Dijital Hayvancılık ve Yeni Teknolojiler

FAO (2018). The Future of Food and Agriculture: Alternative Pathways to 2050. Rome: FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e51e0cf0-4ece-428c-8227-ff6c51b06b16/content adresinden ulaşılmıştır.

MarketsandMarkets (2023). Smart Agriculture Market – Global Forecast to 2028. Chicago: MarketsandMarkets Research.

Berckmans, D. (2017). General introduction to precision livestock farming. Animal Frontiers, 7(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0102.

Rutten, C. J., Velthuis, A. G. J., Steeneveld, W., & Hogeveen, H. (2013). Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(4), 1928–1952. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6107.

Eurobarometer (2022). Special Eurobarometer on Farm to Fork. Brussels: European Commission.

Benjamin, M., & Yik, S. (2019). Precision livestock farming in swine welfare: a review for swine practitioners. Animals, 9(4), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040133.

Hogeveen, H., Steeneveld, W., & Wolf, C. A. (2019). Production diseases reduce the efficiency of dairy production: a review of the results, methods, and approaches regarding the economics of mastitis. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11, 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093954

Grand View Research (2023). Livestock Monitoring Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. San Francisco: Grand View Research.

Verdouw, C., Tekinerdogan, B., Beulens, A., & Wolfert, S. (2021). Digital twins in smart farming. Agricultural Systems, 189, 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103046

De Mol, R. M., & Ouweltjes, W. (2001). Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 49(1-2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00176-3

Roelofs, J. B., López-Gatius, F., Hunter, R. H. F., van Eerdenburg, F. J. C. M., & Hanzen, C. (2010). When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. Theriogenology, 74(3), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.016

Kaufman, E. I., LeBlanc, S. J., McBride, B. W., Duffield, T. F., & DeVries, T. J. (2016). Association of rumination time with subclinical ketosis in transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(7), 5604–5618. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10509

Lambertz, C., Hinrichs, D., & Gauly, M. (2014). Relationship between climatic conditions and milk production traits in dairy cows from different origin. Animal Science Journal, 85(9), 858–865. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7217

Huzzey, J. M., Veira, D. M., Weary, D. M., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2007). Prepartum behavior and dry matter intake identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(7), 3220–3233. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-807

Quimby, W. F., Sowell, B. F., Bowman, J. G. P., Branine, M. E., Hubbert, M. E., & Sherwood, H. W. (2001). Application of feeding and watering behaviour data to predict morbidity of newly received calves in a commercial feedlot. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 81(3), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-098

Bach, A., Valls, N., Solans, A., & Torrent, T. (2008). Associations between nondietary factors and dairy herd performance. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(8), 3259–3272. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1030

Handcock, R. N., Swain, D. L., Bishop-Hurley, G. J., Patison, K. P., Wark, T., Valencia, P., Corke, P., & O'Neill, C. J. (2009). Monitoring animal behaviour and environmental interactions using wireless sensor networks, GPS collars and satellite remote sensing. Sensors, 9(5), 3586–3603. https://doi.org/10.3390/s90503586

Campbell, D. L. M., Marini, D., Lea, J. M., Keshavarzi, H., Dyall, T. R., & Lee, C. (2021). The application of virtual fencing technology effectively herds cattle and sheep. Animal Production Science, 61(13), 1393-1402. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20525

Goliński, P., Sobolewska, P., Stefańska, B., & Golińska, B. (2023). Virtual Fencing Technology for Cattle Management in the Pasture Feeding System—A Review. Agriculture, 13(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010091

Borchers, M. R., Chang, Y. M., Proudfoot, K. L., Wadsworth, B. A., Stone, A. E., & Bewley, J. M. (2017). Machine-learning-based calving prediction from activity, lying, and ruminating behaviors in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(7), 5664–5674. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11526

D'Eath, R. B., Jack, M., Foister, S., Barclay, D., & Rennie, L. (2016). Automatic early warning of tail biting in pigs: 3D cameras can detect lowered tail posture before an outbreak. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153463. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194524

Buczinski, S., & Vandeweerd, J. M. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of refractometry for assessing bovine colostrum quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dairy science, 99(9), 7381–7394. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-10955

European Commission (2021). Digital Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Areas. Brussels: European Commission.

