Yapay Zekâ Destekli Klinik Eğitim ve Simülasyon Sistemleri
Özet
Bu bölüm, yapay zekâ (YZ) destekli klinik eğitim ve simülasyon sistemlerinin acil tıp alanındaki rolünü kapsamlı biçimde ele almaktadır. Simülasyon temelli öğrenmenin katkılarından yola çıkarak, yapay zekâ entegrasyonunun eğitimde sağladığı yenilikler ve klinik pratikte triyaj, tanı ve tedavi planlamasına getirdiği çözümler tartışılmaktadır. YZ tabanlı simülatörler, sanal hastalar, artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamaları aracılığıyla öğrencilere daha gerçekçi, kişiselleştirilmiş ve tekrar edilebilir öğrenme ortamları sunmaktadır. Triyaj sistemlerinde karar destek, radyolojik görüntülerin hızlı analizi, sepsis ve kalp krizi gibi kritik durumların erken öngörülmesi gibi durumlar incelenmiştir. Bölüm, Türkiye’deki uygulamaları uluslararası gelişmelerle karşılaştırarak mevcut durum ve gelecek perspektiflerine ışık tutmakta, etik ve hukuki boyutlara dikkat çekmektedir. Yapay zekâ destekli sistemlerin hem hasta güvenliği hem de tıp eğitimi açısından dönüştürücü bir potansiyel taşıdığı vurgulanmaktadır.
Referanslar
Kirubarajan A, Taher A, Khan S, Masood S. Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: a scoping review. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020;1(6):1691–1702. doi:10.1002/emp2.12277
Berikol G, Kanbakan A, Ilhan B, Doğanay F. Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: a scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education. Turk J Emerg Med. 2025;25. doi:10.4103/tjem.tjem_45_25
Naik VN, Brien SE. Simulation: a means to address and improve patient safety. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:192–200. doi:10.1007/s12630-012-9860-z
Komasawa N, Berg BW. Interprofessional simulation training for perioperative management team development and patient safety. J Perioper Pract. 2016;26:250–253. doi:10.1177/175045891602601103
Davitadze M, Ooi E, Ng CY, et al. SIMBA: using Kolb's learning theory in simulation-based learning to improve participants' confidence. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:116. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03176-2
Bienstock J, Heuer A. A review on the evolution of simulation-based training to help build a safer future. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101:0. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000029503
Komasawa N, Yokohira M. Simulation-based education in the artificial intelligence era. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e40940. doi:10.7759/cureus.40940
HealthySimulation.com. SimConverse: Conversational AI for Healthcare Simulation. Published June 21, 2023. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.healthysimulation.com/medicalsimulation/vendors/simconverse/
Gore T. Lumeto introduces InvolveXR AI Characters: the first customizable AI enabled virtual patients. HealthySimulation.com. Published October 22, 2024. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.healthysimulation.com/lumeto-involvexr-customizable-ai-virtual-patients/
Zidoun Y, Mardi AE. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based simulators versus simulated patients in undergraduate programs: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1260. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06236-x
Mangano A, Valle V, Dreifuss NH, Aguiluz G, Masrur MA. Role of artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery: introduction, general principles, and potential applications. Surg Technol Int. 2020;38:17–21. doi:10.52198/21.STI.38.SO1369
Abd-Alrazaq A, Abuelezz I, Hassan A, et al. Artificial intelligence–driven serious games in health care: scoping review. JMIR Serious Games. 2022;10(4):e39840. doi:10.2196/39840
Wang L, Mao Y, Wang L, Sun Y, Song J, Zhang Y. Suitability of GPT-4o as an evaluator of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills examinati-ons. Resuscitation. 2024;204:110404.doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110404
Ahuja V, Nair LV. Artificial intelligence and technology in COVID era: a narrative review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37(1):28–34. doi:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_558_20
Chenais G, Lagarde E, Gil-Jardiné C. Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: viewpoint of current applications and foreseeable opportunities and challenges. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e40031. doi:10.2196/40031
Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int.2010;107(50):892–898. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0892
Nasser L, McLeod SL, Hall JN. Evaluating the reliability of a remote acuity prediction tool in a Canadian academic emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2024;83(4):373–379. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.018
El Ariss AB, Kijpaisalratana N, Ahmed S, et al. Development and validation of a machine learning framework for improved resource allocation in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;84:141–148. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.040
Xu Y, Malik N, Chernbumroong S, et al. Triage in major incidents: development and external validation of novel machine learning derived primary and secondary triage tools. Emerg Med J. 2024;41:176–183. doi:10.1136/emermed-2022-212440
Davoudi A, Chae S, Evans L, et al. Fairness gaps in machine learning models for hospitalization and emergency department visit risk prediction in home healthcare patients with heart failure. Int J Med Inform. 2024;191:105534. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105534
Ivanov O, Wolf L, Brecher D, et al. Improving ED emergency severity index acuity assignment using machine learning and clinical natural language processing. J Emerg Nurs. 2021;47(2):265–278.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jen.2020.11.001
Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; August 2016; San Francisco, CA. p. 785–794.
