Antik Dönemden Dijital Çağa Parmak İzinin Evrimi
Özet
Parmak izi, insanlık tarihinde kimliklendirme ve adalet arayışının en eski ve en güvenilir araçlarından biri olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Suçun toplumsal yaşamın ayrılmaz bir parçası hâline gelmesiyle birlikte bireylerin ayırt edilmesi ihtiyacı doğmuş, bu gereksinim tarih boyunca çeşitli yöntemlerin geliştirilmesine zemin hazırlamıştır. Parmak izleri, her bireye özgü morfolojik yapıları ve yaşam boyunca değişmezlik göstermeleri nedeniyle erken dönemlerden itibaren dikkat çekmiş, farklı medeniyetlerde kimlik doğrulama ve güven unsuru olarak kullanılmıştır. Antik çağlara ait kayıtlar, parmak izlerinin bilinçli ya da sezgisel biçimde bireysel ayırt edicilik taşıdığının fark edildiğini göstermektedir. Zamanla bu farkındalık, bilimsel düşüncenin gelişimiyle birlikte sistematik inceleme yöntemlerine dönüşmüş; özellikle 19. yüzyıldan itibaren parmak izi analizi adli bilimlerin temel taşlarından biri hâline gelmiştir. Modern kriminalistikte parmak izleri, standartlaştırılmış sınıflandırma sistemleri ve teknolojik analiz araçlarıyla değerlendirilen güvenilir deliller arasında yer almaktadır. Antik dönemlerden dijital çağa uzanan bu tarihsel süreç, parmak izi biliminin yalnızca teknik bir kimliklendirme yöntemi olmadığını, aynı zamanda insanlığın suçla mücadele, düzen arayışı ve adalet anlayışının bilimsel bir yansıması olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
Referanslar
Xiang-Xin Z, Chun-Ge L. The historical application of hand prints in Chinese litigation. Journal of Forensic Identification, 1988;38(6):277-284.
Barnes JG. History. Holder EH, Robinson LO, Laub JH (ed.) The Fingerprint Sourcebook içinde. Washington: U.S. Dept. of Justice Office of Justice Programs. 2011
Hawthorne M. Fingerprints- Analysis and understanding. (1st ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420068658
Sodhi GS, Kaur J. Indian civilization and the science of fingerprinting. Indian J. of Traditional Knowledge. 2003;2(2),126–136.
Cummins H, Midlo C. Finger prints, palms and soles: an ıntroduction to dermatoglyphics. (2nd ed.). New York: Dover Publications; 1961.
Karakuş O. Kriminalistik, (2. Baskı) Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi; 2013.
Cummins H, Midlo C. Finger prints, palms and soles: an ıntroduction to dermatoglyphics. (1st ed.). New York: Dover Publications; 1943.
Galton F. Finger prints (No. 57490-57492). (1st ed.). London:Cosimo Classics, Macmillan; 1892.
Wilder HH, Wentworth B. Personal Identification. (1st ed.) Boston:The Gorham Press; 1918.
Herschel WJ. The origin of finger-printing. (1st ed.) London:Oxford University Press; 1916.
Faulds H. On the skin-furrows of the hand. Nature;1880;22(574), 605-605.
Lambourne G. The fingerprint story. (1st ed.) London: Harrap;1984.
Saferstein R. Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science (12th ed.). Vancouver Island, British Columbia; Pearson Education,2018.
Beavan C. Fingerprints: the origins of crime detection and the murder case that launched forensic science. (1st ed.). New York: Hyperion;2001.
Cole SA. Suspect identities: A history of fingerprinting and criminal ıdentification (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;2001.
Henry ER. Classification and uses of fingerprints, (7th ed). London;H.M. Stationery Office;1934.
de Forest HP. The first fingerprint file in the United States. Finger Print and Ident. Mag. 1938;19,16–20.
Chapel CE. Fingerprinting: A manual of identification. New York: Coward McCann; 1941.
Nickell J. The two Will Wests—A new verdict. Journal of Police Science and Administration:1980,8(4),406–413.
Locard E. La Preuve Judiciaire par les Empreintes Digitales (The Legal Evidence by the Fingerprints). De Médecine Légale et de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique (of Forensic Medicine and of Normal and Pathological Psychology):1914,29,321.
Ashbaugh DR. Quantitative-qualitative friction ridge analysis: an ıntroduction to basic and advanced ridgeology. (1st. ed.). Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press;1999.
Myers HJ. II. Supplemental history of identification in the United States. Fingerprint and Identification Magazine:1942, 25 (6), 3–28.
McCann PD. Report of the standardization mmittee of the international ass'n for identification. Identification News:1973.
National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;2009.
Komarinski P.Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS), Elsevier Academic Press;2005.
Baldi P, Chauvin Y. Neural networks for fingerprint recognition. Neural Computation, 1993:5(3), 402-418.
