İlkokula Hazırbulunuşluğun Değerlendirilmesi
Özet
İlkokula geçiş süreci, Bronfenbrenner’ın Ekolojik Sistemler Kuramı çerçevesinde çocuk için oyun odaklı bir habitattan kurallı ve akademik beklentilerin yüksek olduğu yeni bir yapıya geçişi simgeleyen bütünsel bir "ekolojik geçiş" olarak nitelendirilmektedir. Bu geçiş sürecinde çocukların okula hazırbulunuşluk düzeylerinin saptanması, çocukları "hazır olanlar" ve "olmayanlar" şeklinde etiketlemekten ziyade, sistemin çocuğun gelişimsel ihtiyaçlarına göre uyarlanmasını hedefleyen sistemli bir veri toplama ve yorumlama faaliyetidir. Sürecin sadece bilişsel veya okuma-yazma becerileriyle sınırlandırılmaması, bütüncül, süreç odaklı, kültürel duyarlılığı olan ve üçgenleme yaklaşımıyla çok kaynaklı veri toplama ilkelerine dayanması gerekmektedir. Alan yazında hazırbulunuşluğun değerlendirilmesinde genel olarak formal (yapılandırılmış), informal (doğal/süreç odaklı) ve son dönemde öne çıkan dinamik değerlendirme olmak üzere üç temel metodolojik yaklaşım benimsenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, formal değerlendirme, Metropolitan Okul Olgunluğu Testi veya Marmara İlkokula Hazırbulunuşluk Ölçeği gibi standart araçlar vasıtasıyla çocuğu norm grubuyla kıyaslayarak olası gelişimsel riskleri nesnel biçimde saptamayı amaçlamaktadır. İnformal değerlendirme ise sistematik gözlemler, anekdot kayıtları, kontrol listeleri, portfolyolar ve oyun temelli teknikler aracılığıyla çocuğun doğal rutinleri içerisindeki gerçek performansını ekolojik geçerliliği yüksek bir biçimde izleme olanağı tanır. Son olarak, Vygotsky’nin Yakınsal Gelişim Alanı kuramına dayanan dinamik değerlendirme, öntest-öğretim-sontest metodolojisini uygulayarak çocuğun statik başarısını değil, yetişkin desteği (iskele kurma) eşliğindeki öğrenme potansiyelini ölçmekte; böylece öğrenme güçlükleri ile çevresel uyaran eksikliğini birbirinden ayırt etmeyi sağlamaktadır.
The transition to primary school is characterized as a holistic “ecological transition” within the framework of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, symbolizing a shift for the child from a play-oriented environment to a new structure with strict rules and high academic expectations. During this transition process, assessing children’s level of school readiness is a systematic data-collection and interpretation activity aimed at adapting the system to children’s developmental needs, rather than labeling children as “ready” or “not ready.” The process must not be limited to cognitive or literacy skills alone; rather, it must be holistic, process-oriented, culturally sensitive, and grounded in the principles of multi-source data collection through a triangulation approach. In the literature, three main methodological approaches are generally adopted for assessing school readiness: formal (structured), informal (natural/process-oriented), and dynamic assessment, which has gained prominence in recent years. In this context, formal assessment aims to objectively identify potential developmental risks by comparing the child to a norm group using standardized tools such as the Metropolitan School Readiness Test or the Marmara Primary School Readiness Scale. Informal assessment, on the other hand, allows for the observation of the child’s actual performance within their natural routines—with high ecological validity—through systematic observations, anecdotal records, checklists, portfolios, and play-based techniques. Finally, dynamic assessment, based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development theory, applies the pretest-instruction-posttest methodology to measure not the child’s static achievement but their learning potential with adult support (scaffolding); this helps distinguish between learning difficulties and a lack of environmental stimulation.
Referanslar
Akkoyun, F. (2014). Projektif teknikler. Nobel
Bagnato, S. J. (2007). Authentic assessment for early childhood intervention. Best practices. Guilford Press.
Beaty, J. J. (2010). Observing development of the young child. Pearson.
Bentzen, W. R. (2009). Seeing young children: a guide to observing and recording behavior. Ğ- Delmar Cengage Learning.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Pearson.
