Fonksiyonel Yemlerin Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştirme Sistemlerinde Refah, Adaptasyon ve Çevresel Uyum Üzerine Etkileri
Özet
Koyun ve keçi gibi ruminantlarda hayvancılık; genellikle geleneksel üretim sistemleri şeklinde yapılmaktadır. Söz konusu hayvanların yemleri daha çok doğal otlaklar ve bitki artıklarından oluşmaktadır. Bu yemlerin kalitesi ise mevsime bağlı olarak değişmektedir. Küçükbaş hayvanlar, düşük kaliteli yemleri, seçkin kimyasal bileşim ve organoleptik özelliklere sahip yüksek kaliteli hayvansal ürünlere dönüştürme konusunda en verimli hayvanlardır. Ancak nüfus artışından kaynaklanan çeşitli çevresel etmenler yanında azalan araziler yanında artan dünya nüfusu gıda güvenliğini sağlamak için gelecekte insan gıdasıyla rekabet edemeyen geleneksel olmayan yem kaynaklarının daha sürdürülebilir hayvancılık uygulamalarının geliştirilmesi ve etkili kullanımını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Dolayısıyla özellikle son yıllarda çiftlik hayvanlarının beslenmesinde meyve, sebze işleme yan ürünlerinin kullanımına yönelik önemli çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyal faktörlerin olduğu daha yüksek kalitede gıda ürünlerinin üretimi için ise fonksiyonel yem bileşenlerinin çiftlik hayvanlarının beslenmesinde kullanılabileceği belirtilmektedir.
Referanslar
Kim ET, Kim C, Min K, Lee SS. Effects of plant extracts on microbial population, methane emission and ruminal fermentation characteristics in vitro. Asian-Australasian Journal of Ani- mal Sciences; 2012; 25(6): 806-811. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11447.
Henry BK, Eckard RJ, Beauchemin KA. Review: Adaptation of ruminant livestock production systems to climate changes. Animal; 2018; 12(52): 445-456. doi:10.1017/S1751731118001301.
Ndudzo A, Pullen J, Magwaba T, Ndlovu S, Moyo M, Sibanda S, Chimbo J, Mugoti A. Incorpo- ration of functional feed ingredients to substitute antimicrobials in animal nutrition: Oppor- tunities for livestock production in developing countries. International Journal of Livestock Production; 2023; 14(2): 44-57. doi: 10.5897/IJLP2023.0820.
Zervas G, Tsiplakou E. The effect of feeding systems on the characteristics of products from small ruminants. Small Ruminant Research; 2011; 101: 140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrum- res.2011.09.034.
Onte S, Bhattacharjee S, Dey D. “Non-Conventional Feed Resources.” Agriallis; 2021. 1: 29-35.
Sime AG, Duguma BS. The Role of Non-Conventional Feeds in Small Ruminant Production and Their Implication for Feed Cost Reduction in Ethiopia-A Mini Review. Veterinary Medici- ne and Science; 2025; 11-5: e70554. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70554.
Boudalia S, Smeti S, Dawit M, Senbeta EK, Gueroui Y, Dotas V, Bousbia A, Symeon GK. Alter- native Approaches to Feeding Small Ruminants and Their Potential Benefits. Animals; 2024; 14(6): 904. doi.org/10.3390/ani14060904.
Kasapidou E, Sossidou E, Mitliagka P. Fruit and Vegetable CoProducts as Functional Feed Ingredients in Farm Animal Nutrition for Improved Product Quality. Agriculture; 2015; 5(4): 1020-1034. doi: 10.3390/agriculture5041020.
Bedasso GT. The Functional Feed Additives in Animal Nutrition: The Substitute to Antibiotics Quest Journals. Journal of Research in Agriculture and Animal Science; 2021; 8.
Santos ARMD, Barros LVD, Abreu MLC, Pedreira BC. In vitro ruminal fermentation parame- ters and methane production of Marandu palisadegrass (Urochloa brizantha) in a silvopastoral system associated with levels of protein supplementation. Grass Forage Science; 2020; 75(3): 339-350. doi: 10.1111/ gfs.12476.
Opio C, Gerber P, Steinfeld H. Livestock and the environment: addressing the consequences of livestock sector growth. Advances in Animal Biosciences; 2011; 2: 601-607.
Henry B, Charmley E, Eckard R, Gaughan JB, Hegarty R. Livestock production in a changing climate: adaptation and mitigation research in Australia. Crop and Pasture Science; 2012; 63: 191-202.
Mottet A, de Haan C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Opio C, Gerber P. Livestock: on our plates or ea- ting at our table? A new analysis of the feed/ food debate. Global Food Security; 2017; 14: 1-8.
