Bal Arılarında Üreme
Özet
Bal arıları ana arı, işçi arılar ve kolonide mevsimsel olarak bulunan erkek arılardan oluşan, karmaşık görev dağılımına sahip sosyal böceklerdir. Koloninin sürekliliği, yüksek yumurtlama kapasitesi ve feromon salgılarıyla düzeni sağlayan ana arıya bağlıdır. İşçi arılar üreme yeteneğine sahip olmamakla birlikte besin toplama, yavru bakımı, savunma ve koloni içi düzen gibi tüm temel işlevleri üstlenir. Erkek arılar ise yalnızca çiftleşme amacıyla üretilen ve kolonide her zaman bulunmayan bireylerdir. Ana arı ve erkek arılara ait üreme özellikleri, koloninin devamlılığını belirleyen temel biyolojik unsurlardır. Ana arı doğal koşullarda poliandrik çiftleşme davranışı sergiler ve çok sayıda erkekten aldığı spermleri spermatekasında uzun süre canlı şekilde depolar. Bu durum, kolonide genetik çeşitliliği artırarak verimliliği ve hastalıklara karşı dayanıklılığı güçlendirir. Çiftleşmenin doğal ortamda kontrol edilememesi nedeniyle ıslah çalışmalarında yapay tohumlama önemli bir uygulama haline gelmiştir. Tarihsel süreçte geliştirilen modern tohumlama teknikleri, ana arılara kontrollü sperm aktarımına olanak sağlayarak genetik materyalin yönetilmesine ve koloni performansının artırılmasına önemli katkılar sunmuştur. Bu nedenle bal arılarında üreme sistemlerinin tanımlanması hem biyolojik süreçlerin anlaşılmasına hem de sürdürülebilir arıcılık faaliyetlerinin ve başarılı ıslah programlarının yürütülmesine katkı sağlamaktadır.
Referanslar
Güler A. Besin madde ihtiyaçları ve beslenme. Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Yetiştiriciliği Hastalıkları ve Ürünleri. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Azim Matbaacılık; 2017. s.120–121.
Boes K.E. Honeybee colony drone production and maintenance in accordance with environmental factors: an interplay of queen and worker decisions. Insectes Sociaux. 2010;57(1):1–9.
Nowogrodzki R. Division of labour in the honeybee colony: a review. Bee World. 1984;65(3):109–116.
Wharton K.E., Dyer F.C., Huang Z.Y., Getty T. The honeybee queen influences the regulation of colony drone production. Behavioral Ecology. 2007;18(6):1092–1099.
Lee P.C., Winston M.L. Effects of reproductive timing and colony size on the survival, offspring colony size and drone production in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Ecological Entomology. 1987;12(2):187–195.
Cobey S.W., Tarpy D.R., Woyke J. Standard methods for instrumental insemination of Apis mellifera queens. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2013;52(4):1–18.
Tarpy D.R., Page R.E. The curious promiscuity of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera): evolutionary and behavioral perspectives. American Scientist. 2001;89(4):330–337.
Gençer H.V. Bal arılarında yapay tohumlama. Ankara: Palme Yayınevi; 2018. Yayın No: 1491.
Mackenson O., Tucker K.W. Instrumental insemination of queen bees. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook No. 390. Washington D.C.: USDA; 1970.
Cullen G., Gilligan J.B., Guhlin J.G., Dearden P.K. Germ-stem cells and oocyte production in the honeybee queen ovary. BioRxiv. 2022. doi:10.1101/2022.03.15.484492.
Koeniger G., Koeniger N., Jamie E., Lawrence C. Mating Biology of Honey Bees (Apis mellifera). United States: Wicwas Press; 2014.
Sasaki K., Obara Y. Egg activation and timing of sperm acceptance by an egg in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Sociaux. 2002;49(3):234–240.
Kozii I.V., Wood S.C., Koziy R.V., Simko E. Histomorphological description of the reproductive system in mated honey bee queens. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2021;61(1):114–126. doi:10.1080/00218839.2021.1900636
Winston M.L. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987.
Baer B. Sexual selection in Apis bees. Apidologie. 2005;36(2):187–200.
Zennouche O.S., Iguer-Ouada M., Benmeradi N., Mohammedi A. Structure and organization of the spermatozoa within the spermatheca of honey bee queens Apis mellifera intermissa L. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2015;54(6):577–581.
Pabalan N., Davey K.G., Packer L. Comparative morphology of spermathecae in solitary and primitively eusocial bees (Hymenoptera; Apoidea). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1996;74(5):802–808.
Kressin M., Sommer U., Schnorr B. The spermathecal epithelium of the queen bee (Apis mellifera): morphology, age-dependent changes and cell contacts. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 1996;25(1):31–35.
Martins G.F., Serrão J.E. A comparative study of the spermathecae in bees (Hymenoptera; Apoidea). Sociobiology. 2002;40(3):711–720.
Baer B., Collins J., Maalaps K., den Boer S.P.A. Sperm use economy of honeybee (Apis mellifera) queens. Ecology and Evolution. 2016;6(9):2877–2885.
