Örgütsel Alanda Ekofeminizm ve Ulusal Literatürdeki Yeri

Alkayış, A. (2021). Felsefe eğitiminin önemi ve çevre etiği. Emrah Akyüz (Ed.), Çevre Etiği ve Spinoza içinde (s. 13-42). Çanakkale: Paradigma Akademi.

Ayaz, H. (2014). Çevreci eleştiri üzerine genel bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 3(1), 278-292.

Barthold, C, Bevan, D. & Corvellec, H. (2022). An ecofeminist position in critical practice: Challenging corporate truth in the Anthropocene. Gender, Work and Organization, 29(6), 1796-1814.

Bell, E, Meriläinen, S, Taylor, S, et al. (2020). Dangerous knowledge: The political, personal, and epistemological promise of feminist research in management and organization studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22, 177-192.

Buckingham, S. (2004). Ecofeminism in the Twenty-first Century, The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 146-154.

Buhr, N. & Reiter, S. (2000). Environmental disclosure and accountability: An ecofeminist perspective. Sixth Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, 9-12 July 2000, Manchester, England.

Bullis, C, Glaser, H. (1992). Bureaucratic discourse and the goddess: Towards an ecofeminist critique and rearticulation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(2), 50-60.

Casey, C. (2004). Contested rationalities, contested organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 302-314.

Crittenden, C. (2000). Ecofeminism meets business: A comparison of ecofeminist, corporate, and free market ıdeologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 51–63.

Çelik, R. (2016). Bakım/ özen etiği ve eğitim felsefesinde feminizm temelli bir yaklaşım. Fe Dergi, 8(2), 73-85.

DergiPark (2023). DergiPark. (21/08/2023 tarihinde https://dergipark.org.tr/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

DergiPark Hakkında (2023). Hakkında. (01.09.2023 tarihinde https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/page/about adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Elango, B, Paul, K, Kundu, SK. et al. (2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 543-561.

Ertan, B. (2004). 2000’li yıllarda çevre etiği yaklaşımları ve Türkiye. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 93-108.

Eryılmaz, Ç. (2017). Sosyal bilim paradigmaları çerçevesinde çevre sosyolojisi’nin kuramları ve kavramları. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 159-174.

Gallhofer, S. (2018). Going beyond western dualism: towards corporate nature responsibility reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(8), 2110-2134.

Haneem, F., Ali, R., Kama, N., et al. (2017). Descriptive analysis and text analysis in systematic literature review: A review of master data management, 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 16-17 July 2017, Langkawi, Malaysia, (pp. 1-6).

Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holy, M., Zeman, M. G. & Zeman, Z. (2021). From ecofeminist theories to ecofeminist practice: Women, sustainability and ethical consumerism. In: Martina Topić, George Lodorfos, G. (Eds.), The sustainability debate (Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability, Vol. 14), (pp. 123-140). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Howell, NR. (1997). Ecofeminism: What one needs to know, Zygon, 32(2), 231-241. Doi: 10.1111/0591-2385.861997085

HR Magazine (2018). World's first chief feminism officer job advertised, Rachel Muller-Heyndyk, 04 July 2018. (18/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/content/news/worlds-first-chief-feminism-officer-job-advertised adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Hutchings, E, Loomes, M, Butow, P. et al. (2020). A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: A focus on privacy, trust, and transparency. Systematic Reviews, 9(235).

Irving, S, Helin, I. (2018). A world for sale? An ecofeminist reading of sustainable development discourse. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(3), 264-278.

King, Y. (1989). Chapter 2: The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology, In: Judith Plant (Ed.), Healing the wounds: the promise of ecofeminism, (pp. 18-28), Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

Lauwers, M. (2016). Angles and “limes” in American studies: Ecofeminism in the research field, Angles, 3. Doi: 10.4000/angles.1649

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100.

Nehir, R. (1993). Türkiye'de çevre koruma çalışmalarının örgütlenmesi, Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Nugent, C. & Shandra, JM. (2009). State environmental protection efforts, women’s status, and world polity: A cross-national analysis. Organization & Environment, 22(2), 208-229.

O’Leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. London: Sage Publications.

Pan, C, Guo, H, Jiang, Y, et al. (2020). The double effects of female executives' participation on corporate sustainable competitive advantage through unethical environmental behavior and proactive environmental strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2324-2337.

Phillips, M. (2014). Re-writing corporate environmentalism: Ecofeminism, corporeality and the language of feeling. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(5), 443-458.

Phillips, M. (2019) “Daring to care”: Challenging corporate environmentalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 1151-1164.

Phillips, ME. (2020). Reconnecting with nature: An ecofeminist view of environmental management. Geographical Research, 58(2), 154-166.

Phillips, M. & Willatt, A. (2020). Embodiment, care and practice in a community kitchen. Gender, Work and Organization, 27, 198-217.

Plumwood, V. (1986). Ecofeminism: An overview and discussion of positions and arguments, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(Sup1), 120-138.

Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.

Polat, NH, Topcu, T. Çevre sorunlarına mitlerin ışığında çözüm önerileri. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 2018, 44, 169-192.

Puleo, AH. (2017). What is ecofeminism? Quaderns de la Mediterrània, 25, 27-34.

Radford Ruether, R. (1995). Ecofeminism: symbolic and social connections of the oppression of women and the domination of nature. In: Carol J. Adams (Ed.), Ecofeminism and the sacred (pp. 13-23), New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.

Rao, M. (2012). Ecofeminism at the crossroads in India: A review. DEP - Deportate, Esuli, Profughe, 20(12), 124-142.

Resurrección, BP. (2013). Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas, Women's Studies International Forum, 40, 33-43.

Scopus (2023). Scopus. (20/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.scopus.com/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Spretnak, C. (1987). Ecofeminism: Our roots and flowering, Ecospirit, 3(2), 2-9.

Thomas, R. & Davies, A. (2005). What have the feminists done for us? Feminist theory and organizational resistance. Organization, 12(5), 711-740.

Topić, M. (2022). Corporate social responsibility: An ecofeminist reading of the concept. In: Martina Topić (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Affairs in the British Press (1st ed., pp. 53-98). New York: Routledge.

Urinboyev, R, Wickenberg, P. & Leo, U. (2016). Child rights, classroom and school management: A systematic literature review, The International Journal of Children's Rights, 24(3), 522-547.

Web of Science (2023). Clarivate Web of Science. (20/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.webofscience.com/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Wehrmeyer, W. & McNeil, M. (2000). Activists, pragmatists, technophiles and tree-huggers? Gender differences in employees' environmental attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 211-222.

Widianingsih, LP, Triyuwono, I, Djamhuri, A, et al. (2022). University Social Responsibility from the Transformative Ecofeminism Perspective. The Qualitative Report, 27(6), 1688-1709.

Wood, B, Williams, O, Nagarajan, V. et al. (2021). Market strategies used by processed food manufacturers to increase and consolidate their power: A systematic review and document analysis. Global Health, 17, 17. Doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00667-7

World Economic Forum (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023, 18th Edition, Insight Report, In partnership with Marsh McLennan and Zurich Insurance Group, 11 January 2023. (02/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.weforum.org/reports/globalrisks-report-2023/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Young, A. (2018). Latest scientific discovery drops bombshell — ‘Mother Nature’ is biologically male — Ruminations on the value of care as sustainable organizational practice. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(3), 294-308. Doi: 10.1111/gwao.12185

Alkayış, A. (2021). Felsefe eğitiminin önemi ve çevre etiği. Emrah Akyüz (Ed.), Çevre Etiği ve Spinoza içinde (s. 13-42). Çanakkale: Paradigma Akademi.

Ayaz, H. (2014). Çevreci eleştiri üzerine genel bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 3(1), 278-292.

Barthold, C, Bevan, D. & Corvellec, H. (2022). An ecofeminist position in critical practice: Challenging corporate truth in the Anthropocene. Gender, Work and Organization, 29(6), 1796-1814.

Bell, E, Meriläinen, S, Taylor, S, et al. (2020). Dangerous knowledge: The political, personal, and epistemological promise of feminist research in management and organization studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22, 177-192.

Buckingham, S. (2004). Ecofeminism in the Twenty-first Century, The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 146-154.

Buhr, N. & Reiter, S. (2000). Environmental disclosure and accountability: An ecofeminist perspective. Sixth Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, 9-12 July 2000, Manchester, England.

Bullis, C, Glaser, H. (1992). Bureaucratic discourse and the goddess: Towards an ecofeminist critique and rearticulation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(2), 50-60.

Casey, C. (2004). Contested rationalities, contested organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 302-314.

Crittenden, C. (2000). Ecofeminism meets business: A comparison of ecofeminist, corporate, and free market ıdeologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 51–63.

Çelik, R. (2016). Bakım/ özen etiği ve eğitim felsefesinde feminizm temelli bir yaklaşım. Fe Dergi, 8(2), 73-85.

DergiPark (2023). DergiPark. (21/08/2023 tarihinde https://dergipark.org.tr/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

DergiPark Hakkında (2023). Hakkında. (01.09.2023 tarihinde https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/page/about adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Elango, B, Paul, K, Kundu, SK. et al. (2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 543-561.

Ertan, B. (2004). 2000’li yıllarda çevre etiği yaklaşımları ve Türkiye. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 93-108.

Eryılmaz, Ç. (2017). Sosyal bilim paradigmaları çerçevesinde çevre sosyolojisi’nin kuramları ve kavramları. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 159-174.

Gallhofer, S. (2018). Going beyond western dualism: towards corporate nature responsibility reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(8), 2110-2134.

Haneem, F., Ali, R., Kama, N., et al. (2017). Descriptive analysis and text analysis in systematic literature review: A review of master data management, 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 16-17 July 2017, Langkawi, Malaysia, (pp. 1-6).

Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holy, M., Zeman, M. G. & Zeman, Z. (2021). From ecofeminist theories to ecofeminist practice: Women, sustainability and ethical consumerism. In: Martina Topić, George Lodorfos, G. (Eds.), The sustainability debate (Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability, Vol. 14), (pp. 123-140). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Howell, NR. (1997). Ecofeminism: What one needs to know, Zygon, 32(2), 231-241. Doi: 10.1111/0591-2385.861997085

HR Magazine (2018). World's first chief feminism officer job advertised, Rachel Muller-Heyndyk, 04 July 2018. (18/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/content/news/worlds-first-chief-feminism-officer-job-advertised adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Hutchings, E, Loomes, M, Butow, P. et al. (2020). A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: A focus on privacy, trust, and transparency. Systematic Reviews, 9(235).

Irving, S, Helin, I. (2018). A world for sale? An ecofeminist reading of sustainable development discourse. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(3), 264-278.

King, Y. (1989). Chapter 2: The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology, In: Judith Plant (Ed.), Healing the wounds: the promise of ecofeminism, (pp. 18-28), Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

Lauwers, M. (2016). Angles and “limes” in American studies: Ecofeminism in the research field, Angles, 3. Doi: 10.4000/angles.1649

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100.

Nehir, R. (1993). Türkiye'de çevre koruma çalışmalarının örgütlenmesi, Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Nugent, C. & Shandra, JM. (2009). State environmental protection efforts, women’s status, and world polity: A cross-national analysis. Organization & Environment, 22(2), 208-229.

O’Leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. London: Sage Publications.

Pan, C, Guo, H, Jiang, Y, et al. (2020). The double effects of female executives' participation on corporate sustainable competitive advantage through unethical environmental behavior and proactive environmental strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2324-2337.

Phillips, M. (2014). Re-writing corporate environmentalism: Ecofeminism, corporeality and the language of feeling. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(5), 443-458.

Phillips, M. (2019) “Daring to care”: Challenging corporate environmentalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 1151-1164.

Phillips, ME. (2020). Reconnecting with nature: An ecofeminist view of environmental management. Geographical Research, 58(2), 154-166.

Phillips, M. & Willatt, A. (2020). Embodiment, care and practice in a community kitchen. Gender, Work and Organization, 27, 198-217.

Plumwood, V. (1986). Ecofeminism: An overview and discussion of positions and arguments, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(Sup1), 120-138.

Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.

Polat, NH, Topcu, T. Çevre sorunlarına mitlerin ışığında çözüm önerileri. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 2018, 44, 169-192.

Puleo, AH. (2017). What is ecofeminism? Quaderns de la Mediterrània, 25, 27-34.

Radford Ruether, R. (1995). Ecofeminism: symbolic and social connections of the oppression of women and the domination of nature. In: Carol J. Adams (Ed.), Ecofeminism and the sacred (pp. 13-23), New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.

Rao, M. (2012). Ecofeminism at the crossroads in India: A review. DEP - Deportate, Esuli, Profughe, 20(12), 124-142.

Resurrección, BP. (2013). Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas, Women's Studies International Forum, 40, 33-43.

Scopus (2023). Scopus. (20/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.scopus.com/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Spretnak, C. (1987). Ecofeminism: Our roots and flowering, Ecospirit, 3(2), 2-9.

Thomas, R. & Davies, A. (2005). What have the feminists done for us? Feminist theory and organizational resistance. Organization, 12(5), 711-740.

Topić, M. (2022). Corporate social responsibility: An ecofeminist reading of the concept. In: Martina Topić (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Affairs in the British Press (1st ed., pp. 53-98). New York: Routledge.

Urinboyev, R, Wickenberg, P. & Leo, U. (2016). Child rights, classroom and school management: A systematic literature review, The International Journal of Children's Rights, 24(3), 522-547.

Web of Science (2023). Clarivate Web of Science. (20/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.webofscience.com/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Wehrmeyer, W. & McNeil, M. (2000). Activists, pragmatists, technophiles and tree-huggers? Gender differences in employees' environmental attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 211-222.

Widianingsih, LP, Triyuwono, I, Djamhuri, A, et al. (2022). University Social Responsibility from the Transformative Ecofeminism Perspective. The Qualitative Report, 27(6), 1688-1709.

Wood, B, Williams, O, Nagarajan, V. et al. (2021). Market strategies used by processed food manufacturers to increase and consolidate their power: A systematic review and document analysis. Global Health, 17, 17. Doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00667-7

World Economic Forum (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023, 18th Edition, Insight Report, In partnership with Marsh McLennan and Zurich Insurance Group, 11 January 2023. (02/08/2023 tarihinde https://www.weforum.org/reports/globalrisks-report-2023/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).

Young, A. (2018). Latest scientific discovery drops bombshell — ‘Mother Nature’ is biologically male — Ruminations on the value of care as sustainable organizational practice. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(3), 294-308. Doi: 10.1111/gwao.12185