Böbrek Taşının Retrograd İntrarenal Cerrahi Tedavisinde Yeni Nesil Aspirasyonlu Girişim Kılıfları

Yazarlar

Emre Kandemir

Özet

Referanslar

Scales CD, Jr., Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. European urology. 2012;62(1):160-5.

Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of endourology. 2012;26(10):1257-63.

Dybowski B, Bres-Niewada E, Rzeszutko M, et al. Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery–a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Central European journal of urology. 2021;74(3):437.

Lee JY, Andonian S, Bhojani N, et al. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi–Full-text. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2021;15(12):E676.

Yuen SKK, Traxer O, Wroclawski ML, et al. Scoping review of experimental and clinical evidence and its influence on development of the suction ureteral access sheath. Diagnostics. 2024;14(10):1034.

Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. The Journal of urology. 2013;189(2):580-4.

De Coninck V, Somani B, Sener ET, et al. Ureteral access sheaths and its use in the future: a comprehensive update based on a literature review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2022;11(17):5128.

Pauchard F, Bhojani N, Chew B, et al. How to measure intra-renal pressure during flexible URS: Historical background, technological innovations and future perspectives. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2024;48(1):42-51.

Chen Y, Li C, Gao L, et al. Novel Flexible Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath Can Actively Control Intrarenal Pressure and Obtain a Complete Stone-Free Status. 2022;36(9):1143-8.

Cacciatore L, Minore A, Bonanno L, et al. Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience. World journal of urology. 2025;43(1):153.

Corrales M, Boeykens M, Del Rio AS, et al. The role of suction devices in enhancing outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a narrative review by the YAU urolithiasis and section of EAU endourology. Current Opinion in Urology.10.1097.

Gauhar V, Traxer O, Yuen SKK, et al. Does intraoperative surgeon reported stone free status (IO-SFS) correlate with CT based post operative stone free status (PO-SFS) in flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) in real-world practice? A prospective global FANS collaborative study group initiative with the section of EAU endourology. World journal of urology. 2025;43(1):1-10.

Chen Y, Li C, Gao L, et al. Novel flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath can actively control intrarenal pressure and obtain a complete stone-free status. Journal of endourology. 2022;36(9):1143-8.

Cui D, Ma Q, Xie S, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for≤ 2 cm renal stones. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):4745.

Gauhar V, Madarriaga YQ, Somani B, et al. Is flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) the next best development for retrograde intrarenal surgery in children? Results of a prospective multicentre study. World journal of urology. 2024;42(1):627.

Wang L, Zhou Z, Gao P, et al. Comparison of traditional and suctioning ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal calculi. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2024;409(1):81.

Ying Z, Ming S, Yang R, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of negative pressure aspiration assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery and traditional percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones larger than 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery. 2025;111(5):3613-28.

Pietropaolo A, Keller EX, Sener TE, et al. Economic burden of imaging and interventions in endourology: A worldwide cost analysis from European Association of Urology Young Academic Urology Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Party. Journal of endourology. 2025;39(4):389-98.

Rassweiler J, Fiedler M, Charalampogiannis N, et al. Robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopy: an update. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):69-77.

Altunhan A, Soyturk S, Guldibi F, et al. Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness. World journal of urology. 2024;42(1):579.

YousefiDarestani M. Exploring intelligent ureteral stent for wireless monitoring and early detection of hydronephrosis: University of British Columbia; 2024.

Tang H, Che Y, Wu Z, et al. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study. Frontiers in surgery. 2025;12:1562428.

Lievore E, Zanetti SP, Fulgheri I, et al. Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath. World journal of urology. 2022;40(1):201-11.

İndir

Yayınlanan

2 Ekim 2025

Lisans

Lisans