Endodontik Tedavide Kullanılan İrrigasyon-Aktivasyon Yöntemleri
Özet
Endodontik tedavinin öncelikli amacı enfekte olan kök kanal sistemindeki mikroorganizmaları elimine etmek ve kök kanal sisteminin etkili şekilde dezenfeksiyonunu sağlamaktır. Endodontik tedavinin başarılı olması kök kanal sisteminin etkili şekilde preperasyonu, dezenfeksiyonu ve obturasyonunu kapsamaktadır. Kök kanal sisteminin kompleks anatomik yapısı enfekte alanın preperasyonla tamamen uzaklaştırılmasını önlemektedir. Bu yüzden kök kanal sisteminin tümüyle dezenfeksiyonunu sağlamak ve mikroorganizmaları uzaklaştırmak için irrigasyon-aktivasyon yöntemi kullanılmalıdır.
Geleneksel enjektörler ile yapılan klasik aktivasyon yöntemlerin yanı sıra lazerle aktivasyon, ultrasonik aktivasyon, multisonik ses dalgaları ile aktivasyon, fotodinamik terapi gibi güncel yöntemler de kullanılmaktadır. Geleneksel irrigasyon yöntemi kök kanal sisteminin karmaşık anatomisi nedeniyle yetersiz kalmaktadır. Bu nedenle irrigasyon solüsyonunun etkinliğini arttırmak ve etkili dezenfeksiyon sağlamak için çeşitli irrigasyon-aktivasyon yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır.
Referanslar
Basrani B, Haapasalo M. Update on endodontic irrigating solutions. Endod Topics. 2012;27(1):74–102.doi:10.1111/etp.12019
Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Brandão Garcia R, Bombarda de Andrade F, Bernardineli N, Gomes de Moraes I, Duarte MA. The antimicrobial effect of new and conventional endodontic irrigants on intra-orally infected dentin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(3–4):424–31.doi:10.3109/00016357.2012.690530
Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A. Irrigation trends among American Association of Endodontists members: a web-based survey. J Endod. 2012;38(1):37–40.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.020
Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LW. Evaluation of irrigant flow using different needle types by computational fluid dynamics. J Endod. 2010;36(5):875–9.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.026
Sedgley C, Nagel A, Hall D, Applegate B. Influence of irrigant needle depth on removing bacteria using real-time imaging. Int Endod J. 2005;38(2):97–104.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00906.x
Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LW. Effect of needle depth on irrigant flow: CFD model. J Endod. 2010;36(10):1664–8.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.021
Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Enersen M, Mdala I, Ørstavik D, et al. Influence of apical size and irrigant type on bacterial reduction. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1058–63.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.016
Keir DM, Senia ES, Montgomery S. Effectiveness of a brush for removing debris. J Endod. 1990;16(7):323–7.
Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of irrigant agitation techniques. J Endod. 2009;35(6):791–804.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010
McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng YL. Efficacy of dynamic irrigation system (RinsEndo). Int Endod J. 2008;41(7):602–8.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01397.x
Jiang LM, Lak B, Eijsvogels LM, Wesselink P, van der Sluis LW. Comparison of final irrigation techniques. J Endod. 2012;38(6):838–41.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.020
Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. Self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1. J Endod. 2010;36(4):679–90.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.036
Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, Teperovich E, Paque F. SAF vs rotary evaluation with micro-CT. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1569–73.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.012
Bansode PV, Pathak SD, Wavdhane M, Priyadarshini L. SAF system review. J Med Dent Sci Res. 2021;8(2):25–30.
Setlock J, Fayad MI, BeGole E, Bruzick M. Evaluation of Quantec-E irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96(5):614–7.doi:10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00362-8
Walters MJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Efficacy of irrigation with rotary instrumentation. J Endod. 2002;28(12):837–9.doi:10.1097/00004770-200212000-00014
Trope M, Debelian G. XP-3D Finisher. Endod Pract. 2015;8(5):14–6.
Hülsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during irrigation. Int Endod J. 2000;33(3):186–93.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00234.x
Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C. Sodium hypochlorite accidents review. Endod Pract Today. 2019;13(2).
Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. EndoVac vs needle irrigation. J Endod. 2007;33(5):611–5.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.004
Siu C, Baumgartner JC. Debridement efficacy of EndoVac in vivo. J Endod. 2010;36(11):1782–5.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.030
Howard RK, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE, Yaccino JM. Debris removal with three irrigation techniques. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1301–5.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.015
Paixao S, Rodrigues C, Grenho L, Fernandes MH. Sonic and ultrasonic activation meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2022;80(8):588–95.doi:10.1080/00016357.2022.2048502
Sarno MU, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Lindsey KW, Niu LN, Tay FR. VPro EndoSafe negative pressure system. J Endod. 2012;38(12):1631–4.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.010
Ahmad M, Ford TRP, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debridement: mechanisms. J Endod. 1987;13(3):93–101.doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80274-9
Ricardo S, Nursasongko B. EndoActivator vs Vibringe smear layer. J Int Dent Med Res. 2016;9(3).
