Dental İmplant Dijital Ölçü Kayıt Tekniklerinde Güncel Yaklaşımlar
Özet
Referanslar
Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75-80.
González A, Monzón M, Paz R, vd. The evolution of digital technologies in dentistry: Latest updates, challenges and barriers. Open Res Europe. 2025;5:276. doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21242.1
Gogushev K, Abadjiev M. Conventional vs Digital Impressıon Technique For Manufacturing of Three-Unit Zirconia Bridges: Clinical Time Effıciency. J of IMAB. 2021;27(2):3765-71. doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2021272.3765
Dalal AM, Rathi S, Dhamande M. Digital impressions in dentistry. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2022;10(7):76-81.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, vd. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017:8427595. doi.org/10.1155/2017/8427595
Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, vd. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(10):1113-8. doi.org/10.1111/clr.12234
3Shape TRIOS 5 - The hygienic and easy-to-use intraoral scanner. 3Shape. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.3shape.com/en/scanners/trios-5 adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Ağız İçi Tarayıcılar: Modern Diş Tedavisinde Doğruluk ve Konfor. 3Mash. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://3mash.com/blog/agiz-ici-tarayicilar-modern-dis-tedavisinde-dogruluk-ve-konfor?srsltid=AfmBOorG-IWM3oxi3ZN1zwzyXXv6O94TR_erow12oOG6M4abt6pS1YVH adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Logozzo S, Zanetti E, Franceschini G, vd. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203-21. doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(3):343-52. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029
SCANBODY OP. Dynamic Abutment Solutions. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.dynamicabutment.com/scanbody-op/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
GM Implant Scanbody. Straumann Group. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://shop.straumann.com/neodent/tr/tr_tr/Protez-Yard%C4%B1mc%C4%B1lar%C4%B1/Tarama-bayraklar%C4%B1/GM-Scanbody/p/base_neo_gmscanbody adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Gómez-Polo M, Donmez MB, Çakmak, vd. Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: A systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(S2):165-80. doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13774
Lee JH, Jo JS, Lee SY. Digital impression accuracy for bone-level and tissue-level implants using scan bodies of different heights. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):37367. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20524-6.
Aktas A, Manav TY, Zortuk M. Effect of reusing impression posts and scan bodies on recording accuracy. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;133(5):1324.e1-1324.e7. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.007
Nowicki A, Osypko K. Complex Full-Arch Treatment with Zygomatic Implants, Fully Digital Protocol with Scan Flag Intraoral Scanning, and 3D-Printed Temporary Reconstructions in a Periodontal Patient-A Case Report. Biomedicines. 2024;12(11):2617. doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112617.
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Rutkunas V, vd. Classification of Complete-Arch Implant Scanning Techniques Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2025;37(1):236-43. doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13322.
Zhang T, Yang B, Ge R, vd. Effect of a Novel “Scan Body” on the In Vitro Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Implant Impressions. Int Dent J. 2024;74(4):847-54. doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2024.01.015
Pachiou A, Zervou E, Tsirogiannis P, vd. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(8):1205-17. doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13074
García-Martínez I, Zarauz C, Morejón B, vd. Influence of customized over-scan body rings on the intraoral scanning effectiveness of a multiple implant edentulous mandibular model. J Dent. 2022;122:104095. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104095.
Etxaniz O, Amezua X, Jauregi M, vd. Improving the accuracy of complete arch implant digital scans by using auxiliary clips for intraoral scan bodies: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(1):43-7. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.031.
Demirel M, Donmez MB, Şahmalı SM. Trueness and precision of mandibular complete-arch implant scans when different data acquisition methods are used. J Dent. 2023;138:104700. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104700.
Abdelrehim A, Etajuri EA, Sulaiman E, vd. Magnitude of misfit threshold in implant-supported restorations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(3):528-35. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.010.
Eldabe AK, Adel-Khattab D, Botros KH. Accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry in complete arch digital implant scanning: An in vivo prospective comparative study. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;S0022-3913(25)00294-X. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.041.
Hussein MO. Photogrammetry technology in implant dentistry: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023;130(3):318-26. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.015.
