Çözümleme: Simülasyon Eğitiminde Temel Bileşen
Özet
Simülasyona dayalı eğitim, öğrencilerin teorik ve pratik bilgileri birleştirerek bilişsel, duyuşsal ve psikomotor becerilerini geliştirmelerini sağlayan aktif bir öğrenme ortamı sunar. Bu eğitimin kalbi ve en önemli basamağı olarak kabul edilen çözümleme (debriefing), simülasyonun hemen ardından gerçekleştirilen ve yansıtıcı düşünmeyi teşvik eden yapılandırılmış bir tartışma oturumudur. Deneyimli bir kolaylaştırıcının rehberliğinde yürütülen bu süreç; birey veya ekiplerin bilgi, beceri, tutum ve iletişim boşluklarını belirleyerek gelecekteki klinik performansı iyileştirmeyi amaçlar. Uluslararası standartlara (INACSL) göre çözümleme; geri bildirim, çözümleme ve rehberli yansıtma stratejilerini içerebilir ve temelde tepki, analiz ile uygulama olmak üzere üç ana aşamadan oluşur. Literatürde RAS, GAS, PEARLS ve Plus-Delta gibi farklı üç aşamalı veya çok aşamalı yöntemler bulunmakta, süreç simülasyon sonrasında ya da simülasyon sırasında duraklatılarak uygulanabilmektedir. Eğitim çıktılarının kalitesini artırmak ve süreci iyileştirmek adına DASH ve DES gibi kanıta dayalı ölçekler kullanılarak çözümleme oturumlarının çok boyutlu olarak değerlendirilmesi büyük önem taşımaktadır.
Simulation-based education offers an active learning environment that enables students to develop cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills by integrating theoretical and practical knowledge. Considered the heart and most critical stage of this education, debriefing is a structured discussion session conducted immediately after the simulation to promote reflective thinking. Guided by an experienced facilitator, this process aims to identify gaps in knowledge, skills, attitudes, and communication among individuals or teams, thereby improving future clinical performance. According to international standards (INACSL), the debriefing process can incorporate feedback, debriefing, and guided reflection strategies, and fundamentally consists of three main phases: reaction, analysis, and application. The literature identifies various three-phase or multi-phase methods, such as RAS, GAS, PEARLS, and Plus-Delta, which can be implemented either post-simulation or through within-event pauses. To enhance the quality of educational outcomes and improve the process, it is of great importance to conduct multidimensional evaluations of debriefing sessions using evidence-based scales like DASH and DES.
Referanslar
Şahin G, Başak T. Debriefing methods in simulation-based education. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing. 2021;18(3):341–6.
INACSL Standards Committee, Decker Sharon, Alinier Guillaume, Crawford Scott B, et al. Healthcare simulation standards of best practicetm the debriefing process. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021;58:27–32.
Chronister C, Brown D. Comparison of simulation debriefing methods. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012;8(7):e281–8.
Tuzer H, Dinç L, Elcin M. Importance of debriefing sessions in simulation practices undergraduate nursing education. Turkiye Klinikleri. 2017;3(1):23–7.
Rall M, Manser T, Howard SK. Key elements of debriefing for simulator training. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2000;17(8):516–7.
Reed SJ. Written debriefing: Evaluating the impact of the addition of a written component when debriefing simulations. Nurse Education in Practice. 2015;15(6):543–8.
Abulebda K, Auerbach M, Limaiem F. Debriefing Techniques Utilized in Medical Simulation. StatPearls [Internet]. 2021 Oct 1 [cited 2022 Jul 6]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546660/
Wickers MP. Establishing the climate for a successful debriefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2010;6(3):83–6.
Rossler K, Molloy MA, Pastva AM, et al. Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM simulation-enhanced ınterprofessional education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021;58:49–53.
Mayville ML. Debriefing: The essential step in simulation. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews. 2011;11(1):35–9.
Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, et al. More than one way to debrief. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2016;11(3).
Waznonis AR. Methods and evaluations for simulation debriefing in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;53(8):459–65.
Uslu Y, Yavuz Van Gıersbergen M. Simulation-based learning evaluation scale: turkish validity and reliability study. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing. 2020;
Ateş E, Ulus B. Çözümleme Süreci. In: Karabacak Ü, Uğur E, editors. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Simülasyon Kavramdan Uygulamaya. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2019. p. 173–83.
Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: Development and psychometric properties. Simulation in Healthcare. 2012;7(5):288–94.
Xie YD, Li XY, Liu Q, et al. Cross-culturel validation and psydhometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(272):1–9.
Karaçay P, Kaya H. Simülasyonla eğitimde kullanılan Öğrenci Memnuniyeti ve Öğrenmede Kendine Güven Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2017;25(2):95–103.
Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, et al. The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire. Contemporary Nurse. 2017;53(1):60–74.