Andrew, W., Greatwood, C., & Burghardt, T. (2019). Visual localisation and individual identification of Holstein Friesian cattle via deep learning. Proceedings of ICCV Workshops, 2019, 2073–2082. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.336

Kumar, S., Pandey, A., Satwik, K. S. R., Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., Singh, A. K., & Mohan, A. (2018). Deep learning framework for recognition of cattle using muzzle point image pattern. Measurement, 116, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.064

Azzaro, G., Caccamo, M., Ferguson, J. D., Battiato, S., Farinella, G. M., Guarnera, G. C., ... & Licitra, G. (2011). Objective estimation of body condition score by modeling cow body shape from digital images. Journal of dairy science, 94(4), 2126-2137. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3467

van Nuffel, A., Zwertvaegher, I., Van Weyenberg, S., Pastell, M., Thorup, V. M., Bahr, C., Sonck, B., & Saeys, W. (2015). Lameness detection in dairy cows: Part 2. Use of sensors to automatically register changes in locomotion or behavior. Animals, 5(3), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5030388

Naserkheil, M., Miraie-Ashtiani, S. R., Nejati-Javaremi, A., Son, J., & Lee, D. (2016). Random Regression Models Using Legendre Polynomials to Estimate Genetic Parameters for Test-day Milk Protein Yields in Iranian Holstein Dairy Cattle. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 29(12), 1682–1687. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0768

Ospina, P. A., Nydam, D. V., Stokol, T., & Overton, T. R. (2010). Evaluation of nonesterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate in transition dairy cattle in the northeastern United States: Critical thresholds for prediction of clinical diseases. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(2), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2277

Fontana, I., Tullo, E., Butterworth, A., & Guarino, M. (2015). An innovative approach to predict the growth in intensive poultry farming. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 119, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.10.001

Shalloo, L., Cromie, A., & McHugh, N. (2014). Effect of fertility on the economics of pasture-based dairy systems. Animal, 8(Suppl 1), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000615

Ferrari, S., Silva, M., Guarino, M., & Berckmans, D. (2008). Cough sound analysis to identify respiratory infection in pigs. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 64(2), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2008.07.003

Exadaktylos, V., Silva, M., Aerts, J. M., Taylor, C. J., & Berckmans, D. (2008). Real-time recognition of sick pig cough sounds. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 63(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2008.02.010

Manteuffel, G., Langbein, J., & Puppe, B. (2004). From operant learning to cognitive enrichment in farm animal housing: bases and applicability. Animal Welfare, 13, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600000105

Davies, H., Nenadic, G., Alfattni, G., Arguello Casteleiro, M., Al Moubayed, N., Farrell, S. O., ... & Noble, P. J. M. (2024). Text mining for disease surveillance in veterinary clinical data: part one, the language of veterinary clinical records and searching for words. Frontiers in veterinary science, 11, 1352239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1352239

Allied Market Research (2022). Agricultural Robots Market by Type, Offering, and Application – Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2031.

IFCN Dairy (2023). Dairy Report 2023. Kiel: International Farm Comparison Network.

Antanaitis, R., Malašauskienė, D., Televičius, M., Urbutis, M., Rutkauskas, A., Šertvytytė, G., Anskienė, L., & Baumgartner, W. (2022). Associations of Automatically Recorded Body Condition Scores with Measures of Production, Health, and Reproduction. Agriculture, 12(11), 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111834

Rasmussen, M. D., Blom, J. Y., Nielsen, L. A. H., & Justesen, P. (2001). Udder health of cows milked automatically. Livestock Production Science, 72(1-2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00275-5

Zhu, C., Wei, J., Liu, T., Gong, H., Fan, J., & Hu, T. (2025). Deep Learning Empowers Smart Animal Husbandry: Precise Localization and Image Segmentation of Specific Parts of Sika Deer. Agriculture, 15(16), 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15161719

National Research Council, Committee on Animal Nutrition, & Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition. (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: 2001. National Academies Press.

Montes, M. E., & Boerman, J. P. (2024). Graduate Student Literature Review: Social and feeding behavior of group-housed dairy calves in automated milk feeding systems. Journal of dairy science, 107(7), 4833–4843. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23745

Hernández-Castellano, L. E., Nally, J. E., Lindahl, J., Wanapat, M., Alhidary, I. A., Fangueiro, D., Grace, D., Ratto, M., Bambou, J. C., & de Almeida, A. M. (2019). Dairy science and health in the tropics: challenges and opportunities for the next decades. Tropical animal health and production, 51(5), 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01866-6

Cook, N. B., Hess, J. P., Foy, M. R., Bennett, T. B., & Brotzman, R. L. (2016). Management characteristics, lameness, and body injuries of dairy cattle housed in high-performance dairy herds in Wisconsin. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(7), 5879-5891. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-10956

