Erişkin Kardiyoloji Pratiğinde Radyasyon Maruziyeti ve Maruziyeti Azaltma Önlemleri
Özet
Kardiyovasküler görüntüleme ve girişimsel işlemler, artan teknolojik imkanlar ve klinik kullanım sıklığı nedeniyle hem hastaları hem de sağlık çalışanlarını ciddi miktarda iyonlaştırıcı radyasyona maruz bırakmaktadır. Koroner anjiyografi, stent implantasyonu, ablasyon ve kalp pili yerleştirilmesi gibi karmaşıklaşan yapısal işlemler, daha uzun floroskopi süreleri gerektirerek laboratuvar personelinin katarakt ve özellikle vücudun sol tarafında yoğunlaşan beyin kanseri gibi stokastik risklerini artırmaktadır. Bu tehlikeleri en aza indirmek adına, her hastaya özel fayda-risk değerlendirmesini gözeten "hasta merkezli görüntüleme" modelleri benimsenmelidir. Girişimsel odalarda görev yapan tüm personelin radyasyon düzeyleri yelek içi ve boyun seviyesindeki kişisel dozimetrelerle periyodik olarak izlenmeli, doz limitlerinin aşılmaması sağlanmalıdır. Mesleki radyasyondan korunmanın temel yapı taşlarını oluşturan zamanın minimumda tutulması, ters kare yasasına uygun olarak kaynaktan maksimum mesafede konumlanılması ve kurşun önlük, tiroid koruyucu ile kurşunlu gözlük gibi siperleme ekipmanlarının eksiksiz kullanımı kritik önem taşımaktadır. Ayrıca, düşük kare hızlı floroskopi tercih edilmesi ve robotik yardımlı müdahale gibi yenilikçi teknolojilerin entegrasyonu operatör maruziyetini yüzde 95'e kadar düşürerek klinik güvenliği optimize etmektedir.
Cardiovascular imaging and interventional procedures subject both patients and healthcare professionals to significant amounts of ionizing radiation due to advancing technology and expanding clinical utilization. Increasingly complex anatomical and structural procedures, such as coronary angiography, stent implantation, ablation, and pacemaker placements, prolong fluoroscopy durations, thereby elevating the risks of tissue reactions and stochastic effects, including cataracts and brain malignancies predominantly on the operator's left side. To mitigate these healthcare hazards, a "patient-centered imaging" strategy that carefully weighs individualized risks against benefits must be implemented. Occupational exposure within interventional laboratories should be strictly monitored using personal dosimeters placed both inside the apron and at the neck level to ensure regulatory limits are not exceeded. The cornerstone principles of radiation safety—minimizing exposure time, maximizing distance from the scatter source based on the inverse-square law, and utilizing architectural or personal shielding like lead aprons, thyroid collars, and protective eyewear—remain mandatory. Furthermore, technical optimizations such as lower pulse rates, tighter beam collimation, and the integration of robotic-assisted interventions can successfully reduce operator radiation doses by up to 95%, effectively securing workplace ergonomics and safety.
Referanslar
Hirshfeld JW, Ferrari VA, Bengel FM, et al. 2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT expert consensus document on optimal use of ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging—best practices for safety and effectiveness, part 2: radiological equipment operation, dose-sparing methodologies, patient and medical personnel protection: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on expert consensus decision pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(24):2829-2855.
Einstein AJ, Berman DS, Min JK, et al. Patient-centered imaging: shared decision making for cardiac imaging procedures with exposure to ionizing radiation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(15):1480-1489.
Durán A, Hian SK, Miller DL, et al. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. J Catheterization. 2013;82(1):29-42.
Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. J Circulation. 2009;119(7):1056-1065.
Kim KP, Miller DLJRpd. Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review. J Radiation protection dosimetry. 2009;133(4):227-233.
Williams MC, Stewart C, Weir NW, et al. Using radiation safely in cardiology: what imagers need to know. J Heart. 2019;105(10):798-806.
Lin EC. Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2010;85(12):1142-1146.
Pratt RJRP, Chemistry. Tutorial on fundamentals of radiation physics:: interactions of photons with matter. J Radiation Physics Chemistry. 2004;70(4-5):595-603.
Mettler FA. Medical effects of ionizing radiation. J Radiation Physics Chemistry. 1985.
Jacob S, Donadille L, Maccia C, et al. Eye lens radiation exposure to interventional cardiologists: a retrospective assessment of cumulative doses. J Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2013;153(3):282-293.
Zakeri F, Hirobe T, Akbari Noghabi KJOm. Biological effects of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure on interventional cardiologists. J Occupational medicine. 2010;60(6):464-469.
Ciraj‐Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, et al. Risk for radiation‐induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern? J Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010;76(6):826-834.
Rahman N, Dhakam SH, Shafqut A, et al. Knowledge and practice of radiation safety among invasive cardiologists. J Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2008;58(3):119.
Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar OJRofncftc, et al. Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm. J of EuroIntervention. 2012;7(9):1081-1086.
