Fonksiyonel ve Alternatif Yemlerin Et, Süt ve Yumurta Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri: Besleme, Ürün Kalitesi, Tüketici Perspektifi
Özet
Artan dünya nüfusunun hayvansal protein ihtiyacının ve tüketicilerin farklı özellikler bakımından fonksiyonel ve kaliteli hayvansal ürünler talebinin karşılanabilmesi bunun yanında et, süt ve yumurta gibi hayvansal ürünlerin üretim maliyetlerinin düşürülebilmesi/korunabilmesi amacıyla fonksiyonel ve alternatif yem hammaddeleri hayvan besleme uzmanları tarafından sıklıkla çalışılan bir konu haline gelmiştir. Alternatif yem hammaddelerinin hayvan sağlığı, performansı, karlılık ve ürün kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin incelendiği çok sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Çiftlik hayvanlarının beslenmesinde kullanılan fonksiyonel ve alternatif yemler deniz kaynakları, bitkisel temelli fonksiyonel katkılar, tarımsal sanayi ve gıda yan ürünleri, alternatif protein kaynakları, probiyotikler, biyolojik yemler ve amaca yönelik kullanılan katkılar şeklinde sıralanabilir. Tarım ve sanayi yan ürünleri, eski gıda ürünleri, alternatif bitkisel kaynaklar, üzüm posası, fırıncılık atıkları ve diğer bazı yan ürünler verimliliğe zarar vermeden yem maliyetini düşürebilir, atıkları azaltabilir ve döngüsel ekonomik hedeflerle uyumlu bir hayvan yetiştiriciliği sağlayabilir. Mevcut kitap bölümünde, son zamanlarda giderek yaygınlaşan ve hayvansal üretime entegre edilmesi konusunda umut vadeden bazı alternatif yem hammaddelerinin çiftlik hayvanlarında performans, ürün kalitesi ve tüketici tercihleri üzerine etkilerinin tartışılması/belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir.
Referanslar
Menchaca A. Sustainable food production: The contribution of genome editing in livestock. Sustainability. 2021;13(12).
Ponnampalam EN, Holman BWB. Sustainability II: Sustainable animal production and meat processing. In F. Toldra (Ed.), Lawrie’s meat science, 2023 (9th ed., pp. 727–798). London, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Pan S, Wang D, Lin Y, et al. Effects of ginger straw silage with enzymes on growth performance, digestion and metabolism, meat quality and rumen microflora diversity of Laiwu Black goat. Animals. 2024;14(14).
Salami SA, Luciano G, O’Grady MN, et al. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: A re- view of the implications for ruminant meat production. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2019;251, 37–55.
Ma L, Wang L, Zhang Z, et al. Research Progress of Biological Feed in Beef Cattle. Animals.
2023; 13, 2662.
Aloueedat MK, Obeidat BS, Awawdeh MS. Effects of Partial Replacement of Conventional with Alternative Feeds on Nutrient Intake, Digestibility, Milk Yield and Composition of Awassi Ewes and Lambs. Animals, 2019;9(9), 684.
Pinotti L, Mazzoleni S, Moradei A, et al. Effects of alternative feed ingredients on red meat qu- ality: a review of algae, insects, agro-industrial by-products and former food products. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2023; 22(1), 695–710.
Magan JB, O Callaghan, TF, Kelly AL, et al. Compositional and functional properties of milk and dairy products derived from cows fed pasture or concentrate-based diets. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2021; 20(3), 2769-2800.
Teodoro CR, Castilho Heiss VAR, Garcia RG, et al. Systematic review of natural alternatives in quail feeding: impact of essential and functional oils versus conventional additives. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2025; 81(3), 775-792.
Rad MI, Rouzbehan Y, Rezaei J. Effect of dietary replacement of alfalfa with urea-treated al- mond hulls on intake, growth, digestibility, microbial nitrogen, nitrogen retention, ruminal fermentation, and blood parameters in fattening lambs. Journal of Animal Science. 2016; 94 (1), 349–358.
Phillips CR, Doyle SP, et al. Effect of almond hull level in a finishing diet on lamb growth and carcass performance. Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences. 2015; 2 (2), 11–15.
Scerra, M., Bognanno, M., Foti, F, et al (2022). Influence of almond hulls in lamb diets on ani- mal performance and meat quality. Meat Science, 192, 108903.
Swanson KL, Bill HM, Asmus J, et al. Feeding high amounts of almond hulls to lactating cows.
