Ağaç Yapraklarının Hayvan Beslemede Alternatif Fonksiyonel Yem Kaynağı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi: Besin Değeri, Biyoaktif Bileşikler ve Besleme Stratejileri

Yazarlar

Ceyhun Yücel
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-9051
Cennet Yaman

Özet

İklim değişikliği, kuraklık ve yem fiyatlarındaki artış, hayvancılıkta geleneksel yemlere alternatif kaynak arayışını zorunlu kılıyor. İnsan gıdasıyla rekabet etmeyen ağaç yaprakları bu noktada önemli bir seçenektir. Populus (kavak) ve Salix (söğüt) gibi türler, derin kökleri sayesinde kurak dönemlerde bile biyokütle üretebilir; tarıma elverişsiz alanlarda yetişebilir. Yaprakların değeri yalnızca besin içeriğinden gelmez. Baklagil ağaç yaprakları önemli miktarda protein sağlarken, tanen, saponin ve flavonoid gibi ikincil metabolitler de yapraklara fonksiyonel özellik kazandırır. Bu bileşikler işkembe fermantasyonunu düzenler, sindirimi destekler, metan oluşumunu azaltabilir ve protozoa sayısını düşürebilir; örneğin bazı çalışmalarda okaliptüs (Eucalyptus) yapraklarının metan üretimini azalttığı bildirilmiştir. Ancak yüksek tanen, mimosin ve saponin düzeyleri hayvan sağlığını olumsuz etkileyebilir; bu yüzden yaprakların rasyona katılım oranı bitki türü, hayvanın yaşı ve fizyolojik durumu dikkate alınarak belirlenmelidir. Silajlama, kurutma ve fermantasyon gibi işleme yöntemleri bu olumsuzlukları azaltır. Yaprakların güvenli ve etkili kullanımı için uzun süreli canlı hayvan çalışmalarına dayalı sınırların ortaya konması gerekir. Mevcut besleme modellerinin geleneksel yem bitkilerine göre kurulmuş olması, ikincil metabolitleri hesaba katan yeni modelleme yaklaşımlarını gerektirmektedir. Sonuçta ağaç yaprakları; doğru tür, uygun işleme ve hassas rasyon yönetimiyle uygulandığında yem maliyetini düşüren, yem kaynaklarını çeşitlendiren, metan ve azot kayıplarını sınırlayan ve sürdürülebilir hayvancılığı destekleyen bir kaynak olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Referanslar

Bilotto, F., Harrison, M. T., Vibart, R., Mackay, A. D., Christie, K., Ferreira, C., Cottrell, R. S., Forster, D., & Chang, J. (2024). Towards resilient, inclusive, sustainable livestock far- ming systems. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 152, 104668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tifs.2024.104668

Lee, M. A. (2018). A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in cont- rasting environments. Journal of Plant Research, 131(4), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10265-018-1024-y

Kú-Vera, J. C., Jiménez‐Ocampo, R., Valencia-Salazar, S. S., Montoya-Flores, M. D., Moli- na-Botero, I. C., Arango, J., Gómez, C., Aguilar-Pérez, C. F., & Solorio‐Sánchez, F. J. (2020). Role of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants [Review of Role of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00584

Horst, E. H., Ammar, H., Khouja, M. L., Vargas, J. E., Andrés, S., & López, S. (2022). In Vitro Screening of the Foliage of Eucalyptus Species Harvested in Different Seasons for Modula- ting Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production. Agriculture, 12(12), 2153. https://doi. org/10.3390/agriculture12122153

Chisoro, P., Jaja, I. F., & Assan, N. (2023). Incorporation of local novel feed resources in livesto- ck feed for sustainable food security and circular economy in Africa. Frontiers in Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1251179

Canúl-Solís, J. R., Campos‐Navarrete, M. J., Piñeiro-Vázquez, Á. T., Casanova‐Lugo, F., Bar- ros-Rodríguez, M., Chay‐Canul, A. J., Cárdenas-Medina, J. V., & Castillo-Sánchez, L. E. (2020). Mitigation of Rumen Methane Emissions with Foliage and Pods of Tropical Trees. Animals, 10(5), 843–843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050843

