Anatomical Variations of the Mandibular Canal and Their Clinical Significance
Özet
The mandibular canal (MC) is a bilateral intraosseous structure that contains the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle and plays a critical role in dental and maxillofacial procedures. Although typically described as a single canal, several anatomical variations may be observed, including bifid and trifid canals, the retromolar canal, mandibular incisive canal, accessory mental foramen, anterior loop, and lingual foramina. These variations arise mainly from embryological developmental patterns and may significantly influence surgical and anesthetic interventions. Failure to recognize such variations can result in neurovascular injury, hemorrhage, neurosensory disturbances, or inadequate inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia. With the increasing use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), detection of these variations has improved substantially, as CBCT provides high-resolution three-dimensional imaging and accurate visualization of canal morphology and branching configurations. Therefore, careful preoperative assessment of the MC and its anatomical variations is essential for procedures such as implant placement, third molar extraction, and orthognathic surgery. Systematic identification and appropriate radiological evaluation help minimize iatrogenic complications, enhance treatment planning, and improve overall patient safety and clinical outcomes in contemporary dental practice.
Mandibular kanal (MK), inferior alveolar nörovasküler demeti içeren bilateral intraosseöz bir yapıdır ve dental ile maksillofasiyal işlemlerde kritik bir rol oynar. Genellikle tek bir kanal olarak tanımlansa da bifid ve trifid kanallar, retromolar kanal, mandibular insiziv kanal, aksesuar mental foramen, anterior loop ve lingual foramenler gibi çeşitli anatomik varyasyonlar gözlenebilmektedir. Bu varyasyonlar çoğunlukla embriyolojik gelişim paternlerinden kaynaklanır ve cerrahi ile anestezik girişimleri önemli ölçüde etkileyebilir. Bu varyasyonların fark edilmemesi nörovasküler yaralanma, hemoraji, nörosensöriyel bozukluklar veya yetersiz inferior alveolar sinir bloğu anestezisine yol açabilir. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografinin (KIBT) kullanımının artmasıyla birlikte, yüksek çözünürlüklü üç boyutlu görüntüleme ve kanal morfolojisi ile dallanma paternlerinin doğru şekilde değerlendirilmesi sayesinde bu varyasyonların saptanma oranı belirgin şekilde artmıştır. Bu nedenle implant yerleştirilmesi, üçüncü molar çekimi ve ortognatik cerrahi gibi işlemler öncesinde mandibular kanalın ve anatomik varyasyonlarının dikkatli bir şekilde preoperatif değerlendirilmesi büyük önem taşır. Sistematik tanımlama ve uygun radyolojik inceleme, iyatrojenik komplikasyonları azaltmaya, tedavi planlamasını geliştirmeye ve modern diş hekimliği pratiğinde hasta güvenliği ile klinik başarıyı artırmaya katkı sağlar.
Referanslar
Ocak A. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the anatomical variations in mandibular lingual foramen: a strobe retrospective cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(52):e43138. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000043138.
Hayati K, Putri TA. Prevalence of bifid and trifid mandibular canal by panoramic radiograph at RSGM Unsyiah Banda Aceh: data from April 2012 to March 2017. J Syiah Kuala Dent Soc. 2020;5(1):37–41.
Borghesi A, Bondioni MP. Unilateral triple mandibular canal with double mandibular foramen: cone-beam computed tomography findings of an unexpected anatomical variant. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021;80(2):471–5. doi:10.5603/FM.a2020.0057.
Chávez-Lomeli ME, Mansilla Lory J, Pompa JA, et al. The human mandibular canal arises from three separate canals innervating different tooth groups. J Dent Res. 1996;75(8):1540–4. doi:10.1177/00220345960750080401.
Sarkar S, Mondal S. Bifid mandibular canals: a case report and mini review. J Clin Adv Dent. 2020;4(1):6–8.
Shan S, Zhong S, Li J, Wang T. Systematic review and meta-analysis of mandibular canal variations on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2022;38(4):445–51. doi:10.1007/s11282-022-00610-5.
Rashsuren O, Choi JW, Han WJ, et al. Assessment of bifid and trifid mandibular canals using CBCT. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(3):229–36. doi:10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.229.
Yang X, Lyu C, Zou D. Bifid mandibular canals incidence and anatomical variations by CBCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41(4):535–40. doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000561.
