Çocuklarda İntraoral Dijital Tarayıcıların Kullanım Alanları
Özet
1970’li yıllardan itibaren teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte intraoral dijital tarayıcı sistemlerinin kullanımı diş hekimliğinde önemli ölçüde artmıştır. İntraoral dijital tarayıcılar; intraoral tarama, tanı, tedavi planlaması ve restoratif üretim gibi klinik süreçlerde yaygın olarak kullanılmakta ve geleneksel yöntemlere kıyasla önemli avantajlar sunmaktadır. Bu sistemlerin kullanım kolaylığı, yüksek hasta konforu sağlaması, işlem süresini kısaltması, ölçü hatalarını en aza indirmesi ve klinik doğruluğu artırması, tedavi verimliliğini ve hasta memnuniyetini önemli ölçüde yükseltmektedir. Ayrıca hastaların üç boyutlu dijital modeller aracılığıyla tedavi planlamasına aktif olarak dahil olmaları, hekim-hasta iletişimini güçlendirerek memnuniyet düzeyini daha da yükseltmektedir. Son yıllarda çocuk diş hekimliğinde de intraoral tarayıcıların kullanımı giderek yaygınlaşmıştır. Bu cihazlar; tanısal değerlendirmelerde, restorasyon tasarımı ve üretiminde, erken süt dişi kaybı sonrası yer tutucu planlamasında, ortodontik şeffaf plak uygulamalarındaki tedavi süreçlerinde etkili bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Özellikle dental anksiyetesi yüksek veya kooperasyon sorunu yaşayan çocuklarda, dijital tarama işlemi daha konforlu ve güvenli bir klinik deneyim sunmakta, tedaviye uyumu kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra dijital verilerin uzun süreli arşivlenebilmesi, laboratuvar ile iletişimin hızlanması, yeniden tarama ihtiyacının azalması ve çapraz enfeksiyon riskinin düşmesi gibi ek avantajlar da söz konusudur. Bu bölümde, intraoral dijital tarayıcıların özelliklerini, pediatrik diş hekimliğindeki mevcut ve potansiyel uygulamalarını ve güncel literatüre dayanarak klinik uygulamaya sağladıkları katkıları anlamaktadır.
1970’li yıllardan itibaren teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte intraoral dijital tarayıcı sistemlerinin kullanımı diş hekimliğinde önemli ölçüde artmıştır. İntraoral dijital tarayıcılar; intraoral tarama, tanı, tedavi planlaması ve restoratif üretim gibi klinik süreçlerde yaygın olarak kullanılmakta ve geleneksel yöntemlere kıyasla önemli avantajlar sunmaktadır. Bu sistemlerin kullanım kolaylığı, yüksek hasta konforu sağlaması, işlem süresini kısaltması, ölçü hatalarını en aza indirmesi ve klinik doğruluğu artırması, tedavi verimliliğini ve hasta memnuniyetini önemli ölçüde yükseltmektedir. Ayrıca hastaların üç boyutlu dijital modeller aracılığıyla tedavi planlamasına aktif olarak dahil olmaları, hekim-hasta iletişimini güçlendirerek memnuniyet düzeyini daha da yükseltmektedir. Son yıllarda çocuk diş hekimliğinde de intraoral tarayıcıların kullanımı giderek yaygınlaşmıştır. Bu cihazlar; tanısal değerlendirmelerde, restorasyon tasarımı ve üretiminde, erken süt dişi kaybı sonrası yer tutucu planlamasında, ortodontik şeffaf plak uygulamalarındaki tedavi süreçlerinde etkili bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Özellikle dental anksiyetesi yüksek veya kooperasyon sorunu yaşayan çocuklarda, dijital tarama işlemi daha konforlu ve güvenli bir klinik deneyim sunmakta, tedaviye uyumu kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra dijital verilerin uzun süreli arşivlenebilmesi, laboratuvar ile iletişimin hızlanması, yeniden tarama ihtiyacının azalması ve çapraz enfeksiyon riskinin düşmesi gibi ek avantajlar da söz konusudur. Bu bölümde, intraoral dijital tarayıcıların özelliklerini, pediatrik diş hekimliğindeki mevcut ve potansiyel uygulamalarını ve güncel literatüre dayanarak klinik uygulamaya sağladıkları katkıları anlamaktadır.