Poland V., Eubel H., King M., Solheim C., Millar A.H., Baer B. Stored sperm differs from ejaculated sperm by proteome alterations associated with energy metabolism in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Molecular Ecology. 2011;20(12):2643–2654.
Klenk M., Koeniger G., Koeniger N., Fasold H. Proteins in spermathecal gland secretion and spermathecal fluid and the properties of a 29 kDa protein in queens of Apis mellifera. Apidologie. 2004;35(4):371–381.
Weirich G.F., Collins A.M., Williams V.P. Antioxidant enzymes in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Apidologie. 2002;33(1):3–14.
Nascimento J.D., Caneguim B.H., Paula M.C., Ribeiro A.R., Sasso-Cerri E., Rosa J.A. Spermathecae: morphofunctional features and correlation with fat bodies and trachea in six species of vectors of Chagas disease. Acta Tropica. 2019;197:105032. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105032.
Paillard M., Rousseau A., Giovenazzo P., Bailey J.L. Preservation of domesticated honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) drone semen. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2017;110(4):1412–1418.
Rangel J., Fisher A. Factors affecting the reproductive health of honey bee (Apis mellifera) drones—A review. Apidologie. 2019;50(6):759–778.
Page R.E. Jr., Peng C.Y. Aging and development in social insects with emphasis on the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Experimental Gerontology. 2001;36(4–6):695–711.
Klein C.D., Kozii I.V., Wood S.C., Koziy R.V., Zabrodski M.W., Dvylyuk I., de Mattos I.M., Moshynskyy I., Honaramooz A., Simko E. Testicular changes of honey bee drones, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), during sexual maturation. Journal of Insect Science. 2021;21(2):1–12.
Collins A.M., Caperna T.J., Williams V., Garrett W.M., Evans J.D. Proteomic analyses of male contributions to honey bee sperm storage and mating. Insect Molecular Biology. 2006;15(5):541–549.
Moors L., Spaas O., Koeniger G., Billen J. Morphological and ultrastructural changes in the mucus glands of Apis mellifera drones during pupal development and sexual maturation. Apidologie. 2005;36(2):245–254.
Delaplane K., Hagan K., Vogel K., Bartlett L. Mechanisms for polyandry evolution in a complex social bee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2024;78(39):1–10. doi:10.1007/s00265-024-03439-0.
Koeniger G. Mating sign and multiple mating in the honeybee. Bee World. 1986;67(3):141–150.
Baudry E., Solignac M., Garnery L., Gries M., Cornuet J.M., Koeniger N. Relatedness among honeybees (Apis mellifera) of a drone congregation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1998;265(1408):2009–2014.
Koeniger N., Koeniger G. Reproductive isolation among species of the genus Apis. Apidologie. 2000;31(2):313–339.
Woyke J. Why the eversion of the endophallus of honey bee drone stops at the partly everted stage and significance of this. Apidologie. 2008;39(6):627–636.
Woyke J. Three substances ejected by Apis mellifera drones from everted endophallus and during natural matings with queen bees. Apidologie. 2010;41(5):613–621.
Koeniger G. Morpho-functional study of the mating in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie. 1984;15(2):189–203.
Woyke J. The hatchability of lethal eggs in a two sex-allele fraternity of honeybees. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1962;1(1):6–13.
Koeniger N. An evolutionary approach to mating behaviour and drone copulatory organs in Apis. Apidologie. 1991;22(6):581–590.
Woyke J. Dynamics of entry of spermatozoa into the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queen honey bees. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1983;22(3):150–154.
Laidlaw H.H. Origin and development of instrumental insemination of queen bees. In: Moritz R.F.A. (ed.) The Instrumental Insemination of the Queen Bee. Bucharest: Apimondia; 1989. p.9–17.
Gençer V. Bal arılarında yapay tohumlama. Hayvancılık Araştırma Dergisi. 1998;8(1–2):39–51.
Laidlaw H.H. Instrumental insemination of honeybee queens: its origin and development. Bee World. 1987;68(1):17–36.
Erkan C. Arıcılığın tarihçesi. In: Yücel B. (ed.) Bal Arısı ve Arıcılık. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2024. p.1–10.
Oldroyd B.P., Thompson G.J. Behavioural genetics of the honey bee Apis mellifera. In: Simpson S.J. (ed.) Advances in Insect Physiology. Vol. 33. San Diego: Academic Press; 2006. p.1–49.
Plate M., Bernstein R., Hoppe A., Bienefeld K. The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding. Genetics Selection Evolution. 2019;51(1):1–14.
Gillard T.L., Oldroyd B.P. Controlled reproduction in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) via artificial insemination. In: Advances in Insect Physiology. Vol. 59. London: Academic Press; 2020. p.1–42.
Cobey S., Tarpy D.R., Woyke J. Standard methods for instrumental insemination of Apis mellifera queens. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2013;52(4):1–18.
Scientific Beekeeping. II Generation Instrumental Insemination. (20/10/2025 tarihinde http://scientificbeekeeping.co.uk/IIgen%202.html adresinden erişilmiştir).
