Aort Darlığı
Özet
Referanslar
Jahanyar J, Said SM, de Kerchove L, et al. Aortic root anatomy: insights into annular and root enlargement techniques. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;13(3):244-254. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-aae-25.
Yadgir S, Johnson CO, Aboyans V, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of calcific aortic valve and degenerative mitral valve diseases, 1990-2017. Circulation 2020;141(21):1670-1680. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043391
Chen QF, Shi S, Wang YF, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of valvular heart disease, 1990 to 2021. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(24):e037991. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037991.
Sopek Merkaš I, Lakušić N, Predrijevac M, Štambuk K, Hrabak Paar M. Bicuspid aortic valve with associated aortopathy, significant left ventricular hypertrophy or concomitant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(18):4251-4257. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i18.4251.
Verma R, Cohen G, Colbert J, Fedak PWM. Bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy: 2022 guideline update. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2023;38(2):61-67. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001020.
Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Evangelista A, et al; Endorsed by the Heart Valve Society (HVS), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS), Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR), Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI) and the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon). International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60(3):448-476. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab038.
Kalra A, Das R, Alkhalil M, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve disease: Classifications, treatments, and emerging transcatheter paradigms. Struct Heart 2023;8(1):100227. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100227.
Otto CM, Newby DE, Hillis GS. Calcific aortic stenosis: A review. JAMA 2024;332(23):2014-2026. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.16477.
Yu YL, Jiang Q. Advances in pathophysiological mechanisms of degenerative aortic valve disease. Cardiol Res 2025;16(2):86-101. doi: 10.14740/cr2012.
Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: A focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017;30(4):372-392. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009.
Strom JB, Playford D, Stewart S, Strange G. An artificial intelligence algorithm for detection of severe aortic stenosis: A clinical cohort study. JACC Adv. 2024;3(9):101176. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101176.
Adrichem R, van den Dorpel MMP, Hirsch A, Geleijnse ML, Budde RPJ, Van Mieghem NM. Moderate aortic stenosis-advanced imaging, risk assessment, and treatment strategies. Struct Heart 2024;8(5):100279. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100279.
Hecht S, Annabi MS, Stanová V, et al. A novel echocardiographic parameter to confirm low-gradient aortic stenosis severity. JACC Adv. 2024;3(10):101245. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101245.
Généreux P, Sharma RP, Cubeddu RJ, et al. The mortality burden of untreated aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;82(22):2101-2109. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.796.
Richardson C, Gilbert T, Aslam S, et al. Rationale and design of the early valve replacement in severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis trial. Am Heart J 2024;275:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.013.
Généreux P, Schwartz A, Oldemeyer JB, et al; EARLY TAVR Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2025;392(3):217-227. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405880.
Franke KB, Bhatia D, Roberts-Thomson RL, Psaltis PJ. Aortic valve replacement reduces mortality in moderate aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Cardiol 2023;20(1):61-67. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.01.003.
Maznyczka A, Prendergast B, Dweck M, et al. Timing of aortic valve intervention in the management of aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2024;17(21):2502-2514. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.046.
Lee G, Chikwe J, Milojevic M, et al. ESC/EACTS vs. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 2023;44(10):796-812. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac803.
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):e35-e71. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932.
Tran JH, Itagaki S, Zeng Q, et al. Transcatheter or surgical replacement for failed bioprosthetic aortic valves. JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1049.
Alabbadi S, Bowdish ME, Sallam A, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 65 years in the United States. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025:S0022-5223(25)00002-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.12.025.
Hahn RT, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2024;13(3):211-223. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-aae-0166.
Kırali K, Göksedef D, Yakut C. Reverse "U" aortotomy for aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg 2005;20(3):269-270. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.200452.x
Ozgur MM, Hancer H, Yigit F, Aksut M, Ozer T, Altas O, Sarıkaya S, Kırali K. Reverse-U Aortotomy (Kırali Incision) for Aortic Valvular Interventions. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025;73(2):126-131. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776705.
Yakut C, Kırali K. Aort kapak hastalıklarında cerrahi değerlendirme ve cerrahi yaklaşımlar. T Klin Kardiyol 15:111-135, 2002.
Stassen J, Ewe SH, Pio SM, et al. Managing patients with moderate aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2023;16(6):837-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.013.
Kirmani BH, Jones SG, Muir A, et al. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023;12(12):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3.
Kırali K. Miniaturized Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Heart Valve Surgery. In: Kırali K, Coselli JS, Kalangos A (eds). Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Advances in Extracorporeal Life Support, Volume 1. Elsevier, England, 2023 (ISBN: 978-0-323-99302-9). pp 561–564. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-18918-0.00035-8.
Kırali K. Reverse U aortotomy (Kırali incision) for aortic valve replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2016;24(5):467-9. doi: 10.1177/0218492315575847.
Makkinejad A, Monaghan K, Chen SA, et al. Aortic annular enlargement vs isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with matched annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 2025;119(3):568-575. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.022.
Ardal H, Toker ME, Rabuş MB, Uyar I, Antal A, Sişmanoğlu M, Mansuroğlu D, Kirali K, Yakut C. Does aortic root enlargement impair the outcome of patients with small aortic root? J Card Surg 2006;21(5):449-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00274.x.
Meneas C, Voisine P, Mestres C, et al. Aortic root enlargement versus stentless valve implantation for avoidance of patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with small aortic root: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 2024;14(8):e090050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090050.
Jahanyar J, Said SM, de Kerchove L, et al. Aortic root anatomy: insights into annular and root enlargement techniques. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2024;13(3):244-254. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-aae-25.
