Mikrobiyolojide Hayvan Modellerine Etik ve Pratik Bir Alternatif Olarak Hücre Kültürü
Özet
Bu bölüm, veteriner mikrobiyolojisinde hayvan modellerine etik ve pratik bir alternatif olarak hücre kültürünü ele almaktadır. Geleneksel hayvan deneylerinin sınırlılıklarını —etik kaygılar, yüksek maliyetler ve sınırlı klinik uygulama değeri— vurgulamakla birlikte, “hücre kültürü, tanımlanmış bir besin ortamında hücrelerin, fibroblastların veya dokuların in vitro çoğaltılması anlamına gelir” ifadesini öne çıkarmaktadır. Bu bölümde, hücre kültürünün gelişimi gözden geçirilmekte ve zorunlu hücre içi patojenlerin izolasyonu, aşı ve antijen üretimi, antimikrobiyal duyarlılık testlerinin gerçekleştirilmesi ve toksisitenin değerlendirilmesindeki uygulamaları özetlenmektedir. Kontaminasyon, hücre hattının özgünlüğü ve sınırlı çok hücreli karmaşıklık gibi süregelen zorluklar da tartışılmaktadır. Genel olarak, bu bölüm hücre kültürünü veteriner mikrobiyolojinin geleceğini şekillendiren çok yönlü, tekrarlanabilir ve etik açıdan tercih edilebilir bir platform olarak konumlandırmaktadır.
This chapter explores cell culture as an ethical and practical alternative to animal models in veterinary microbiology. It highlights the limitations of traditional animal experimentation—ethical concerns, high costs, and limited translational value—while emphasising that “cell culture refers to the in vitro propagation of cells, fibroblasts, or tissues in a defined nutrient environment.” The chapter reviews the evolution of cell culture and outlines its applications in isolating obligate intracellular pathogens, producing vaccines and antigens, performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and assessing toxicity. Persistent challenges, including contamination, cell line authenticity, and limited multicellular complexity, are also discussed. Overall, the chapter positions cell culture as a versatile, reproducible, and ethically preferable platform shaping the future of veterinary microbiology.
Referanslar
Younes N, Nasrallah GK. Editorial: Unconventional animal models in infectious disease research – Part I. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2021;11. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.759621
Domínguez-Oliva A, Hernández-Ávalos I, Martı́nez-Burnes J, ve ark. The importance of animal models in biomedical research: current ınsights and applications. Animals. 2023;13(7): 1223. doi:10.3390/ani13071223
Vashishat A, Patel P, Gupta GD, ve ark. alternatives of animal models for biomedical research: a comprehensive review of modern approaches. Steam Cell Review and Reports. 2024;20(4): 881-899. doi:10.1007/s12015-024-10701-x
Hammad S, Othman A, Abdel‐Wareth AAA, ve ark. From basic research to applied veterinary sciences: current status, challenges and perspectives. Archives of Toxicology. 2018;92: 2141-2143. doi:10.1007/s00204-018-2204-1
Segeritz CP, Vallier L. Cell Culture. Jalali M (Ed.) Basic Science Methods for Clinical Researchers içinde. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2016. p. 151-172.
Moro LG, Guarnier LP, Azevedo MF, ve ark. A brief history of cell culture: from Harrison to organs-on-a-chip. Cells. 2024;13(24), 2068. doi:10.3390/cells13242068
Nessar A, Röhrs V, Ziersch M, ve ark. Promoting ethical and reproducible cell culture: implementing animal-free alternatives to teaching in molecular and cell biology. Frontiers. 2025;7, 1670513. doi:10.3389/ftox.2025.1670513
Zhao C. Cell culture: in vitro model system and a promising path to in vivo applications. Journal of Histotechnology 2023;46(1), 1-4. doi:10.1080/01478885.2023.2170772
Arunachalam K, Sreeja PS. Cell Culture Techniques. Arunachalam K, Sreeja PS (Ed.), Advanced Cell and Molecular Techniques içinde. New Jersey: Humana press; 2025. p. 3-12.
Houpikian P, Raoult D. traditional and molecular techniques for the study of emerging bacterial diseases: one laboratory’s perspective. Emerging infectious diseases. 2002;8(2), 122. doi:10.3201/eid0802.010141
Toslak EE, Padron B, Denizli O, ve ark. Current comparison of the efficacy vero and BHK-21 cell lines in the isolation of Chlamydia abortus. Eurasian journal of veterinary sciences. 2025;41, 1-9. doi:10.63673/eurasianjvetsci.459
Ballav S, Deshmukh AJ, Siddiqui S, ve ark. two-dimensional and three-dimensional cell culture and their applications. Zhan X (Ed.), Cell Culture -Advanced Technology and Applications in Medical and Life Sciences içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2021. p 39-45.
Луценко Т. Directions of developing new technologies based on cultivation of animal cells and tissues. Biotechnologia Acta. 2024;17(1), 20-28. doi:10.15407/biotech17.01.020
Salauddin Md. A brief concept of cell culture: challenges, prospects and applications. Zhan X (Ed.), Cell Culture - Advanced Technology and Applications in Medical and Life Sciences içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2021. p 1-14.
Jedrzejczak-Silicka M. History of Cell Culture. Gowder SJT (Ed.), New Insights into Cell Culture Technology içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2017. p 1-9.
