Fonksiyonel ve Alternatif Yemlerin Tek Mideli Hayvanlarda Sindirim Fizyolojisi, Bağırsak Sağlığı ve Performans Üzerine Etkileri
Özet
Fonksiyonel ve alternatif yemler, kanatlı beslemede sindirim sağlığının korunması, verimliliğin artırılması ve ürün kalitesinin iyileştirilmesi amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Probiyotikler, prebiyotikler, postbiyotikler, enzimler, organik asitler, fitobiyotikler ve tarımsal yan ürünler bu kapsamda değerlendirilmektedir. Bu yem ve katkılar; bağırsak mikrobiyotasını dengeleyerek, sindirim enzimlerinin aktivitesini destekleyerek ve besin maddelerinden yararlanmayı artırarak yemden yararlanma, büyüme ve yumurta verimini olumlu yönde etkileyebilir. Ayrıca et ve yumurtanın besin değeri, duyusal özellikleri, oksidatif stabilitesi ve raf ömrünün iyileştirilmesine katkı sağlayabilir. Bununla birlikte elde edilen etkiler; kullanılan yem materyalinin yapısına, katkı düzeyine, kanatlı türüne, yaşına ve yetiştirme koşullarına göre değişebilmektedir. Bu nedenle fonksiyonel ve alternatif yemlerin rasyonlarda uygun düzeylerde kullanılması, sürdürülebilir ve kaliteli kanatlı üretimi açısından önem taşımaktadır.
Referanslar
de Lange, CFM, Pluske J, Gong J, et al. Strategic use of feed ingredients and feed additives to stimulate gut health and development in young pigs. Livestock Science, 2010;134 (1-3):124–134.
Adams S, Che D, Qin G, et al. Interactions of dietary fibre with nutritional components on gut microbial composition, function and health in monogastrics. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 2018;19(10), 1011-1023.
Tardiolo G, La Fauci D, Riggio, et al. Gut microbiota of ruminants and monogastric livestock: an overview. Animals, 2025;15(5),758.
Kogut MH, Arsenault RJ. Gut health: The new paradigm in food animal production. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2016;3,71.
Gessner DK, Ringseis R, Eder K. Potential of plant polyphenols to combat oxidative stress and inflammatory processes in farm animals. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2017;101(4),605–628.
Kiczorowska B, Samolińska W, Al-Yasiry ARM, et al. The natural feed additives as immunostimulants in monogastric animal nutrition–a review. Annals of animal science, 2017;17(3),605-625.
Gaggìa F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B. Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2010;141,S15–S28.
Asml A, Agazzi A, Invernizzi G, et al. The beneficial role of probiotics in monogastric animal nutrition and health. Journal of Dairy Veterinary Animal Research, 2015;2(4),00041.
Bedford M, Cowieson AJ. Exogenous enzymes and their effects on intestinal microbiology. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2012;173(1-2),76-85.
Saettone V, Biasato I, Radice E, et al. State-of-the-Art of the Nutritional Alternatives to the Use of Antibiotics in Humans and Monogastric Animals. Animals, 2020;10(12), 2199.
Dal Pont GC, Eyng C, Bortoluzzi C et al. Enzymes and gut health in monogastric animals: effects beyond digestibility. In Gut microbiota, immunity, and health in production animals (pp. 33-55). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2022.
Panitsidis I, Barbe F, Chevaux E, et al. Probiotics, prebiotics, paraprobiotics, postbiotics. In Sustainable use of feed additives in livestock: Novel ways for animal production (pp. 173-227). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2023.
Liu Y, Espinosa C D, Abelilla JJ, Et al. Non-antibiotic feed additives in diets for pigs: A review. Animal Nutrition, 2016;4(2),113-125.
Stein H, de Lange K. Alternative feed ingredients for pigs. In London Swine Conference-Today’s Challenges (pp. 3-4), 2007.