Cao K, Nguyen DL, Tymoszek C, Jain AK. End-to-end latent fingerprint search. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2019:15, 880-894.
Awad AI. Machine learning techniques for fingerprint identification: A short review. In Proceedings of CCIS.2012;322, 524–531.
Win KN, Li K, Chen J, Viger PF, Li K. Fingerprint classification and identification algorithms for criminal investigation: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2020:110, 758-771.
El Naqa I, Murphy MJ. What are machine and deep learning? El Naqa I, Murphy MJ (ed.) Machine and Deep Learning in Oncology, Medical Physics and Radiology içinde Cham:Springer,2022.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83047-2_1
Winters D. Fingerprint recognition using deep learning - A review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics. 2023:5. 08-15. 10.54216/JAIM.050101.
Wagner L. Beyond the Surface: Examining How Artificial Intelligence Enhances Fingerprint Analysis and Identity Verification. 2025. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5334143
Cole SA. Grand illusion: The uncertain science of fingerprint evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press:2004.
Fiodorova A. Information exchange and EU law enforcement. Oxon, UK and New York, NY: Routledge:2018.
Amelung N, Granja R, Machado H. A brief history of the evolution of biometrics and biometric database systems crossing borders in EU law enforcement. Modes of Bio-Bordering içinde. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore: 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8183-0_2
Paripurna A, Indriani M, Widiati EP. Implementation of Resolution No. 4/2016 of the ICPO-INTERPOL concerning biometric data sharing: between countermeasures against Terrorist Foreign Fighters (FTFS) and protection of the privacy of Indonesian citizens. Brawijaya University. 2018;5(1);117-142. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.01.08
European Commission. What is SIS and how does it work? Migration and Home Affairs. 2020.https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen/schengen-information-system/what-sis-and-how-does-it-work_en
European Commission. Alerts and data in SIS. Migration and Home Affairs. 2020. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen/schengen-information-system/alerts-and-data-sis_en
Broeders D, Dijstelbloem H. The datafication of mobility and migration management: The mediating state. In: Van der Ploeg I, Pridmore, J (eds.), Digitizing identities: Doing identity in a networked world. New York: Routledge.2016. p. 242–260. 10.4324/9781315756400-13
Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K. Big Data: die Revolution, die unser Leben verändern wird. München:Redline Wirtschaft; 2013.
Liberatore A. Balancing security and democracy, and the role of expertise: Biometrics politics in the European Union. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 2007; 13(1–2): 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-006-9016-1
Stojičić S, Petrović N, Srećković M, et al. The digital forensic method used in interoperability framework for information systems used on EU level in area of migration and border management. In Thematic conference proceedings of international significance [Elektronski izvor]/International Scientific Conference" Archibald Reiss Days", Belgrade, 9-10 November 2021 (pp. 547-566). Belgrade: University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies.
Toom V, Granja R, Ludwig A. The Prüm decisions as an aspirational regime: Reviewing a decade of cross-border exchange and comparison of forensic DNA data. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 2019; 41: 50-57.
EUR-Lex .Stepping up cross-border cooperation – the Prüm decision. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/stepping-up-cross-border-cooperation-the-pr-m-decision.html. (Accessed 26th July 2025).
Kyriakou K, Apostolaras A, Velentzas P, et al. A secure and trustworthy biometric data ecosystem for cross-border suspect identification. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), 15-18 December, Washington DC, (pp. 2762-2771).
Topfer E. Network with errors: Europe’s emerging web of DNA databases. Statewatch Journal. 2011;21(1) Available from http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-134-dna-databases.pdf (Accessed 09th February 2017).
House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee. Cross-border law enforcement cooperation - UK participation in Prüm. Available from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmeuleg/342-xii/34203.htm (Accessed 28th July 2025).
Benos G, Koutsoukos K, Symvoulidis C. et al. Enhancing International Security: A Secure Biometric Data Sharing Framework for Effective Cross-Border Crime and Terrorism Prevention. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), 15-18 December, Washington DC, (pp. 2690-2696).
Sallavaci O. Strengthening cross-border law enforcement cooperation in the EU: the Prüm network of data exchange. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2018; 24: 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9355-0
McCartney C. Forensic data exchange: ensuring integrity. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2014; 47(1): 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2014.906654
Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Document No. 228091. 2009. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
Daluz HM. Fundamentals of fingerprint analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018.
Swofford HJ. The emerging paradigm shift in the epistemology of fingerprint conclusions. Journal of Forensic Identification, 2015; 65(3): 201.
Gnanasivam P, Muttan DS. Estimation of age through fingerprints using wavelet transform and singular value decomposition. International Journal of Biometrics and Bioinformatics (IJBB), 2012; 6(2): 58-67.
Prabhu RR, Ravikumar CN. A novel extended biometric approach for human character recognition using fingerprints. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2013; 77(1).
