Steam Eğitim Modeli'nin Müzik Eğitimi Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi
Özet
Bu çalışma, 21. yüzyılın ve Endüstri 4.0’ın getirdiği yeni iş gücü gereksinimleri doğrultusunda STEAM (Bilim, Teknoloji, Mühendislik, Sanat, Matematik) eğitim modelini müzik eğitimi bakımından değerlendirmektedir. Sanatın geleneksel STEM yapısına entegre edilmesiyle oluşturulan STEAM modeli, bireylerin yalnızca teknik ve bilimsel beceriler değil, aynı zamanda yaratıcılık, eleştirel düşünme, sanatsal duyarlılık ve bütüncül problem çözme yetenekleri kazanmalarını hedeflemektedir. Müzik eğitimi; sesin fiziksel ilkeleri, armoni ile dizilerin matematiksel temelleri ve müzik teknolojileri sayesinde STEAM disiplinleriyle doğrudan ve doğal bir bağlantıya sahiptir. Bununla birlikte STEAM müzik eğitimi; yaratıcı ifade, eleştirel analiz, müziksel iletişim, esneklik, öz yönelim, kültürlerarası etkileşim ve demokratik liderlik gibi temel yaşam ve kariyer becerilerini geliştirmektedir. Bu pedagojik yaklaşımda öğretmen doğrudan bilgi aktarıcısı değil, yol gösterici bir rehber niteliğinde olup öğrenciler tasarım odaklı düşünme, oyun, deneyim ve iş birliğine dayalı problem çözme süreçleri üzerinden kendi öğrenmelerini aktif olarak yapılandırırlar. Sonuç olarak, geleneksel müfredatların ve öğretmen yeterliliklerinin STEAM ilkelerine uyarlanması, geleceğin nesillerini çağın karmaşık gereksinimlerine hazırlamak adına kritik bir önem taşımaktadır.
This study evaluates the STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) education model in terms of music education, addressing the evolving workforce demands of the 21st century and Industry 4.0. Created by integrating the arts into the traditional STEM framework, STEAM aims to foster individuals who possess technical competencies alongside creativity, critical thinking, sensitivity, and holistic problem-solving skills. Music is naturally connected to STEAM disciplines through the physical principles of sound, mathematical foundations of scales and harmony, and modern music technologies. Additionally, STEAM music education nurtures vital life and career competencies, including creative expression, critical analysis, effective communication, adaptability, self-direction, intercultural understanding, and democratic leadership. Within this pedagogical approach, the teacher serves as a supportive guide rather than a sole provider of information, encouraging students to actively construct their knowledge through design thinking, play, experimentation, and collaborative problem-solving. Consequently, revising traditional curricula and enhancing teacher competencies to align with STEAM principles is essential for preparing future generations to meet complex modern demands.
Referanslar
Angier, N. (2010). STEM education has little to do with flowers. The New York Times. (24/11/2021 tarihinde https://www.nytimes.com /2010/10/05/science/05angier.html adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Bamberger, J. (1982). Revisiting children’s drawings of simple rhythms: A function for reflection-in-action. S. Strauss (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth içinde (s. 191-226). New York: Academic Press.
Bennett, M. (1998). Basic concepts in intercultural communication. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40-47.
Bureekhampun, S., & Mungmee, T. (2020). STEAM education for preschool students: Patterns, activity designs and effects. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1201-1212.
Burton, G., & Dimbleby, R. (1995). Between ourselves: An introduction to interpersonal communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
Byrne, C. (2005). Pedagogical communication in the music classroom. D. E. Miell, R. A. R. MacDonald, & D. J. Hargreaves (Ed.), Musical communication içinde (301-321). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cunnington, M., Kantrowitz, A., Harnett, S., & Hill-Ries, A. (2014). Cultivating common ground: Integrating standards-based visual arts, math and literacy in high-poverty urban classrooms. Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21977/D910119294
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2006). The Dance of Leadership; The Art of Leading in Business, Government, and Society. London: Routledge.
Graham, N. J., & Brouillette L. (2016). Using arts integration to make science memorable in the upper elementary grades: A quasi experimental study. Journal for Learning through the Arts 12(1), 1-17.
Güngör, N. (2011). İletişime giriş. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
Hartmann, W. (2010). Improvisation in der Schule. Barbara, H. (Ed.), Orff-Schulwerk Informazionen No:83 içinde (7-12). Salzburg: Universitat Mozarteum.
Hong, O. (2017). STEAM education in Korea: Current policies and future directions. Policy Trajectories and Initiatives in STEM Education, 8(2), 92-102.
Inoa, R., Weltsek, G., & Tabone, C. (2014). A study on the relationship between theater arts and student literacy and mathematics achievement. Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities, 10(1), 1-21.
Jantakun, T., Jantakun, K., & Jantakoon, T. (2020). STEAM education using design thinking process through virtual communities of practice (STEAM-DT-VCoPs). Journal of Educational Issues,7(1), 249-259.
Keating, D. P. (1980). Thinking processes in adolescence. J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology içinde (211-246). New York: John Wiley.
Kömürcü, İ. (2019). Yaratıcılık bağlamında sanatçı adaylarının eleştirel düşünme becerileri. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 1659-1676.
Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2020). STEAM education in flexible learning zones. Ministry of National Education - General Directorate of Innovation and Educational Technologies, Ankara, Turkey. (24/12/2021 tarihinde http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/ meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_10/15171214_STEAM_Education_in_Flexible_Learning_Zones_-_Article_-_EN.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Nasera, F. A. (2019). Contemplative thinking skills and their effects on preparatory students’ drawing performances. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 8(10), 127-140.
OECD (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. (23/11/2021 tarihinde https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Petre, G. (2020). Developing students' leadership skills through cooperative learning: an action research case study. International Forum, 23(2), 143-162.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ssm.12201
Schultz, L. (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy. Old Dominion University. (23/10/2021 tarihinde http://ww2.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Bloom /blooms_taxonomy adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Shatunova, O., Anisimova, T., Sabirova, F. & Kalimullina, O. (2019). STEAM as an innovative educational technology. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10 (2), 131-144.
Small, A. (1987). Music teaching and critical thinking: What do we need to know? Music Educators Journal, 74(1), 46-49.
Thuneberg, H., Salmi, H., & Fenyvesi, K. (2017). Hands-on math and art exhibition promoting science attitudes and educational plans. Education Research International, 2017(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9132791
Tutar, H. (2003). Örgütsel iletişim. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Vasquez, J. A. (2015). STEM beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 10-15.
Webster, P. (1996). Creativity as crative thinking. G. Spruce (Ed.), Teaching Music içinde (81-91). London: Routledge.
Wilson, M. S. (2010). Developing tomorrow’s leaders today. New York: John Wiley.
Zıllıoğlu, M. (2007). İletişim Bilgisi ve Tanımı. Eskişehir: Açıköğretim Yayınları.
