Rehabilitasyon
Özet
Larinks kanseri tedavisinde uygulanan cerrahi girişimler, hastanın yalnızca anatomik yapısını değil; konuşma, yutma, solunum ve koku gibi temel fonksiyonlarını da önemli ölçüde etkiler. Bu nedenle cerrahi sonrası rehabilitasyon süreci, hastaların fonksiyonel kazanımlarını ve yaşam kalitesini belirleyen kritik bir aşamadır. Total larinjektomi sonrası doğal ses kaynağı tamamen ortadan kalkarken, parsiyel larinjektomilerde neoglottik yapı ile sınırlı bir fonksiyon korunabilir. Ses rehabilitasyonunda özofageal konuşma, elektrolarenks ve özellikle günümüzde altın standart kabul edilen trakeoözofageal ses protezleri temel yöntemlerdir. Bunun yanında cerrahi sonrası ortaya çıkan disfaji, basınç dinamiklerindeki değişiklikler ve neofarengeal yapıya bağlı olarak gelişebilir; bu nedenle direnç temelli egzersiz programları ve modern rehabilitasyon cihazları yutma fonksiyonunun iyileştirilmesinde önemli rol oynar. Ayrıca trakeostomal solunumun pulmoner etkileri ve nazal hava akımının kesilmesine bağlı gelişen koku kaybı da rehabilitasyonun önemli bileşenlerindendir. Rehabilitasyon süreci multidisipliner bir yaklaşım gerektirir ve cerrahi teknik, faringoözofageal segment fonksiyonu, psikososyal durum ve sosyoekonomik faktörler başarıyı belirleyen önemli unsurlardır. Gelecekte gelişen biyolojik rekonstrüksiyon teknikleri ve hands-free konuşma sistemleri fonksiyonel restorasyonu daha ileri seviyeye taşıma potansiyeline sahiptir.
Surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer significantly alters not only the anatomical structures but also essential functions such as speech, swallowing, respiration, and olfaction. Therefore, postoperative rehabilitation plays a crucial role in restoring functional abilities and improving patients’ quality of life. Following total laryngectomy, the natural sound source is completely lost, whereas partial laryngectomy may preserve limited phonatory function through a neoglottic mechanism. Speech rehabilitation methods include esophageal speech, electrolarynx, and tracheoesophageal voice prostheses, which are currently considered the gold standard due to their high success rates. Postoperative dysphagia may occur as a result of altered pressure dynamics and structural changes in the neopharynx; thus, resistance-based exercise programs and modern rehabilitation devices have become important tools for improving swallowing function. In addition, pulmonary consequences of tracheostomal breathing and loss of nasal airflow leading to olfactory impairment represent important aspects of rehabilitation. Effective rehabilitation requires a multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, speech-language therapists, and other healthcare professionals. Surgical technique, pharyngoesophageal segment function, psychosocial status, and socioeconomic factors all influence rehabilitation outcomes. Emerging technologies, including hands-free speech systems and biological voice reconstruction techniques, may further enhance functional restoration in the future.
Referanslar
Mody MD, Rocco JW, Yom SS, et al. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2021;398(10318):2289-2299. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01550-6.
Rosa VM, Fores JML, da Silva EPF, et al. Interdisciplinary interventions in the perioperative rehabilitation of total laryngectomy: an integrative review. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73(suppl 1):e484s. doi:10.6061/clinics/2018/e484s.
Pfister D, Spencer S, Adelstein D, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: head and neck cancers. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2020;18(7):873-98.
Neijman M, Hilgers F, van den Brekel M, et al. Dysphagia After Total Laryngectomy: An Exploratory Study and Clinical Phase II Rehabilitation Trial with the Novel Swallowing Exercise Aid (SEA 2.0). Dysphagia. 2024;39(5):916-936. doi:10.1007/s00455-024-10673-7.
Ralli M, Angeletti D, D'Aguanno V, et al. Evaluation of Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Supracri- coid Laryngectomy and Rehabilitation Protocols. Clinica Terapeutica. 2021;172(4):363-368. doi:10.7417/ct.2021.2341.
Fantini M, Gallia M, Borrelli G, et al. Substitution Voice Rehabilitation After Open Partial Horizontal Laryngectomy Through the Proprioceptive Elastic Method (PROEL): A Preliminary Study. Journal of Voice. 2022;36(2):291.e1-291.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.025.
Doluoglu S, Camalan BV, Ozlugedik S. Mapping Scientific Trends and Collaboration Networks in Voice Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy. Journal of Voice. 2025;doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.10.025.
Neijman M, van Alphen MJA, van Son R, et al. Evaluation of post-laryngectomy dysphagia rehabilitation using High-Resolution impedance manometry: an exploratory study. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2025;282(11):5815-5827. doi:10.1007/s00405-025-09642-z.
Zenga J, Goldsmith T, Bunting G, et al. State of the art: Rehabilitation of speech and swallowing after total laryngectomy. Oral Oncology. 2018;86(38-47. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.023.
Pawlicki D, Gamrot-Wrzoł M, Sojat J, et al. Tracheoesophageal prostheses in voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Folia Medica Cracoviensia. 2025;65(2):127-142. doi:10.24425/fmc.2025.156130.
Nemr K, Raquel A, Takeshita-Monaretti T, et al. Scientific evidence regarding the quality of life of total laryngectomees. Arch Otolaryngol Rhinol. 2015;1(
Vartanian JG, Carrara-de-Angelis E, Kowalski LP. Practice of laryngectomy rehabilitation interventions: a perspective from South America. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. 2013;21(3):212-7. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e328361067b.
Stanisce L, McGlone M, Koshkareva Y, et al. Socioeconomic Influence on Speech Rehabilitation After Total Laryngectomy. Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2023;169(6):1499-1505. doi:10.1002/ohn.412.
Lewin JS, Baumgart LM, Barrow MP, et al. Device Life of the Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Revisited. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(1):65-71. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2771.
Laccourreye O, Ménard M, Crevier-Buchman L, et al. In situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications of the Provox voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(4):527-30. doi:10.1097/00005537-199704000-00018.
Borragán A, Lucchini E, Agudo M, et al. Il metodo propriocettivo elastico (PROEL) nella terapia vocale. Acta Phoniatrica Latina. 2008;30(1):18.
Maniaci A, Lavalle S, Mayo-Yanez M, et al. Videofluoroscopy-guided botulinum toxin for pharyngoesophageal spasm: a promising advance in laryngectomy rehabilitation. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2024;281(6):3305-3306. doi:10.1007/s00405-024-08554-8.
Lu Z, Li C, Chen J, et al. Infrahyoid Myocutaneous Flaps with Common Wall of Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Serosas for Voice Rehabilitation After Total Laryngectomy. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Le Journal d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale. 2024;53(19160216241301327. doi:10.1177/19160216241301327.
Liu H, Ng ML. Electrolarynx in voice rehabilitation. Auris, Nasus, Larynx. 2007;34(3):327-32. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2006.11.010.
Longobardi Y, Savoia V, Libero R, et al. Rehabilitation After Total Laryngectomy: An Integrated Protocol Remotely Delivered During COVID-19. Int J Telerehabil. 2023;15(1):e6548. doi:10.5195/ijt.2023.6548.
Maclean J, Cotton S, Perry A. Post-laryngectomy: it's hard to swallow: an Australian study of prevalence and self-reports of swallowing function after a total laryngectomy. Dysphagia. 2009;24(2):172-9. doi:10.1007/s00455-008-9189-5.