Tanasescu AM. Cell culture techniques and practices to avoid contamination by fungi and bacteria in the research cell culture laboratory. J. Vis. Exp. 2023;197, e64769. doi:10.3791/64769
Knight KL. The evolution of tissue culture. Nature Medicine. 2008;14(7): 710. doi:10.1038/nm0708-710
Taylor MW. A history of cell culture. Viruses and Man: A History of Interactions içinde. New York: Springer; 2014. p 41-52.
Agustina‐Hernández M, Francés‐Herrero E, Gómez‐Álvarez M, ve ark. Biotechnological progresses in modelling the human endometrium: the evolution of current in vitro techniques and emerging trends. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2024; 12: 1495338. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1495338
Liu G, David BT, Trawczynski M, ve ark. Advances in pluripotent stem cells: history, mechanisms, technologies, and applications. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2019;16(1): 3–20. doi:10.1007/s12015-019-09935-x
Blair K, Wray J, Smith A. The liberation of embryonic stem cells. PLoS Genetics. 2011;7(4): e1002019. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002019
Klein SG, Steckbauer A, Alsolami S, ve ark. Toward best practices for controlling mammalian cell culture environments. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2022;10: 788808. doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.788808
Kim JH. Determination of safe levels and toxic levels for feed hazardous materials in broiler chickens: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 2023;65(3): 490–502. doi:10.5187/jast.2023.e26
Sakat S, Bagade OM, Mhaske G, ve ark. Significance of animal experimentation in biomedical research in the current era: narrative review. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2022;12(1): 2–10. doi:10.7324/JAPS.2022.121002-1
Stokes WS. Humane endpoints for laboratory animals used in regulatory testing. ILAR Journal. 2002;43(Suppl 1): 31–38. doi:10.1093/ilar.43.suppl_1.s31
Sántha M. Biologia futura: animal testing in drug development—the past, the present and the future. Biologia Futura. 2020;71(4): 443–454. doi:10.1007/s42977-020-00050-4
Taylor K, Alvarez LR. An estimate of the number of animals used for scientific purposes worldwide in 2015. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2019;47: 196–213. doi:10.1177/0261192919899853
Hubrecht R, Carter E. The 3Rs and humane experimental technique: implementing change. Animals. 2019;9(10): 754. doi:10.3390/ani9100754
Kaito C, Murakami K, Imai L, ve ark. Animal infection models using non-mammals. Microbiology and Immunology. 2020;64(9): 585–598. doi10.1111/1348-0421.12834
Hossain MI, Saleh NUA, Numan A, ve ark. Bombyx mori as a model for Niallia circulans pathogenicity. Drug Discoveries & Therapeutics. 2023;17(1): 18–26. doi:10.5582/ddt.2022.01112
Akhtar A. The flaws and human harms of animal experimentation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2015;24(4): 407–419. doi:10.1017/s0963180115000079
Pamies D. guidance document on good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0. ALTEX. 2021;38(1): 176–224. doi:10.14573/altex.2111011
Deepika D, Bharti K, Sharma S, ve ark. Advancing human health risk assessment: the role of new approach methodologies. Frontiers in Toxicology. 2025;7:1632941. doi:10.3389/ftox.2025.1632941
Suárez-Martínez E, Suazo-Sanchez I, Celis-Romero M, ve ark. 3D and organoid culture in research: physiology, hereditary genetic diseases and cancer. Cell & Bioscience. 2022;12(1): 39. doi:10.1186/s13578-022-00775-w
Caccamo PD, Brun YV. The molecular basis of noncanonical bacterial morphology. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26(3): 191–204. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.012
Bastawecy IM, Abdelmonem M, Afify AF, ve ark. Viral contamination in cell culture: analyzing the impact of Epstein–Barr virus and Ovine herpesvirus 2. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2025;16: 1442321. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1442321. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1442321
Gray AR, Wood BA, Henry E, ve ark. Evaluation of cell lines for the isolation of foot-and-mouth disease virus and other viruses causing vesicular disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;7: 426. doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00426
Martínez-Gutierrez M, Barrera GA, Aponte S, ve ark. Differentiation of an adult neuron cell line increases susceptibility to rabies infection. Biomédica. 2004;24(1): 97–104. doi:10.7705/biomedica.v24i1.1253
Bussell RH, Karzon DT. Canine distemper virus in primary and continuous cell lines of human and monkey origin. Archives of Virology. 1965;17(2): 183–192. doi:10.1007/BF01267905
Ammerman NC, Beier-Sexton M, Azad AF. Growth and maintenance of Vero cell lines. Current Protocols in Microbiology. 2008;11(1): 1–7. doi:10.1002/9780471729259.mca04es111
Balevi A, İlban A, Padron B, ve ark. Comparative analysis of Neospora caninum ısolation success from various fetal tissues: the importance of brain samples. Technical note. Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ. 2024; 35(2): 7. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4850984
Meguro H, Bryant JD, Torrence AE, ve ark. Canine kidney cell line for isolation of respiratory viruses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1979;9(2): 175–179. doi:10.1128/jcm.9.2.175-179.1979
Johnson JC, Rosenbusch RF. Effect of host cell on the in vitro characteristics expressed by two bovine viral diarrhea virus strains. Veterinary Microbiology. 1990;21(4): 319–329. doi:10.1016/0378-1135(90)90003-E
Sohaimi NM, Ugwu CC. The importance and challenges of primary chicken embryo liver cells in studies of poultry viral diseases: a review. Journal of World’s Poultry Research. 2023;13(4): xxx–xxx. doi:10.36380/jwpr.2023.39
Kawaguchi T, Nomura K, Hirayama Y, ve ark. Establishment and characterization of a chicken hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, LMH. Cancer Research. 1987;47(16): 4460–4464.
