Conceptual Blending Theory and Idioms: Rich Sources of Conceptual Blends

Adıgüzel, M. F. (2024a). Conceptual blending theory: The case of “Flying Bus” from Turkish. Dil Araştırmaları, 34(1), 1–20.

Adıgüzel, M. F. (2024b). Kavramsal harmanlama kuramı üzerine notlar ve örnekler. In G. Kurt (Ed.), Filoloji alanında uluslararası çalışma ve değerlendirmeler (pp. 1–14). Serüven Yayınevi.

Aksan, Y. (2006). A cognitive approach to Turkish Idioms of anger. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, 17, 1–20.

Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Koltuksuz, A., Sezer, T., Mersinli, Ü., Demirhan, U. U., Yılmazer, H., Kurtoğlu, Ö., Atasoy, G., Öz, S., & Yıldız, İ. (2012). Construction of the Turkish national corpus (TNC). In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp. 3223–3227). İstanbul: LREC 2012.

Alazazmeh, A., & Zibin, A. (2022). Anger metaphors in Arabic: A cognitive linguistic analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(2), 113–129.

Arıca Akkök, S. (2017). Metaphors of anger in Turkish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(5), 1235–1253.

Ayto, J. (2009). Oxford Dictionary of English idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Benczes, R. (2002). The semantics of idioms: A cognitive linguistic approach. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 49(3–4), 295–317.

Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668–683.

Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive linguistics, 11(3–4), 175–196.

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deignan, A. (2010). The cognitive view of metaphor: Conceptual metaphor theory. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 44–56). London: Equinox.

Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1994). Conceptual projection and middle spaces. UCSD Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Fraser, B. (1970). Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language, 6(1), 22–42.

Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Why Cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 2–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.

Grady, J. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614.

Grady, J. (2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Katz, J. J. (1973). Compositionality, idiomaticity, and lexical substitution. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 357–376). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z., Szelid, V., Nucz, E., & Blanco, J. E. (2015). Anger metaphors across languages: A cognitive linguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 603–628.

Kövecses, Z., Szelid, V., Nucz, E., & Blanco, J. E. (2024). Cross-linguistic patterns in emotion metaphors. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 55(3), 245–260.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (2006). Cognitive grammar and the nature of idioms. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 335–357.

Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiomatic creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. John Benjamins.

Lundmark, C. (2006). Metaphor and creativity in English business media discourse. Metaphorik.de, 11, 75–99.

Maalej, Z. (2004). The embodiment of anger in Tunisian Arabic. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 267–297.

Matsuki, K. (1995). Metaphors of anger in Japanese. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 137–151). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491–538.

Tran, C. D. (2022). Conceptual metaphors of anger in Vietnamese. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(1), 41–57.

Türk Dil Kurumu. (2019). Atasözleri ve deyimler sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.

Turner, M. (2007). Conceptual integration. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 377–393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.