Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar
Özet
Erken çocukluk döneminde üstün yeteneklilik çoğu zaman akademik başarıdan ziyade hızlı öğrenme, yoğun merak, özgün problem çözme yolları, yaratıcılık ve çevresel uyaranlara duyarlılık gibi gelişimsel göstergeler aracılığıyla kendini göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda, Gagne, Gardner, Renzulli, Tannenbaum ve Sternberg’in modellerinde vurgulanan çevresel destekler, bilişsel olmayan özellikler ve gelişimsel süreçler, erken çocuklukta üstün yetenek potansiyelinin ortaya çıkarılmasında belirleyici bir rol oynamaktadır. Zekâ için öğrenmeyi geliştirmek için üst bilişsel süreçleri kullanarak deneyimlerden öğrenme kapasitesi ve çevreye uyum sağlama yeteneğidir. Yetenek ise “kişinin becerilerinin bir toplamı, onun içsel armağanları, bilgisi, deneyimi, yargısı, dürtüsü ve öğrenme kapasitesidir. Bu iki kavramın tanımları bile Türkiye’deki erken çocukluktan başlayan üstün yetenekli ve özel yetenekli paradoksunu yansıtmaktadır. Kitap bölümünde üstün zekânın/yeteneğin tanılama sürecinde Türkiye’de ve Dünya’da kullanılan Stanford Binet Zekâ Testi, Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zekâ Ölçeği (WISC-R), Kaufman Kısa Zekâ Testi (K-BIT), Wechsler Sözel Olamayan Yetenek Testi (WNV), Leiter Uluslararası Performans Ölçeği ve Anadolu-Sak Zekâ Ölçeği (ASIS) gibi psikometrik testlere kısaca değinilmiştir. Ayrıca üstün zekâlı/yetenekli çocukların normal akranlarından farklı duygusal ve bilişsel özellikleri de sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak bu bölüm, üstün yetenekliliğin erken çocukluk döneminde tekil, sabit ve yalnızca psikometrik ölçütlerle tanımlanamayacağını açık biçimde ortaya koymaktadır. Dolayısıyla erken çocukluk döneminde üstün yetenekliliğe yönelik yaklaşımların, etiketleyici tanılama anlayışından ziyade, çocuğun potansiyelini tanıyan, besleyen ve bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim olanakları sunan kapsayıcı ve süreç odaklı bir perspektifle ele alınması gerektiği yargısına ulaşılmıştır.
In early childhood, giftedness often manifests not through academic achievement alone, but rather through developmental indicators such as rapid learning, intense curiosity, unique approaches to problem-solving, creativity, and heightened sensitivity to environmental stimuli. In this context, the environmental supports, non-cognitive characteristics, and developmental processes emphasized in the theoretical models of Gagné, Gardner, Renzulli, Tannenbaum, and Sternberg play a critical role in identifying gifted potential during early childhood. Intelligence can be conceptualized as the capacity to learn from experiences through the use of metacognitive processes that enhance learning and facilitate adaptation to the environment. Talent, on the other hand, refers to “the aggregate of an individual’s abilities, encompassing innate gifts, knowledge, experience, judgement, motivation, and capacity for learning.” Even the definitions of these two concepts reflect the paradox surrounding the distinction between giftedness and special talent that emerges from early childhood education practices in Türkiye. This book chapter briefly addresses several psychometric instruments commonly used in the identification of giftedness both in Türkiye and internationally, including the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R), Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT), Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability (WNV), Leiter International Performance Scale, and Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale (ASIS). Furthermore, evidence suggests that gifted children exhibit emotional and cognitive characteristics that differ from those of their typically developing peers. In conclusion, this chapter clearly demonstrates that giftedness in early childhood cannot be adequately understood as a singular, fixed construct defined solely through psychometric criteria. Accordingly, approaches to giftedness during early childhood should move beyond label-oriented identification frameworks and instead adopt an inclusive and process-oriented perspective that recognizes, nurtures, and supports children's potential through individualized educational opportunities.
Referanslar
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Tan, M. L. (2011). Cultural Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook on intelligence (pp. 582-602). Cambridge Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511977244.030
Axelrod, B., Handfield-Jones, H., & Michaels, E. (2002). A new game plan for C players. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 80–90.
