Tarım ve Hava Kirliliği
Özet
Tarımsal faaliyetlerden kaynaklanan hava kirliliği ile endüstriyel ve kentsel kökenli kirleticilerin tarım ve çevre üzerindeki etkilerinin artmasıyla birlikte, bitki büyüme ve gelişimini doğrudan veya dolaylı yollarla etkileyerek gıda üretimini, ürün kalitesini ve gıda güvenliğini tehdit eder hale gelmiştir. Ayrıca artan nüfus, enerji üretimi, ulaşım, atık yönetimi ve biyokütle yakımı gibi faaliyetler sonucunda atmosfere salınan organik ve inorganik kirleticilerin miktarı önemli ölçüde artmış; birçok bölgede hava kalitesi kabul edilebilir sınırların üzerine çıkmıştır. Bu durum, hava kalitesinin iyileştirilmesine yönelik etkili ve bütüncül müdahalelerin gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bölümün birinci kısmında, hava kirliliği ile tarımsal üretim ve küresel gıda güvenliği arasındaki karmaşık ve çift yönlü ilişki ele alınmıştır. Sanayileşme ve kentleşmeyle artan troposferik ozon (yer seviyesindeki O3), partikül madde (PM2,5 ve PM10; aerodinamik çapı sırasıyla ≤2,5 µm ve ≤10 µm olan solunabilir ince ve kaba parçacıklar), azot oksitler (NOₓ), kükürt dioksit (SO2) ile tarım kaynaklı amonyak (NH3) ve uçucu organik bileşiklerin (VOC’ler) agroekosistemler üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Özellikle troposferik ozonun fotosentezi baskılaması sonucu buğday ve soya gibi temel ürünlerde ortaya çıkan verim kayıpları ile partikül maddenin toprak ve bitki sağlığı üzerindeki doğrudan ve dolaylı etkileri ayrıntılı olarak incelenmiştir. Ayrıca asit yağışları ve azot çökelimi gibi süreçlerin toprak verimliliği, su kalitesi ve ekosistem dengesi üzerindeki etkileri, gıda güvenliğinin dört temel boyutu olan bulunabilirlik, erişilebilirlik, kullanım ve istikrar çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir. Bölümün ikinci kısmında, söz konusu baskıların azaltılmasına yönelik bütüncül çözüm ve azaltım stratejileri ele alınmıştır. Entegre politika yaklaşımları, endüstriyel emisyon kontrol teknolojileri ve düşük emisyonlu ulaşım sistemleri gibi makro düzey önlemlerin yanı sıra; hassas tarım uygulamaları, geliştirilmiş gübre yönetimi ve yenilikçi üretim teknikleri gibi tarımsal stratejiler ile kentsel planlamada yeşil altyapının rolü tartışılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, hava kalitesi yönetiminin sürdürülebilir tarım ve gıda güvenliği politikalarının ayrılmaz bir bileşeni olduğu vurgulanmakta; dayanıklı ve sürdürülebilir gıda sistemlerinin oluşturulabilmesi için sektörler arası eşgüdüm, gelişmiş izleme sistemleri ve paydaş katılımının kritik öneme sahip olduğu ortaya konmaktadır.