Holzhauer, M., Bartels, C. J., Bergsten, C., van Riet, M. M., Frankena, K., & Lam, T. J. (2012). The effect of an acidified, ionized copper sulphate solution on digital dermatitis in dairy cows. Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997), 193(3), 659–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.049

Møller, H. B., Sommer, S. G., & Ahring, B. K. (2004). Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass and bioenergy, 26(5), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.008

Sørensen, J. F. L., & Jørgensen, H. P. (2022). Rural Development Potential in the Bioeconomy in Developed Countries: The Case of Biogas Production in Denmark. Sustainability, 14(17), 11077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711077

Berckmans, D. (2014). Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties, 33(1), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2273

Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J. (2017). Big data in smart farming – a review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023

van der Voort, M., Van Meensel, J., Lauwers, L., Vercruysse, J., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Charlier, J. (2014). A stochastic frontier approach to study the relationship between gastrointestinal nematode infections and technical efficiency of dairy farms. Journal of dairy science, 97(6), 3498–3508. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7444

Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016). Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198

Monostori, L., Kádár, B., Bauernhansl, T., Kondoh, S., Kumara, S., Reinhart, G., Sauer, O., Schuh, G., Sihn, W., & Ueda, K. (2016). Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 65(2), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.005

Ferraz, P. A., Poit, D. A. S., Pinto, L. M. F., Guerra, A. C., Neto, A. L., do Prado, F. L., ... & Pugliesi, G. (2024). Accuracy of early pregnancy diagnosis and determining pregnancy loss using different biomarkers and machine learning applications in dairy cattle. Theriogenology, 224, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.05.006

Stranieri, S., Riccardi, F., Meuwissen, M. P., & Soregaroli, C. (2021). Exploring the impact of blockchain on the performance of agri-food supply chains. Food Control, 119, 107495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107495

Hasan, H. R., Musamih, A., Salah, K., Jayaraman, R., Omar, M., Arshad, J., & Boscovic, D. (2024). Smart agriculture assurance: IoT and blockchain for trusted sustainable produce. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 224, 109184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109184

WHO (2022). Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Wiggans, G. R., Cole, J. B., Hubbard, S. M., & Sonstegard, T. S. (2017). Genomic selection in dairy cattle: the USDA experience. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 5, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111422

Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157(4), 1819–1829. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819

Mrode, R., Ojango, J. M. K., Okeyo, A. M., & Mwacharo, J. M. (2019). Genomic selection and use of molecular tools in breeding programs for indigenous and crossbred cattle in developing countries: an update. Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00694

Koncagül, S., Şen, A. Ö., Yıldırır, M., Koyun, H., Ünay, E., Karakoyunlu, I., & Kasakolu, A. (2025). Genome-wide association study in the Holstein cattle population highlights candidate variants for milk production traits. Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience, 19(12), 101694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101694

Carlson, D. F., Lancto, C. A., Zang, B., Kim, E. S., Walton, M., Oldeschulte, D., Seabury, C., Sonstegard, T. S., & Fahrenkrug, S. C. (2016). Production of hornless dairy cattle from genome-edited cell lines. Nature Biotechnology, 34(5), 479–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3560

Burkard, C., Lillico, S. G., Reid, E., Jackson, B., Mileham, A. J., Ait-Ali, T., Whitelaw, C. B. A., & Archibald, A. L. (2017). Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs: macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function. PLoS Pathogens, 13(2), e1006206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006206

FDA (2022). Guidance for Industry: Regulation of Intentionally Altered Genomic DNA in Animals. Silver Spring: U.S. Food & Drug Administration.

Henderson, G., Cox, F., Ganesh, S., Jonker, A., Young, W., Global Rumen Census Collaborators, & Janssen, P. H. (2015). Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Scientific Reports, 5, 14567. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567

Difford, G. F., Plichta, D. R., Løvendahl, P., Lassen, J., Noel, S. J., Højberg, O., Wright, A.-D. G., Zhu, Z., Kristensen, L., Nielsen, H. B., Guldbrandtsen, B., & Sahana, G. (2018). Host genetics and the rumen microbiome jointly associate with methane emissions in dairy cows. PLoS Genetics, 14(10), e1007580. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007580

Weimer, P. J., Cox, M. S., de Paula, T. V., Lin, M., Hall, M. B., & Suen, G. (2017). Transient changes in milk production efficiency and bacterial community composition resulting from near-total exchange of ruminal contents between high-and low-efficiency Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(9), 7165-7182. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12746

European Commission (2020). Farm to Fork Strategy: For a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. Brussels: European Commission.