Reeves RR, Ang L, Bahadorani J, et al. Invasive cardiologists are exposed to greater left sided cranial radiation: the BRAIN study (Brain Radiation Exposure and Attenuation During Invasive Cardiology Procedures). J JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015;8(9):1197-1206.
Smilowitz NR, Balter S, Weisz GJCRM. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiology. J Cardiovascular Revas Medicine. 2013;14(4):223-228.
de Gonzalez AB, Darby SJTl. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. J The lancet. 2004;363(9406):345-351.
Sun Z, AbAziz A, Khairuddin Md Yusof AJBri. Radiation-induced noncancer risks in interventional cardiology: optimisation of procedures and staff and patient dose reduction. J BioMed research international. 2013;2013.
Lickfett L, Mahesh M, Vasamreddy C, et al. Radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Circulation. 2004;110(19):3003-3010.
Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi–detector row CT and electron-beam CT. J Radiology. 2003;226(1):145-152.
Limbacher M, Douglas PS, Germano GJJotACoC. Radiation safety in the practice of cardiology. J Am Coll of Cardiology. 1998;31(4):892-915.
Kuon EJH. Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology. J Heart. 2008;94(5):667-674.
Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, et al. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(18):1450-1455.
Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, et al. Cardiac CT: are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume. J Clinical radiology. 2010;65(12):1013-1017.
Mayo JR, Leipsic JAJAjor. Radiation dose in cardiac CT. J Am Coll of Roentgenology. 2009;192(3):646-653.
Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. J Radiology. 2008;246(3):742-753.
Mettler Jr FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. J Radiology. 2008;248(1):254-263.
Chen J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R, et al. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(9):702-711.
Foti C, Padovani R, Trianni A, et al. Staff dosimetry in interventional cardiology: survey on methods and level of exposure. J Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):100-103.
Fetterly KA, Mathew V, Lennon R, et al. Radiation dose reduction in the invasive cardiovascular laboratory: implementing a culture and philosophy of radiation safety. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;5(8):866-873.
Cusma JT, Bell MR, Wondrow MA, et al. Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(2):427-435.
Best PJ, Skelding KA, Mehran R, et al. SCAI consensus document on occupational radiation exposure to the pregnant cardiologist and technical personnel. J Heart, Lung. 2011;20(2):83-90.
Vano EJH. Radiation exposure to cardiologists: how it could be reduced. J Heart. 2003;89(10):1123-1124.
Venneri L, Rossi F, Botto N, et al. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. J American Heart Journal. 2009;157(1):118-124.
Rajabi AB, Noohi F, Hashemi H, et al. Ionizing radiation-induced cataract in interventional cardiology staff. J Research in cardiovascular medicine. 2015;4(1).
Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, et al. Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. J Radiation Research. 2010;174(4):490-495.
Stein EG, Haramati LB, Bellin E, et al. Radiation exposure from medical imaging in patients with chronic and recurrent conditions. J of the Am Coll of Radiology. 2010;7(5):351-359.
Mahmud E, Pourdjabbar A, Ang L, et al. Robotic technology in interventional cardiology: Current status and future perspectives. J Catheterization Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017;90(6):956-962.
Bonatti J, Vetrovec G, Riga C, et al. Robotic technology in cardiovascular medicine. J Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(5):266-275.
Pass RH, Gates GG, Gellis LA, et al. Reducing patient radiation exposure during paediatric SVT ablations: use of CARTO® 3 in concert with “ALARA” principles profoundly lowers total dose. J Cardiology in the Young. 2015;25(5):963-968.
Einstein AJ. Radiation risk from cardiac CT and nuclear cardiology: addressing concerns with innovative solutions. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18(4):561.
Limbacher M, Douglas PS, Germano GJJotACoC. Radiation safety in the practice of cardiology. J of the Am Coll of Cardiology. 1998;31(4):892-915.
Durán A, Hian SK, Miller DL, et al. A summary of recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. J Catheterization Cardiovascular Interventions. 2013;81(3):562-567.
Kuon E, Robinson D, Empen K, et al. Fluoroscopy time--an overestimated factor for patient radiation exposure in invasive cardiology. J Rofo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2005;177(6):812-817.
Morishima Y, Chida K, Katahira Y, et al. Need for radiation safety education for interventional cardiology staff, especially nurses. J Acta cardiologica. 2016;71(2):151-155.
Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez J, et al. Influence of patient thickness and operation modes on occupational and patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology. J Radiation protection dosimetry. 2006;118(3):325-330.
Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. J JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009;2(8):940-946.
Brasselet C, Blanpain T, Tassan-Mangina S, et al. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. J European Heart Journal. 2008;29(1):63-70.
Zanca F, Dabin J, Collard C, et al. Evaluation of a suspended radiation protection system to reduce operator exposure in cardiology interventional procedures. J Catheterization Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;98(5):E687-E694.
Abdelaal E, Plourde G, MacHaalany J, et al. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions. J JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014;7(5):567-574.
Nguyen PK, Wu JCJEroct. Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk? J Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2011;9(2):177-183.
