Pediatrik Ses Bozukluklarına Klinik Yaklaşım: Değerlendirme ve Müdahale
Özet
Pediatrik ses bozuklukları vokal üretimle birlikte sosyal etkileşimi, akademik katılımı ve duygusal ifadeyi de etkileyen çok boyutlu klinik durumlardır. Yapısal, fonksiyonel, nörolojik ve psikojenik pek çok etkene bağlı olarak ortaya çıkabilen bu heterojen tablo, erişkinlere kıyasla daha bütüncül bir değerlendirme ve müdahale yaklaşımı gerektirir. Bu bölümde, pediatrik ses bozukluklarına yönelik klinik yaklaşım iki ana eksende ele alınmıştır. Değerlendirme kısmında; klinik görüşme ve öykü alma, medikal ve orofasiyal muayene, endoskopik inceleme (videolaringostroboskopi), aerodinamik ölçümler (maksimum fonasyon süresi ve s/z oranı), akustik analiz (temel frekans, şiddet, pertürbasyon ve spektral parametreler), algısal değerlendirme (GRBAS ve CAPE-V) ve yaşam kalitesini yansıtan öznel ölçekler (pVHI ile Türkçe uyarlaması pSHE) tanıtılmıştır. Müdahale kısmında ise vokal hijyen ve davranışsal düzenlemeler, semptom odaklı stratejiler, psikojenik yaklaşımlar ve fizyolojik temelli yöntemler (vokal fonksiyon egzersizleri, rezonant ses terapisi ve vurgu yöntemi) açıklanmıştır. Bölüm, çocuklarda ses bozukluklarının doğru tanımlanması, uygun terapinin seçilmesi ve sürecin izlenmesi açısından klinisyenlere yol gösterici, bütüncül bir çerçeve sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.
Pediatric voice disorders are multidimensional clinical conditions that affect not only vocal production but also social interaction, academic participation, and emotional expression. Arising from numerous structural, functional, neurological, and psychogenic factors, this heterogeneous condition requires a more comprehensive approach to assessment and intervention compared with adults. In this chapter, the clinical approach to pediatric voice disorders is addressed along two main axes. The assessment section introduces clinical interview and history taking, medical and orofacial examination, endoscopic examination (videolaryngostroboscopy), aerodynamic measurements (maximum phonation time and the s/z ratio), acoustic analysis (fundamental frequency, intensity, perturbation, and spectral parameters), perceptual evaluation (GRBAS and CAPE-V), and subjective scales reflecting quality of life (pVHI and its Turkish adaptation, pSHE). The intervention section explains vocal hygiene and behavioral modifications, symptom-oriented strategies, psychogenic approaches, and physiologically based methods (vocal function exercises, resonant voice therapy, and the accent method). The chapter aims to provide clinicians with a guiding, comprehensive framework for the accurate identification of voice disorders in children, the selection of appropriate therapy, and the monitoring of the treatment process.
Referanslar
Gupta OP, Bhatia PL, Agarwal MK, et al. Nasal, pharyngeal, and laryngeal manifestations of hypothyroidism. Ear, nose, & throat journal. 1977 Sep;56(9):349-56.
Hartnick CJ, Boseley ME. Clinical management of children's voice disorders. Plural Publishing; 2010 Mar 1.
Kelchner LN, Brehm SB, Weinrich B. Pediatric voice: a modern, collaborative approach to care. Plural Publishing; 2014.
Bless DM, Hirano M, Feder RJ. Videostroboscopic evaluation of the larynx. Ear, nose, & throat journal. 1987 Jul;66(7):289-96.
Hartnick CJ, Zeitels SM. Pediatric video laryngo-stroboscopy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2005 Feb 1;69(2):215-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.08.021
Hersan R, Behlau M. Behavioral management of pediatric dysphonia. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2000 Oct 1;33(5):1097-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70268-1
Bless DM. Assessment of laryngeal function. In: Phonosurgery: Assessment and surgical management of voice disorders. 1991. p. 95–121.
Hirano M, Bless DM. Videostroboscopic examination of the larynx. Singular; 1993.
Scherer RC. Aerodynamic assessment in voice production. NCVS Status and Progress Report. 1991;1:151–166.
Iwata S. Aerodynamic aspects for phonation in normal and pathologic larynges. Vocal physiology. 1988;2:423-31.
Ptacek PH, Sander EK. Maximum duration of phonation. Journal of speech and hearing disorders. 1963 May;28(2):171-82. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2802.17
Iwata S, Von Leden H. Phonation quotient in patients with laryngeal diseases. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 1970 Nov 26;22(2):117-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263375
Hirano M, Koike Y, Von Leden H. Maximum phonation time and air usage during phonation: clinical study. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 1968 Nov 26;20(4):185-201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263198
Boone DR, McFarlane SC, Von Berg SL. The voice and voice therapy. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon; 2005.
Eckel FC, Boone DR. The S/Z ratio as an indicator of laryngeal pathology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1981 May;46(2):147-9. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4602.147
Tavares EL, Brasolotto AG, Rodrigues SA, et al. Maximum phonation time and s/z ratio in a large child cohort. Journal of Voice. 2012 Sep 1;26(5):675-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.001
Kılıç MA. Ses problemi olan hastanın objektif ve subjektif yöntemlerle değerlendirilmesi. Curr Pract ORL. 2010;6(2):257-65.
Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP) technical manual. 2005.
Mathew MM, Bhat JS. Soft phonation index—a sensitive parameter?. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2009 Jun;61(2):127-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-009-0050-4
Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. Disorders of human communication. 1981;5:1-99.
Kempster GB, Gerratt BR, Abbott KV, et al. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Clinical Focus. 2009 May. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017)
Reynolds V, Buckland A, Bailey J, et al. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index. Journal of Voice. 2012 Sep 1;26(5):672-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.002
Tezcaner CZ, Ozgursoy SK, Sati I, et al. Changes after voice therapy in objective and subjective voice measurements of pediatric patients with vocal nodules. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(12):1923-1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1008-6
Zur KB, Cotton S, Kelchner L, et al. Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2007 Jan 1;71(1):77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.004
Özkan ET, Tüzüner A, Demirhan E, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish pediatric voice handicap index. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(5):680-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.02.014
Stemple JC, Glaze L, Klaben B. Clinical voice pathology: theory and management. 4th ed. Plural Publishing; 2010.
Angelillo N, Di Costanzo B, Angelillo M, et al. Epidemiological study on vocal disorders in paediatric age. J Prev Med Hyg. 2008 Mar 1;49(1):1-5.
Nemec JI. The motivation background of hyperkinetic dysphonia in children: a contribution to psychologic research in phoniatry. Logos. 1961;4:28-31.
Green G. Psycho-behavioral characteristics of children with vocal nodules: WPBIC ratings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1989 Aug;54(3):306-12. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5403.306
Verdolini Abbott K, Yee-Key Li N, Hersan R, et al. Voice therapy for children. Clinical management of children's voice disorders. 2010:111-33.
Stemple JC, Lee L, D'Amico B, et al. Efficacy of vocal function exercises as a method of improving voice production. J Voice. 1994;8(3):271-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80299-1
Titze IR. More about resonant voice: chasing the formants but staying behind them. Journal of Singing-The Official Journal of the National Association of Teachers of Singing. 2003 May 1;59(5):413-4.
Kotby MN. The accent method of voice therapy. Singular; 1995.
Kılıç MA. Ses terapisi olarak vurgu yöntemi. Türkiye Klinikleri J ENT Spec Top. 2013;6(2):16-21.
