3 Boyutlu Baskı Teknolojisiyle Üretilen Daimi Protetik Restorasyonlara Genel Bakış
Özet
Dijital diş hekimliği, özellikle bilgisayar destekli tasarım/bilgisayar destekli üretim (CAD/CAM) sistemlerinin gelişmesiyle hızlı bir ilerleme göstermiştir. Dijital diş hekimliğindeki en güncel yeniliklerden biri üç boyutlu (3B) baskı teknolojisidir. Üç boyutlu baskının diş hekimliği uygulamalarına entegrasyonu, materyal ve iş gücü maliyetlerinde azalma ile ilişkilendirilmiştir. Bu teknoloji, daha hızlı üretim süreleri sağlamakta ve dental ürünlerin talep üzerine üretilebilmesine olanak tanımaktadır (1).Bu amaçla çeşitli geçici ve/veya daimi kron ve köprüler, endokronlar, monolitik restorasyonlar üretilebilmektedir. Üç boyutlu (3B) baskı ile üretilen kron ve köprü restorasyonlarının, hem geçici hem de uzun dönem restorasyonlar olarak yeterli dayanıklılık gösterdiği çeşitli makalelerle de bildirilmiştir.
Referanslar
Lamiaa Hussein Abbas, Mariem Osama Wassel, Islam Tarek Hassan et al. 3D printed endocrowns versus prefabricated zirconia crowns for pulpotomized primary molars: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Dentistry, 153 (2025) 105556. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105556
Sina Jamshidi, Reza Darabi, Mohammad Azarian et al. Marginal fit of endocrowns fabricated by three‐dimensional printing and the conventional method: An in vitro study. Dental Research Journal 2023.
Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(9):1289–96. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
Tzanakakis E, Tzoutzas I, Kontonasaki E. Zirconia: contemporary views of a much talked material: structure, applications and clinical considerations. Hellenic Stomatolog Rev. 2013;57:101–37.
Kim SH, Yeo MY, Choi SY, Park EJ. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns depending on different marginal thicknesses. Materials. 2022;15(14):4861. doi: 10.3390/ma15144861
Rogina M. Hassan, Yomna Ibrahim, Rewaa G AboELHassan et al. Evaluation of fracture resistance and surface characteristics in monolithic zirconia: a comparative analysis of 3D printing and milling techniques. BMC Oral Health (2025) 25:1236 . doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06570-6
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971; 131: 107–111. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cura JA, Ten Cate JM. Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res. 2009; 43: 97–102. doi: 10.1159/000209341
El-Dessouky RA, Salama MM, Shakal MA, Korsel AM. Marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM zirconia- based crown during fabrication steps. Tanta Dent J. 2015; 12: 81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tdj.2014.12.002
Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014; 42: 199–209. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002
Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017; 9: 265–270. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi A. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013; 14: 118–129.
Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 364–367. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.030
Wei-Ting Chou, Chuan-Chung Chuang, Yi-Bing Wang et al.Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three dimensional printing. Plos One September 16, 2021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257158
Nagehan Aktaş, Yasemin Akın, Mert Ocak et al. Marginal and internal adaptation and absolute marginal discrepancy of 3D-printed, milled, and prefabricated crowns for primary molar teeth: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health (2025) 25:575. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05947-x
Referanslar
Lamiaa Hussein Abbas, Mariem Osama Wassel, Islam Tarek Hassan et al. 3D printed endocrowns versus prefabricated zirconia crowns for pulpotomized primary molars: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Dentistry, 153 (2025) 105556. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105556
Sina Jamshidi, Reza Darabi, Mohammad Azarian et al. Marginal fit of endocrowns fabricated by three‐dimensional printing and the conventional method: An in vitro study. Dental Research Journal 2023.
Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(9):1289–96. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
Tzanakakis E, Tzoutzas I, Kontonasaki E. Zirconia: contemporary views of a much talked material: structure, applications and clinical considerations. Hellenic Stomatolog Rev. 2013;57:101–37.
Kim SH, Yeo MY, Choi SY, Park EJ. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns depending on different marginal thicknesses. Materials. 2022;15(14):4861. doi: 10.3390/ma15144861
Rogina M. Hassan, Yomna Ibrahim, Rewaa G AboELHassan et al. Evaluation of fracture resistance and surface characteristics in monolithic zirconia: a comparative analysis of 3D printing and milling techniques. BMC Oral Health (2025) 25:1236 . doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06570-6
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971; 131: 107–111. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cura JA, Ten Cate JM. Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res. 2009; 43: 97–102. doi: 10.1159/000209341
El-Dessouky RA, Salama MM, Shakal MA, Korsel AM. Marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM zirconia- based crown during fabrication steps. Tanta Dent J. 2015; 12: 81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tdj.2014.12.002
Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014; 42: 199–209. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002
Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017; 9: 265–270. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi A. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013; 14: 118–129.
Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 364–367. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.030
Wei-Ting Chou, Chuan-Chung Chuang, Yi-Bing Wang et al.Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three dimensional printing. Plos One September 16, 2021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257158
Nagehan Aktaş, Yasemin Akın, Mert Ocak et al. Marginal and internal adaptation and absolute marginal discrepancy of 3D-printed, milled, and prefabricated crowns for primary molar teeth: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health (2025) 25:575. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05947-x