Crusco, M. (2013). Draw-A-Person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance. The Centre for Longitudinal Studies Institute of Education University of London, 1, 4-5.https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Miranda-Crusco-WP-CLS-20137-FINAL.pdf
Çelik, Ö. & Demirbaş, A. (2023). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının tanıma ve değerlendirme süreçlerinin incelenmesi: Nitel bir araştırma. Uluslararası Temel Eğitim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 170-183. https://doi.org/10.59062/ijpes.1400279
Danniels, E. & Pyle, A. (2022). Inclusive play-based learning: approaches from enacting kindergarten teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(7), 1169-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01369-4
Duncan, R., Duncan, G., Stanley, L., Aguilar, E., & Halfon, N. (2020). The kindergarten Early Development Instrument predicts third grade academic proficiency. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 53, 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.05.009
Fan, R. J. (2012). A study on the kinetic family drawings by children with different family structures. The International Journal of Arts Education, 10(1), 173-204.
Janus, M. and Offord, D. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): A measure of children's school readiness.. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/cjbs2007001
Goodwin, W. L., & Goodwin, L. D. (1996). Understanding quantitative and qualitative research in early childhood education (Vol. 59). Teachers College Press.
Gullo, D. F. (2005). Understanding assessment and evaluation in early childhood education. Teachers College Press.
Goryunova, M. (2019). Combination of federal state educational standards and professional standards, portfolio of students. SHS Web of Conferences, 69, 00046. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196900046
Gülay Ogelman, H. (2018). Oyun: çocuğun dili iç dünyası. (Ed. A. Önder). Örneklerle okul öncesi çocuklarını değerlendirme ve anlama (ss. 71-83). Eğiten Kitap.
Haywood, H.C. & Lidz, C.S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University
Hertzog, N. B. (2022). Early entrance to kindergarten? It depends. Gifted Child Today, 45(3), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221091858
Hill, J. (2015). How useful is dynamic assessment as an approach to service delivery within educational psychology?. Educational Psychology in Practice, 31(2), 127-136.https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2014.994737
Hughes, C. (1998). Finding your marbles: Does preschoolers' strategic behavior predict later understanding of mind? Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1326–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1326
Jablon, J. R., Dombro, A. L., & Dichtelmiller, M. (2007). The power of observation for birth through eight. 2nd ed. NAEYC
Kagan, S. L. (1990). Readiness 2000: Rethinking rhetoric and responsibility. Phi Delta Kappan. https://policyforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Readiness-2000-Rethinking-Rhetoric-and-Responsibility.pdf
Kelly-Vance, L., & Ryalls, B. O. (2005). A systematic, reliable approach to play assessment in preschoolers. School Psychology International, 26(4), 398-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/014303430505901
Kriegel, E. R., Singer, M. R., Keim, S. A., Rapoport, E., & Adesman, A. (2021). School readiness of young children enrolled in preschool in the United States. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 42(7), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000000930
Linder, T. W., Linas, K., & Stokka, K. (2008). Play-based transdisciplinary ıntervention with young children with disabilities. Play therapy for very young children, 307-337.
Magnuson, K. A., Meyers, M. K., Ruhm, C. J., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American educational research journal, 41(1), 115-157.https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001115
McAfee, O., & Leong, D. J. (2012). Erken çocukluk döneminde gelişim ve öğrenmenin değerlendirilmesi ve desteklenmesi (B. Ekinci Çev. Ed.). Nobel.
McDermott, P. A. (1993). National standardization of uniform multisituational measures of child and adolescent behavior pathology. Psychological Assessment, 5(4), 413-424.
Meisels, S. J. (1998). Assessing readiness. CIERA Report.
Merriam, S. B. (2018). Görüşmelerin etkin yönetimi. (Ed. S. Turan). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (ss.85-110). Nobel.
Morrison, G. S. (2018). Early childhood education today. Pearson.
Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. Upper Saddle River.
NAEYC. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Washington, DC.
Nah, K. O., & Kwak, J. I. (2011). Child assessment in early childhood education and care settings. South Korea. Asian Social Science, 7(6), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n6p66
Oktay, A. (1980). Metropolitan Okul Olgunluğu Testi ve Türk çocuklarına uygulanması. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi.