Di Meo MC, Licaj I, Varricchio R, De Nisco M, Stilo R, Rocco M, Bianchi A R, D’Angelo L, De Girolamo P, Vito P, Zarrelli A, Varricchio E. Functional Feed with Bioactive Plant-Derived Compounds: Effects on Pig Performance, Muscle Fatty Acid Profile, and Meat Quality in Finis- hing Pigs. Animals; 2025; 15(4): 535. doi: 10.3390/ani15040535.
Villalba JJ, Provenza FD, Manteca X. Links between ruminants’ food preference and their wel- fare. Animal; 2010; 4(7): 1240-1247. doi: 1017/S1751731110000467.
Hegarty RS, McFarlane JR, Godwin IR. Use of encapsulated sodium bicarbonate to increase feed intake, fiber digestibility, and growth of weaner sheep. Journal of Animal Science; 2017; 95(9): 4121-4129.
Melo M, da Silva A, Silva Filho E, Oliveira R, Silva Junior J, Oliveira JP, Vaz A, Moura J, Pereira Filho J, Bezerra L. Polymeric Microparticles of Calcium Pectinate Containing Urea for Slow Re- lease in Ruminant Diet. Polymers (Basel); 2021; 31: 13(21): 3776. doi: 10.3390/polym13213776.
Azeem T, Akhtar N, Rehman A. Encapsulation of feed additives for ruminants: A comprehensive review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology; 2017; 8(1): 28.
Phillips CJC. Introduction to welfare and nutrition. Nutrition and the Welfare of Farm Ani- mals. Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2016. 1–27359. ISBN 978-3-319-27354-27359.
Spanghero M, Robinson PH, Zanfi C, Fabbro E. Effect of increasing doses of a microencapsu- lated blend of essential oils on performance of lactating primiparous dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology; 2009; 153 (1-2): 153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.004.
Bribiesca JER, Casas RL, Monterrosa RGC, P´erez AR. Supplementing selenium and zinc na- noparticles in ruminants for improving their bioavailability meat. Nutrient Delivery. Elsevier, sayfa: 713–747. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804304-2.00019-6.
Tolve R, Tchuenbou-Magaia F, Di Cairano M, Caruso MC, Scarpa T, Galgano F. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds for the formulation of functional animal feeds: The biofortification of derivate foods. Animal Feed Science and Technology; 2021; 279: 115036. doi: 10.1016/j.anifee- dsci.2021.115036.
Ben Salem H, Smith T. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry envi- ronments. Small Ruminant Research; 2008; 77: 174-194.
Gaughan J. Projected impacts of climate changes and sustainability of sheep production sys- tems. In Sheep production adapting to climate change (ed. V Sejian, R Bhatta, J Gaughan, PK Malik, SMK Naqvi and R Lal); 2017; 189-196. Springer, Singapore.
Hassen A, Dawid I. Ruminant Livestock Production System Adaptation Strategies to Clima- te Change: A Review. OAJRC Environmental Science; 2021; 2(1): 7-16. doi: 10.26855/oajr- ces.2021.11.001.
Reidsma P, Wolf J, Kanellopoulos A, Schaap BF, Mandryk M, Verhagen J, van Ittersum MK. Climate change im-pact and adaptation research require farming systems analysis and integ- rated assessment: A case study in the Netherlands. Procedia Environmental Science; 2015; 29: 286-287.
Hoekstra, N. J., Suter, M., Finn, J. A., Husse, S., and Lüscher, A. (2015). Do belowground ver- tical niche differences between deep and shallow-rooted species enhance resource uptake and drought resistance in grassland mixtures? Plant Soil, 394, 21-34.
Cullen BR, Eckard RJ and Rawnsley RP 2012. Resistance of pasture production to projected climate changes in south-eastern Australia. Crop and Pasture Science 63, 77–86.
Hennessy KJ, Whetton PH and Preston B 2010. Climate projections. In Adapting agriculture to climate change (ed. CJ Stokes and SM Howden), sayfa; 13-20. CSIRO Publishing Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
Ajila CM, Brar SK, Verma M, Rao UP. Sustainable solutions for agro processing waste mana- gement: An Overview. In Environmental Protection Strategies for Sustainable Development, Malik, A., Grohmann, E., Eds., Springer Science/Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2012; 65-109.
Mamvura CI, Cho S, Mbiriri DT, Lee HG, Choi NJ. Effect of encapsulating nitrate in sesa- me gum on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters. AsianAustralasian Journal of Animimal Science; 2014; 27(11): 1577. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14280.
