Milan 2014 Konsensüsü ve Analitik Performans Hedefleri

Ferraro S, Braga F, Panteghini M. Laboratory medicine in the new healthcare environment. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2016;54(4):523-533. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0803

Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2015;53(6):833-835. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0067

Fraser CG. The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2015;53(6):837-840. doi:10.1515/cclm-2014-0914

Kallner A, McQueen M, Heuck C. The Stockholm Consensus Conference on Quality Specifications in Laboratory Medicine, 25-26 April 1999. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 1999;59(7):475-476. doi: 10.1080/00365519950185175

Panteghini M, Ceriotti F, Jones G, et al. Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2017;55(12):1849-1856. doi:10.1515/cclm-2017-0772

Horvath AR, Bell KJL, Ceriotti F, et al. Outcome-based analytical performance specifications: current status and future challenges. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2024;62(8):1474-1482. doi:10.1515/cclm-2024-0125

Horvath AR, Bossuyt PM, Sandberg S, et al. Setting analytical performance specifications based on outcome studies – is it possible? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2015;53(6):841-848. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0214

Carobene A. Reliability of biological variation data available in an online database: need for improvement. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2015;53(6):871-877. doi:10.1515/cclm-2014-1133

Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2014;52(7):951-958. doi:10.1515/cclm-2014-0142

Panteghini M. Moving to practice with the application of Milan model 1b-based analytical performance specifications. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2025. doi:10.1515/cclm-2025-1014

Lyon AW, Kavsak PA, Lyon OA, et al. Simulation models of misclassification error for single thresholds of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I due to assay bias and imprecision. Clinical Chemistry. 2017;63(2):585-592. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2016.265058

Aarsand AK, Røraas T, Fernandez-Calle P, et al. The Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist: a standard for evaluating studies on biological variation. Clinical Chemistry. 2018;64(3):501-514. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2017.281808

Aarsand AK, Webster C, Coskun A, et al. EFLM Biological Variation Database. Erişim: https://biologicalvariation.eu [Erişim tarihi: 23 Mayıs 2026].

Carobene A, Aarsand AK, Bartlett WA, et al. The European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): a summary report. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2021;60(4):505-517. doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-0370

Braga F, Panteghini M. Performance specifications for measurement uncertainty of common biochemical measurands according to Milan models. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2021;59(8):1362-1368. doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-0170

Ceriotti F, Fernandez-Calle P, Klee GG, et al. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2017;55(2): 189-194. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0091