Oktay, A. (2010). Yaşamın sihirli yılları: Okul öncesi dönem. Pegem Akademi.
Özdoğru, A. A. (2018). Program development, assessment, and evaluation in early childhood care and education. In Handbook of research on program development and assessment methodologies in K-20 education (pp. 109-127). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Özyurt, M. and GÜZEL, N. (2018). Okul öncesi eğitimi alan çocukların okul olgunluğu düzeylerinin ve okul olgunluğuna ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 1250-1267. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.441260
Quirk, M., Dowdy, E., Goldstein, A., & Carnazzo, K. (2017). School readiness as a longitudinal predictor of social-emotional and reading performance across the elementary grades. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(4), 248-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417719680
Pagani, L., Fitzpatrick, C., Archambault, I., & Janosz, M. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: A French Canadian replication and extension.. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 984-994. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018881
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R. & Meyer, C. (1991).1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio?. Educational leadership, 48(5), 60-63.
Pérez, E., Herrero-Nivela, M., & Losada, J. (2020). Association between preschoolers’ specific fine (but not gross) motor skills and later academic competencies: Educational implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01044
Peterson, J. W., Loeb, S., & Chamberlain, L. J. (2018). The intersection of health and education to address school readiness of all children. Pediatrics, 142(5), https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1126
Pianta, R. C. (2010). Going to school in the United States: The shifting ecology of transition. In S. L. Kagan & K. Tarrant (Eds.), Transitions for young children: Creating connections across early childhood systems (pp. 33–44). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co..
Polat Unutkan, Ö. (2003). Marmara İlkokula Hazırbulunuşluk Ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve standardizasyonu. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi.
Puckett, M. B., & Black, J. K. (2008). Meaningful Assessments of the Young Child. Pearson.
Romano, E., Babchishin, L., Pagani, L., & Kohen, D. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: Replication and extension using a nationwide Canadian survey.. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 995-1007. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018880
Saputri, W. & Risnawati, E. (2024). Preparing for the school readiness of early childhood by enhancing the well-being and family support. Jpud - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 18(1), 270-286. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.181.19
Savaşır, I., Sezgin, N. & Erol, N. (1995) Ankara gelişim tarama envanteri el kitabı. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi.
Snow, C. E. 2006. What Counts as Literacy in Early Childhood?, in K. McCartney and D. Phillips (eds )Blackwell handbook of early childhood development , Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470757703.ch14
Swanson, H. L. & Lussier, C. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002321
Taşer, İ. & Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2021). The analysis of mothers’ support for their children’s education according to some variables. E-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 553-573. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.956780
Tekin, H. & Koçyiğit, S. (2020). Öz düzenleme becerilerinin ilkokula hazırbulunuşluk üzerindeki etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(5), 1932-1945. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3928
Turner, K. M. T., Dittman, C. K., Rusby, J. C., & Lee, S. (2017). Parenting Support in an Early Childhood Learning Context. In M. R. Sanders & T. G. Mazzucchelli (Eds.), The power of positive parenting. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190629069.003.0021
Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Wade, T., Bowden, J., & Sites, H. (2017). Child maltreatment and motor coordination deficits among preschool children. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 11(2), 159-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-017-0186-4
Wagner, R. & Compton, D. (2011). Dynamic assessment and ıts ımplications for RTI Models. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 311-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411407859
Williams, P. G., Lerner, M. A., Council on Early Childhood, Council on School Health, Sells, J., Alderman, S. L., ... & Weiss-Harrison, A. (2019). School readiness. Pediatrics, 144(2), e20191766. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1766
Yalaz, K., Anlar, B., & Bayoğlu, U. B. (2009). Denver II Gelişimsel Tarama Testi: Türk çocuklarına uyarlanması ve standardizasyonu el kitabı (3. baskı). Gelişimsel Çocuk Nörolojisi Derneği.
Yavuzer, H. (2012). Resimleriyle çocuk: Resim analizi ve psikolojik testler. Remzi Kitabevi.
Wortham, S. C., & Hardin, B. J. (2016). Assessment in early childhood education. Pearson.
Zaatari, W. E. & Maalouf, I. (2022). How the Bronfenbrenner Bio-ecological System Theory explains the development of students’ sense of belonging to school?. Sage Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221134089