Referanslar
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J . 2009;28(1):44-56. doi:10.4012/dmj.28.44
Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: Current systems and future possibilities. The Journal of the American Dental Association . 2006;137(9):1289-1296. doi:https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression. Ahad MdAR, ed. J Healthc Eng . 2017;2017:8427595. doi:10.1155/2017/8427595
Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig . 2012;17. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
Keleş Gülbahçe E, Şengün Berber E, Aykut Yetkiner A. Digital Dentistry Practices in Pediatric Dentistry. Journal of Ege University School of Dentistry . 2022;43(50):55-60. doi:10.5505/eudfd.2022.79058
Blatz M, Conejo J. The Current State of Chairside Digital Dentistry and Materials. Dent Clin North Am . 2019;63:175-197. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002
Hacker T, Heydecke G, Reissmann DR. Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens. J Dent . 2015;43(1):51-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013
Yılmaz H, Aydın MN. Çocuklarda dijital ve geleneksel ölçü yöntemi: konfor, tercih ve zaman. Uluslararası J Pediatr Dent. (2019) 29:728–35. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12566 11. Park S, Byun S, Oh S, Lee H, Kim J,
Cave V, Keys W. Digital and conventional impressions have similar working times. Evid Based Dent 2018;19:84-85.
Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2014;146(5):673-682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023
Serrano-Velasco D, Martín-Vacas A, Paz-Cortés MM, Giovannini G, Cintora-López P, Aragoneses JM. Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time—A systematic review. Front Pediatr . 2023;11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1213072
Gavounelis NA, Gogola CC, Halazonetis DJ. The effect of scanning strategy on intraoral scanner accuracy. Dentistry Journal. 2022;10(7):123. doi:10.3390/dj10070123.
Petrović V, Šlaj M, Buljan M, Morelato L, Zulijani A, Perić B. A comparison of dental arch width and length on 3D digital and plaster models. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(9):3572. doi:10.3390/app14093572.
Bosoni C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Souki BQ, Franchi L, Giuntini V. Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res . 2023;26(4):585-590. doi:10.1111/ocr.12648
Grünheid T, McCarthy S, Larson B. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2014;146:673-682.
Dhanotra KGS, Bhatia R. Digitainers—digital space maintainers: A review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(S1):S66-S72. doi:10.5005/jp-journals10005-2040
Soni HK. Application of CAD-CAM for fabrication of metal-free band and loop space maintainer. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(2):ZD14-ZD16. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/23459.9246
Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Lesti M, et al. Peek polymer in orthodontics: A pilot study on children. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e1271-e1275.
Han UK, Vig KWL, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 1991;100(3):212-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70058-5
Cuperus AMR, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JGJH, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: A validation study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2012;142(3):308-313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031
Quimby M, Vig K, Rashid R, Firestone A. The Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Made on Computer-Based Digital Models. Angle Orthod . 2004;74:298-303. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0298:TAAROM>2.0.CO;2
Nada S, Hasanin M, ElNaghy R. A critical evaluation of image superimposition in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2025;104(5):465-472. doi:10.1177/00220345241311263.
Patel J, Winters J, Walters M. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique for a Neonate With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal . 2019;56(8):1120-1123. doi:10.1177/1055665619835082
Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent . 2015;37(2):163-170.
Dursun E, Monnier-Da Costa A, Moussally C. Chairside CAD/CAM Composite Onlays for the Restoration Of Primary Molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent . 2018;42(5):349-354. doi:10.17796/1053-4625-42.5.5
Davidovich E, Dagon S, Tamari I, Etinger M, Mijiritsky E. An Innovative Treatment Approach Using Digital Workflow and CAD-CAM Part 2: The Restoration of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization in Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2020;17:1499. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051499
Mittal H, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A. Clinical Performance of Indirect Composite Onlays as Esthetic Alternative to Stainless Steel Crowns for Rehabilitation of a Large Carious Primary Molar. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry . 2016;40:345-352. doi:10.17796/1053-4628-40.5.345
Einhorn DuVall N, Wajdowicz M, Brewster J, Roberts H. Preparation ferrule design effect on endocrown failure resistance. J Prosthodont 2019;28:237–242.
Bilgin M, Erdem A, Tanrıver M. CAD/CAM Endocrown fabrication from a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network block for primary molar: A Case Report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;40:264-268.
Mehta D, Shah J, Thakkar B. Amelogenesis imperfecta: Four case reports. J Nat Sci Biol Med . 2013;4(2):462. doi:10.4103/0976-9668.116967
Witkop CJ. Hereditary Defects of Dentin. Dent Clin North Am . 1975;19(1):25-45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00655-3
Ergun G, Kaya BM, Egilmez F, Cekic-Nagas I. Functional and esthetic rehabilitation of a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta. J Can Dent Assoc . 2013;79:d38. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23763729
Masri R, Driscoll CF, eds. Clinical Applications of Digital Dental Technology . Wiley; 2015. doi:10.1002/9781119045564
Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent . 1991;1(2):150-154.
FEUERSTEIN P. Can technology help dentists deliver better patient care? The Journal of the American Dental Association . 2004;135:11S-16S. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0414
Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am . 2017;61 4:779-796. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:46656105
Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent . 2015;18(2):101-129.