Main, D. C. J., Webster, J., & Green, L. E. (2001). Animal welfare assessment in farm assurance schemes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science, 51(Suppl. 30), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923171

Welfare Quality® Consortium (2009). Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Cattle. Lelystad: Welfare Quality® Consortium.

DANMAP (2023). Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark. Statens Serum Institut, Technical University of Denmark.

Whay, H. R., Main, D. C. J., Green, L. E., & Webster, A. J. F. (2003). Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Veterinary Record, 153(7), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.153.7.197

Randall, L. V., Kim, D. H., Abdelrazig, S. M. A., Bollard, N. J., Hemingway-Arnold, H., Hyde, R. M., Thompson, J. S., & Green, M. J. (2023). Predicting lameness in dairy cattle using untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomics and machine learning. Journal of dairy science, 106(10), 7033–7042. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23118

Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Rome: FAO.

Dijkstra, J., Bannink, A., France, J., Kebreab, E., & van Gastelen, S. (2018). Short communication: Antimethanogenic effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol depend on dose and basal diet, but not on feeding frequency. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(10), 9427–9431. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14456

Bell, M. J., Eckard, R. J., & Cullen, B. R. (2012). The effect of future climate scenarios on the balance between productivity and greenhouse gas emissions from sheep grazing systems. Livestock Science, 147(1-3), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.04.012

Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems, 15(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8

USDA ERS (2023). Technology Use on U.S. Farms: Evidence from Recent Surveys. Economic Information Bulletin. Washington D.C.: USDA.

State Council of China (2021). 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035. Beijing: State Council.

Mapiye, O., Makombe, G., Molotsi, A., Dzama, K., & Mapiye, C. (2023). Information and communication technologies (ICTs): The potential for enhancing the dissemination of agricultural information and services to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Information Development, 39(3), 638-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211064847

Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., Ayre, M., & Dela Rue, B. (2019). Managing socio-ethical challenges in the development of smart farming: from a fragmented to a comprehensive approach for responsible innovation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(5-6), 741–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5

ICAR (2022). ICAR Guidelines: Section 17 – Digital Data Exchange and Connectivity. International Committee for Animal Recording.

Gonzalez, L. F., Montes, G. A., Puig, E., Johnson, S., Mengersen, K., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and artificial intelligence revolutionizing wildlife monitoring and conservation. Sensors, 16(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010097

Cilulko, J., Janiszewski, P., Bogdaszewski, M., & Szczygielska, E. (2013). Infrared thermal imaging in studies of wild animals. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 59(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0688-1

Colomina, I., & Molina, P. (2014). Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 92, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013

Gadzama, I. U., Asadi, H., Hina, Q., & Ray, S. (2025). Influence of Virtual Fencing Technology in Cattle Management and Animal Welfare. Ruminants, 5(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5020021

FAO (2020). WaPOR, FAO portal to monitor Water Productivity through Open access of Remotely sensed derived data. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/in-action/remote-sensing-for-water-productivity adresinden ulaşılmıştır.

Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., Ayre, M., & Dela Rue, B. (2019). Managing socio-ethical challenges in the development of smart farming: from a fragmented to a comprehensive approach for responsible innovation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(5-6), 741–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5

Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: how do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security, 24, 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347

Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı (2023). Tarım Dijitalizasyon Programı Eylem Planı. Ankara: Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı.

European Commission (2022). Data Governance Act. Regulation (EU) 2022/868 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels: European Commission.

Fielke, S. J., Taylor, B., & Jakku, E. (2020). Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: a state-of-the-art review. Agricultural Systems, 180, 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102763

Macarthur, E. L. L. E. N., & Heading, H. E. A. D. I. N. G. (2019). How the circular economy tackles climate change. Ellen MacArthur Found, 1(3), 1-71.

Lyng, K. A., Skovsgaard, L., Jacobsen, H. K., & Hanssen, O. J. (2020). The implications of economic instruments on biogas value chains: a case study comparison between Norway and Denmark: K.-A. Lyng et al. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(8), 7125-7152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00463-9

van Huis, A. (2013). Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology, 58, 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704

Arrien, M. M., Aldaya, M. M., & Rodríguez, C. I. (2025). Livestock and Water Resources: A Comparative Study of Water Footprint in Different Farming Systems. Sustainability, 17(5), 2251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052251