Aygün, C., Kara, İ. H., Oral, H. H., Erdoğdu, İ., Atalay, A. K., & Sever, A. L. (2018). Bazı Çalı Bitkilerinin Sezonluk (İlkbahar, Yaz, Sonbahar) Yaprak Örneklerindeki Makro ve Mikro Besin Elementi İçerikleri. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bdbad/ issue/38577/447680

Hotea, I., Dragomirescu, M., Berbecea, A., & Radulov, I. (2023). The Role of Nutrition in En- hancing Sustainability in Sheep Production. In IntechOpen eBooks. IntechOpen. https://doi. org/10.5772/intechopen.113938

Pelcastre, A. A. S., Ramírez-Mella, M., Ávila, N. L. R., & Candelaria-Martínez, B. (2020). ÁR- BOLES Y ARBUSTOS TROPICALES CON POTENCIAL PARA DISMINUIR LA PRODUC- CIÓN DE METANO EN RUMIANTES. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 23(2). htt- ps://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.3061

Mpofu, M. C., Makumbe, P., Toit, L. du, Chikwanda, D., Madzimure, J., & Chakeredza, S. (2025). The contribution of indigenous multipurpose trees found in Southern Africa to increa- sed livestock production and climate change adaptation: a review [Review of The contribution of indigenous multipurpose trees found in Southern Africa to increased livestock production and climate change adaptation: a review]. Frontiers in Climate, 7. Frontiers Media. https://doi. org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1636284

Sow, S., Ranjan, S., Kumar, N., Nilanjaya, Gitari, H. I., Dayal, P., & Kumar, S. (2024). Sustainab- le fodder production in South Asia through silvopastoral systems. Current Science, 126(10), 1217. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v126/i10/1217-1224

Gunasekaran, S., Bandeswaran, C., & Valli, C. (2022). Tree leaf meal from fodder trees in sil- vipasture and their potential to support growth in young ruminants. SHILAP Revista de Lepi- dopterología. https://doaj.org/article/9a689bec35714888b4dc37873a947f75

Ahmed, M. A., Adeyemi, K. D., Jahromi, M. F., Jusoh, S., Alimon, A. R., & Samsudin, A. A. (2017). Effects of dietary Kleinhovia hospita and Leucaena leucocephala leaves on rumen fer- mentation and microbial population in goats fed treated rice straw. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49(8), 1749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1388-3

Kemp, P., Barry, T. N., & Douglas, G. (2003). Edible forage yield and nutritive value of pop- lar and willow. NZGA Research and Practice Series, 10, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.33584/ rps.10.2003.2983

Boudalia, S., Smeti, S., Dawit, M., Senbeta, E. K., Gueroui, Y., Dotas, V., Bousbia, A., & Symeon,

G. (2024). Alternative Approaches to Feeding Small Ruminants and Their Potential Benefits. Animals, 14(6), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060904

Pardo, G. O., & Prado, A. del. (2020). Guidelines for small ruminant production systems under climate emergency in Europe. Small Ruminant Research, 193, 106261. https://doi.or- g/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106261

Mesbahi, G., Barré, P., Delagarde, R., Ginane, C., & Novak, S. (2025). Seasonal dynamics of the nutritive value of temperate forage trees differ among species. Agroforestry Systems, 99(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01258-w

Boğa, M., Avcı, B. C., KILIÇ, H. N., & CİVANER, A. G. (2021). Bazı Baklagil Ağaç Yaprakları- nın Alternatif Yem Kaynağı Olarak Besin Madde İçerikleri ve Sindirilebilirliklerinin Belirlen- mesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(5), 1191. https:// doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.993655

Nawab, A., Tang, S., Gao, W., Li, G., Xiao, M., An, L., Wu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). Tannin Supple- mentation in Animal Feeding; Mitigation Strategies to Overcome the Toxic Effects of Tannins on Animal Health: A Review [Review of Tannin Supplementation in Animal Feeding; Mitiga- tion Strategies to Overcome the Toxic Effects of Tannins on Animal Health: A Review]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12(4), 217. Canadian Center of Science and Education. https://doi. org/10.5539/jas.v12n4p217

Zhu, X., Dou, X., Su, T., Ye, L., Zhang, L., Liu, H., & Han, D. (2025). Microbiomic and Meta- bolomic Insights into the Roles of Hydrolysable Versus Condensed Tannins on the Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestion, and Rumen Fermentation in Liaoning Cashmere Goats. Microorganisms, 13(4), 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040933