Photogrammetry. Ottawa Dental Laboratory. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.ottawadentallab.com/photogrammetry/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Ma B, Yue X, Sun Y, vd. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):636. doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, vd. Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(1):252-7. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.008.
Yüceer ÖM, Çevik P. Diş Hekimliğinde Fotogrametri: Geleneksel Derleme. Acta Odontologica Turcica. 2026;43(1):33-8. doi.org/ 10.17214/gaziaot.1353478
Tohme H, Lawand G, Eid R, vd. Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(21):9859. doi.org/10.3390/app11219859
Abuduwaili K, Huang R, Song J, vd. Comparison of photogrammetric imaging, intraoral scanning and conventional impression accuracy of full-arch dental implant rehabilitation: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):753. doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06029-8.
Clozza E. Intraoral scanning and dental photogrammetry for full-arch implant-supported prosthesis: A technique. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024;14(4):244-9. doi.org/10.1002/cap.10269.
Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Laureti A, vd. Image-guided photogrammetry accuracy: In vitro evaluation of an implant-supported complete arch digital scanning technology. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;134(3):818-28. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.047.
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, vd. Accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using intraoral and extraoral photogrammetry systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(6):2508-14. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.041.
Negreiros WM, Akhondi S, Quiles HK, vd. Photogrammetry in Implant Dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2025;70 Suppl 1:S15-24. doi.org/10.1111/adj.70028.
Shining3D Intraoral Photogrammetry. CAD-Ray. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.cad-ray.com/product/shining3d-aoralscan-elite-ios-wireless-intraoral-photogrammetry/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
The Power of Photogrammetry in Full-Arch Implant Restorations. DESS. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.dess-usa.com/blog/the-power-of-photogrammetry-in-fullarch-implant-restorations/?srsltid=AfmBOoqcQkcTEDc0MUUdFmN1bnzY_5PLZLAoEdkN5F45FxMHtfeyRYij adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Sánchez-Monescillo A, Hernanz-Martín J, González-Serrano C, vd. All-on-four rehabilitation using photogrammetric impression technique. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(4):288-93. doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a42098.
Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Agustín-Panadero R, Bagán L, vd. Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(4):e366-371. doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19365.
Referanslar
Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75-80.
González A, Monzón M, Paz R, vd. The evolution of digital technologies in dentistry: Latest updates, challenges and barriers. Open Res Europe. 2025;5:276. doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21242.1
Gogushev K, Abadjiev M. Conventional vs Digital Impressıon Technique For Manufacturing of Three-Unit Zirconia Bridges: Clinical Time Effıciency. J of IMAB. 2021;27(2):3765-71. doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2021272.3765
Dalal AM, Rathi S, Dhamande M. Digital impressions in dentistry. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2022;10(7):76-81.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, vd. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017:8427595. doi.org/10.1155/2017/8427595
Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, vd. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(10):1113-8. doi.org/10.1111/clr.12234
3Shape TRIOS 5 - The hygienic and easy-to-use intraoral scanner. 3Shape. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.3shape.com/en/scanners/trios-5 adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Ağız İçi Tarayıcılar: Modern Diş Tedavisinde Doğruluk ve Konfor. 3Mash. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://3mash.com/blog/agiz-ici-tarayicilar-modern-dis-tedavisinde-dogruluk-ve-konfor?srsltid=AfmBOorG-IWM3oxi3ZN1zwzyXXv6O94TR_erow12oOG6M4abt6pS1YVH adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Logozzo S, Zanetti E, Franceschini G, vd. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203-21. doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(3):343-52. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029
SCANBODY OP. Dynamic Abutment Solutions. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.dynamicabutment.com/scanbody-op/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
GM Implant Scanbody. Straumann Group. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://shop.straumann.com/neodent/tr/tr_tr/Protez-Yard%C4%B1mc%C4%B1lar%C4%B1/Tarama-bayraklar%C4%B1/GM-Scanbody/p/base_neo_gmscanbody adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Gómez-Polo M, Donmez MB, Çakmak, vd. Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: A systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(S2):165-80. doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13774
Lee JH, Jo JS, Lee SY. Digital impression accuracy for bone-level and tissue-level implants using scan bodies of different heights. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):37367. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20524-6.
