Makaleyi Geri Çekme, Erratum Yayınlama
Özet
Akademik yayıncılık, yalnızca yeni bilginin paylaşılması değil, aynı zamanda bilimsel bilginin doğruluğunun, güvenilirliğinin ve bütünlüğünün korunmasını sağlayan temel bir mekanizmadır. Bilimsel literatürün kümülatif doğası gereği, yayınlanmış bir çalışmada yer alan hatalar, metodolojik kusurlar veya etik ihlaller; klinik uygulamalar, kılavuzlar ve gelecekteki araştırma yönelimleri üzerinde geniş kapsamlı negatif sonuçlar doğurabilmektedir. Bu bölümde, bilimsel kaydın düzeltilmesi amacıyla kullanılan temel editoryal araçlar olan makale geri çekme (retraction), erratum, corrigendum ve editoryal kaygı bildirimi (expression of concern) ele alınmaktadır. Editörlerin, yayıncıların ve yazarların sorumlulukları uluslararası yayın etiği rehberleri doğrultusunda tanımlanmakta; erratum, corrigendum ve editoryal kaygı bildiriminin hangi durumlarda uygun olduğu akademik etkiler çerçevesinde tartışılmaktadır.
Academic publishing serves not only to share new knowledge but also to maintain the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of scientific information. Since the scientific literature builds on itself, errors, methodological issues, or ethical breaches in studies can significantly impact clinical practice, guidelines, and future research. This section explains the main editorial tools used to correct the scientific records, such as retraction, erratum, corrigendum, and editorial expressions of concern. It outlines the roles of editors, publishers, and authors following international publication ethics guidelines and discusses when retraction, erratum, corrigendum, and expressions of concern should be issued, considering their academic significance.
Referanslar
Fanelli D. Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign. PLoS Med. 2013 Dec 3;10(12):e1001563.
Barbour V, Kleinert S, Wager E, Yentis S. Guidelines for retracting articles [Internet]. Committee on Publication Ethics; 2009 Sept. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/guidance/guideline/retraction-guidelines
NISO Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern Working Group. NISO RP-45-2024, Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern (CREC) [Internet]. NISO;. Available from: https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-45-2024-crec
Hoch R, Mika K, Nancarrow C, Osman A, Puebla I, FORCE11 Research Data Publishing Ethics WG. Joint FORCE11 & COPE Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group Flowcharts [Internet]. Zenodo; 2023. Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/7896759
Retraction notice regarding several articles published in the Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2021 Nov 17;41(5):5769–72.
Teixeira Da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):521–54.
Wager E, Kleinert S. Responsible research publication: International standards for authors. A position statement developed at the 2nd world conference on research integrity, Singapore, July 22, 2010. Promot Res Integr Glob Environ. 2011 Jan 1;24:309–16.
Teixeira Da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review. Account Res. 2015 Jan 2;22(1):22–40.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals: Corrections and Version Control [Internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; 2024. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