Kelln, B., Penner, G. B., Acharya, S. N., McAllister, T. A., & Lardner, H. A. (2020). Impact of condensed tannin-containing legumes on ruminal fermentation, nutrition, and perfor- mance in ruminants: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 101(2), 210. https://doi. org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0096

Amad, A. A., & Zentek, J. (2023). The use of Moringa oleifera in ruminant feeding and its cont- ribution to climate change mitigation. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fanim.2023.1137562

Rahman, M. A. A.-E., Mohamed, N. H., El-Nile, A. E., Kholif, A. E., Vargas‐Bello‐Pérez, E., Attia, M., & Sallam, S. M. A. (2024). Vegetative growth response and in vitro evaluation of three multipurpose fodder tree leaves and shrubs as potential feeds for farm animals. Agroforestry Systems, 98(8), 3019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-01071-x

Du, Z., Yang, F., Fang, J., Yamasaki, S., Oya, T., Nguluve, D., Kumagai, H., & Cai, Y. (2023). Si- lage preparation and sustainable livestock production of natural woody plant [Review of Silage preparation and sustainable livestock production of natural woody plant]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1253178

Duru, M. (2024). Yonca Silajlarına Defne (Laurus nobilis L.) Yaprağı Tozu İlavesinin Silaj Ka- litesine ve In vitro Gaz Üretim Parametrelerine Etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 12(3), 412–417. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i3.412-417.6678

Castro-Montoya, J. M., & Dickhoefer, U. (2020). The nutritional value of tropical legume fora- ges fed to ruminants as affected by their growth habit and fed form: A systematic review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 269, 114641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114641

Gaviley, O., Pan’kova, S., Poliakova, L., & Chorna, G. (2024). Assessment of phytochemical cha- racteristics of walnut (Juglans regia) leaves: determination of nutritional value and quantitative content of phenolic compounds. Research in Agricultural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17097/ agricultureatauni.1424918

Choubey, M., Chaudhary, S. K., & Singh, A. (2024). Assessing the nutritional value of common tree leaves in eastern Uttar Pradesh for livestock feeding. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research, 8, 1422. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i12sr.3366

Emara, R., Alaa. (2025). Reproductive performance, digestibility, and rumen bacteria of go- ats fed two levels of phytogenic mixture. In Figshare. Figshare (United Kingdom). https://doi. org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8127858.v1

Ahmed, M. G., Elwakeel, E. A., El-Zarkouny, S. Z., & Al‐Sagheer, A. A. (2024). Environmental impact of phytobiotic additives on greenhouse gas emission reduction, rumen fermentation manipulation, and performance in ruminants: an updated review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(26), 37943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33664-5

Wanapat, M., Dagaew, G., Sommai, S., Matra, M., Suriyapha, C., Prachumchai, R., Muslykhah, U., & Phupaboon, S. (2024). The application of omics technologies for understanding tropical plants-based bioactive compounds in ruminants: a review [Review of The application of omi- cs technologies for understanding tropical plants-based bioactive compounds in ruminants: a review]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of Animal Science and Biotech- nology, 15(1). BioMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-024-01017-4

Zhang, X., Du, W., Xie, K., & Hou, F. (2026). Lycium barbarum Byproducts Modulate Rumen Fermentation, Enhance Digestive Enzyme Activity, and Improve Immune and Antioxidant Status in Grazing Sheep. Food Science & Nutrition, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.71509

Ekwemalor, K., Enenya, I., Adjei‐Fremah, S., Asiamah, E., Faulkner, P. E., & Yeboah, O.-A. (2024). Alternative to Antibiotics Used in Sheep Production. In IntechOpen eBooks. IntechO- pen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.114992

Göncü, M., & Kaya, H. (2024). Zeytin Yaprağının (Folium Olivae) Süt Sığırı Toplam Rasyon Karışımlarında (TMR) Kuru Çayır Otu Yerine İkame Edilebilirliğinin In Vitro Gaz Üretim Tekniği ile Belirlenmesi. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/men- ba/issue/84417/1460050

Khejornsart, P., Juntanam, T., Gunun, P., Gunun, N., & Cherdthong, A. (2024). Effect of Hi- gh-Tannin and -Polyphenol Plant Material Supplement on Rumen Fermentation, Nitrogen Partitioning and Nutrient Utilization in Beef Cattle. Animals, 14(21), 3092. https://doi. org/10.3390/ani14213092