Iwanaga J, Kikuta S, Tanaka T, Kamura Y, Tubbs RS. Review of risk assessment of major anatomical variations in clinical dentistry. Clin Anat. 2019;32(5):672–7.
Altındağ A, Yalın H, Yüksel İB. Pattern diversity and prevalence of bifid mandibular canal: a CBCT-based cross-sectional study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025;29(1):110. doi:10.1007/s10006-025-01409-4.
Leite GM, Lana JP, de Carvalho Machado V, et al. Anatomic variations and lesions of the mandibular canal detected by cone beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(8):795–804. doi:10.1007/s00276-013-1247-5.
Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:155–9.
Kalantar Motamedi MH, Navi F, Sarabi N. Bifid mandibular canals: prevalence and implications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:387–90. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.011.
Rodella LF, Buffoli B, Labanca M, et al. A review of the mandibular and maxillary nerve supplies and their clinical relevance. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57(4):323–34. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.09.007.
Kqiku L, Weiglein AH, Pertl C, et al. Histology and intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(6):1013–6. doi:10.1007/s00784-010-0459-x.
Iliescu VI, Cismaş SC, Truţă RI, et al. Bifid mandibular canal: a case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2021;62(2):633–6.
Iwanaga J, Takeshita Y, Matsushita Y, et al. What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44:1–10.
von Arx T, Bornstein MM. The bifid mandibular canal in three-dimensional radiography: morphologic and quantitative characteristics. Swiss Dent J. 2021;131(1):10–28.
Shah N, Murtadha L, Brown J. Bifurcation of the inferior dental nerve canal: an anatomical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56(4):267–71.
Shen EC, Fu E, Fu MJ, Peng M. Configuration and corticalization of the mandibular bifid canal in a Taiwanese adult population: a computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(4):893–7.
Zhou X, Gao X, Zhang J. Bifid mandibular canals: CBCT assessment and macroscopic observation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42:1073–9.
Miličević A, Salarić I, Đanić P, et al. Anatomical variations of the bifid mandibular canal on panoramic radiographs. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021;55(3):248–55.
Okumuş Ö, Dumlu A. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canal according to gender, type and side. J Dent Sci. 2019;14(2):126–33. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2019.03.009.
Fu E, Peng M, Chiang CY, et al. Bifid mandibular canals and associated factors: CT evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(2):e64–7. doi:10.1111/clr.12049.
Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, et al. Incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans using CBCT. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(1):53–60. doi:10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.53.
Do Q, Shen D, Ohyama H, Tubbs RS, Iwanaga J. A rare case of trifid mandibular canal with bilateral retromolar foramina. Anat Cell Biol. 2020;53(4):504–7. doi:10.5115/acb.20.153.
Choi YY, Han SS. Double mandibular foramen leading to accessory canal. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(9):851–5. doi:10.1007/s00276-014-1310-x.
Potu BK, Jagadeesan S, Bhat KM, Sirasanagandla SR. Retromolar foramen and canal: a comprehensive review. Morphologie. 2013;97(317):31–7.
Bilecenoğlu B, Tuncer N. Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(10):1493–7.
Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, et al. Observation of the retromolar foramen and canal: CBCT and macroscopic study. Oral Radiol. 2012;28(1):10–4.
Meechan JG. How to overcome failed local anaesthesia. Br Dent J. 1999;186(1):15–20.
Tomrukçu DN. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine başvuran hastalarda retromolar foramen görülme sıklığı ve anatomik yapısı [uzmanlık tezi]. Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi; 2018.
Ayesha RT, Pachipulusu B, Govindaraju P. Assessment of prevalence and position of mandibular incisive canal using CBCT. Tzu Chi Med J. 2019;32(2):205–10. doi:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_76_19.
Rosa MB, Sotto-Maior BS, Machado VDC, Francischone CE. Retrospective study of the anterior loop and incisive canal using CBCT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(2):388–92. doi:10.11607/jomi.2648.
Ghoncheh Z, Moghaddam Zadeh B, Shaeri S. Prevalence and position of mandibular incisive canal, anterior loop and lingual foramen using CBCT. J Craniomaxillofac Res. 2020;6(4):3283. doi:10.18502/jcr.v6i4.3283.
Marin S, Abdihodžić D, Milinković N, et al. Bifid mandibular canal assessment and its relevance to local anesthesia. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2025;25(3):183–90. doi:10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.3.183.