Memari Y, Mohajerfar M, Armin A, Kamalian F, Rezayani V, Beyabanaki E. Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont . 2019;28(2):e536-e544. doi:10.1111/jopr.12800
Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health . 2014;14:10. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
Burhardt L, Livas C, Kerdijk W, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2016;150(2):261-267. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.027
Noirrit E, Chabreron O, Nasr K, Esclassan R. A contribution of CAD/CAM treatment of a dental trauma in a special care patient. Spec Care Dentist . 2018;38(1):55-57. doi:10.1111/scd.12261
Hazar Bodrumlu E, Çakmak Özlü F, Yılmaz H, Demiriz L. Investigating the effect of bruxism on maxillary arch length and width in children using three-dimensional digital model analysis. Prog Orthod . 2022;23(1). doi:10.1186/S40510-021-00396-Y,
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Wöstmann B, Uebereck CF, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Occlusal Caries Detection with Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparative Clinical Study. J Clin Med . 2024;13(4). doi:10.3390/JCM13040925,
Benli M, Öngül D, Karataşlı B, Gökçen Rohlig B. Comparison of fit parameters of crown restorations produced by digital and conventional methods. Journal of Ege University School of Dentistry . 2019;40(2):89-96. doi:10.5505/eudfd.2019.49354
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Schraml EM, Wöstmann B, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Improving the Communication of Dental Findings in Pediatric Dentistry by Using Intraoral Scans as a Visual Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Dent J (Basel) . 2024;12(1). doi:10.3390/DJ12010015,
Agrawal PV, Lahoti KR, Rathi N, Jagtap A, Tasgaonkar A, Kotnis R. 3D printed denture for a pediatric patient with complete anodontia: a case report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025;18(1):114–118. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3027.
Villarreal-Martínez K, Fierro-Serna V, Rosales-Berber MA, et al. Digital nasoalveolar molding through presurgical orthopedics in newborns/infants with cleft lip and palate: A comprehensive review and case study. Special Care in Dentistry . 2024;44(4):1074-1082. doi:10.1111/SCD.12989,
Referanslar
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J . 2009;28(1):44-56. doi:10.4012/dmj.28.44
Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: Current systems and future possibilities. The Journal of the American Dental Association . 2006;137(9):1289-1296. doi:https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression. Ahad MdAR, ed. J Healthc Eng . 2017;2017:8427595. doi:10.1155/2017/8427595
Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig . 2012;17. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
Keleş Gülbahçe E, Şengün Berber E, Aykut Yetkiner A. Digital Dentistry Practices in Pediatric Dentistry. Journal of Ege University School of Dentistry . 2022;43(50):55-60. doi:10.5505/eudfd.2022.79058
Blatz M, Conejo J. The Current State of Chairside Digital Dentistry and Materials. Dent Clin North Am . 2019;63:175-197. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002
Hacker T, Heydecke G, Reissmann DR. Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens. J Dent . 2015;43(1):51-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013
Yılmaz H, Aydın MN. Çocuklarda dijital ve geleneksel ölçü yöntemi: konfor, tercih ve zaman. Uluslararası J Pediatr Dent. (2019) 29:728–35. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12566 11. Park S, Byun S, Oh S, Lee H, Kim J,
Cave V, Keys W. Digital and conventional impressions have similar working times. Evid Based Dent 2018;19:84-85.
Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2014;146(5):673-682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023
Serrano-Velasco D, Martín-Vacas A, Paz-Cortés MM, Giovannini G, Cintora-López P, Aragoneses JM. Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time—A systematic review. Front Pediatr . 2023;11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1213072
Gavounelis NA, Gogola CC, Halazonetis DJ. The effect of scanning strategy on intraoral scanner accuracy. Dentistry Journal. 2022;10(7):123. doi:10.3390/dj10070123.
Petrović V, Šlaj M, Buljan M, Morelato L, Zulijani A, Perić B. A comparison of dental arch width and length on 3D digital and plaster models. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(9):3572. doi:10.3390/app14093572.
Bosoni C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Souki BQ, Franchi L, Giuntini V. Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res . 2023;26(4):585-590. doi:10.1111/ocr.12648
Grünheid T, McCarthy S, Larson B. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2014;146:673-682.
Dhanotra KGS, Bhatia R. Digitainers—digital space maintainers: A review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(S1):S66-S72. doi:10.5005/jp-journals10005-2040
Soni HK. Application of CAD-CAM for fabrication of metal-free band and loop space maintainer. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(2):ZD14-ZD16. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/23459.9246
Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Lesti M, et al. Peek polymer in orthodontics: A pilot study on children. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e1271-e1275.