Atuahene D, Sam BA, Idan F, et al. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics in Pigs and Poultry: A Review of Gut Health, Performance, and Environmental Outcomes. Veterinary Sciences, 2025:12(11),1054.
Lee SH, Choi S, Park YB, et al. Nutritional strategies using synbiotics and organic acids to enhance piglet post-weaning growth and gut health. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 2026:25-e00456.https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2500456
Jha R, Fouhse JM, Tiwari UP, et al. Dietary fiber and intestinal health of monogastric animals. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2019;6,48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00048
Chuang WY, Lin LJ, Shih HD, et al. The potential utilization of high-fiber agricultural by-products as monogastric animal feed and feed additives: A review. Animals, 2021;11(7), 2098.
Mroz Z. Organic acids as potential alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters for pigs. Advances in Pork Production, 2005;16,169–182.
Hamer HM, Jonkers DMAE. Venema, K., et al. The role of butyrate on colonic function. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2008;27(2),104-119.
Mohammadi Gheisar M, Kim IH. Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition–a review. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2018;17(1),92-99.
Zeng Z, Zhang S, Wang H, et al. Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2015;6(1),7.
Zhai H, Liu H, Wang S, et al. Potential of essential oils for poultry and pigs. Animal Nutrition, 2018;4 (2),179-186.
Baker JT, Duarte ME, Holanda DM, et al. Friend or foe? Impacts of dietary xylans, xylooligosaccharides, and xylanases on intestinal health and growth performance of monogastric animals. Animals, 2021;11(3),609.
Upadhaya SD, Kim IH. Efficacy of phytogenic feed additive on performance, production and health status of monogastric animals–a review. Annals of Animal Science, 2017;17(4),929-948.
Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. The Journal of Nutrition, 1995;125(6),1401–1412.
Kiarie E, Romero LF, Nyachoti CMThe role of added feed enzymes in promoting gut health in swine and poultry. Nutrition Research Reviews, 2013;26(1),71-88.
Tang WW, Li DY, Hazen SL. Dietary metabolism, the gut microbiome, and heart failure. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2019;16(3),137-154.
Prates JA. Enhancing meat quality and nutritional value in monogastric livestock using sustainable novel feed ingredients. Foods, 2025;14(2),146.
Mottet A, de Haan C, Falcucci A, et al. Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security, 2017;14,1–8.
Nte IJ, Owen OJ, Owuno F. Anti-nutritional factors in animal feedstuffs: A review. International Journal of Research and Review, 2023;10(2),226-244.
Hassan ZM, Manyelo TG, Selaledi L, et al. The effects of tannins in monogastric animals with special reference to alternative feed ingredients. Molecules, 2020;25(20),4680.
Lanza M, Battelli M, Gallo, et al. Sustainability of Animal Production Chains: Alternative Protein Sources as an Ecological Driver in Animal Feeding: A Review. Animals, 2025;15(22),3245.
Khajali F, Rafiei F. A review of plant anti-nutritional factors in animal health and production: The classification, biological properties, and the passivation strategy. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2024;18,101290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101290
Woyengo TA, Beltranena E, Zijlstra RT. Effect of anti-nutritional factors of oilseed co-products on feed intake of pigs and poultry. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2017;233,76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.006
Dou Z, Toth JD, Westendorf ML. Food waste for livestock feeding: Feasibility, safety, and sustainability implications. Global Food Security, 2018;17,154-161.
Malenica D, Kass M, Bhat R, et al. Sustainable management and valorization of agri-food industrial wastes and by-products as animal feed: for ruminants, non-ruminants and as poultry feed. Sustainability, 2022;15(1),117.
Lu S, Taethaisong N, Meethip W, et al. Nutritional composition of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) and its potential uses as alternative protein sources in animal diets: A review. Insects, 2022;13(9),831.
Jones KR, Karuppusamy S, Sundaram V. Unraveling the promise of agroindustrial byproducts as alternative feed source for sustainable rabbit meat production. Emerging Animal Species, 2024;10,100044.
