Advanced Visualization In Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (Cbct): From Volume Rendering (Vr) To Cinematic Rendering (Cr)
Özet
This chapter discusses the role of advanced visualization in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), emphasizing that the clinical value of CBCT depends not only on volumetric data acquisition but also on the way these data are transformed into meaningful three-dimensional images. After outlining the technical principles, clinical indications, dose optimization, and emerging developments in CBCT, the chapter reviews major post-processing and visualization methods, including multiplanar reformatting (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), surface rendering/surface shaded display (SR/SSD), volume rendering (VR), and cinematic rendering (CR). Particular attention is given to the transition from VR to CR. VR is presented as a rapid, practical tool that remains compatible with measurement-based workflows, whereas CR is described as a complementary technique that uses advanced light-and-shadow modeling to create photorealistic anatomical representations with improved depth perception. The potential applications of these methods are discussed in endodontics, implantology, periodontology, orthodontics, maxillofacial trauma, pathological lesions, surgical planning, education, and patient communication. The chapter concludes that CR should not be regarded as a replacement for VR, but as a next-generation adjunct that enhances anatomical understanding, visual confidence, and clinical communication in selected cases.
Referanslar
Wenzel A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis of caries in a historical perspective: from film to machine-intelligence supported systems. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2021;50(5):20210010. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20210010.
Molteni R. The way we were (and how we got here): fifty years of technology changes in dental and maxillofacial radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2021;50(1):20200133. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20200133.
Ardila CM, Vivares-Builes AM, Pineda-Vélez E. Image quality, radiation dose, and patient comfort associated with wireless sensors in digital radiography: a systematic review. Dentistry Journal. 2024;12(8):267. doi:10.3390/dj12080267.
Benavides E, Krecioch JR, Connolly RT, et al. Optimizing radiation safety in dentistry: clinical recommendations and regulatory considerations. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2024;155(4):280-293.e4. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2023.12.002.
Kaasalainen T, Ekholm M, Siiskonen T, et al. Dental cone beam CT: an updated review. Physica Medica. 2021;88:193-217. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.007.
Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121. doi:10.17096/jiufd.00289.
Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, et al. Dental cone beam CT: a review. Physica Medica. 2015;31(8):844-860. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.004.
Fontenele RC, Gaêta-Araujo H, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: clinical recommendations and indication-specific features. Journal of Dentistry. 2025;159:105781. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105781.
Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):88. doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5.
Nasseh I, Al-Rawi W. Cone beam computed tomography. Dental Clinics of North America. 2018;62(3):361-391. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.002.
Pauwels R. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;165(1-4):156-161. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv057.
Brasil DM, Merken K, Binst J, et al. Monitoring cone-beam CT radiation dose levels in a university hospital. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2023;52(3):20220213. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20220213.
Kaaber L, Matzen LH, Schropp L, et al. Low-dose CBCT protocols in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2024;138(3):427-439. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.03.013.
Zanon C, Pepe A, Cademartiri F, et al. Potential benefits of photon-counting CT in dental imaging: a narrative review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(8):2436. doi:10.3390/jcm13082436.
Patcas R, Angst C, Kellenberger CJ, et al. Method of visualisation influences accuracy of measurements in cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015;43(7):1277-1283. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.001.
Ng SY. Visualisation of dental anatomy in CBCT scans (Part 2). British Dental Journal. 2024;237(3):179-196. doi:10.1038/s41415-024-7670-7.
Mazziotti S, Blandino A, Gaeta M, et al. Postprocessing in maxillofacial multidetector computed tomography. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2015;66(3):212-222. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2014.12.004.
Hassan B, Nijkamp P, Verheij H, et al. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2013;35(1):38-44. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjr050.
Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics - a review of the literature. International Endodontic Journal. 2019;52(8):1138-1152. doi:10.1111/iej.13115.
Da Fonte JBM, Fontenele RC, Farias-Gomes A, et al. Do the number of zirconia implants and the thickness of CBCT image reconstruction affect the detection of peri-implant bone defect? A diagnostic accuracy ex vivo study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2024;35(11):1485-1492. doi:10.1111/clr.14336.
Gaêta-Araujo H, Alzoubi T, Vasconcelos KDF, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a two-decade overview. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2020;49(8):20200145. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20200145.
Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2009;30(6):1088-1095. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1653.
Fernandes TMF, Adamczyk J, Poleti ML, et al. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2015;23(1):56-63. doi:10.1590/1678-775720130445.
Bhat SH, Hareesha KS, Kamath AT, et al. A framework to enhance the experience of CBCT data in real-time using immersive virtual reality: impacting dental pre-surgical planning. IEEE Access. 2024;12:45442-45455. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3375770.
Berger M, Li J, Levine JA. A generative model for volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2019;25(4):1636-1650. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2018.2816059.
Lee TH, Lee J, Lee H, et al. Fast perspective volume ray casting method using GPU-based acceleration techniques for translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2009;39(8):657-666. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.04.007.
Li L, Peng H, Chen X, et al. Visualization of boundaries in volumetric data sets through a what material you pick is what boundary you see approach. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2016;126:76-88. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.11.014.
Dogan Y, Sirin Y. Do cone beam CT picture archiving and communication systems viewer interfaces meet the expectations of dental professionals from a usability perspective? Cureus. 2024;16(2):e54288. doi:10.7759/cureus.54288.
Chan F, Brown LF, Parashos P. CBCT in contemporary endodontics. Australian Dental Journal. 2023;68(Suppl 1):S39-S55. doi:10.1111/adj.12995.