Son AY, Baldridge AS, Churyla A, et al. Trends and outcomes of aortic root enlargement during bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep 2024;3(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.09.007.
Totsugawa T, Hiraoka A, Tamura K, Yoshitaka H, Sakaguchi T. Ultrasonic annular debridement in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;68(1):81-83. doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01158-8.
Kırali K. (Chapter 14) Stentless Bioprostheses for aortic Valve Replacement in Calcific Aortic Stenosis. In: Aikawa E (ed). Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. In Tech, Croatia, 2013. p 411-449. (ISBN 978-953-51-1150-4).
Alomari M, Paciotti B, Garg P, Noor S, Celik NB, Sareyyupoglu B. Utilization of ultrasonic aspirator for combined aortic and mitral valve decalcification: a case study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2025;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03324-3.
Kırali K, Mansuroğlu D, Ömeroğlu SN, et al. Five-year experience in aortic root replacement with the flanged composite graft. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73(4):1130-1137. Doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03604-9.
Kırali K, Sarikaya S, Ozen Y, et al. Surgery for aortic root abscess: A 15-year experience. Tex Heart Inst J 2016;43(1):20-28. Doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4747.
Ahmed A, Levy KH. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2021;36(7):2486-2495. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15546.
Tran JH, Itagaki S, Zeng Q, et al. Transcatheter or surgical replacement for failed bioprosthetic aortic valves. JAMA Cardiol 2024;9(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1049.
Tarantini G, Tang GHL, Pilgrim T, et al; THIRD Registry Investigators. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing 3 aortic valve interventions: The THIRD Multicenter Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2025;18(1):103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.037.
Ökten ME, Mataracı İ, Erkin A, Kocamaz Ö, Özer T, Kırali K. Stentsiz biyolojik aort kapak kullanımının akustik konforu. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 2010;18(3):167-171.
Dhanekula AS, Nishath T, Aldea GS, Burke CR. Use of a sutureless aortic valve in reoperative aortic valve replacement. JTCVS Tech 2022;13:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.02.025.
Cummings I, Salmasi MY, Bulut HI, Zientara A, AlShiekh M, Asimakopoulos G. Sutureless biological aortic valve replacement (Su-AVR) in redo operations: A retrospective real-world experience report of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03652-7.
Kopjar T, Gasparovic H, Paar MH, Lovric D, Cerina P, Tokic T, Milicic D. Comparison of apixaban versus aspirin for the prevention of latent bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis: study protocol for a prospective randomized trial. Trials 2024;25(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08175-w.
Thuraiaiyah J, Jørgensen TH, Jensen JM, et al. Prospective study on the impact of different antithrombotic therapies on subclinical leaflet thickening and its temporal dynamics in transcatheter aortic valves-The NOTION-4 trial. Am Heart J 2025;279:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.002.
Uimonen M, Kuitunen I, Ponkilainen V, Mennander A, Mattila MS. Antithrombotic management after aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024;19(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02863-z.
Duarte F, Aguiar-Neves I, Guerreiro CE, Silva M, Ferreira ND, Fontes-Carvalho R. Valve thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: State-of-the-art Review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2025;105(4):813-824. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31393.
Groberio JG, Reginato PH, Streit RE, et al. Incidence of aortic valve reintervention in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized studies. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025;73(1):12-22. doi: 10.1007/s11748-024-02090-2.
Ahmed M, Ahsan A, Shafiq A, et al. Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk. Int J Surg 2024;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
Harvey JE 3rd, Kapadia SR, Cohen DJ, et al. Trends in complications among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc 2024;13(17):e031461. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031461.
Mori M, Shioda K, Waldron C, et al. Comparison of outcomes between low-risk aortic valve replacement trials and a surgical registry. JAMA Netw Open 2025;8(1):e2453267. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53267.
Amat-Santos IJ, García-Gómez M, Avanzas P, et al. Surgical vs transcatheter treatment in patients with coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2024;17(21):2472-2485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.003.
Hamodat O, Almuzainy S, Nizar S. Comparative outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: A systematic review. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2024;36(3):242-251. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1393.
Chen T, Gao C, Chen C, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in Chinese patients with intermediate and high surgical risk for aortic stenosis: a decision analysis on effect, affordability and cost-effectiveness. BMJ Open 2024;14(11):e082283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082283.
Song Y, Kim KT, Park SJ, et al. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years. J Chest Surg 2024;57(3):242-251. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.143.
Bowdish ME, Mehaffey JH, Chang SC, et al. Bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients 40 to 75 years of age. J Am Coll Cardiol 2025;85(12):1289-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.01.013.
Loganath K, Craig NJ, Everett RJ, et al. Early intervention in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and myocardial fibrosis: The EVOLVED Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2025;333(3):213–221. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.22730.
Son AY, Baldridge AS, Churyla A, et al. Trends and outcomes of aortic root enlargement during bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep 2024;3(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.09.007.
Thourani VH, Habib R, Szeto WY, Sabik JF, Romano JC, MacGillivray TE, Badhwar V. Survival after surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: A contemporary trial benchmark. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024;117(1):106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.10.006.
Mehaffey JH, Kawsara M, Jagadeesan V, et al. Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025;169(3):866-875.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.012.
Thyregod HGH, Jørgensen TH, Ihlemann N, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation: 10-year outcomes of the NOTION trial. Eur Heart J 2024;45(13):1116-1124. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae043. PMID: 38321820.
Mori M, Shioda K, Waldron C, et al. Comparison of outcomes between low-risk aortic valve replacement trials and a surgical registry. JAMA Netw Open 2025;8(1):e2453267. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53267