Rödig T, Bozkurt M, Konietschke F, Hülsmann M. Vibringe vs syringe vs PUI. J Endod. 2010;36(8):1410–3.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.016
R M. Ultrasonics in endodontics. J Dent Med. 1957;12:12–8.
Martin H, Cunningham WT, Norris JP, Cotton WR. Ultrasonic vs hand filing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980;49(1):79–81.doi:10.1016/0030-4220(80)90220-0
Walmsley A, Williams A. Oscillatory pattern of ultrasonics. J Endod. 1989;15(5):189–94.doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80178-6
van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Review: PUI. Int Endod J. 2007;40(6):415–26.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
Weller RN, Brady JM, Bernier WE. Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning. J Endod. 1980;6(9):740–3.doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80216-8
Stamos DE, Sadeghi EM, Haasch GC, Gerstein H. Debridement with hand, sonic, ultrasonic. J Endod. 1987;13(9):434–40.doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80216-8
Çiçek AG, Bodrumlu E. Ultrasonics review (Turkish). Atatürk Univ Dent J. 2012;Suppl 6.
Ahmad M, Ford TRP, Crum LA. Acoustic streaming role. J Endod. 1987;13(10):490–9.doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80262-4
Al-Jadaa A, Paqué F, Attin T, Zehnder M. PUI in accessory canals. Int Endod J. 2009;42(1):59–65. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01492.x
Huque et al. Bacterial eradication by ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J. 1998;31(4):242–50.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00175.x
Hosny N, El Khodary S, El Boghdadi R, Shaker O. Neem vs NaOCl RCT. Int Endod J. 2021;54(9):1434–47.doi:10.1111/iej.13561
Căpută PE, Retsas A, Kuijk L, de Paz LEC, Boutsioukis C. Systematic review: ultrasonic activation. J Endod. 2019;45(1):31–44.e13.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.008
De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Ultrasonic vs laser smear layer removal. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1580–3.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.021
Myers ML. Effect of laser on oral tissues. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(3):395–7.doi:10.1016/0022-3913(91)90507-H
Lee BS, Lin CP, Hung YL, Lan WH. Structural effects of Er:YAG on dentin. Photomed Laser Ther. 2004;22(4):330–4.doi:10.1089/pho.2004.22.330
Blanken J, De Moor RJG, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser-induced cavitation visualization. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(7):514–9.doi:10.1002/lsm.20808
Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, DiVito E. PIPS disinfection. J Endod. 2011;37(7):1008–12.doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.026
DiVito E, Peters OA, Olivi G. Er:YAG smear layer removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(2):273–80.
doi:10.1007/s10103-011-0880-1
Gregorčič P, Jezeršek M, Možina J. Optodynamic energy efficiency. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17(7):075006.doi:10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.075006
Ivanusic T, Lukac M, Lukac N, Jezersek M. SWEEPS endodontics. J LAHA. 2019;2019:1–10.
Guidotti R, Merigo E, Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Medioni E, Vescovi P. Er:YAG laser fiber aid in smear removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(1):69–75.doi:10.1007/s10103-012-1220-6
Jezeršek M, Jereb T, Lukač N, Tenyi A, Lukač M, Fidler A. Apical extrusion during laser irrigation. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019;37(9):544–50.doi:10.1089/photob.2019.4672
Yang Q, Liu M, Zhu L, Peng B. Hard-tissue debris removal using laser irrigation. Int Endod J. 2020;53(4):529–38.doi:10.1111/iej.13243
Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Park E, Curtis A, Patel P, Vandrangi P. Apical pressure: GentleWave vs syringe. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1525–34.doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1632-z
Ordinola-Zapata R, Crepps JT, Arias A, Lin F. Apical pressure measurement: needles vs multisonic system. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(1).doi:10.5395/rde.2021.46.e20
Garland R. GentleWave case report. Oral Health Case Rep. 2017;3:135–2.
Kim KH, Lévesque C, Malkhassian G, Basrani B. GentleWave biofilm removal ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2024;57(7):922–32.doi:10.1111/iej.14056
Velardi JP, Alquria TA, Alfirdous RA, Corazza BJ, Gomes AP, Silva EG, et al. GentleWave vs PUI against LPS. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4894.doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08850-2
Coaguila-Llerena H, Gaeta E, Faria G. Outcomes of GentleWave. Restor Dent Endod. 2022;47(1). doi:10.5395/rde.2022.47.e3
Shahi Ardakani A, Afrasiabi S, Sarraf P, Benedicenti S, Solimei L, Chiniforush N. SWEEPS + photodynamic therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(11):2628.doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15112628
Markan S, Lehl G, Kapoor S. Nanotechnology in dentistry. J Dent Oral Biol. 2017;2(10):1067.
Yin IX, Zhang J, Zhao IS, Mei ML, Li Q, Chu CH. Antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:2555–62.doi:10.2147/IJN.S233789