Ohmine T, Narai S, Matsubara T, ve ark. Eligibility of feline calicivirus for a surrogate of human norovirus in comparison with murine norovirus, poliovirus and coxsackievirus. Biocontrol Science. 2018;23(3): 145–152. doi:10.4265/bio.23.145
Brindhalakshmi B. Isolation and molecular characterization of canine and feline parvovirus strains: an updated review. Journal of Dairy Veterinary & Animal Research. 2016;3(5): 93–100. doi:10.15406/jdvar.2016.03.00093
Croy TR, Kuo CC, Wang SP. Comparative susceptibility of eleven mammalian cell lines to infection with trachoma organisms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1975;1(5): 434–439. doi:10.1128/jcm.1.5.434-439.1975
Bell-Sakyi L, Hartley C, Khoo JJ, ve ark. New cell lines derived from European tick species. Microorganisms. 2022;10(6): 1086. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10061086
Ying-Jin S, Yuste I, González-Burgos E, ve ark. Fabrication of organ-on-a-chip using microfluidics. Bioprinting. 2025;46: e00394. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2025.e00394
McKim JM. Building a tiered approach to in vitro predictive toxicity screening: a focus on assays with in vivo relevance. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 2010;13(2): 188–206. doi:10.2174/138620710790596736
Lakhan SE. In silico research is rewriting the rules of drug development: is it the end of human trials? Cureus. 2025;17(5): e84007. doi:10.7759/cureus.84007
Philippeos C, Hughes RD, Dhawan A, ve ark. Introduction to cell culture. Mitry RR, Hughes RD (Eds.) Human Cell Culture Protocols içinde. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2011. p. 1–13.
Chandra V, Tiwari A, Pant KK, ve ark. Animal cell culture: basics and applications. Verma P (Ed.) Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology içinde. London: Springer; 2022. p. 691–720.
Killekar K, Puranik SI, Ghagane SC, ve ark. Overview of primary cell culture models in preclinical research of prostate and bladder cancer. Zhan X (Ed.) Cell Culture - Advanced Technology and Applications in Medical and Life Sciences içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2021. p. 12-17.
Price PJ. Best practices for media selection for mammalian cells. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Animal. 2017;53(8): 673–681. doi:10.1007/s11626-017-0186-6
Rønning SB, Pedersen ME, Bjørnerud E. Emerging food trends: cellular agriculture—novel food production technology. Hassoun A (Ed.), Food Industry 4.0 içinde. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2024. p. 233–246.
Brunmaier LAE, Walker TW. Chemically defined medium formulation and adaptation method for supporting growth of endothelial cells. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1): 19226. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19226-w
Perez-Diaz N, Hoffman E, Clements J, ve ark. Longitudinal characterization of TK6 cells sequentially adapted to animal product-free, chemically defined culture medium: considerations for genotoxicity studies. Frontiers in Toxicology. 2023;5: 1177586. doi:10.3389/ftox.2023.1177586
Dayeh VR, Bols NC, Tanneberger K, ve ark. The use of fish-derived cell lines for investigation of environmental contaminants: an update following OECD’s fish toxicity testing framework No. 171. Current Protocols in Toxicology. 2013;56(1): 1-5. doi:10.1002/0471140856.tx0105s56
Tung VSK, Mathews F, Boruk M, ve ark. Cultured mesenchymal cells from nasal turbinate as a cellular model of the neurodevelopmental component of schizophrenia etiology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(20): 15339. doi:10.3390/ijms242015339
Michl J, Park KC, Swietach P. Evidence-based guidelines for controlling pH in mammalian live-cell culture systems. Communications Biology. 2019;2: 144. doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0393-7
Rubio NR, Datar I, Stachura DL, ve ark. Cell-based fish: a novel approach to seafood production and an opportunity for cellular agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2019;3: 43. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00043
Wang J, Wei Y, Zhao S, ve ark. The analysis of viability for mammalian cells treated at different temperatures and its application in cell shipment. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4): e0176120. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176120
DeBusschere BD, Borkholder DA, Kovacs GTA. Design of an integrated silicon-PDMS cell cartridge. Solid-State, Actuators, and Microsystems Workshop Technical Digest. 1998: 358–361. doi:10.31438/trf.hh1998.83
Huang M, Hu MZ, Cai G, ve ark. Overcoming ice: cutting-edge materials and advanced strategies for effective cryopreservation of biosamples. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1): 187. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03265-6
Freitas-Ribeiro S, Reis RL, Pirraco RP. Long-term and short-term preservation strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products: state of the art and emerging trends. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1(4): 212. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac212
Gurruchaga H, Burgo LS, Hernández RM, ve ark. Advances in the slow freezing cryopreservation of microencapsulated cells. Journal of Controlled Release. 2018;281: 119–138. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.016