Air pollution originating agricultural activities and the increasing impact of industrial and urban pollutants on agriculture and the environment are directly or indirectly affecting plant growth and development, thus threatening food production, product quality, and food security. Furthermore increasing human population growth and its activities due to population growth and increased activities such as energy generation, transportation, waste management, and biomass burning, the release of organic and inorganic pollutants into the atmosphere has risen substantially, and air quality in many regions has exceeded acceptable threshold levels. This situation underscores the urgent need for effective and integrated interventions to improve air quality. The first part of this chapter examines the complex and bidirectional relationship between air pollution, agricultural production, and global food security. The impacts of ground-level ozone (O3); particulate matter (PM2,5 and PM10; defined as inhalable fine and coarse particles with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 µm and ≤10 µm, respectively); nitrogen oxides (NOₓ); sulfur dioxide (SO2); and agriculturally derived ammonia (NH3) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on agroecosystems are evaluated. Particular attention is given to yield losses in staple crops such as wheat and soybean resulting from the suppression of photosynthesis by tropospheric ozone, as well as to the direct and indirect effects of particulate matter on soil and plant health. In addition, the consequences of processes such as acid deposition and nitrogen deposition for soil fertility, water quality, and ecosystem balance are assessed within the framework of the four fundamental dimensions of food security: availability, access, utilization, and stability. The second part of the chapter addresses integrated mitigation and adaptation strategies aimed at reducing these pressures. In addition to macro-level measures such as integrated policy approaches, industrial emission control technologies, and low-emission transportation systems, agricultural strategiesincluding precision agriculture, improved fertilizer management, and innovative production techniques are discussed, along with the role of green infrastructure in urban planning. In conclusion, air quality management is emphasized as an integral component of sustainable agriculture and food security policies. Achieving resilient and sustainable food systems requires cross-sectoral coordination, advanced monitoring systems, and active stakeholder engagement.
Referanslar
Izah SC, Ogwu MC, Shahsavani A, et al. Understanding the One Health Implications of Air Pollution. In: Air Pollutants in the Context of One Health: Fundamentals, Sources, and Impacts. Cham: Springer Nature; 2024. p. 161–185.
Liang L, Wang Z, Li J. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;237: 117649.
Alawi OA, Kamar HM, Alsuwaiyan A, et al. Temporal trends and predictive modeling of air pollutants in Delhi: A comparative study of artificial intelligence models. Scientific Reports. 2024;14: 30957.
Sharma M, Singh K, Gautam AS, et al. Longitudinal study of air pollutants in Indian metropolises: Seasonal patterns and urban variability. Aerosol Science and Engineering. 2024;9: 320–335.
Richard G, Sawyer WE, Sharipov A. Environmental Impacts of Air Pollution. In: Sustainable Strategies for Air Pollution Mitigation: Development, Economics, and Technologies. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 47–76.
Sharps K, Vieno M, Beck R, et al. Quantifying the impact of ozone on crops in Sub-Saharan Africa demonstrates regional and local hotspots of production loss. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28: 62338–62352.
Guarin JR, Jägermeyr J, Ainsworth EA, et al. Modeling the effects of tropospheric ozone on the growth and yield of global staple crops with DSSAT v4.8.0. Geoscientific Model Development. 2024;17: 2547–2567.
Das S, Pal D, Sarkar A. Particulate matter pollution and global agricultural productivity. In: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 50: Emerging Contaminants in Agriculture. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 79–107.
Manono BO, Khan S, Kithaka KM. A review of the socio-economic, institutional, and biophysical factors influencing smallholder farmers’ adoption of climate smart agricultural practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. Earth. 2025;6: 48.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. A Coming to Terms with Terminology. Rome: The Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization; 2012. Available from: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/cfs/Docs1112/CFS39Docs/CFS_FSN_Terminology_16_October_2012.pdf [Accessed 20 June 2025].
Manono BO, Sadiq FK, Sadiq AA, et al. Impacts of air quality on global crop yields and food security: An integrative review and future outlook. Air. 2025;3(3): 24.
Aher SB, Saroj P, Nandi S. Impact of ground-level ozone on agriculture. Harit Dhara. 2025;8(1): 12–15.
Ahmad S, Zeb B, Ditta A, et al. Morphological, mineralogical, and biochemical characteristics of particulate matter in three size fractions (PM10, PM2.5, and PM1) in the urban environment. ACS Omega. 2023;8: 31661–31674.
World Health Organization. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution. 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health [Accessed 28 March 2025].
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Particulate matter (PM) basics. 2024. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics [Accessed 28 March 2025].