Gharehchopogh FS, Khalifelu ZA. Analysis and evaluation of unstructured data: text mining versus natural language processing. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT). IEEE; 2011:1–4.
Zhang X, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Pacella CB, Zhang W. Integrating structured and unstructured data for predicting emergency severity: an association and predictive study using transformer-based natural language processing models. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24(372):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12911-024-02793-9
Patel D, Timsina P, Gorenstein L, et al. Traditional machine learning, deep learning, and BERT (large language model) approaches for predicting hospitalizations from nurse triage notes: comparative evaluation of resource management. JMIR AI. 2024;3(1): e52190. doi:10.2196/52190
Weidman AC, Sedor-Schiffhauer Z, Zikmund C, et al. Words to live by: using medic impressions to identify the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions. Acad Emerg Med. 2025;32(5):516–525. doi:10.1111/acem.15067
Saggu S, Daneshvar H, Samavi R, et al. Prediction of emergency department revisits among child and youth mental health outpatients using deep learning techniques. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24(1):42. doi:10.1186/s12911-024-02450-1
Lee S, Mohr NM, Street WN, Nadkarni P. Machine learning in relation to emergency medicine clinical and operational scenarios: an overview. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(2):219-227. doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.1.41244
Wardlaw JM, Mair G, von Kummer R, et al. Accuracy of automated computer-aided diagnosis for stroke imaging: a critical evaluation of current evidence. Stroke. 2022;53(7):2393–2403. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036204
Zhang C, Peng J, Wang L, et al. A deep learning-powered diagnostic model for acute pancreatitis. BMC Med Imaging.2024;24:154. doi:10.1186/s12880-024-01339-9
Song YF, Huang HN, Ma JJ, et al. Early prediction of sepsis in emergency department patients using various methods and scoring systems. Nurs Crit Care. 2025;30(3):e13201. doi:10.1111/nicc.13201
Aygun U, Yagin FH, Yagin B, et al. Assessment of sepsis risk at admission to the emergency department: clinical interpretable prediction model. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(5):457. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14050457
Iftikhar H, Anjum S, Bhutta ZA, Najam M, Bashir K. Performance of ChatGPT in emergency medicine residency exams in Qatar: a comparative analysis with resident physicians. Qatar Med J. 2024;2024(4):61. doi:10.5339/qmj.2024.61
Colakca C, Ergin M, Ozensoy HS, et al. Emergency department triaging using ChatGPT based on emergency severity index principles: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22106. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-73229-7
Ao G, Chen M, Li J, et al. Comparative analysis of large language models on rare disease identification. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025;20:150. doi:10.1186/s13023-025-03656-w
Chang CH, Nguyen PA, Huang CC, et al. Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: an external validation study. Int J Med Inform. 2025;193:105683. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105683
Lee SH, Hong WP, Kim J, Cho Y, Lee E. Smartphone AI vs. medical experts: a comparative study in prehospital STEMI diagnosis. Yonsei Med J. 2024;65(3):174–180. doi:10.3349/ymj.2023.0341
Sen A, Navarro L, Avril S, Aguirre M. A data-driven computational methodology towards a prehospital acute ischaemic stroke screening tool using haemodynamics waveforms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024;244:107982. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107982
Ferri P, Sáez C, Félix-De Castro A, et al. Deep ensemble multitask classification of emergency medical call incidents combining multimodal data improves emergency medical dispatch. Artif Intell Med. 2021;117:102088. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102088
Elayan H, Aloqaily M, Guizani M. Digital twin for intelligent context-aware IoT healthcare systems. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021;8(23):16749–16757. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3051158
Boulos MN, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, Buller DB, Dellavalle RP. Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform. 2014;5(3):229. doi:10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4814
Schnapp B, Sehdev M, Schrepel C, et al. ChatG‐PD? Comparing large language model artificial intelligence and faculty rankings of the competitiveness of standardized letters of evaluation. AEM Educ Train. 2024;8(6):e11052. doi:10.1002/aet2.11052
Misra SM, Suresh S. Artificial intelligence and objective structured clinical examinations: using ChatGPT to revolutionize clinical skills assessment in medical education. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024;11. doi:10.1177/23821205241263475
Karnan N, Francis J, Vijayvargiya I, et al. Analyzing the effectiveness of AI-generated patient education materials: a comparative study of ChatGPT and Google Gemini. Cureus. 2024;16(11):e74398. doi:10.7759/cureus.74398
de Bruijne M. Machine learning approaches in medical image analysis: from detection to diagnosis. Med Image Anal.2016;33:94–97. doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.06.032
Mathews SC, McShea MJ, Hanley CL, Ravitz A, Labrique AB, Cohen AB. Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;38:1-9. doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0111-3
European Commission. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive). Published September 28, 2022. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2022-09/1_1_197605_prop_dir_ai_en.pdf
European Commission. New liability rules on products and artificial intelligence to protect consumers and foster innovation. Published September 28, 2022. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_5807