Singh M, Majumdar O. Dermatoglyphics: blueprints of human cognition on fingerprints. Computational Science and Electronic Journal, 2015; 6: 124-146.
Kralik M, Novotny V. Epidermal ridge breadth: an indicator of age and sex in paleodermatoglyphics. Variability and Evolution, 2003; 11: 5-30.
Acree MA. Is there a gender difference in fingerprint ridge density? Forensic Science International, 1999; 102: 35-44.
Gutierrez-Redomero E, Alonso C, Romero E, Galera V. Variability of fingerprint ridge density in a sample of Spanish Caucasians and its application to sex determination. Forensic Science International, 2008; 180: 17-22.
Ceyhan EB, Saĝiroĝlu Ş, Tatoĝlu S, et al. Age estimation from fingerprints: Examination of the population in Turkey. 2014 13th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, 2014; 478-481.
Song HON, Tang WT, Zhang LHA, et al. Quantitative analysis of the correlation between fingerprint and age. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022; 41(06): 1047.
Jamwal P. Review paper on application of dermatoglyphics in health, career, academic, and forensic setup. Indian Journal of Social Studies and Humanities, 2021.
Majumdar O. Dermatoglyphics: Blueprints of human cognition on fingerprints. Computational Science and Electronic Journal, 2015; 6(2): 124-146.
Atasu M, Kuru B, Firatli E, et al. Dermatoglyphic findings in periodontal diseases. International Journal of Anthropology, 2005; 20(1): 63-75.
Jindal G, Pandey RK, Gupta S, et al. A comparative evaluation of dermatoglyphics in different classes of malocclusion. The Saudi Dental Journal, 2015; 27(2): 88-92.
Singh S, Khurana AK, Harode HA, et al. Study of fingerprint patterns to evaluate the role of dermatoglyphics in early detection of bronchial asthma. Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine, 2016; 7(1): 43.
Vaidya P, Mahale S, Badade P, et al. Dermatoglyphics in periodontics: An assessment of the relationship between fingerprints and periodontal status-A cross-sectional observation study. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 2017; 28(6): 637-641.
Vasan MD, Thakar BR. Predictive digital forensic model to track antisocial behavior based on dermatoglyphics. In: Peng SL, Dey N, Bundele M, eds. Computing and Network Sustainability. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 75. Singapore: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7150-9_37
Janiani P, Subramanian EM. Assessment and correlation between dactyloscopy and behavior of children undergoing dental treatment: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2023; 16(3): 444-447. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2600
Agarwal M, Alex A, Konde S. Relationship between dermatoglyphics, cheiloscopy, rugoscopy, and dental caries: a cross-sectional study in Bengaluru, Karnataka. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 2018; 9(4): 577-581. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_18
Jones KZ. The Everything Palmistry Book: Discover what the future holds–Life, Love, and Wealth–All in the Palm of Your Hand. 1st ed. Avon, MA: Adams Media; 2010.
van Oorschot R, Jones M. DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature, 1997; 387: 767.
Kaygısız M. Kriminalistikte parmak izi incelemesi [Yüksek lisans tezi]. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Adli Tıp Enstitüsü; 1995. p. 1-4.
Akbabaöz O. Eşkâle dayalı kimliklendirmeden kriminal kimliklendirmeye: Osmanlı iç güvenliğinde biyometrik unsurlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2022; (74): 409-416.
Şahin E. 1907'den 2000'e Polis Okulları. (1. Baskı). Ankara: Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü Basımevi; 2001.
Şahin E. Osmanlı'dan Cumhuriyete Türk Polisinin Eğitimi. Çağın Polisi Dergisi, 2010; 9(98): 19-22.
Tongur H. Türkiye'de genel kolluk teşkil ve görevlerinin gelişimi (1. Baskı). Ankara: Polis Akademisi Yayınları; 2016.
Jandarma Meslek Okulunda Jandarma erbaşlarına okutulan derslerin müfredat programı. Ankara: Jandarma Genel Komutanlığı; 1937.
Baykal T. İz ve emare. Jandarma Mecmuası, 1938; (51): 63-77.
Esen S. Jandarma Subay Tatbikat ve Astsubay Okulunun 1962-1963 eğitim ve öğretim yılı. Jandarma Dergisi, 1963; (25/26): 12-17.
Sarıyıldız G. Osmanlı bürokrasisinde fotoğraflı belge kullanımı ve parmak izi uygulaması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Tarih Dergisi, 2009; 47: 185-187.
Bingöl S. Osmanlı Devleti’nde Tanzimat’tan sonra kriminal kimlik tespit yöntemlerine dair notlar ve belgeler (dokuz belge ile birlikte). Belleten, 2011; 274(C LXXV): 851.
European Commission. Study on the feasibility of improving information exchange under the Prüm Decisions. Deloitte Consulting & Advisory CVBA; 2020.
https://www.statewatch.org/media/1386/eu-com-prum-expansion-technical-study-final-report-5-20.pdf