Poli, C. H. E. C., Tontini, J. F., Jacondino, L. R., Villalba, J. J., Muir, J. P., & Tedeschi, L. O. (2025). Plant tannin for grazing ruminant growth. Animal Frontiers, 15(3), 47. https://doi. org/10.1093/af/vfaf026

Mulaudzi, A., Mnisi, C. M., & Mlambo, V. (2022b). Enhancing the Utility of Dietary Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal for Sustainable Jumbo quail (Coturnix sp.) Production. Sustainability, 14(9), 5067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095067

Mulyono, A. M. W., Husein, M., Sukaryani, S., Yakin, E. A., Windyasmara, L., & Maruto, T. S. (2024). Changes in the nutritional value of lamtoro (Leucaena leucosephala) leaves

İpçak, H. H., Özüretmen, S., ALÇİÇEK, A., & Özelçam, H. (2017). Alternatif Protein Kaynak- larının Hayvan Beslemede Kullanım Olanakları. Hayvansal Üretim. https://doi.org/10.29185/ hayuretim.343285

Valcl, N., & Lavrenčič, A. (2025). Effect of tannins and drying methods on in vitro dry matter and crude protein degradability and digestibility of soybean meal for ruminants. Scientific Re- ports, 15(1), 28612. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14678-6

Boğa, Y. E., Abdallah, N., Kurşun, K., & Baylan, M. (2024). Kanatlı Hayvan Rasyonlarında Mo- ringa oleifera Kullanımı. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 12(5), 867. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i5.867-883.6230

Iqbal, S. M., Rajput, N., Leghari, I. H., Rajput, M. N., & Ali, S. (2024). Effect Of Acacia Nilotica On The Growth Performance Of Broiler Chickens. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences. https://doi.org/10.53555/sfs.v11i3.2260

Mahamane, M., Amadou, I., Lawali, S., & Soulé, M. (2025). Exploring the benefits of Moringa oleifera Lam. its contribution in strengthening resilience in the Sahel: an explicative review. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2544958

Ogbuewu, I. P., & Mbajiorgu, C. A. (2024). Enhancement of nutritional and functional qualities of tropical leaf meal as feed ingredients in chickens through the use of fermentation techno- logy. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 56(8), 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024- 04223-4

Saeed, M., Hassan, F., Al‐Khalaifah, H., Islam, R., Kamboh, A. A., & Liu, G. (2025). Fermented banana feed and nanoparticles: a new eco-friendly, cost-effective potential green approach for poultry industry. Poultry Science, 104(7), 105171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105171

Kazemi, M. (2025). Recycling Agricultural Waste: Sustainable Solutions for Enhancing Lives- tock Nutrition. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70321

Anim-Jnr, A. S., Ishaq, S., Sasu, P., Gyimah, S., Greathead, H., Bösch, C., Mabiki, F. P., & Em- mambux, M. N. (2025). Valorising mango, cashew apple, and papaya by-products for sustai- nable small ruminant production in low-income food deficit countries—a review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1529837

Kolobe, S. D., Manyelo, T. G., Ng`ambi, J. W., Malematja, E., Chitura, T., NEMAULUMA, M. F. D., Nawaz, S., Shoaib, M., & Arshad, H. J. (2022). THE POTENTIAL USE OF ACACIA LEAF MEAL AS PROTEIN FEED SOURCE FOR POULTRY DIETS: A REVIEW. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 6, 1491. https://doi.org/10.36899/japs.2022.6.0557

Quevedo-Cascante, M., Mogensen, L., Kongsted, A. G., & Knudsen, M. T. (2022). The en- vironmental impacts of agroforestry in agri-food systems: a life cycle assessment approach. Research Portal Denmark, 127. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?s- rc=au&id=au-a39331b8-f7ac-4c33-afa6-9adaaa394172&ti=The%20environmental%20im- pacts%20of%20agroforestry%20in%20agri-food%20systems%3A%20a%20life%20cycle%20 assessment%20approach

Chaudhary, M., Shekh, M. A., Devalia, B. R., Darji, V. B., & Sherasiya, A. N. (2023). Effect of Feeding Moringa oleifera Replacing TMR on Nutrients Intake, Rumen Fermentation and Economics in Adult Cattle. International Journal of Bio-Resource and Stress Management, 14, 1518. https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2023.4877a