Geraghty RJ, Capes-Davis A, Davis JM, ve ark. Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research. British Journal of Cancer. 2014;111(6): 1021–1046. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.166
Talebipour A, Saviz M, Vafaiee M, ve ark. Facilitating long-term cell examinations and time-lapse recordings in cell biology research with CO₂ mini-incubators. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1): 3418. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52866-y
Meganck RM, Baric RS. Developing therapeutic approaches for twenty-first-century emerging infectious viral diseases. Nature Medicine. 2021;27: 401-410. doi:10.17615/brbs-1836
Fasciano AC, Mecsas J, Isberg RR. New age strategies to reconstruct mucosal tissue colonization and growth in cell culture systems. Microbiology Spectrum. 2019;7(2): 13–19. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.bai-0013-2019
Omsland A, Hackstadt T, Heinzen RA. Bringing culture to the uncultured: Coxiella burnetii and lessons for obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens. PLoS Pathogens. 2013;9(9): 1003540. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003540
Sarshar M, Scribano D, Tranquilli G, ve ark. A simple, fast and reliable scan-based technique as a novel approach to quantify intracellular bacteria. BMC Microbiology. 2019;19(1): 1625. doi:10.1186/s12866-019-1625-1
Urzì O, Gasparro R, Costanzo E, ve ark. Three-dimensional cell cultures: the bridge between in vitro and in vivo models. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(15): 12046. doi:10.3390/ijms241512046
Gómez-Osorio LM, Penagos-Tabares F, Bošnjak-Neumuller J, ve ark. Porcine proliferative enteropathy: overview of disease dynamics and non-antibiotic alternatives for prevention and control strategies. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025;12: 1596316. doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1596316
Toledo-Perona R, Contreras A, Gomis J, Quereda JJ, García-Galán A, Sánchez A, ve ark. Controlling Coxiella burnetii in naturally infected sheep, goats and cows, and public health implications: a scoping review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024;11: 1321553. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1321553
Vanderhoeven E, Mosmann J, Díaz A, ve ark. Enzootic activity of Chlamydia in farms located in a hotspot area for zoonosis emergence. Research Square. 2021. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1014196/v1
Rohde G, Straube E, Essig A, ve ark. Chlamydial zoonoses. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2010;107(10): 174–180. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0174
Sachse K, Vretou E, Livingstone M, ve ark. Recent developments in the laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Veterinary Microbiology. 2008;135(2): 2–21. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.040
Caspe SG, Hill H. Chlamydiosis in animals. Animals. 2024;14(21): 3130. doi: 10.3390/ani14213130
Atif FA. Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum: Rickettsiales pathogens of veterinary and public health significance. Parasitology Research. 2015;114(11): 3941–3957. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4698-2
Saito TB, Walker DH. Ehrlichioses: an important One Health opportunity. Veterinary Sciences. 2016;3(3): 20. doi:10.3390/vetsci3030020
Biggs HM, Behravesh CB, Bradley K, ve ark. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group rickettsioses, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 2016;65(2): 1–44. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6502a1
Wilson J, Breitschwerdt EB, Juhasz NB, ve ark. Novel Rickettsia species infecting dogs, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2020;26(12): 3011–3014. doi:10.3201/eid2612.200272
Zhang Y, Sun YQ, Chen J, ve ark. Mapping the global distribution of spotted fever group rickettsiae: a systematic review with modelling analysis. The Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(1): 12–25. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00212-6
Wasik MA, Eichwald L, Genzel Y, ve ark. Cell culture-based production of defective interfering particles for influenza antiviral therapy. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;102(3): 1167–1180. doi:10.1007/s00253-017-8660-3
Rodrigues AF, Soares HR, Guerreiro MR, ve ark. Viral vaccines and their manufacturing cell substrates: new trends and designs in modern vaccinology. Biotechnology Journal. 2015;10(9): 1329–1344. doi:10.1002/biot.201400387
Metwally S, Viljoen G, El Idrissi A. Veterinary Vaccines: Principles and Applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2021.
Long CM, Beare PA, Cockrell DC, ve ark. Contributions of lipopolysaccharide and the type IVB secretion system to Coxiella burnetii vaccine efficacy and reactogenicity. npj Vaccines. 2021;6(1): 29. doi:10.1038/s41541-021-00296-6
Peyrusson F, Nguyen TK, Buyck JM, ve ark. In vitro models for the study of the intracellular activity of antibiotics. Verstraeten N, Michiels J (Eds.), Methods in Molecular Biology içinde. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2021; p. 239-251.