World Health Organization. WHO unveils updated global database of air quality standards. 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/26-02-2025-who-unveils-updated-global-database-of-air-quality-standards [Accessed 28 March 2025].
World Health Organization. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228 [Accessed 28 March 2025].
Borghi F, Spinazzè A, De Nardis N, et al. Studies on air pollution and air quality in rural and agricultural environments: A systematic review. Environments. 2023;10: 208.
Jia L, Zhou X, Wang Q. Effects of agricultural machinery operations on PM2.5, PM10 and TSP in farmland under different tillage patterns. Agriculture. 2023;13: 930.
Rai PK. Impacts of particulate matter pollution on plants: Implications for environmental biomonitoring. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2016;129: 120–136.
Luo X, Bing H, Luo Z, et al. Impacts of atmospheric particulate matter pollution on environmental biogeochemistry of trace metals in soil–plant system: A review. Environmental Pollution. 2019;255: 113138.
Shahid M, Natasha, Dumat C, et al. Ecotoxicology of heavy metal (loid)-enriched particulate matter: Foliar accumulation by plants and health impacts. In: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Cham: Springer; 2021;253: p. 65–113.
Kim KH, Kabir E, Kabir S. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environment International. 2015;74: 136–143.
United Nations Children’s Fund. Air pollution accounted for 8.1 million deaths globally in 2021, becoming the second leading risk factor for death, including for children under five years. 2024. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/thailand/press-releases/air-pollution-accounted-81-million-deaths-globally-2021-becoming-second-leading-risk [Accessed 28 March 2025].
World Health Organization. Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. 2005. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-SDE-PHE-OEH-06-02 [Accessed 28 March 2025].
Jyethi DS. Air quality: Global and regional emissions of particulate matter, SOx, and NOx. In: Plant Responses to Air Pollution. Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 5–19.
Obolkin V, Molozhnikova E, Shikhovtsev M, et al. Sulfur and nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere of Lake Baikal: Sources, automatic monitoring, and environmental risks. Atmosphere. 2021;12(10): 1348.
Prakash J, Agrawal SB, Agrawal M. Global trends of acidity in rainfall and its impact on plants and soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2023;23: 398–419.
Agathokleous E, De Marco A, Paoletti E, et al. Air pollution and climate change threats to plant ecosystems. Environmental Research. 2022;212: 113420.
Ravishankara AR. A question of balance: Weighing the options for controlling ammonia, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. National Science Review. 2019;6: 858–859.
Bauke SL, Amelung W, Bol R, et al. Soil water status shapes nutrient cycling in agroecosystems from micrometer to landscape scales. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2022;185: 773–792.
Manono BO. Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from the Waimate District (New Zealand) pasture soils as influenced by irrigation, effluent dispersal and earthworms. Cogent Environmental Science. 2016;2: 1256564.
Sadiq FK, Sadiq AA, Matsika TA, et al. Sustainable remediation of persistent organic pollutants: A review on recent innovative technologies. Current Research in Biotechnology. 2025;9: 100293.
Wyer KE, Kelleghan DB, Blanes-Vidal V, et al. Ammonia emissions from agriculture and their contribution to fine particulate matter: A review of implications for human health. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022;323: 116285.
Zhao H, Huang J, Zheng Y. Observation of ozone deposition flux and its contribution to stomatal uptake over a winter wheat field in eastern China. Atmospheric Environment. 2024;326: 120472.
Yao Q, Torrents A, Li H, et al. Using a vegetative environmental buffer to reduce the concentrations of volatile organic compounds in poultry-house atmospheric emissions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2018;66: 8231–8236.
Chen S, He Y, Jiang M, et al. Unveiling the importance of VOCs from pesticides applicated in main crops for elevating ozone concentrations in China. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2024;465: 133385.
David E, Niculescu VC. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as environmental pollutants: Occurrence and mitigation using nanomaterials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(24): 13147.
Rajeev P, Shukla PC, Singh GK, et al. Assessment of entrainment of key PAHs emanating from major combustion sources into the ambient air. Fuel. 2023;347: 128430.
