Kısa Dental İmplant Uygulamaları ve Prognozunun Değerlendirilmesi
Özet
Diş kayıplarının rehabilitasyonunda dental implantlar ve implant destekli protezler, yüksek başarı oranlarıyla güvenilir tedavi seçenekleri sunmaktadır. Ancak geleneksel yükleme protokollerinde iyileşme süresinin uzun olması, hasta memnuniyetini olumsuz etkileyebilmektedir. Bu bağlamda immediat yükleme protokolü geliştirilmiş, implant yerleştirilmesini takiben ilk bir hafta içinde fonksiyonel yükleme yapılması mümkün hale gelmiştir. Başarılı bir immediat yükleme için primer stabilite, uygun kemik kalitesi ve miktarı, kontrollü oklüzal yükleme ve dengeli protez tasarımı kritik öneme sahiptir. Ayrıca hasta faktörleri, uygulanan cerrahi teknik ve implant dizaynı da başarıyı doğrudan etkilemektedir. Güncel yaklaşımlar arasında özellikle All-on-Four konsepti öne çıkmaktadır. Bu yöntem, tedavi süresini kısaltarak daha öngörülebilir sonuçlar sunmakta ve hasta memnuniyetini artırmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, her vakada detaylı klinik değerlendirme yapılmalı; bruksizm, kötü ağız hijyeni ve yetersiz kemik kalitesi gibi kontrendikasyonlar göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır. Sonuç olarak immediat yükleme, uygun hasta ve koşullarda planlandığında fonksiyonel, estetik ve biyolojik açıdan başarılı sonuçlar sağlayabilen güvenilir bir tedavi seçeneği olarak kabul edilmektedir.
Referanslar
Kanasi E, Ayilavarapu S, Jones J. The aging population: demographics and the biology of aging. Periodontology 2000. 2016;72(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12126
Bataineh AB, Al-Dakes AM. The influence of length of implant on primary stability: an in vitro study using resonance fre quency analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e1–e6.
Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, et al. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2015;42(1):72–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12323
Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, et al. Survival rates of short dental implants (=6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:8-20.
Amine M, Guelzim Y, Benfaida S, et al. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;120:133-142.
Anitua E, Alkhraisat MH. 15-Year follow-up of short dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient: mandible vs maxilla. Ann Anat. 2019;222:88-93.
Chen S, Ou Q, Wang Y, et al. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (>/=10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:1192-1203.
Nisand D, Picard N, Rocchietta I. Short implants compared to implants in vertically augmented bone: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:170-179.
Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P et al. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1119–1124.
Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(Suppl 2):35-51.
Anitua E, Alkhraist MH, Pinas L, et al. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:682–689.
Van Assche N, Michels S, Quirynen M, et al. Extra short dental implants supporting an overdenture in the edentulous maxilla: a proof of concept. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:567–576.
Al-Johany SS, Al Amri MD, Alsaeed S, et al. Dental implant length and diameter: a proposed classification scheme. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:252-60.
Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 199117:126-131.
Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, et al. The anchorage of Brånemark and ITI implants of different lengths. I. An experimental study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:593-600.
Shillinburg HT Jr, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, et al.Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Chicago:Quintessence,1997:89-90.
Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 1997;12(3):360–370.
Glantz PO, Nilner K. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic implant-borne reconstructions. Periodontology 2000. 1998;17:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00129.x
Meijer HJA, Boven C, Delli K, et al. Is there an effect of crown to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 18(Suppl 18):243-252.
Ravidà A, Barootchi S, Alkanderi A, et al. The effect of crown-to-implant ratio on the clinical outcomes of dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:1121–1131.
Fathi A, Rismanchian M, Khodadadi R, et al. Does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported prostheses? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131:819–825.
Sanz M, Naert I, Working Group 2. Biomechanics/risk management (Working Group 2). Clinical oral implants research 2009;20 Suppl 4:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01780.x
Urdaneta RA, Leary J, Lubelski W, et al. The effect of implant size 5 × 8 mm on crestal bone levels around single-tooth implants. J Periodontol. 2012;83(10):1235-1244. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110299.
Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, et al. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):707-714. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01307.x.