Chiaraviglio L, Kang Y, Kirby JE. High throughput, real-time, dual-readout testing of intracellular antimicrobial activity and eukaryotic cell cytotoxicity. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2016;117: 54841. doi:10.3791/54841
Barcia-Macay M, Seral C, Mingeot-Leclercq M, ve ark. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the intracellular activities of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in a model of THP-1 macrophages. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2006;50(3): 841–851. doi:10.1128/AAC.50.3.841-851.2006
Kang JY, Kim D, Mun SY, ve ark. Evaluating the immunomodulation effects of live lactic acid bacteria from kimchi on Transwell Caco-2 monolayer permeability. Food Bioscience. 2025;68: 106462. doi:10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106462
Schumacher A, Vranken T, Malhotra A, ve ark. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods: agar dilution to 3D tissue-engineered models. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2018;37(2): 187–208. doi:10.1007/s10096-017-3089-2
López-Jiménez AT, Mostowy S. Emerging technologies and infection models in cellular microbiology. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1): 6520. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26641-w
Schoonen WGEJ, Westerink WMA, Roos JADM de, Débiton E. Cytotoxic effects of 100 reference compounds on Hep G2 and HeLa cells and of 60 compounds on ECC-1 and CHO cells. I. Mechanistic assays on ROS, glutathione depletion and calcein uptake. Toxicology in Vitro. 2005;19(4): 505–516. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2005.01.003
Vinken M, Blaauboer BJ. In vitro testing of basal cytotoxicity: establishment of an adverse outcome pathway from chemical insult to cell death. Toxicology in Vitro. 2017;39: 104–110. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.12.004
Niles AL, Moravec RA, Riss T. In vitro viability and cytotoxicity testing and same-well multi-parametric combinations for high throughput screening. Current Chemical Genomics. 2009;3: 33–41. doi:10.2174/1875397300903010033
Pamies D. Good cell culture practice for stem cells and stem-cell-derived models. Toxicology Letters. 2017;280: 80-81. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.07.196
Drexler HG, Uphoff CC. Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures: incidence, sources, effects, detection, elimination, prevention. Cytotechnology. 2002;39(2): 75–90. doi:10.1023/A:1022913015916
Horváth P, Aulner N, Bickle M, ve ark. Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2016;15(11): 751–769. doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.175
Zhang Q, Li J, Middleton A, ve ark. Bridging the data gap from in vitro toxicity testing to chemical safety assessment through computational modeling. Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6: 261. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00261
Referanslar
Younes N, Nasrallah GK. Editorial: Unconventional animal models in infectious disease research – Part I. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2021;11. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.759621
Domínguez-Oliva A, Hernández-Ávalos I, Martı́nez-Burnes J, ve ark. The importance of animal models in biomedical research: current ınsights and applications. Animals. 2023;13(7): 1223. doi:10.3390/ani13071223
Vashishat A, Patel P, Gupta GD, ve ark. alternatives of animal models for biomedical research: a comprehensive review of modern approaches. Steam Cell Review and Reports. 2024;20(4): 881-899. doi:10.1007/s12015-024-10701-x
Hammad S, Othman A, Abdel‐Wareth AAA, ve ark. From basic research to applied veterinary sciences: current status, challenges and perspectives. Archives of Toxicology. 2018;92: 2141-2143. doi:10.1007/s00204-018-2204-1
Segeritz CP, Vallier L. Cell Culture. Jalali M (Ed.) Basic Science Methods for Clinical Researchers içinde. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2016. p. 151-172.
Moro LG, Guarnier LP, Azevedo MF, ve ark. A brief history of cell culture: from Harrison to organs-on-a-chip. Cells. 2024;13(24), 2068. doi:10.3390/cells13242068
Nessar A, Röhrs V, Ziersch M, ve ark. Promoting ethical and reproducible cell culture: implementing animal-free alternatives to teaching in molecular and cell biology. Frontiers. 2025;7, 1670513. doi:10.3389/ftox.2025.1670513
Zhao C. Cell culture: in vitro model system and a promising path to in vivo applications. Journal of Histotechnology 2023;46(1), 1-4. doi:10.1080/01478885.2023.2170772
Arunachalam K, Sreeja PS. Cell Culture Techniques. Arunachalam K, Sreeja PS (Ed.), Advanced Cell and Molecular Techniques içinde. New Jersey: Humana press; 2025. p. 3-12.
Houpikian P, Raoult D. traditional and molecular techniques for the study of emerging bacterial diseases: one laboratory’s perspective. Emerging infectious diseases. 2002;8(2), 122. doi:10.3201/eid0802.010141
Toslak EE, Padron B, Denizli O, ve ark. Current comparison of the efficacy vero and BHK-21 cell lines in the isolation of Chlamydia abortus. Eurasian journal of veterinary sciences. 2025;41, 1-9. doi:10.63673/eurasianjvetsci.459
Ballav S, Deshmukh AJ, Siddiqui S, ve ark. two-dimensional and three-dimensional cell culture and their applications. Zhan X (Ed.), Cell Culture -Advanced Technology and Applications in Medical and Life Sciences içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2021. p 39-45.
Луценко Т. Directions of developing new technologies based on cultivation of animal cells and tissues. Biotechnologia Acta. 2024;17(1), 20-28. doi:10.15407/biotech17.01.020
Salauddin Md. A brief concept of cell culture: challenges, prospects and applications. Zhan X (Ed.), Cell Culture - Advanced Technology and Applications in Medical and Life Sciences içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2021. p 1-14.
Jedrzejczak-Silicka M. History of Cell Culture. Gowder SJT (Ed.), New Insights into Cell Culture Technology içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2017. p 1-9.
Tanasescu AM. Cell culture techniques and practices to avoid contamination by fungi and bacteria in the research cell culture laboratory. J. Vis. Exp. 2023;197, e64769. doi:10.3791/64769
Knight KL. The evolution of tissue culture. Nature Medicine. 2008;14(7): 710. doi:10.1038/nm0708-710
Taylor MW. A history of cell culture. Viruses and Man: A History of Interactions içinde. New York: Springer; 2014. p 41-52.