Sustercic D, Sersa I. Human tooth pulp anatomy visualization by 3D magnetic resonance microscopy. Radiology and Oncology. 2012;46(1):1-7. doi:10.2478/v10019-012-0018-y.
Kim G, Lee J, Lee H, et al. Automatic extraction of inferior alveolar nerve canal using feature-enhancing panoramic volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2011;58(2):253-264. doi:10.1109/TBME.2010.2089053.
Cavalcanti MGP, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2002;31(4):218-223. doi:10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600701.
Whyms BJ, Vorperian HK, Gentry LR, et al. The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2013;115(5):682-691. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2013.02.008.
Alshomrani F. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based diagnosis of dental bone defects. Diagnostics. 2024;14(13):1404. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14131404.
Khasawneh L, Al Mortadi N, Abu-Ishqair E, et al. Cone beam computed tomography changes upon oral appliance therapy for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a non-randomized clinical trial. Medicine. 2024;103(40):e39923. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000039923.
Can E, Böning G, Lüdemann WM, et al. Evaluation of a prototype metal artifact reduction algorithm for cone beam CT in patients undergoing radioembolization. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):16399. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66978-y.
Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, et al. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2015;44(1):20140224. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140224.
Johnson PT, Schneider R, Lugo-Fagundo C, et al. MDCT angiography with 3D rendering: a novel cinematic rendering algorithm for enhanced anatomic detail. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2017;209(2):309-312. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.17903.
Stadlinger B, Valdec S, Wacht L, et al. 3D-cinematic rendering for dental and maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2020;49(1):20190249. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20190249.
Rowe SP, Zinreich SJ, Fishman EK. 3D cinematic rendering of the calvarium, maxillofacial structures, and skull base: preliminary observations. British Journal of Radiology. 2018;91(1086):20170826. doi:10.1259/bjr.20170826.
Willershausen I, Necker F, Kloeckner R, et al. Cinematic rendering to improve visualization of supplementary and ectopic teeth using CT datasets. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2023;52(4):20230058. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20230058.
Hu R, Zhang XY, Liu J, et al. Clinical application of cinematic rendering in maxillofacial fractures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022;51(12):1562-1569. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2022.05.003.
Wang X, Ma G, Song J, et al. Heterogeneous many-core optimization for Monte Carlo path-tracing on new generation Sunway HPC system. CCF Transactions on High Performance Computing. 2024;6(6):566-587. doi:10.1007/s42514-024-00196-w.
Zellmann S, Wu Q, Sahistan A, et al. Beyond ExaBricks: GPU volume path tracing of AMR data. Computer Graphics Forum. 2024;43(3):e15095. doi:10.1111/cgf.15095.
Yuan Y, Yang J, Sun Q, et al. Precomputed low-frequency lighting in cinematic volume rendering. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(10):e0312339. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0312339.
Brookmeyer C, Chu LC, Rowe SP, et al. Clinical implementation of cinematic rendering. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology. 2024;53(3):313-328. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.01.010.
Bueno MR, Estrela C, Granjeiro JM, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography cinematic rendering: clinical, teaching and research applications. Brazilian Oral Research. 2021;35:e024. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0024.
Stehrer R, Malek M, Fellner FA. Cinematic rendering for virtual anatomy and pathoanatomy in cranio-maxillofacial trauma care. Trauma and Emergency Care. 2020;5(1). doi:10.15761/TEC.1000193.
Dappa E, Higashigaito K, Fornaro J, et al. Cinematic rendering - an alternative to volume rendering for 3D computed tomography imaging. Insights into Imaging. 2016;7(6):849-856. doi:10.1007/s13244-016-0518-1.
Al-Haj Husain A, Stojicevic M, Hainc N, et al. Advanced imaging and preoperative MR-based cinematic rendering reconstructions for neoplasms in the oral and maxillofacial region. Diagnostics. 2025;15(1):33. doi:10.3390/diagnostics15010033.
Al-Haj Husain A, Valdec S, Stadlinger B, et al. Preoperative visualization of the lingual nerve by 3D double-echo steady-state MRI in surgical third molar extraction treatment. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022;26(2):2043-2053. doi:10.1007/s00784-021-04185-z.
Steffen T, Winklhofer S, Starz F, et al. Three-dimensional perception of cinematic rendering versus conventional volume rendering using CT and CBCT data of the facial skeleton. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2022;241:151905. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151905.
Binder J, Krautz C, Engel K, et al. Leveraging medical imaging for medical education - a cinematic rendering-featured lecture. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2019;222:159-165. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2018.12.004.
Breen MS, Jawhar OM, Lustrin ES, et al. 3D cinematic volume-rendering technique of traumatic spine injuries: a powerful tool for radiology education. Neurographics. 2022;12(4):203-209. doi:10.3174/ng.2100069.
Glemser PA, Engel K, Simons D, et al. A new approach for photorealistic visualization of rendered computed tomography images. World Neurosurgery. 2018;114:e283-e292. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.174.
Pachowsky ML, Morf H, Simon D, et al. Cinematic rendering in rheumatic diseases-photorealistic depiction of pathologies improves disease understanding for patients. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022;9:946106. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.946106.
Elshafei M, Binder J, Baecker J, et al. Comparison of cinematic rendering and computed tomography for speed and comprehension of surgical anatomy. JAMA Surgery. 2019;154(8):738-744. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1168.
Shim J, Lee Y. No-reference-based and noise level evaluations of cinematic rendering in bone computed tomography. Bioengineering. 2024;11(6):563. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11060563.
