Curriculum Flexibility and Contextual Adaptation In Science Education

Adah Miller, E., Li, T., Chen, I. C., Krajcik, J., & Codere Kelly, S. (2025). Designing for and investigating elementary students’ cognitive flexibility, science, and literacy achievement in project-based science learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00131-1

Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2021). Industry, science education, and teacher agency: A discourse analysis of teachers’ evaluations of industry-produced teaching resources. Science Education, 105, 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21607

Betancur, L., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Schunn, C. (2018). Socioeconomic gaps in science achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0132-5

Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2006, February). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement (Working Paper 5). Learning Lives.

Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545

Davis, E. A., Janssen, F. J., & Van Driel, J. H. (2016). Teachers and science curriculum materials: Where we are and where we need to go. Studies in science education, 52(2), 127–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1161701

Drits-Esser, D., & Stark, L. A. (2015). The impact of collaborative curriculum design on teacher professional learning. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 1–27. http://ejse.southwestern.edu

Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294

Ketonen, L., & Nieminen, J. H. (2025). Professional autonomy vs. assessment criteria: Teacher agency in the midst of assessment reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 58(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2460476

Krajcik, J. S., Miller, E. C., & Chen, I.-C. (2021). Using project-based learning to leverage culturally relevant pedagogy for science sensemaking in urban elementary classrooms. In M. M. Atwater (Ed.), International handbook of research on multicultural science education (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37743-4_10-1

Kwon, H., & Lee, Y. (2025). A meta-analysis of STEM project-based learning on creativity. STEM Education, 5(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025014

Lee, O. (2011, May 10–12). Effective STEM education strategies for diverse and underserved learners [Paper prepared for the Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K–12 Schools]. National Research Council.

Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2008). Science curriculum and student diversity: A framework for equitable learning opportunities. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1086/590522

Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Penick, J. E. (2007). Involving science teachers in the development and implementation of assessment tools for “Science for All” type curricula. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9046-7

Mansour, N. (2013). Modelling the sociocultural contexts of science education: The teachers’ perspective. Research in Science Education, 43, 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9269-7

Manyukhina, Y., & Wyse, D. (2019). Learner agency and the curriculum: A critical realist perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1599973

Martin, S. N., & Kang, D. Y. (2019). Rethinking approaches to research: The importance of considering contextually mitigating factors in promoting equitable practices in science education research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09949-4

Miller-Rushing, A., & Hufnagel, E. (2022). Trends in K-12 teacher agency research: A review of science education research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2037875

Molla, A. S., & Lee, Y.-J. (2010). How much variation is acceptable in adapting a curriculum? In A. D. Henshall & B. C. Fontanez (Eds.), Educational change (pp. 1–34). Nova Science Publishers.

Nordine, J., & Fortus, D. (2026). Reinventing Science Standards to Better Support Meaningful Science Learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 63(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70021

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Curriculum flexibility and autonomy: Promoting a thriving learning environment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eccbbac2-en

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as ‘agents of change’: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. J. J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187–206). Bloomsbury Academic.

Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x

Qoyyimah, U., Singh, P., Doherty, C., & Exley, B. (2019). Teachers’ professional judgement when recontextualising Indonesia’s official curriculum to their contexts. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1625069

Rakesh, D., Lee, P. A., Gaikwad, A., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2025). Annual research review: Associations of socioeconomic status with cognitive function, language ability, and academic achievement in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms and protective factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 66(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14082

Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2013). School teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 490–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.665195

Ryder, J., Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2018). Expressions of agency within complex policy structures: Science teachers’ experiences of education policy reforms in Sweden. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1435921

Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and teacher education, 26(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015

Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (402–435). Macmillan.

Toledo, F. L., & Caballes, D. G. (2024). Utilizing open educational resources in science education: Barriers to access and strategies for success. Sci-Int. (Lahore), 36(6), 723–731.

Touchet, B., Wright, D., & Andrews, L. (2024). Pedagogy vs. reality: An investigation of supports and barriers when implementing NGSS storylines. Research Issues in Contemporary Education, 9(1), 46–76. https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6157-9911

Varelas, M., Morales-Doyle, D., Raza, S., Segura, D., Canales, K., & Mitchener, C. (2018). Community organizations’ programming and the development of community science teachers. Science Education, 102(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21321

Wild, A., Galosy, J., Kagle, M., Gillespie, N., & Rozelle, J. (2018). Teacher agency over curriculum and professional learning: Lock-step. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(4), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-12-2017-0034

Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728