Agustina‐Hernández M, Francés‐Herrero E, Gómez‐Álvarez M, ve ark. Biotechnological progresses in modelling the human endometrium: the evolution of current in vitro techniques and emerging trends. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2024; 12: 1495338. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1495338
Liu G, David BT, Trawczynski M, ve ark. Advances in pluripotent stem cells: history, mechanisms, technologies, and applications. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2019;16(1): 3–20. doi:10.1007/s12015-019-09935-x
Blair K, Wray J, Smith A. The liberation of embryonic stem cells. PLoS Genetics. 2011;7(4): e1002019. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002019
Klein SG, Steckbauer A, Alsolami S, ve ark. Toward best practices for controlling mammalian cell culture environments. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2022;10: 788808. doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.788808
Kim JH. Determination of safe levels and toxic levels for feed hazardous materials in broiler chickens: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 2023;65(3): 490–502. doi:10.5187/jast.2023.e26
Sakat S, Bagade OM, Mhaske G, ve ark. Significance of animal experimentation in biomedical research in the current era: narrative review. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2022;12(1): 2–10. doi:10.7324/JAPS.2022.121002-1
Stokes WS. Humane endpoints for laboratory animals used in regulatory testing. ILAR Journal. 2002;43(Suppl 1): 31–38. doi:10.1093/ilar.43.suppl_1.s31
Sántha M. Biologia futura: animal testing in drug development—the past, the present and the future. Biologia Futura. 2020;71(4): 443–454. doi:10.1007/s42977-020-00050-4
Taylor K, Alvarez LR. An estimate of the number of animals used for scientific purposes worldwide in 2015. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2019;47: 196–213. doi:10.1177/0261192919899853
Hubrecht R, Carter E. The 3Rs and humane experimental technique: implementing change. Animals. 2019;9(10): 754. doi:10.3390/ani9100754
Kaito C, Murakami K, Imai L, ve ark. Animal infection models using non-mammals. Microbiology and Immunology. 2020;64(9): 585–598. doi10.1111/1348-0421.12834
Hossain MI, Saleh NUA, Numan A, ve ark. Bombyx mori as a model for Niallia circulans pathogenicity. Drug Discoveries & Therapeutics. 2023;17(1): 18–26. doi:10.5582/ddt.2022.01112
Akhtar A. The flaws and human harms of animal experimentation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2015;24(4): 407–419. doi:10.1017/s0963180115000079
Pamies D. guidance document on good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0. ALTEX. 2021;38(1): 176–224. doi:10.14573/altex.2111011
Deepika D, Bharti K, Sharma S, ve ark. Advancing human health risk assessment: the role of new approach methodologies. Frontiers in Toxicology. 2025;7:1632941. doi:10.3389/ftox.2025.1632941
Suárez-Martínez E, Suazo-Sanchez I, Celis-Romero M, ve ark. 3D and organoid culture in research: physiology, hereditary genetic diseases and cancer. Cell & Bioscience. 2022;12(1): 39. doi:10.1186/s13578-022-00775-w
Caccamo PD, Brun YV. The molecular basis of noncanonical bacterial morphology. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26(3): 191–204. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.012
Bastawecy IM, Abdelmonem M, Afify AF, ve ark. Viral contamination in cell culture: analyzing the impact of Epstein–Barr virus and Ovine herpesvirus 2. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2025;16: 1442321. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1442321. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1442321
Gray AR, Wood BA, Henry E, ve ark. Evaluation of cell lines for the isolation of foot-and-mouth disease virus and other viruses causing vesicular disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;7: 426. doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00426
Martínez-Gutierrez M, Barrera GA, Aponte S, ve ark. Differentiation of an adult neuron cell line increases susceptibility to rabies infection. Biomédica. 2004;24(1): 97–104. doi:10.7705/biomedica.v24i1.1253
Bussell RH, Karzon DT. Canine distemper virus in primary and continuous cell lines of human and monkey origin. Archives of Virology. 1965;17(2): 183–192. doi:10.1007/BF01267905
Ammerman NC, Beier-Sexton M, Azad AF. Growth and maintenance of Vero cell lines. Current Protocols in Microbiology. 2008;11(1): 1–7. doi:10.1002/9780471729259.mca04es111
Balevi A, İlban A, Padron B, ve ark. Comparative analysis of Neospora caninum ısolation success from various fetal tissues: the importance of brain samples. Technical note. Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ. 2024; 35(2): 7. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4850984
Meguro H, Bryant JD, Torrence AE, ve ark. Canine kidney cell line for isolation of respiratory viruses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1979;9(2): 175–179. doi:10.1128/jcm.9.2.175-179.1979
Johnson JC, Rosenbusch RF. Effect of host cell on the in vitro characteristics expressed by two bovine viral diarrhea virus strains. Veterinary Microbiology. 1990;21(4): 319–329. doi:10.1016/0378-1135(90)90003-E
Sohaimi NM, Ugwu CC. The importance and challenges of primary chicken embryo liver cells in studies of poultry viral diseases: a review. Journal of World’s Poultry Research. 2023;13(4): xxx–xxx. doi:10.36380/jwpr.2023.39
Kawaguchi T, Nomura K, Hirayama Y, ve ark. Establishment and characterization of a chicken hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, LMH. Cancer Research. 1987;47(16): 4460–4464.
Ohmine T, Narai S, Matsubara T, ve ark. Eligibility of feline calicivirus for a surrogate of human norovirus in comparison with murine norovirus, poliovirus and coxsackievirus. Biocontrol Science. 2018;23(3): 145–152. doi:10.4265/bio.23.145
Brindhalakshmi B. Isolation and molecular characterization of canine and feline parvovirus strains: an updated review. Journal of Dairy Veterinary & Animal Research. 2016;3(5): 93–100. doi:10.15406/jdvar.2016.03.00093
Croy TR, Kuo CC, Wang SP. Comparative susceptibility of eleven mammalian cell lines to infection with trachoma organisms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1975;1(5): 434–439. doi:10.1128/jcm.1.5.434-439.1975
Bell-Sakyi L, Hartley C, Khoo JJ, ve ark. New cell lines derived from European tick species. Microorganisms. 2022;10(6): 1086. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10061086
Ying-Jin S, Yuste I, González-Burgos E, ve ark. Fabrication of organ-on-a-chip using microfluidics. Bioprinting. 2025;46: e00394. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2025.e00394
McKim JM. Building a tiered approach to in vitro predictive toxicity screening: a focus on assays with in vivo relevance. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 2010;13(2): 188–206. doi:10.2174/138620710790596736
Lakhan SE. In silico research is rewriting the rules of drug development: is it the end of human trials? Cureus. 2025;17(5): e84007. doi:10.7759/cureus.84007
Philippeos C, Hughes RD, Dhawan A, ve ark. Introduction to cell culture. Mitry RR, Hughes RD (Eds.) Human Cell Culture Protocols içinde. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2011. p. 1–13.