Akbağ, H. I. (2022). Silvopastoral Keçi Üretim Sistemleri için Önem Taşıyan Bazı Çalı ve Ağaç Yapraklarının Besin Madde Bileşimleri. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(4), 943. htt- ps://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1136238

Linares, E. B. C., Herrera, M. A. L., Izquierdo, A. V., & Hernández, J. O. (2021). Sistema sil- vopastoril de cosecha y acarreo como alternativa para la producción ovina sostenible en el trópico húmedo. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 12(66). https://doi.org/10.29298/ rmcf.v12i66.872

Ripamonti, A., Finocchi, M., Pulina, A., Franca, A., Seddaiu, G., Turini, L., Mele, M., & Manti- no, A. (2025). Effects of tree presence on forage yield and nutritive value in agroforestry lives- tock systems: a global systematic review. Agroforestry Systems, 99(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10457-025-01214-8

Silva, I. A. G. da, Dubeux, J. C. B., Souza, C. G. de, Ruiz‐Moreno, M., Santos, M. V. F. dos, Apo- linário, V. X. de O., Mello, A. C. L. de, Cunha, M. V. da, Muir, J. P., & Lira, M. A. (2024). Nut- ritive value and condensed tannins of tree legumes in silvopasture systems. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68563-9

Rodríguez-Tuz, J., Escobedo-Mex, J. G., Medina-Dzul, K., Piñeiro-Vázquez, Á. T., Casano- va‐Lugo, F., Escobedo-Cruz, M., & Escobedo-Cabrera, A. (2025). Rendimiento de biomasa y composición química de Morus alba L. a diferentes intervalos de cosecha y alturas de corte en el sur de México. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.56369/ tsaes.5810

Vandermeulen, S., Ramírez-Restrepo, C. A., Beckers, Y., Claessens, H., & Bindelle, J. (2018). Agroforestry for ruminants: a review of trees and shrubs as fodder in silvopastoral temperate and tropical production systems [Review of Agroforestry for ruminants: a review of trees and shrubs as fodder in silvopastoral temperate and tropical production systems]. Animal Produc- tion Science, 58(5), 767. CSIRO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1071/an16434

Narváez-Herrera, J. P., Angulo-Arizala, J., Hernández, W. A. B., & Mahecha-Ledesma, L. (2023). Arbustivas y arbóreas del piedemonte amazónico colombiano: potencial nutricional y am- biental en sistemas ganaderos. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 52442. https://doi.org/10.15517/ am.2023.52442

BAŞER, A., & Kamalak, A. (2020). Türkiye’nin Akdeniz bölgesinde yetişen bazı baklagil ağaç yapraklarının yem değerleri ve in vitro fermentasyon özellikleri. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(4), 940. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.734767

GÜLTEKİN, Y., Tolunay, A., & ÖZMİŞ, M. (2019). A VIEW ON ANIMAL GRAZING IN FO- REST RESOURCES: A SAMPLE OF UŞAK PROVINCE IN TURKEY. TURKISH JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 3(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.558376

Denek, N., Avcı, M., Can, A., DAŞ, B. D., Aydin, S. S., & Savrunlu, M. (2014). Kimi Kaba Yem- lerde Farklı Bitki Yapraklarının İn Vitro Metan Üretimi Üzerine Etkisi. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/huvfd/issue/29578/317297

Hassan, F., Arshad, M., Ebeid, H. M., Rehman, M. S., Khan, M. S., Shahid, S., & Yang, C. (2020). Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 575801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.575801

Oruç, A. F., & Avcı, M. (2018). The Effect of Willow Tree (Salix Alba) Leafs Added at Different Levels to Some Roughages on In Vitro Digestibility and Methane Production. Harran Üniver- sitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.470754

Molina-Botero, I. C., Villegas, D., Montoya, A. J. A., Mazabel, J., Bastidas, M., Ruden, A., Ga- viria, H., Peláez, J. D., Chará, J., Restrepo, E. M., Moorby, J. M., & Arango, J. (2024). Effect of a silvopastoral system with Leucaena diversifolia on enteric methane emissions, animal per- formance, and meat fatty acid profile of beef steers. Agroforestry Systems, 98(7), 1967–1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-01046-y

Yayınlanan

6 Ekim 2026

Lisans

Lisans