Tarigholizadeh S, Sushkova S, Rajput VD, et al. Transfer and degradation of PAHs in the soil–plant system: A review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2023;72: 46–64.
Zeeshan Manzoor M, Sarwar G, Ibrahim M, et al. Remediation quantum of organic amendments to immobilize potentially toxic heavy metals in wastewater-contaminated soils through maize cultivation. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2024;12: 1420705.
Gitipour S, Sorial GA, Ghasemi S, et al. Treatment technologies for PAH-contaminated sites: A critical review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2018;190: 546.
Dell’Anno F, Rastelli E, Sansone C, et al. Bacteria, fungi and microalgae for the bioremediation of marine sediments contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons in the omics era. Microorganisms. 2021;9: 1695.
Nowroz F, Hasanuzzaman M, Siddika A, et al. Elevated tropospheric ozone and crop production: Potential negative effects and plant defense mechanisms. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;14: 1244515.
Tai AP, Sadiq M, Pang JY, et al. Impacts of surface ozone pollution on global crop yields: Comparing different ozone exposure metrics and incorporating co-effects of CO2. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2021;5: 534616.
Broberg MC, Daun S, Pleijel H. Ozone induced loss of seed protein accumulation is larger in soybean than in wheat and rice. Agronomy. 2020;10: 357.
Wang Y, Wild O, Ashworth K, et al. Reductions in crop yields across China from elevated ozone. Environmental Pollution. 2022;292: 118218.
Feng Z, De Marco A, Anav A, et al. Economic losses due to ozone impacts on human health, forest productivity and crop yield across China. Environment International. 2019;131: 104966.
Sampedro J, Waldhoff ST, Van de Ven DJ, et al. Future impacts of ozone driven damages on agricultural systems. Atmospheric Environment. 2020;231: 117538.
Pandya S, Gadekallu TR, Maddikunta PK, et al. A study of the impacts of air pollution on the agricultural community and yield crops (Indian context). Sustainability. 2022;14: 13098.
Zeeshan N, Freer-Smith P, Murtaza G, et al. His dark materials: Quantifying the problem of dust (particulate matter) in the agricultural landscape of California. Atmospheric Environment. 2024;330: 120562.
Lobell DB, Burney JA. Cleaner air has contributed one-fifth of US maize and soybean yield gains since 1999. Environmental Research Letters. 2021;16: 074049.
Atafar Z, Sarkhoshkalat MM, Manesh MB. Overview of air pollution: History, sources and effects. In: Air Pollution, Air Quality, and Climate Change. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2025. p. 1–21.
Macaulay BM, Owoeye JA, Abiya SF, et al. Acid rain: A growing global concern. In: Handbook of Environment and Waste Management: Acid Rain and Greenhouse Gas Pollution Control. Singapore: World Scientific; 2020. p. 59–93.
Sobanaa M, Prathiviraj R, Selvin J, et al. A comprehensive review on methane’s dual role: Effects in climate change and potential as a carbon–neutral energy source. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2024;31: 10379–10394.
Sharma R, Mishra AK. Role of essential climate variables and black carbon in climate change: Possible mitigation strategies. In: Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2022. p. 31–53.
Xu Y, Wu X, Kumar R, et al. Substantial increase in the joint occurrence and human exposure of heatwave and high-PM hazards over South Asia in the mid-21st century. AGU Advances. 2020;1: e2019AV000103.
Nilsson M, Sie A, Muindi K, et al. Weather, climate, and climate change research to protect human health in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Global Health Action. 2021;14: 1984014.
Kornhuber K, Coumou D, Vogel E, et al. Amplified Rossby waves enhance risk of concurrent heatwaves in major breadbasket regions. Nature Climate Change. 2020;10: 48–53.
Prasad R, Prasad S. Algal blooms and phosphate eutrophication of inland water ecosystems with special reference to India. International Journal of Plant and Environment. 2019;5: 1–8.