Chandra V, Tiwari A, Pant KK, ve ark. Animal cell culture: basics and applications. Verma P (Ed.) Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology içinde. London: Springer; 2022. p. 691–720.
Killekar K, Puranik SI, Ghagane SC, ve ark. Overview of primary cell culture models in preclinical research of prostate and bladder cancer. Zhan X (Ed.) Cell Culture - Advanced Technology and Applications in Medical and Life Sciences içinde. London: IntechOpen; 2021. p. 12-17.
Price PJ. Best practices for media selection for mammalian cells. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Animal. 2017;53(8): 673–681. doi:10.1007/s11626-017-0186-6
Rønning SB, Pedersen ME, Bjørnerud E. Emerging food trends: cellular agriculture—novel food production technology. Hassoun A (Ed.), Food Industry 4.0 içinde. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2024. p. 233–246.
Brunmaier LAE, Walker TW. Chemically defined medium formulation and adaptation method for supporting growth of endothelial cells. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1): 19226. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19226-w
Perez-Diaz N, Hoffman E, Clements J, ve ark. Longitudinal characterization of TK6 cells sequentially adapted to animal product-free, chemically defined culture medium: considerations for genotoxicity studies. Frontiers in Toxicology. 2023;5: 1177586. doi:10.3389/ftox.2023.1177586
Dayeh VR, Bols NC, Tanneberger K, ve ark. The use of fish-derived cell lines for investigation of environmental contaminants: an update following OECD’s fish toxicity testing framework No. 171. Current Protocols in Toxicology. 2013;56(1): 1-5. doi:10.1002/0471140856.tx0105s56
Tung VSK, Mathews F, Boruk M, ve ark. Cultured mesenchymal cells from nasal turbinate as a cellular model of the neurodevelopmental component of schizophrenia etiology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(20): 15339. doi:10.3390/ijms242015339
Michl J, Park KC, Swietach P. Evidence-based guidelines for controlling pH in mammalian live-cell culture systems. Communications Biology. 2019;2: 144. doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0393-7
Rubio NR, Datar I, Stachura DL, ve ark. Cell-based fish: a novel approach to seafood production and an opportunity for cellular agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2019;3: 43. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00043
Wang J, Wei Y, Zhao S, ve ark. The analysis of viability for mammalian cells treated at different temperatures and its application in cell shipment. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4): e0176120. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176120
DeBusschere BD, Borkholder DA, Kovacs GTA. Design of an integrated silicon-PDMS cell cartridge. Solid-State, Actuators, and Microsystems Workshop Technical Digest. 1998: 358–361. doi:10.31438/trf.hh1998.83
Huang M, Hu MZ, Cai G, ve ark. Overcoming ice: cutting-edge materials and advanced strategies for effective cryopreservation of biosamples. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1): 187. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03265-6
Freitas-Ribeiro S, Reis RL, Pirraco RP. Long-term and short-term preservation strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products: state of the art and emerging trends. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1(4): 212. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac212
Gurruchaga H, Burgo LS, Hernández RM, ve ark. Advances in the slow freezing cryopreservation of microencapsulated cells. Journal of Controlled Release. 2018;281: 119–138. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.016
Geraghty RJ, Capes-Davis A, Davis JM, ve ark. Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research. British Journal of Cancer. 2014;111(6): 1021–1046. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.166
Talebipour A, Saviz M, Vafaiee M, ve ark. Facilitating long-term cell examinations and time-lapse recordings in cell biology research with CO₂ mini-incubators. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1): 3418. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52866-y
Meganck RM, Baric RS. Developing therapeutic approaches for twenty-first-century emerging infectious viral diseases. Nature Medicine. 2021;27: 401-410. doi:10.17615/brbs-1836
Fasciano AC, Mecsas J, Isberg RR. New age strategies to reconstruct mucosal tissue colonization and growth in cell culture systems. Microbiology Spectrum. 2019;7(2): 13–19. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.bai-0013-2019
Omsland A, Hackstadt T, Heinzen RA. Bringing culture to the uncultured: Coxiella burnetii and lessons for obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens. PLoS Pathogens. 2013;9(9): 1003540. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003540
Sarshar M, Scribano D, Tranquilli G, ve ark. A simple, fast and reliable scan-based technique as a novel approach to quantify intracellular bacteria. BMC Microbiology. 2019;19(1): 1625. doi:10.1186/s12866-019-1625-1
Urzì O, Gasparro R, Costanzo E, ve ark. Three-dimensional cell cultures: the bridge between in vitro and in vivo models. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(15): 12046. doi:10.3390/ijms241512046
Gómez-Osorio LM, Penagos-Tabares F, Bošnjak-Neumuller J, ve ark. Porcine proliferative enteropathy: overview of disease dynamics and non-antibiotic alternatives for prevention and control strategies. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025;12: 1596316. doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1596316
Toledo-Perona R, Contreras A, Gomis J, Quereda JJ, García-Galán A, Sánchez A, ve ark. Controlling Coxiella burnetii in naturally infected sheep, goats and cows, and public health implications: a scoping review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024;11: 1321553. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1321553