Aktas A, Manav TY, Zortuk M. Effect of reusing impression posts and scan bodies on recording accuracy. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;133(5):1324.e1-1324.e7. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.007
Nowicki A, Osypko K. Complex Full-Arch Treatment with Zygomatic Implants, Fully Digital Protocol with Scan Flag Intraoral Scanning, and 3D-Printed Temporary Reconstructions in a Periodontal Patient-A Case Report. Biomedicines. 2024;12(11):2617. doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112617.
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Rutkunas V, vd. Classification of Complete-Arch Implant Scanning Techniques Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2025;37(1):236-43. doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13322.
Zhang T, Yang B, Ge R, vd. Effect of a Novel “Scan Body” on the In Vitro Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Implant Impressions. Int Dent J. 2024;74(4):847-54. doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2024.01.015
Pachiou A, Zervou E, Tsirogiannis P, vd. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(8):1205-17. doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13074
García-Martínez I, Zarauz C, Morejón B, vd. Influence of customized over-scan body rings on the intraoral scanning effectiveness of a multiple implant edentulous mandibular model. J Dent. 2022;122:104095. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104095.
Etxaniz O, Amezua X, Jauregi M, vd. Improving the accuracy of complete arch implant digital scans by using auxiliary clips for intraoral scan bodies: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(1):43-7. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.031.
Demirel M, Donmez MB, Şahmalı SM. Trueness and precision of mandibular complete-arch implant scans when different data acquisition methods are used. J Dent. 2023;138:104700. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104700.
Abdelrehim A, Etajuri EA, Sulaiman E, vd. Magnitude of misfit threshold in implant-supported restorations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(3):528-35. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.010.
Eldabe AK, Adel-Khattab D, Botros KH. Accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry in complete arch digital implant scanning: An in vivo prospective comparative study. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;S0022-3913(25)00294-X. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.041.
Hussein MO. Photogrammetry technology in implant dentistry: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023;130(3):318-26. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.015.
Photogrammetry. Ottawa Dental Laboratory. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.ottawadentallab.com/photogrammetry/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Ma B, Yue X, Sun Y, vd. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):636. doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, vd. Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(1):252-7. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.008.
Yüceer ÖM, Çevik P. Diş Hekimliğinde Fotogrametri: Geleneksel Derleme. Acta Odontologica Turcica. 2026;43(1):33-8. doi.org/ 10.17214/gaziaot.1353478
Tohme H, Lawand G, Eid R, vd. Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(21):9859. doi.org/10.3390/app11219859
Abuduwaili K, Huang R, Song J, vd. Comparison of photogrammetric imaging, intraoral scanning and conventional impression accuracy of full-arch dental implant rehabilitation: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):753. doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06029-8.
Clozza E. Intraoral scanning and dental photogrammetry for full-arch implant-supported prosthesis: A technique. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024;14(4):244-9. doi.org/10.1002/cap.10269.
Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Laureti A, vd. Image-guided photogrammetry accuracy: In vitro evaluation of an implant-supported complete arch digital scanning technology. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;134(3):818-28. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.047.
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, vd. Accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using intraoral and extraoral photogrammetry systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(6):2508-14. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.041.
Negreiros WM, Akhondi S, Quiles HK, vd. Photogrammetry in Implant Dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2025;70 Suppl 1:S15-24. doi.org/10.1111/adj.70028.
Shining3D Intraoral Photogrammetry. CAD-Ray. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.cad-ray.com/product/shining3d-aoralscan-elite-ios-wireless-intraoral-photogrammetry/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
The Power of Photogrammetry in Full-Arch Implant Restorations. DESS. (11/02/2026 tarihinde https://www.dess-usa.com/blog/the-power-of-photogrammetry-in-fullarch-implant-restorations/?srsltid=AfmBOoqcQkcTEDc0MUUdFmN1bnzY_5PLZLAoEdkN5F45FxMHtfeyRYij adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Sánchez-Monescillo A, Hernanz-Martín J, González-Serrano C, vd. All-on-four rehabilitation using photogrammetric impression technique. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(4):288-93. doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a42098.
Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Agustín-Panadero R, Bagán L, vd. Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(4):e366-371. doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19365.
