Simülasyon ve Etik
Özet
Simülasyona dayalı eğitim, klinik ve karar verme becerilerini geliştiren güvenli bir ortam sunarken, katılımcılar, eğitimciler ve standardize hastalar için psikolojik riskler barındırmaktadır. Bu süreçte biyotıp etiğinin özerklik, zarar vermeme, yararlılık ve adalet ilkeleri ile dürüstlük, şeffaflık ve profesyonel dürüstlük gibi temel değerlerin gözetilmesi kritik önem taşır. Eğitimde psikolojik güvenliğin sağlanması; ön bilgilendirme, kurgu sözleşmesi, gizlilik anlaşmaları ve ölçülü geri bildirim mekanizmalarıyla mümkündür. Teknolojik kaynakların hedeflere uygun seçimi, manken ölümlerinin etik yönetimi ve standardize hastaların fiziksel ile ruhsal refahının korunması simülasyon tasarımının sorumlulukları arasındadır. Son yıllarda hemşirelik eğitiminde vaka analizlerine kıyasla simülasyon ve standardize hasta kullanımı, öğrencilerin etik karar verme becerilerini, empati düzeylerini ve ahlaki anlayışlarını anlamlı derecede artırmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, teorik bilgi ile klinik uygulama arasındaki bağın güçlendirilmesi için kurumsal planlamalara ve boylamsal çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.
Simulation-based education offers a safe learning environment to enhance clinical and decision-making skills; however, it inherently carries psychological risks for participants, educators, and standardized patients. Upholding biomedical ethical principles—autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice—alongside core values like honesty, transparency, and professional integrity is paramount during this process. Establishing psychological safety is achieved through meticulous prebriefing, fiction contracts, confidentiality agreements, and respectful feedback mechanisms. Simulation design strictly requires the objective-aligned selection of technology, ethical management of simulated manikin death, and preservation of the physical and psychological well-being of standardized patients. Recently, integrating simulation and standardized patients into nursing curricula has significantly improved students' ethical decision-making, empathy, and moral reasoning compared to traditional case studies. Consequently, institutional planning and longitudinal research are essential to strengthen the connection between theory and clinical practice.
Referanslar
Kim J, Park J-H, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):152. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7
Emmerich N, Gormley G, McCullough M. Ethics of healthcare simulation. In: Nestel D, Kelly M, Jolly B, Watson M, (eds.) Healthcare simulation education. 1st ed. Wiley; 2018. p. 121–6.
Decker S, Caballero S, McClanahan C. Foundations of simulation. In: Ulrich B, Mancini B, (eds.) Mastering simulation: A handbook for success. 1st ed. USA: Sigma Theta Tau International; 2014. p. 18–21.
Code of Ethics Working Group. Healthcare simulationist code of ethics. Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2018. p. 1–12. 5.
Bowler F, Klein M, Wilford A. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM: Professional Integrity. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021;58:45–8. A doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.014
Kang SJ, Min HY. Psychological safety in nursing simulation. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(2):E6–9. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000571
Kang SJ, Bae JA. Psychological safety in nursing simulation education: A concept analysis. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2017;17(9):331–40. doi:10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.09.331
Madireddy S, Rufa EP. Maintaining confidentiality and psychological safety in medical simulation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(6):339–49. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047
Smith AB, Lammers SE. The Ethics of Simulation. In: Palaganas JC, Maxworthy JC, Epps CA, Mancini ME, editors. Defining excellence in simulation programs. 1st ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015. p. 592–601.
INACSL Standards Committee, McDermott DS, Ludlow J, Horsley E, Meakim C. Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM Prebriefing: preparation and briefing. Clin Simul Nurs.2021;58:9–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.008
INACSL Standards Committee, McMahon E, Jimenez FA, Lawrence K, Victor J. Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM Evaluation of learning and performance. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021;58:54–6. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.016
INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM simulation glossary. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.012
Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, Baxter H, Wright B, McLaughlin K. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training. Med Educ. 2012;46(11):1055–62. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04355.x
Henricksen JW, Altenburg C, Reeder RW. Operationalizing healthcare simulation psychological safety: A descriptive analysis of an ıntervention. Simul Healthc. 2017;12(5):289–97. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000253
Mileder LP, Vajda C, Wegscheider T. Patient death in simulation-based medical education. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:109–10. doi:10.5116%2Fijme.55f2.7d9b
Rutherford-Hemming T, Alfes CM, Breymier TL. A systematic review of the use of standardized patients as a simulation modality in nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019;40(2):84–90. doi:10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000401
Turner S, Harder N. Psychological safe environment: A concept analysis. Clin Simul Nurs. 2018;18:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2018.02.004
Kostovich CT, O’Rourke J, Stephen LA. Establishing psychological safety in simulation: Faculty perceptions. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;91(May):104468. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104468
Maloney S, Haines T. Issues of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness for simulation in health professions education. Adv Simul. 2016;1(1):4–9. doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0020-3
Lioce L, Lopreiato J, Downing D, Chang TP, Robertson JM, Anderson M, et al. Healthcare simulation dictionary. 2nd ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2020. p. 48–9.
Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Hölzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, et al. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) standards of best practice (SOBP). Adv Simul. 2017;2(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s41077-017-0043-4
Hoskins K, Grady C, Ulrich CM. Ethics education in nursing: Instruction for future generations of nurses. Online J Issues Nurs. 2018;23(1):4. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man03
Andersson H, Svensson A, Frank C, Rantala A, Holmberg M, Bremer A. Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2022;23(1):1–26. doi:10.1186/s12910-022-00766-z
Pearson E, McLafferty I. The use of simulation as a learning approach to non-technical skills awareness in final year student nurses. Nurse Educ Pract. 2011;11(6):399–405. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2011.03.023
Buxton M, Phillippi JC, Collins MR. Simulation: a new approach to teaching ethics. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):70–4. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12185
Smith K V, Witt J, Klaassen J, Zimmerman C, Cheng A-L. High-fidelity simulation and legal/ethical concepts: a transformational learning experience. Nurs Ethics. 2012;19(3):390–8. doi:10.1177/0969733011423559
Honkavuo L. Ethics simulation in nursing education: Nursing students’ experiences. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(7–8):1269–81. doi:10.1177%2F0969733021994188
Gallagher A, Peacock M, Zasada M, Coucke T, Cox A, Janssens N. Care-givers’ reflections on an ethics education immersive simulation care experience: A series of epiphanous events. Nurs Inq. 2017;24(3). doi:10.1111/nin.12174
Sedgwick M, Yanicki S, Harder N, Scott D. A scoping review of the integration of ethics education in undergraduate nursing high-fidelity human simulation-based learning. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30(5–6):605–14. doi:10.1111/jocn.15552
Basak T, Cerit B. Comparing two teaching methods on nursing students’ ethical decision-making level. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019;29:15–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2019.02.003
