Sosyal Medyada Adalet Arayışı

Aguiar, P., Vala, J., Correia, I. ve Pereira, C. (2008). Justice in our world and in that of others: Belief in a just world and reactions to victims. Social Justice Research, 21(1), 50-68.

Anadolu Ajansı (2020). Alibeyköy’de trafikte kadın sürücüye saldıran kişi tutuklanması talebiyle mahkemeye sevk edildi. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/alibeykoyde-trafikte-kadin-surucuye-saldiran-kisi-tutuklanmasi-talebiyle-mahkemeye-sevk-edildi/1941493 [Erişim tarihi: 20.12.2020]

Anderson, M. ve Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media ve technology 2018. Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018 [Erişim tarihi: 14.12.2020]

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (2020). Guide on Article 6-Right to fair trial. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.pdf [Erişim tarihi: 14.12.2020]

Berridge, S. ve Portwood-Stacer, L. (2015) Introduction: feminism, hashtags and violence against women and girls. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 341.

Biocca, F ve Harms, C. (2002). Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the networked minds theory and measure. Proceedings of PRESENCE, 7-36.

Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238-66.

Dalbert, C. ve Filke, E. (2007). Belief in a personal just world, justice judgments, and their functions for prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(11), 1516-27.

Dalbert, C. (2009). Belief in a just world. M. R. Leary ve R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual. Differences in Social Behavior içinde (288-97). New York: The Guilford.

Das, A., Macbeth, J. ve Elsaesser, C. (2019). Online school conflicts: Expanding the scope of restorative practices with a virtual peace room. Contemporary Justice Review, 22(4), 351-70.

deSilver, D. (2014). Facebook is a news source for many, but only incidentally. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/04/facebook-is-a-news-source-for-many-but-only-incidentally [Erişim tarihi: 12.12.2020]

Dutton, W. (2008). The wisdom of collaborative network organizations: Capturing the value of networked individuals. Prometheus, 26(3), 211-30.

Euronews (2020). Türkiye’de adaleti artık sosyal medya mı sağlıyor? https://tr.euronews.com/2020/08/19/turkiye-de-adaleti-artik-sosyal-medya-mi-sagliyor [Erişim tarihi: 19.12.2020]

Facebook (2020). Facebook Q3 2020 Earnings. https://investor. fb.com/investor-events/event-details/2020/Facebook-Q3-2020-Earnings/default.aspx [Erişim tarihi: 13.12.2020]

Fileborn, B. (2014). Online activism and street harassment: Digital justice or shouting into the ether? British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), 1482-501.

Greer, C. ve McLaughlin, E. (2011). ‘Trial by media’: policing, the 24-7 news mediasphere and the ‘politics of outrage’. Theoretical Criminology, 15(1), 23-46.

Janoski-Haehlen, E. M. (2011). The courts are all a Twitter: The implications of social media use in the courts. Val. UL Rev., 46, 43.

Johnstone, G. (2013). Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates. London: Routledge.

Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms 1. Journal of Personality, 45(1), 1-52.

Lipkusa, I. M., Dalbert, C. ve Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self-versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 666-77.

Lucas, T., Alexander, S., Firestone, I. ve LeBreton, J. M. (2008). Just world beliefs, perceived stress, and health behavior: The impact of a procedurally just world. Psychology and Health, 23(7), 849-65.

Mattan, A. J., Puddister, K. ve Small, T. A. (2020). Tweet Justice: The Canadian Court’s use of social media. American Review of Canadian Studies, 50(2), 229-44.

McNutt, J. G. (Eds.). (2018). Technology, Activism, and Social Justice in a Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University.

Mendes, K., Ringrose, J. ve Keller, J. (2018). # MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236-46.

Milivojevic, S. ve McGovern, A. (2014). The death of Jill Meagher: Crime and punishment on social media. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(3), 22-39.

New York Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (2019) Advisory opinion 08-176. https://ww2.nycourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/files/2020-01/2019-Judicial-Campaign-Ethics-Handbook.pdf [Erişim tarihi: 13.12.2020]

Olsen, T. ve O’Clock, C. (2010). The role of social-networking tools in judicial systems. Future Trends in State Courts, 2010, 164-9.

Onedio (2019) Türkiye’nin Adaleti Sosyal Medyada Aradığının Kanıtı 8 Olay. Erişim https://onedio.com/haber/turkiye-nin-adaleti-sosyal-medyada-aradiginin-kaniti-8-olay-893116 [Erişim tarihi: 12.12.2020]

Orth, U. (2002). Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Social Justice Research, 15(4), 313-25.

Otto, K. ve Dalbert, C. (2005). Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(6), 559-73.

Peleg-Koriat, I. ve Klar-Chalamish, C. (2020). The# MeToo movement and restorative justice: Exploring the views of the public. Contemporary Justice Review, 23(3), 239-60.

Randall, M. ve Haskell, L. (2013). Trauma-informed approaches to law: Why restorative justice must understand trauma and psychological coping. Dalhousie LJ, 36, 501.

Salter, M. (2013). Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media. Crime, Media, Culture, 9(3), 225-42.

Salter, M. (2016). Crime, justice and social media. London: Routledge.

Schejter, A. M. ve Tirosh, N. (2012). Social media new and old in the Al-’Arakeeb conflict: A case study. The Information Society, 28(5), 304-15.

Schejter, A. M. ve Tirosh, N. (2015). “Seek the meek, seek the just”: Social media and social justice. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 796-803.

Schejter, A. ve Tirosh, N. (2014). New media policy: The redistribution of voice. Y. Liu ve R. Picard (Eds.), Policy and Marketing Strategies for Digital Media içinde (73-86), London: Routledge.

Steinberg, S. B. (2016). #Advocacy: Social media activism’s power to transform law. Ky. LJ, 105, 413.

Stratton, G., Powell, A. ve Cameron, R. (2017). Crime and justice in digital society: Towards a ‘digital criminology’? International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(2), 17.

Strohmayer, A., Laing, M. ve Comber, R. (2017). Technologies and social justice outcomes in sex work charities: Fighting stigma, saving lives. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems içinde (3352-64).

Stubbs-Richardson, M., Rader, N. E. ve Cosby, A. G. (2018). Tweeting rape culture: Examining portrayals of victim blaming in discussions of sexual assault cases on Twitter. Feminism ve Psychology, 28(1), 90-108.

Sutton, R. M., Stoeber, J. ve Kamble, S. V. (2017). Belief in a just world for oneself versus others, social goals, and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 115-9.

Tang, G. ve Lee, F. L. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763-73.

Tonry, M. (2009). Explanations of American punishment policies: A national history. Punishment ve Society, 11(3), 377-94.

Warren, M. (2014). Open justice in the technological age. Monash UL Rev., 40, 45.

Wickham, S., Shryane, N., Lyons, M., Dickins, T. E. ve Bentall, R. P. (2014). Why does social inequality affect mental health? The role of just world beliefs, trust and social rank in psychological well-being, paranoia and hallucinations. Journal of Public Mental Health, 13(2), 114-26.