Baker, J. A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200102
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of subnormals. In H. H. Goddard (Ed.), Develop ment of intelligence in children (the Binet-Simon Scale). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1948). The development of the Binet-Simon Scale, 1905-1908. In W. Dennis (Ed.), Readings in the history of psychology (pp. 412–424). Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11304-047
Boodoo, G. M., Bradley, C. L., Frontera, R. L., Pitts, J. R., & Wright, L. P. (1989). A survey of procedures used for identifying gifted learning disabled children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 110–114.
Butler-Por, N. (1993). Underachieving gifted students. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks and A.H. Passow (Eds), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent (pp.649-668). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Cao, T. H., Jung, J. Y., & Lee, J. (2017). Assessment in Gifted Education: A Review of the Literature From 2005 to 2016. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(3), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17714572
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046743
Chaffey, G. W. (2004). Low self-efficacy: An important talent mask for ‘at risk’ gifted children. Mindscape, 24(2), 9-14.
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What no child left behind leavesbehind: The roles of IQ and self-control in pre-dicting standardized achievement test scoresand report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 439–451. doi:10.1037/a0026280
Eren, F., Omerelli Cete, A., Avcil, S., & Baykara, B., (2018). Emotional and behavioral characteristics of gifted children and their families. Archives Of Neuropsychiatry, 55(2), 105–112.
Ford, D. Y. (2013). Recruiting and retaining culturally different students in gifted education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003237655
Francis, R., Hawes, D. J., & Abbott, M. (2016). Intellectual giftedness and psychopathology in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598779
Gagné, F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development based analysis. In K. A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R. J. Stenberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Ed), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 67-79). Elsevier.
Gagné, F. (2013). The DMGT 2.0: From gifted inputs to talented outputs. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 56–68). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Gagné’s Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT). (1999). Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22(2), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329902200209
Gallardo-Gallardo, E. (2018). The meaning of talent in the world of work. In David G. Collings, Hugh Scullion, Paula M. Caligiuri (Eds), Global talent management (pp.33-58). Routledge.
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. F. (2013). What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.002
Garavan, T. N., Carbery, R., & Rock, A. (2012). Mapping talent development: Definition, scope and architecture. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(1), 5–24.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2016). Multiple intelligences: Prelude, theory, and aftermath. In R. J. Sternberg, S. T. Fiske, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Scientists making a difference: One hundred eminent behavioral and brain scientists talk about their most important contributions (pp. 167–170). Cambridge University Press.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history and bibliography [Editorial]. Intelligence, 24(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8
Guilbault, K. M., & McCormick, K. M. (2024). Underachievement of gifted learners in school. In K. H. Collins, J. J. Roberson, & F. H. R. Piske (Eds), Underachievement in Gifted Education (pp.7-24). NY: Routledge.
Handfield-Jones, H., Michaels, E., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Heller, K. A. (2004). Identification of gifted and talented students. Psychology Science, 46(3), 302–323.
Heller, K. A., Mönks, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.). (2000). International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.). Elsevier Applied Science Publishers/Elsevier Science Publishers.
Hoad, T. F. (1993). The concise Oxford dictionary of English etymology. Oxford University Press Oxford.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1037/10599-000
Jensen, A. R. (1987). Individual differences in the Hick paradigm. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 101–175). Ablex Publishing.
Kılıç, O., & Bağrıaçık, T. (Ed.). (2018). Özel yetenekli çocuğum var. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_06/19122200_07143702_Aile_EYitim_KYlavuzu.pdf adresinde erişilmiştir.
Klimecká, E. (2023). Inclusive education of gifted students at secondary schools in the czech republic compared to students with special educational needs. Roeper Review, 45(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2145398
Kranzler, J. H. (1997). What does the WISC-III measure? Comments on the relationship between intelligence, working memory capacity, and information processing speed and efficiency. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088952
Krneta, J. (2024). The phenomenon of unsuccessful gifted in gifted psychology research. In K. H. Collins, J. J. Roberson, & F. H. R. Piske (Eds), Underachievement in Gifted Education (pp.56-66). NY: Routledge.