Journal of Dairy Science. 2021; 104, 8846–8856.
Wang J, Wu C, Kong F, et al. Effect of almond hulls on the growth performance, body composi- tion, digestive tract weight, and liver antioxidant capacity of broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2021a; 20 (2), 100149.
Wang J, Singh AK, Kong F, et al. Effect of almond hulls as an alternative ingredient on broiler performance, nutrient digestibility, and cecal microbiota diversity. Poultry Science. 2021b; 100 (3), 100853.
Wang J, Kong F, Kim WK. Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens. Poultry Science. 2021c; 100 (9), 101286.
SoltaniNezhad B, Dayani O, Khezri A, et al. Performance and carcass characteristics in fat- tening lambs feed diets with different levels of pistachio by-products silage with wasted date. Small Ruminant Research. 2016; 137, 177–182.
Razzaghi A, Naserian AA, Valizadeh R, et al. Pomegranate seed pulp, pistachio hulls, and toma- to pomace as replacement of wheat bran increased milk conjugated linoleic acid concentrations without adverse effects on ruminal fermentation and performance of Saanen dairy goats. Ani- mal Feed Science and Technology. 2015; 210, 46–55.
Sedighi-Vesagh R, Naserian AA, Ghaffari MH, et al. Effects of pistachio by-products on diges- tibility, milk production, milk fatty acid profile and blood metabolites in Saanen dairy goats. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2015; 99, 777–787.
Priolo A, Valenti B, Natalello A, et al. Fatty acid metabolism in lambs fed hazelnut skin as a partial replacer of maize. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2021; 272, 114794.
Menci R, Biondi L, Natalello A, et al. Feeding hazelnut skin to lambs delays lipid oxidation in meat. Meat Science. 2023; 202, 109218.
Campione A, Natalello A, Valenti B, et al. Effect of feeding hazelnut skin on animal performan- ce, milk quality, and rumen fatty acids in lactating ewes. Animals. 2020; 10, 588.
Renna M, Lussiana C, Malfatto V, et al. Evaluating the suitability of hazelnut skin as a feed ing- redient in the diet of dairy cows. Animals. 2020; 10 (9), 1653.
Anderson MJ, Blanton Jr JR, Gleghorn J, et al. Ascophyllum nodosum supplementation strate- gies that improve overall carcass merit of implanted English crossbred cattle. Asian-Australasi- an Journal of Animal Sciences, 2006; 19(10), 1514-1518.
Braden K, Blanton Jr J, Montgomery J, et al. Tasco supplementation: effects on carcasschara- cteristics, sensory attributes, and retail display shelf- life. Journal of Animal Science. 2007; 85, 754–768.
Fike JH, Saker KE, O’keefe SF, et al. Effects of Tasco (a seaweed extract) and heat stress on N metabolism and meat fatty acids in wether lambs fed hays containing endophyte-infected fes- cue. Small Ruminant Research. 2005; 60(3), 237-245.
Zhu W, Li D, Wang J, et al. Effects of polymannuronate on performance, antioxidant capacity, immune status, cecal microflora, and volatile fatty acids in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2015; 94(3), 345-352.
Abudabos AM, Okab AB, Aljumaah RS, et al. Nutritional value of green seaweed (Ulva lactuca) for broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2013; 12(2), e28.
Ma L, Wang L, Zhang Z, et al. Research Progress of Biological Feed in Beef Cattle. Animals. 2023; 13, 2662.
Akdağ A, Kop-Bozbay C, Okuyucu IC. Sağımda Fermente Protein Ek Yemi ile Yemlenen Ana- dolu Mandalarının Süt Verimi ve Kalitesi. 13. Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi Kongre Kitabı. 2023; s:45-46.
Gungor E, Erener G. Effect of dietary raw and fermented sour cherry kernel (Prunus cerasus L.) on digestibility, intestinal morphology and caecal microflora in broiler chickens. Poultry science. 2020; 99(1), 471-478.
Mammi LME, Ghiaccio F, Benini E, Vecchiato CG, Fusaro I, Buonaiuto G, Formigoni A. For- mer Food and Agro-Industrial By-Products in Dairy Cow Diets: Effects on Milk Quality and Cheese Production. Animals. 2025; 15(8), 1113.