Abedin MA, Habiba U, Shaw R. Salinity scenario in Mekong, Ganges, and Indus river deltas. In: Water Insecurity: A Social Dilemma. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2014. p. 115–138.
Snowsill A, Hamilton R, Schneider L, et al. Re-viewing pollution: A tale of two basins. Environmental Science and Policy. 2024;156: 103751.
Khalifa SA, Elshafiey EH, Shetaia AA, et al. Overview of bee pollination and its economic value for crop production. Insects. 2021;12: 688.
Démares F, Gibert L, Creusot P, et al. Acute ozone exposure impairs detection of floral odor, learning, and memory of honey bees, through olfactory generalization. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;827: 154342.
Vanderplanck M, Lapeyre B, Brondani M, et al. Ozone pollution alters olfaction and behavior of pollinators. Antioxidants. 2021;10: 636.
Ryalls JM, Langford B, Mullinger NJ, et al. Anthropogenic air pollutants reduce insect-mediated pollination services. Environmental Pollution. 2022;297: 118847.
Hill AE, Burkhardt J, Bayham J, et al. Air pollution, weather, and agricultural worker productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2024;106: 1329–1353.
He Q, Ji X. The labor productivity consequences of exposure to particulate matters: Evidence from a Chinese national panel survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18: 12859.
Dong D, Wang J. Air pollution as a substantial threat to the improvement of agricultural total factor productivity: Global evidence. Environment International. 2023;173: 107842.
Ye HJ, Huang Z, Chen S. Air pollution and agricultural labor supply: Evidence from China. China Economic Review. 2023;82: 102075.
Srivastava Y. Climate change: A challenge for postharvest management, food loss, food quality, and food security. In: Climate Change and Agricultural Ecosystems. London: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 355–377.
Bailey G, Brian J, Champion C. An investigation into the impact of sealed wooden and acrylic showcases and storage cases on the corrosion of lead objects during long term storage and display. AICCM Bulletin. 2017;38: 43–50.
Jiang X, Wang W. Genetic face-lifting: Applications and prospects of epigenetic modifications in stress response of trees. Plant Gene and Trait. 2024;15.
Cong W, Miao Y, Xu L, et al. Transgenerational memory of gene expression changes induced by heavy metal stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biology. 2019;19: 282.
Katsidi EC, Avramidou EV, Ganopoulos I, et al. Genetics and epigenetics of Pinus nigra populations with differential exposure to air pollution. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14: 1139331.
Sofia D, Gioiella F, Lotrecchiano N, et al. Mitigation strategies for reducing air pollution. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27: 19226–19235.
Wallington TJ, Anderson JE, Dolan RH, et al. Vehicle emissions and urban air quality: 60 years of progress. Atmosphere. 2022;13: 650.
Amann M, Kiesewetter G, Schöpp W, et al. Reducing global air pollution: The scope for further policy interventions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 2020;378: 20190331.
Jonidi Jafari A, Charkhloo E, Pasalari H. Urban air pollution control policies and strategies: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2021;19: 1911–1940.
Timmers VR, Achten PA. Non-exhaust PM emissions from electric vehicles. Atmospheric Environment. 2016;134: 10–17.
Malmqvist E. Particles from electric vehicles. Acid News. 2022;3. Available from: https://www.airclim.org/acidnews/particles-electric-vehicles [Accessed 29 July 2025].
Bondorf L, Köhler L, Grein T, et al. Airborne brake wear emissions from a battery electric vehicle. Atmosphere. 2023;14: 488.
Beddows DC, Harrison RM. PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors for non-exhaust particles from road vehicles: Dependence upon vehicle mass and implications for battery electric vehicles. Atmospheric Environment. 2021;244: 117886.
Rissman J, Bataille C, Masanet E, et al. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Applied Energy. 2020;266: 114848.