Schneider D, Witt L, Hämmerle CHF. Influence of the crown-to-implant length ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting single crown restorations: a cross-sectional retrospective 5-year investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(2):169-174. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02230.x.
Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, et al. Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(6):425-433. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00071.
Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross O, et al. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(7):1934-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.036.
Nissan J, Gross O, Ghelfan O, et al. The effect of splinting implant-supported restorations on stress distribution of different crown-implant ratios and crown height spaces. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(12):2990-2994. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.06.210.
Misch CE. Diagnostic casts, periimplant prosthodontics, treatment prosthesis, and surgical templates. In Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby, 1999:128.
Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant protected occlusion: A biomechanical rationale. Compendium 1994;15:1330-1334.
Ayna M, Wessing B, Gutwald R, et al. A 5-year prospective clinical trial on short implants (6 mm) for single tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: immediate versus delayed loading. Odontology. 2019;107(2):244-253. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0378-x.
Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell'Aquila D, et al. Short dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(1):25-32.
Deporter D, Ogiso B, Sohn DS, et al. Ultrashort sintered porous-surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1280-1286.
Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6x5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:930-937.
Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:139-144.
Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(Suppl 1):104-110.
Fugazzotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatment results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:487-496.
Anitua E, Orive G. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retro spective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J Periodontol. 2010;81:819-826.
Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol 2006;77:1340-1347.
Friberg B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:184-189.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed crite ria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(Suppl):237-259.
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(Suppl 2):136-159.
Felice P, Pellegrino G, Checchi L, et al. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a random ized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1394-1403.
Tolentino da Rosa de Souza P, Binhame Albini Martini M, Reis Azevedo-Alanis L. Do short implants have similar survival rates compared to standard implants in posterior single crown?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(5):890-901.
Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, et al. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior region. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(2):191-213. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12180.
Calvo-Guirado JL, López Torres JA, Dard M, et al. Evaluation of extrashort 4-mm implants in mandibular edentulous patients with reduced bone height in comparison with standard implants: a 12-month results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(7):867-874.
Torassa D, Naldini P, Calvo-Guirado JL, et al. Prospective, clinical pilot study with eleven 4-mm extra-short ımplants splinted to longer implants for posterior maxilla rehabilitation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):357.
Nizam N, Gürlek Ö, Kaval ME. Extra-short implants with osteotome sinus floor elevation: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(2):415-422.
Leighton Y, Carpio L, Weber B, et al. Clinical evaluation of single 4-mm implants in the posterior mandible: A 3-year follow-up pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(1):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.039.
Villarinho EA, Triches DF, Alonso FR, et al. Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: A prospective clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(4):671-680.
Pohl V, Thoma DS, Sporniak-Tutak K, et al. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(4):438-445.
Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, et al. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;47:8-17.
Svezia L, Casotto F. Short dental ımplants (6 mm) versus standard dental ımplants (10 mm) supporting single crowns in the posterior maxilla and/or mandible: 2-year results from a prospective cohort comparative trial. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018;9(3):e4.
Lombardo G, Pighi J, Marincola M, et al. Cumulative success rate of short and ultrashort ımplants supporting single crowns in the posterior maxilla: A 3-year retrospective study. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:8434281. doi: 10.1155/2017/8434281
Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, et al. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(4):254-262.
Gürlek Ö, Kaval ME, Buduneli N, et al. Extra-short implants in the prosthetic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla. Aust Dent J. 2019;64(4):353-358. doi: 10.1111/adj.12711.
Robles D, Fernandez-Hernández S, Punset M, et al. Stability, micromotion, and microstrain in short ımplants with high C/I ratios: combined in vitro and finite element analysis approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025;0(0):1-26. doi: 10.11607/jomi.11547.
Has LC, Orbak R. Effect of bone quality, ımplant length, and loading timing on stress transmission in the posterior mandible: A finite element analysis. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025;12(8):888.
Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(2):165-169. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90301-7.
Salehivaziri H, Yousefimanesh H, Hagh LG, et al. Evaluation of the effects of diameter, length, splinted or non- splinted forms, and crown-to-implant ratio on the stress distribution around extra-short implants in the posterior mandible: Finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025;0(0):1-20. doi: 10.11607/jomi.11298. Epub ahead of print.
Eraslan R, Yagci F, Esim E. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(4):348-357. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13795.