Lanza M, Battelli M, Gallo L, Soglia F, Bovera F, Giunta F, Primi R, Biondi L, Giannuzzi D, Zam- piga M. Sustainability of Animal Production Chains: Alternative Protein Sources as an Eco- logical Driver in Animal Feeding: A Review. Animals. 2025; 15,3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ani15223245
Gatta D, Russo C, Giuliotti L, Mannari C, Picciarelli P, Lombardi L, Giovannini L, Ceccarelli N, Mariotti L. Influence of Partial Replacement of Soya Bean Meal by Faba Beans or Peas in Heavy Pigs Diet on Meat Quality, Residual Anti-Nutritional Factors and Phytoestrogen Content. Arc- hives of Animal Nutrition. 2013; 67, 235–247.
Lanza M, Fabro C, Scerra M, Bella M, Pagano R, Brogna DMR, Pennisi P. Lamb Meat Quality and Intramuscular Fatty Acid Composition as Affected by Concentrates Including Different Legume Seeds. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2011; 10, e18.
Scerra M, Caparra P, Foti F, Cilione C, Zappia G, Motta C, Scerra V. Intramuscular Fatty Acid Composition of Lambs Fed Diets Containing Alternative Protein Sources. Meat Science. 2011; 87, 229–233.
White CL, Staines VE, Staines MvH. A Review of the Nutritional Value of Lupins for Dairy Cows. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2007; 58, 185.
Petterson DS. The Use of Lupins in Feeding Systems-Review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Ani- mal Science. 2000; 13, 861–882.
Toyomizu M, Sato K, Taroda H, Kato T, Akiba Y. Effects of Dietary Spirulina on Meat Colour in Muscle of Broiler Chickens. British Poultry Science. 2001; 42, 197–202.
Zahroojian N, Moravej H, Shivazad M. Effects of Dietary Marine Algae (Spirulina platensis) on Egg Quality and Production Performance of Laying Hens. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2013; 15, 1353–1360.
Schiavone A, Dabbou S, Petracci M, Zampiga M, Sirri F, Biasato I, Gai F, Gasco L. Black Soldier Fly Defatted Meal as a Dietary Protein Source for Broiler Chickens: Effects on Carcass Traits, Breast Meat Quality and Safety. Animal. 2019; 13, 2397–2405.
Ait-Kaki A, Chebli Y, El Otmani S, Moula N. Effects of Yellow Mealworm Larvae (Tenebrio mo- litor) and Turmeric Powder (Curcuma) on Laying Hens Performance, Physical and Nutritional Eggs Quality. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture. 2022; 47, 87–96
Juodka R, Nainien˙e R, Juškien˙e V, Juška R, Leikus R, Kadžien˙e G, Stankeviˇcien˙e D. Came- lina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) as Feedstuffs in Meat Type Poultry Diet: A Source of Protein and n-3 Fatty Acids. Animals. 2022; 12, 295.
Cherian G, Campbell A, Parker T. Egg Quality and Lipid Composition of Eggs from Hens Fed Camelina Sativa. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2009; 18, 143–150.
Tsiplakou E, Pitino R, Manuelian CL, Simoni M, Mitsiopoulou C, De Marchi M Righi F. Plant feed additives as natural alternatives to the use of synthetic antioxidant vitamins in livestock animal products yield, quality, and oxidative status: A review. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(5), 780.
Manso T, Gallardo B, Salvá A, Guerra-Rivas C, Mantecón AR, Lavín P, de la Fuente MA. Influence of dietary grape pomace combined with linseed oil on fatty acid profile and milk compo- sition. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016; 99, 1111–1120.
Sajdakowska M, Gębski J, Guzek D, Gutkowska K, Żakowska-Biemans S. Dairy products qua- lity from a consumer point of view: Study among Polish adults. Nutrients, 2020; 12(5), 1503.
Teixeira A, Rodrigues S. Consumer perceptions towards healthier meat products. Current opi- nion in food science. 2021; 38, 147-154.
de Araújo PD, Araújo WMC., Patarata L, Fraqueza MJ. Understanding the main factors that influence consumer quality perception and attitude towards meat and processed meat produ- cts. Meat Science. 2022; 193, 108952.
Grunert KG, Bredahl L, Brunsø K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector—a review. Meat science. 2004; 66(2), 259-272.
Yang W, Renwick A. Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for credence attributes of livestock products–A meta-analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2019; 70(3), 618-639.
Gorton M, Yeh CH, Chatzopoulou E, White J, Tocco B, Hubbard C, Hallam F. Consumers’ willingness to pay for an animal welfare food label. Ecological economics. 2023; 209, 107852.