Lassila, E., Hyry-Beihammer, E. K., Kizkapan, O., Rocena, A., & Sumida, M. (2023). Giftedness in Inclusive Classrooms: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Thinking in Finland, Austria, Turkey, the Philippines, and Japan. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(4), 306-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231183652
Li, D., & Shi, J. (2019). Fluid intelligence, trait emotional intelligence and academic performance in children with different intellectual levels. High Ability Studies, 32(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1694493
Lindt, S., Rutherford, E., & Wagner, H. (2021). Social and emotional needs of gifted elementary students: understanding the development of self-concept identification. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 8(1), 1–10.
Lo, C. O., Lin-Yang, R. C., & Chrostowski, M. (2022). Giftedness as a framework of inclusive education. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211049157
Mason, E., & Mönks, F. (2000). Developmental Psychology and Giftedness: Theories and Research. In K. Heller, F. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 141-156). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
McCollin, M. J. (2011). The history of giftedness and talent development. In Rotatori, A.F., Obiakor, F. E., & Bakken, J. P. (Ed.) History of Special Education (Advances in Special Education, Vol. 21 pp. 289-313). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-4013(2011)0000021015
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
Minton, H. L. (1988). Lewis M. Terman: Pioneer in psychological testing. New York University Press.
Murphy, F. A. (1955). Psychological problems related to the teaching of gifted children. Education, 76(2), 97–101.
Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive theory and the Cognitive Assessment System: A new theory-based measure of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 247–267). The Guilford Press.
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Riverside.
National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC). (2008). What is giftedness? Retrieved December 30, 2022 from http://www.nagc.org/WhatisGiftedness.aspx Cognitive and Academic Profiles 88.
National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC). (2012). NAGC legislative advocacy. Retrieved December 30, 2022 from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=585 New Jersey Administrative Code, 6A:8 (2010) Standards and assessment of student achievement.
Niu, W., & Brass, J. (2011). Intelligence in worldwide perspective. In R. J. Sternberg, & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 623-646). NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511977244.032
Özbay, Y. (2013). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar ve aileleri. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı Yay. https://www.aile.gov.tr/media/92202/01_05_ustun-yetenekli-cocuklar.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
Perleth, Ch. & Heller, K. A. (1994). The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness. In R.F. Subotnik & K.D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary Longitudinal Studies of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 77-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Peterson, J. S., & Moon, S. M. (2008). Counseling the gifted. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 223–245). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_12
Phelps, C., Brazzolotto, M., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (2023). Identification and teaching practices that support inclusion in gifted education. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 10(1), 1–9.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2013). Lessons learned from working with high-ability students. Gifted Education International, 29(1), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429412440653
Pfeiffer, S. I. (Ed.). (2018a). APA handbook of giftedness and gifted education. American Psychological Association.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (Ed.). (2018b). Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices. Springer.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986) The three-ring conception of giftedness: a developmental model for creative productivity. In: Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, J. E., Eds., Conceptions of Giftedness (pp.53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_2
Renzulli, J. S. (2021). Assessment for learning: The missing element for identifying high potential in low income and minority groups. Gifted Education International, 37(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429421998304
Rousseau, L. (2021). “Neuromyths” and Multiple Intelligences (MI) theory: A comment on Gardner (2020). Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 720706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720706
Sak, U., Bal Sezerel, B., Ayas, B., Tokmak, F., Özdemir, N., Demirel Gürbüz, Ş. ve Öpengin, E. (2016). Anadolu Sak Zekâ Ölçeği (ASIS) uygulayıcı kitabı. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi ÜYEP Merkezi.
Saklofske, D. H., Van de Vijver, F. J., Oakland, T., Mpofu, E., & Suzuki, L. A. (2015). Intelligence and culture: History and assessment. In Handbook of intelligence (pp. 341-365). NY: Springer.
Sarıçam, H. (2024). Üstün yetenekli çocukların psikolojik, sosyal ve duygusal özellikler açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Edirne: Trakya Üniversitesi.
Sarıçam, H., Adam Karduz, F. F., Özbey, A., & Çelik, Z. (2017). Bilim ve sanat merkezi ve diğer okullardaki öğrenciler arasında duygusal zekâ düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Siirt Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 461–485.
Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99–144). The Guilford Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
Spearman, C. C. (1930). ‘G’ and after - A school to end schools. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930 (pp. 339-366). Clark University Press. doi:10.1037/11017-018
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Our research program validating the triarchic theory of successful intelligence: Reply to Gottfredson. Intelligence, 31(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00143-5
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Assessment of gifted students for identification purposes: New techniques for a new millenium. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.003
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Theories of intelligence. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 145-161). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-010
Sternberg, R. J. (2022a). Identify transformational, not just transactional giftedness! Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 159–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211037950
Sternberg, R. J. (2020b). Transformational giftedness. In T. L. Cross & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Conceptual frameworks for giftedness and talent development (pp. 203–234). Prufrock Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Ablex.
Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (1995). What do we mean by “giftedness”? A pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900205
Sternberg, R. J., Ambrose, D., & Karami, S. (Eds.). (2022). Palgrave handbook of transformational giftedness for education. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sternberg, R. J., Chowkase, A., Desmet, O., Karami, S., Landy, J., & Lu, J. (2021). Beyond transformational giftedness. Education Sciences, 11(5), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050192
Şahin, H., & Zorlu, A. (2022). Türkiye’de özel yetenekli bireyleri tanılama süreci ve tanılamada kullanılan yöntemler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 863-885. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.788454
Tamul, Ö. F., Bal Sezerel, B., Sak, U., Karabacak, F. (2020). Anadolu-Sak Zekâ Ölçeği’nin (ASIS) sosyal geçerlik çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 49, 393-412.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children psychological and educational perspectives. Macmillan.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2001). Giftedness: The ultimate instrument for good and evil. In N. Colangelo & S. G. Assouline (Eds.), Talent development IV: Proceedings from the 1998 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 89–120). Great Potential Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45-59). Allyn & Bacon.
Tansley, C. (2011). What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management? Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 266–274.
Terman, L. M., Baldwin, B. T., Bronson, E., DeVoss, J. C, Fuller, F., Goodenough, F. L. Yates, D. H. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Volume 1: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1937). Measuring intelligence: A guide to the administration of the new revised Stanford-Binet tests of intelligence. Houghton Mifflin.
Terman, L. M. & Oden, M. H. (1954). Major issues in the education of gifted children. Journal of Teacher Education, 5, 230–232.
Treffinger, D. J., & Renzulli, J. S. (1986). Giftedness as potential for creative productivity: Transcending IQ scores. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 8(3), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198609552960
URL1. https://ozelyetenekliler.hacettepe.edu.tr/
URL2. https://gef-ozelegitim-ustunzekalilar.gazi.edu.tr/
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Revised edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (5th ed., WISC–V). Pearson.
Wiley, K. R. (2020). The social and emotional world of gifted students: Moving beyond the label. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1528-1541. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22340
Winner, E. (1996). The miseducation of our gifted children. Education Week, 16(7), 7.
Winner, E. (1998). Uncommon talents: Gifted children, prodigies and savants (pp.32-37). NY: Scientific American Presents, Inc.
Winner, E. (2000). Giftedness: Current theory and research. Current Directions in Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 9(5), 153–156.
Winsor, D. L., & Mueller, C. E. (2024). Underachieving gifted children and adolescents. In K. H. Collins, J. J. Roberson, & F. H. R. Piske (Eds), Underachievement in Gifted Education (pp.7-24). NY: Routledge.
Witt, J. C., & Gresham, F. M. (1985). Review of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 1716-1719). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
Woolger, C. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Third edition In William I. Dorfman, Michel Hersen (Eds), Understanding Psychological Assessment (pp. 219-233). NY: Springer.
Zhang, L.-f., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). The pentagonal implicit theory of giftedness revisited: A cross-validation in Hong Kong. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 21(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553949
Ziegler, A., & Perleth, Ch. (1997). Will sisyphus be able to roll the stone up the mountain? A critical examination of the status of diagnosis and promotion of the gifted in occupational education set against the Munich Talent Model. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 44, 152–163.
Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2002). Motivationale Ziele im Mathematikunterricht von MittelstufenschülerInnen am Gymnasium [Motivational orientations of high school students in mathematics]. Empirische Paedagogik, 16, 57–78.
Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2003). Identification of underachievement with standardized tests, student, parental and teacher assessments. An empirical study on the agreement among various diagnostic sources. Gifted and Talented International, 18, 87–94.