Han UK, Vig KWL, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 1991;100(3):212-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70058-5
Cuperus AMR, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JGJH, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: A validation study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2012;142(3):308-313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031
Quimby M, Vig K, Rashid R, Firestone A. The Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Made on Computer-Based Digital Models. Angle Orthod . 2004;74:298-303. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0298:TAAROM>2.0.CO;2
Nada S, Hasanin M, ElNaghy R. A critical evaluation of image superimposition in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2025;104(5):465-472. doi:10.1177/00220345241311263.
Patel J, Winters J, Walters M. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique for a Neonate With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal . 2019;56(8):1120-1123. doi:10.1177/1055665619835082
Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent . 2015;37(2):163-170.
Dursun E, Monnier-Da Costa A, Moussally C. Chairside CAD/CAM Composite Onlays for the Restoration Of Primary Molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent . 2018;42(5):349-354. doi:10.17796/1053-4625-42.5.5
Davidovich E, Dagon S, Tamari I, Etinger M, Mijiritsky E. An Innovative Treatment Approach Using Digital Workflow and CAD-CAM Part 2: The Restoration of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization in Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2020;17:1499. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051499
Mittal H, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A. Clinical Performance of Indirect Composite Onlays as Esthetic Alternative to Stainless Steel Crowns for Rehabilitation of a Large Carious Primary Molar. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry . 2016;40:345-352. doi:10.17796/1053-4628-40.5.345
Einhorn DuVall N, Wajdowicz M, Brewster J, Roberts H. Preparation ferrule design effect on endocrown failure resistance. J Prosthodont 2019;28:237–242.
Bilgin M, Erdem A, Tanrıver M. CAD/CAM Endocrown fabrication from a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network block for primary molar: A Case Report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;40:264-268.
Mehta D, Shah J, Thakkar B. Amelogenesis imperfecta: Four case reports. J Nat Sci Biol Med . 2013;4(2):462. doi:10.4103/0976-9668.116967
Witkop CJ. Hereditary Defects of Dentin. Dent Clin North Am . 1975;19(1):25-45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00655-3
Ergun G, Kaya BM, Egilmez F, Cekic-Nagas I. Functional and esthetic rehabilitation of a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta. J Can Dent Assoc . 2013;79:d38. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23763729
Masri R, Driscoll CF, eds. Clinical Applications of Digital Dental Technology . Wiley; 2015. doi:10.1002/9781119045564
Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent . 1991;1(2):150-154.
FEUERSTEIN P. Can technology help dentists deliver better patient care? The Journal of the American Dental Association . 2004;135:11S-16S. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0414
Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am . 2017;61 4:779-796. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:46656105
Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent . 2015;18(2):101-129.
Memari Y, Mohajerfar M, Armin A, Kamalian F, Rezayani V, Beyabanaki E. Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont . 2019;28(2):e536-e544. doi:10.1111/jopr.12800
Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health . 2014;14:10. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
Burhardt L, Livas C, Kerdijk W, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2016;150(2):261-267. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.027
Noirrit E, Chabreron O, Nasr K, Esclassan R. A contribution of CAD/CAM treatment of a dental trauma in a special care patient. Spec Care Dentist . 2018;38(1):55-57. doi:10.1111/scd.12261
Hazar Bodrumlu E, Çakmak Özlü F, Yılmaz H, Demiriz L. Investigating the effect of bruxism on maxillary arch length and width in children using three-dimensional digital model analysis. Prog Orthod . 2022;23(1). doi:10.1186/S40510-021-00396-Y,
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Wöstmann B, Uebereck CF, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Occlusal Caries Detection with Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparative Clinical Study. J Clin Med . 2024;13(4). doi:10.3390/JCM13040925,
Benli M, Öngül D, Karataşlı B, Gökçen Rohlig B. Comparison of fit parameters of crown restorations produced by digital and conventional methods. Journal of Ege University School of Dentistry . 2019;40(2):89-96. doi:10.5505/eudfd.2019.49354
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Schraml EM, Wöstmann B, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Improving the Communication of Dental Findings in Pediatric Dentistry by Using Intraoral Scans as a Visual Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Dent J (Basel) . 2024;12(1). doi:10.3390/DJ12010015,
Agrawal PV, Lahoti KR, Rathi N, Jagtap A, Tasgaonkar A, Kotnis R. 3D printed denture for a pediatric patient with complete anodontia: a case report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025;18(1):114–118. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3027.
Villarreal-Martínez K, Fierro-Serna V, Rosales-Berber MA, et al. Digital nasoalveolar molding through presurgical orthopedics in newborns/infants with cleft lip and palate: A comprehensive review and case study. Special Care in Dentistry . 2024;44(4):1074-1082. doi:10.1111/SCD.12989,
