S., Silva, G. P. S., Braghittoni, L. S. & Trindade, N. M. (2020) Atomic modelsof high school students, radiation and radioactivity concepts. Physics Education, 55 (3), 035030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab7fc6
Çökelez, A. & Duman, A. (2005) Atom and molecule: upper secondary school french students’representations in long-term memory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6 (3), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90005G
Çökelez, A. & Yalçın, S. (2012) Investigation of mental models of elementary 7th grade students about atomconcept. Elementeary Education Online, 11 (2) 452-471.
Çökelez, A. (2012) Junior high school students’ ideas about the shape and size of the atom. Research in Science Education, 42, 673-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9223-8
Demircioğlu, G., Aydın, M. A. & Demircioğlu, H. (2012) The effect of conceptual change text and three-dimensional model on 7th grade students' understanding of atomic structure. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 7 (2), 70-96.
Dhindsa, H.S. & Anderson, O.R. (2004) Using a Conceptual-Change Approach to Help Preservice Science Teachers Reorganize Their Knowledge Structuresfor ConstructivistTeaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15 (1), 6385.
Dow, W.M., Auld J. and Wilson D. (1978). Pupils Concept of Gases, Liquid and Solids. Unpublished Manuscript, Dundee Collage of Education, Dundee.
Ehab O. M., Safwan M. O., Nathir A.F. Al-R., Nacir T. & Ihab M. O. (2018) Misconceptions about atomicmodels amongst the chemistry students. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6 (2), 256-263. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss2.958
Griffiths, Alan K. and Kirk R. Preston. (1992) Grade 12 Students’ Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 611-628.
Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (2000) Leaming about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: a case study of multiple models uses in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.
Lena R., Andersson B. and Marton F. (1990) Students’ Conceptions of Matter. Journal of Educational Pschology, 82 (3), 555-559.
Luera, GR, Otto, CA., & Zitzewitz, P.W. (2005) A conceptual change approachto teaching energy & thermodynamics to pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2 (4), 3-8.
Nakleh, Mary B. (1994) Students’ Model of Matter in the Context of Acid Base Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71 (6), 495-499.
Nakleh, Mary B. (1992) Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69 (3), 191-196.
Nicoll, G. (2001) A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (7), 707-730.
Shimshon, N. and Nussbaum J. (1978) Junior High School Pupils’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: An Interview Study. Science Education, 62 (3), 273-281.
Shimshon, N. and Nussbaum J. (1981) Pupils’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: A Cross-Age Study. Science Education, 65 (2), 187-196.
Yalın İ. (1999). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Referanslar
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon B.S. and Silberstein, E. (1986) Revision of course materials on the basis of research on conceptual difficulties, J. Chem. Educ. 63 (1), p 64. DOI: 10.1021/ed063p64.
Bilir V., Digilli B.A. & Karaçam, S. (2018) Atomic theories that preservice science teachers confuse andunderlying reasons. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19 (1), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.331368
Brook, A., Briggs M. and Driver R. (1984). Aspects of Secondary Students Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter. Leeds: Univercity of Leeds Chidren’s Learning in Science Project. Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Cardoso, P. S. S., Nunes, M. C. S., Silva, G. P. S., Braghittoni, L. S. & Trindade, N. M. (2020) Atomic modelsof high school students, radiation and radioactivity concepts. Physics Education, 55 (3), 035030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab7fc6
Çökelez, A. & Duman, A. (2005) Atom and molecule: upper secondary school french students’representations in long-term memory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6 (3), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90005G
Çökelez, A. & Yalçın, S. (2012) Investigation of mental models of elementary 7th grade students about atomconcept. Elementeary Education Online, 11 (2) 452-471.
Çökelez, A. (2012) Junior high school students’ ideas about the shape and size of the atom. Research in Science Education, 42, 673-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9223-8
Demircioğlu, G., Aydın, M. A. & Demircioğlu, H. (2012) The effect of conceptual change text and three-dimensional model on 7th grade students' understanding of atomic structure. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 7 (2), 70-96.
Dhindsa, H.S. & Anderson, O.R. (2004) Using a Conceptual-Change Approach to Help Preservice Science Teachers Reorganize Their Knowledge Structuresfor ConstructivistTeaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15 (1), 6385.
Dow, W.M., Auld J. and Wilson D. (1978). Pupils Concept of Gases, Liquid and Solids. Unpublished Manuscript, Dundee Collage of Education, Dundee.
Ehab O. M., Safwan M. O., Nathir A.F. Al-R., Nacir T. & Ihab M. O. (2018) Misconceptions about atomicmodels amongst the chemistry students. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6 (2), 256-263. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss2.958
Griffiths, Alan K. and Kirk R. Preston. (1992) Grade 12 Students’ Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 611-628.
Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (2000) Leaming about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: a case study of multiple models uses in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.
Lena R., Andersson B. and Marton F. (1990) Students’ Conceptions of Matter. Journal of Educational Pschology, 82 (3), 555-559.
Luera, GR, Otto, CA., & Zitzewitz, P.W. (2005) A conceptual change approachto teaching energy & thermodynamics to pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2 (4), 3-8.
Nakleh, Mary B. (1994) Students’ Model of Matter in the Context of Acid Base Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71 (6), 495-499.
Nakleh, Mary B. (1992) Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69 (3), 191-196.
Nicoll, G. (2001) A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (7), 707-730.
Shimshon, N. and Nussbaum J. (1978) Junior High School Pupils’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: An Interview Study. Science Education, 62 (3), 273-281.
Shimshon, N. and Nussbaum J. (1981) Pupils’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: A Cross-Age Study. Science Education, 65 (2), 187-196.
Yalın İ. (1999). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