Vanderhoeven E, Mosmann J, Díaz A, ve ark. Enzootic activity of Chlamydia in farms located in a hotspot area for zoonosis emergence. Research Square. 2021. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1014196/v1
Rohde G, Straube E, Essig A, ve ark. Chlamydial zoonoses. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2010;107(10): 174–180. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0174
Sachse K, Vretou E, Livingstone M, ve ark. Recent developments in the laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Veterinary Microbiology. 2008;135(2): 2–21. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.040
Caspe SG, Hill H. Chlamydiosis in animals. Animals. 2024;14(21): 3130. doi: 10.3390/ani14213130
Atif FA. Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum: Rickettsiales pathogens of veterinary and public health significance. Parasitology Research. 2015;114(11): 3941–3957. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4698-2
Saito TB, Walker DH. Ehrlichioses: an important One Health opportunity. Veterinary Sciences. 2016;3(3): 20. doi:10.3390/vetsci3030020
Biggs HM, Behravesh CB, Bradley K, ve ark. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group rickettsioses, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 2016;65(2): 1–44. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6502a1
Wilson J, Breitschwerdt EB, Juhasz NB, ve ark. Novel Rickettsia species infecting dogs, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2020;26(12): 3011–3014. doi:10.3201/eid2612.200272
Zhang Y, Sun YQ, Chen J, ve ark. Mapping the global distribution of spotted fever group rickettsiae: a systematic review with modelling analysis. The Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(1): 12–25. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00212-6
Wasik MA, Eichwald L, Genzel Y, ve ark. Cell culture-based production of defective interfering particles for influenza antiviral therapy. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;102(3): 1167–1180. doi:10.1007/s00253-017-8660-3
Rodrigues AF, Soares HR, Guerreiro MR, ve ark. Viral vaccines and their manufacturing cell substrates: new trends and designs in modern vaccinology. Biotechnology Journal. 2015;10(9): 1329–1344. doi:10.1002/biot.201400387
Metwally S, Viljoen G, El Idrissi A. Veterinary Vaccines: Principles and Applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2021.
Long CM, Beare PA, Cockrell DC, ve ark. Contributions of lipopolysaccharide and the type IVB secretion system to Coxiella burnetii vaccine efficacy and reactogenicity. npj Vaccines. 2021;6(1): 29. doi:10.1038/s41541-021-00296-6
Peyrusson F, Nguyen TK, Buyck JM, ve ark. In vitro models for the study of the intracellular activity of antibiotics. Verstraeten N, Michiels J (Eds.), Methods in Molecular Biology içinde. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2021; p. 239-251.
Chiaraviglio L, Kang Y, Kirby JE. High throughput, real-time, dual-readout testing of intracellular antimicrobial activity and eukaryotic cell cytotoxicity. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2016;117: 54841. doi:10.3791/54841
Barcia-Macay M, Seral C, Mingeot-Leclercq M, ve ark. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the intracellular activities of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in a model of THP-1 macrophages. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2006;50(3): 841–851. doi:10.1128/AAC.50.3.841-851.2006
Kang JY, Kim D, Mun SY, ve ark. Evaluating the immunomodulation effects of live lactic acid bacteria from kimchi on Transwell Caco-2 monolayer permeability. Food Bioscience. 2025;68: 106462. doi:10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106462
Schumacher A, Vranken T, Malhotra A, ve ark. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods: agar dilution to 3D tissue-engineered models. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2018;37(2): 187–208. doi:10.1007/s10096-017-3089-2
López-Jiménez AT, Mostowy S. Emerging technologies and infection models in cellular microbiology. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1): 6520. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26641-w
Schoonen WGEJ, Westerink WMA, Roos JADM de, Débiton E. Cytotoxic effects of 100 reference compounds on Hep G2 and HeLa cells and of 60 compounds on ECC-1 and CHO cells. I. Mechanistic assays on ROS, glutathione depletion and calcein uptake. Toxicology in Vitro. 2005;19(4): 505–516. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2005.01.003
Vinken M, Blaauboer BJ. In vitro testing of basal cytotoxicity: establishment of an adverse outcome pathway from chemical insult to cell death. Toxicology in Vitro. 2017;39: 104–110. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.12.004
Niles AL, Moravec RA, Riss T. In vitro viability and cytotoxicity testing and same-well multi-parametric combinations for high throughput screening. Current Chemical Genomics. 2009;3: 33–41. doi:10.2174/1875397300903010033
Pamies D. Good cell culture practice for stem cells and stem-cell-derived models. Toxicology Letters. 2017;280: 80-81. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.07.196
Drexler HG, Uphoff CC. Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures: incidence, sources, effects, detection, elimination, prevention. Cytotechnology. 2002;39(2): 75–90. doi:10.1023/A:1022913015916
Horváth P, Aulner N, Bickle M, ve ark. Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2016;15(11): 751–769. doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.175
Zhang Q, Li J, Middleton A, ve ark. Bridging the data gap from in vitro toxicity testing to chemical safety assessment through computational modeling. Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6: 261. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00261
