Dergi Metrikleri
Özet
Modern akademik yayıncılıkta dergilerin etki düzeyi ve akademik niteliği, araştırmacıların dergi seçimi ve kurumsal performans değerlendirmeleri gibi süreçlerde kullanılan sayısal metrikler üzerinden tanımlanmaktadır. Atıf temelli, prestij odaklı ve alan-normalize yaklaşımlar üzerine inşa edilen dergi metrikleri, bu değerlendirme süreçlerinin temel araçları haline gelmiştir. Bununla birlikte, akademik yayıncılık ekosisteminde fiili referans sistemler haline gelmiş olan Web of Science ve Scopus veri tabanlarının kapsam ve metodolojik farklılıkları ile disiplinler arası yayın ve atıf kültürlerindeki çeşitlilik, bu göstergelerin bağlamdan bağımsız biçimde yorumlanmasını güçleştirmektedir. Bu nedenle dergi metrikleri, tek başına mutlak kalite göstergeleri olarak değil; alan özellikleri, zaman pencereleri ve hesaplama yaklaşımları dikkate alınarak birlikte değerlendirilmesi gereken tamamlayıcı araçlar olarak ele alınmalıdır. Ancak bu bütüncül ve eleştirel yaklaşım benimsendiğinde, nicel göstergeler dergi performansının daha sağlıklı ve anlamlı biçimde yorumlanmasına katkı sağlayabilmektedir.
In modern academic publishing, the impact level and academic quality of journals are assessed through quantitative metrics that inform journal selection and institutional performance evaluations. Journal metrics, built upon citation-based, prestige-oriented, and field-normalized approaches, have become the primary tools in these assessment processes. However, differences in coverage and methodology among databases such as Web of Science and Scopus, as well as variations in publication and citation practices across disciplines, make it difficult to interpret these indicators independently of their context. Therefore, journal metrics should not be regarded as absolute measures of quality in isolation; rather, they should be considered complementary tools that require joint interpretation, taking into account disciplinary characteristics, time windows, and underlying calculation methods. Only when such a holistic and critical approach is adopted can quantitative indicators contribute to a more robust and meaningful evaluation of journal performance.
Referanslar
Baykoucheva S. Interviews with Eugene Garfield. Driving Science Information Discovery in the Digital Age. Elsevier; 2022;145–152. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823723-6.00004-5
Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science. Science. 1955;122(3159): 108–111. doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
Garfield E. Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Science. 1972;178(4060): 471–479. doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
Garfield E. The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1): 90. doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90
González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics. 2010;4(3): 379–391. doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. 2010;4(3): 265–277. doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
Garfield E. Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Science. 1972;178(4060): 471–479. doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
Zijlstra H, McCullough R. CiteScore: a new metric to help you track journal performance and make decisions, ELSEVIER, 2016. (20.12.2025 tarihinde https://www.elsevier.com/connect/citescore-a-new-metric-to-help-you-choose-the-right-journal adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics. 2010;4(3): 379–391. doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News. 2007;68(5): 314–316. doi.org/10.5860/crln.68.5.7804
Bergstrom CT, West JD, Wiseman MA. The EigenfactorTM Metrics. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28(45): 11433–11434. doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0003-08.2008
Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. 2020;4(3): 265–277. doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
Szomszor M. Introducing the Journal Citation Indicator: A new, field-normalized measurement of journal citation impact, Clarivate, 2021. (20.12.2025 tarihinde https://clarivate.com/blog/introducing-the-journal-citation-indicator-a-new-field-normalized-measurement-of-journal-citation-impact/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102(46): 16569–16572. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: A manifesto, 26 October 2010. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), 2013. (20.12.2025 tarihinde https://sfdora.org/read/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