Ramani V, Rani Kuiti M, Ghosh D, et al. Effectiveness of environmental regulations: Firm’s decisions and welfare implications. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2024;75: 2443–2463.
Oncioiu I, Dănescu T, Popa MA. Air-pollution control in an emergent market: Does it work? Evidence from Romania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17: 2656.
Liu H, Owens KA, Yang K, et al. Pollution abatement costs and technical changes under different environmental regulations. China Economic Review. 2020;62: 101497.
Surendran U, Nagakumar KC, Samuel MP. Remote sensing in precision agriculture. In: Digital Agriculture: A Solution for Sustainable Food and Nutritional Security. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 201–223.
Rees RM, Maire JM, Florence A, et al. Mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils by precision management. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering. 2020;7: 75–80.
Garfí M, Castro L, Montero N, et al. Evaluating environmental benefits of low-cost biogas digesters in small-scale farms in Colombia: A life cycle assessment. Bioresource Technology. 2019;274: 541–548.
Reeves S, Wang W, Ginns S. Mitigate N2O emissions while maintaining sugarcane yield using enhanced efficiency fertilisers and reduced nitrogen rates. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2024;128: 325–340.
Stein LY. Agritech to tame the nitrogen cycle. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2024;16: a041668.
Hewitt CN, Ashworth K, MacKenzie AR. Using green infrastructure to improve urban air quality (GI4AQ). Ambio. 2020;49: 62–73.
Sheikh HA, Maher BA, Woods AW, et al. Efficacy of green infrastructure in reducing exposure to local, traffic-related sources of airborne particulate matter (PM). Science of the Total Environment. 2023;903: 166598.
Wróblewska K, Jeong BR. Effectiveness of plants and green infrastructure utilization in ambient particulate matter removal. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2021;33: 110.
Corada K, Woodward H, Alaraj H, et al. A systematic review of the leaf traits considered to contribute to removal of airborne particulate matter pollution in urban areas. Environmental Pollution. 2021;269: 116104.
Riley R, de Preux L, Capella P, et al. How do we effectively communicate air pollution to change public attitudes and behaviours? A review. Sustainability Science. 2021;16: 2027–2047.
Fino A, Vichi F, Leonardi C, et al. An overview of experiences made and tools used to inform the public on ambient air quality. Atmosphere. 2021;12: 1524.
Laha SR, Pattanayak BK, Pattnaik S. Advancement of environmental monitoring system using IoT and sensor: A comprehensive analysis. AIMS Environmental Science. 2022;9: 771–800.
Singh D, Dahiya M, Kumar R, et al. Sensors and systems for air quality assessment monitoring and management: A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021;289: 112510.
Yang L, Lin Y, Wang J, et al. Achieving air pollution control targets with technology-aided monitoring: Better enforcement or localized efforts? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2024;16: 280–315.
Munir S, Mayfield M, Coca D, et al. Analysis of air pollution in urban areas with Airviro dispersion model—A case study in the city of Sheffield, United Kingdom. Atmosphere. 2020;11: 285.
Özdemir ET, Birinci E, Deniz A. Multi-source observations on the effect of atmospheric blocking on air quality in İstanbul: A study case. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2024;196: 698.
Garcia A, Saez Y, Harris I, et al. Advancements in air quality monitoring: A systematic review of IoT-based air quality monitoring and AI technologies. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2025;58: 275.
Al-Thani HG, Isaifan RJ. Policies and regulations for sustainable clean air: An overview. In: Sustainable Strategies for Air Pollution Mitigation: Development, Economics, and Technologies. Cham: Springer Nature; 2024. p. 409–437.
Imarhiagbe O, Okafor AC, Ogwu MC. Air pollution control technologies and strategies. In: Evaluating Environmental Processes and Technologies. Cham: Springer Nature; 2025. p. 231–258.
Hassan Bhat T, Jiawen G, Farzaneh H. Air pollution health risk assessment (AP-HRA), principles and applications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18: 1935.
