Prostat Hastalıklarına Yönelik Tedaviler Sonrası İdrar Kaçırma

GacciM, DeNunzioC, SakalisV, RiekenM, CornuJN, Gravas S. Latest Evidence on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. J Clin Med. 2023.

Loughlin KR, Prasad MM. Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol. 2010;183(3):871–7.

Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology. 2005;66(5 Suppl):83–94.

Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with uro- dynamic findings. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1317–20.

Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Investigating the mechanism underlying urinary continence recovery after radi- cal prostatectomy: effectiveness of a longer urethral stump to prevent urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2018;122(3):456–62.

Bessede, T.; Sooriakumaran, P.; Takenaka, A.; Tewari, A. Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: Comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy. World J. Urol. 2016, 35, 549–565.

Porena, M.; Mearini, E.; Mearini, L.; Vianello, A.; Giannantoni, A. Voiding Dysfunction after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: More than External Urethral Sphincter Deficiency. Eur. Urol. 2007, 52, 38–45.

Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA, et al. Patient- and tumour- related prognostic factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(3):674–89.

Mandel P, Kretschmer A, Chandrasekar T, et al. The effect of BMI on clinicopathologic and functional outcomes after open radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(3):297–302.

Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary con- tinence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028–33.

Dell’Oglio P, Stabile A, Gandaglia G, et al. New surgical approaches for clinically high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17(11):1013–31.

Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, et al. Degree of preserva- tion of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatec- tomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):559–68.

Li Y, Xiao Y, Shen Z, Yang S, Li Z, Liao H, Zhou S. Recent Advances in Diagnosing and Treating Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug 31. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16110-1. Epub ahead of print. Erratum in: Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 12.

Rasmussen A, Mouritsen L, Dalgaard A, Frimodt-Møller C. Twenty-four hour pad weighing test: reproducibility and dependency of activity level and fluid intake. Neurourol Urodyn. 1994;13(3):261–5.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405–17.

Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot- assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the pasadena consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):368–81.

Holze S, Mende M, Healy KV, et al. Comparison of various continence definitions in a large group of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a multicentre, prospective study. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):70.

NakaneA,KubotaH,NodaY,etal.Improvement in earlyurinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy based on postoperative pelvic anatomic features: a retrospective review. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):87.

d’Altilia N, Mancini V, Falagario UG, et al. A matched-pair analysis after robotic and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a new definition of continence and the impact of different surgical techniques. Cancers. 2022.

Sandhu JS, Breyer B, Comiter C, et al. Incontinence after prostate treatment: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):369–78.

Cornu JN, Gacci M, Hashim H et al. EAU guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male LUTS. In: EAU Guidelines Published at the 38th EAU Annual Congress, Milan 2023. Arnhem

Hennessey DB, Hoag N, Gani J. Impact of bladder dysfunction in the management of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence-a review. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 2):S103–11.

Zhou L, Chen Y, Yuan X, Zeng L, Zhu J, Zheng J. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for continence after radical prosta- tectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1186067.

Alan C, Eren AE, Ersay AR, Kocoglu H, Basturk G, Demirci E. Efficacy of duloxetine in the early management of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol. 2015;8(1):43–8.

Kotecha P, Sahai A, Malde S. Use of Duloxetine for Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.Eur. Urol. Focus 2020, 7, 618–628.

Meisterhofer,K.; Herzog,S.A.; Strini,K.A.; Sebastianelli,L.; Bauer,R.; Dalpiaz,O. Male Slings for Postprostatectomy Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. Focus 2019, 6, 575–592.

Abrams, P.; Constable, L.D.; Cooper, D.; MacLennan, G.; Drake, M.J.; Harding, C.; Mundy, A.; McCormack, K.; McDonald, A.; Norrie, J.; et al. Outcomes of a Noninferiority Randomised Controlled Trial of Surgery for Men with Urodynamic Stress Incontinence After Prostate Surgery (MASTER). Eur. Urol. 2021, 79, 812–823.

Sacco, E.; Gandi, C.; Marino, F.; Totaro, A.; Di Gianfrancesco, L.; Palermo, G.; Pierconti, F.; Racioppi, M.; Bassi, P. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: A propensity score-matched study. BJU Int. 2020, 127, 229–237.

Khouri,R.K.,Jr.;Ortiz,N.M.;Baumgarten,A.S.;Ward,E.E.;VanDyke,M.E.;Hudak,S.J.;Morey,A.F.ArtificialUrinarySphincter Outperforms Sling for Moderate Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urology 2020, 141, 168–172.

Constable,L.;Abrams,P.;Cooper,D.;Kilonzo,M.;Cotterill,N.;Harding,C.;Drake,M.J.;Pardoe,M.N.;McDonald,A.;Smith, R.; et al. Synthetic sling or artificial urinary sphincter for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery: The MASTER non-inferiority RCT. Health Technol. Assess. 2022, 26, 1–152.

Bettez M, Tu le M, Carlson K et al. 2012 update: guidelines for adult urinary incontinence collaborative consensus document for the Canadiann Urological Association. Can Urol Assoc J 2012 Oct; 6: 354–63.

Angulo JC, Ruiz S, Lozano M, Arance I, Virseda M, Lora D. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) and male readjustment mechanical external (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence. World J Urol. 2021;39(4):1083–92.

Tricard T, Song QX, Munier P, et al. Adjustable continence therapy (proACT) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence post-prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023 update). World J Urol. 2023;41(7):1793–802.

Sacomani CAR, Zequi SC, Costa WHD, et al. Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post- prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44(1):114–20.

Walsh IK, Williams SG, Mahendra V, Nambirajan T, Stone AR. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient: safety, efficacy and satisfaction. BJU Int. 2002;89(4):364–8

Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681–9.

Chow PM, Agrawal-Patel S, Wood H, Angermeier K. Prior male sling does not affect outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter. BJU Int. 2024;133(5):564–9.

Munier P, Nicolas M, Tricard T, Droupy S, Costa P, SAÜSsine C. What if artificial urinary sphincter is not possible? Feasibility and effectiveness of ProACT for patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated by sling. Neurourol Urodynam. 2020;39(5):1417–22.

Plata,M.;Zuluaga,L.;Santander,J.;Salazar,M.;Castaño,J.C.;Benavides-Martínez,J.A.;Garzón,D.L.;Schlesinger,R.;Serrano,B.; Echeverry, M.; et al. Performance of the artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with urinary incontinence: Results from a contemporary long-term real-world nationwide analysis. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2022, 41, 1573–1581.

Tutolo,M.;Cornu,J.;Bauer,R.M.;Ahyai,S.;Bozzini,G.;Heesakkers,J.;Drake,M.J.;Tikkinen,K.;Launonen,E.;Larré,S.;etal. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AÜS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2018, 38, 710–718.

GacciM, DeNunzioC, SakalisV, RiekenM, CornuJN, Gravas S. Latest Evidence on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. J Clin Med. 2023.

Loughlin KR, Prasad MM. Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol. 2010;183(3):871–7.

Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology. 2005;66(5 Suppl):83–94.

Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with uro- dynamic findings. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1317–20.

Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Investigating the mechanism underlying urinary continence recovery after radi- cal prostatectomy: effectiveness of a longer urethral stump to prevent urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2018;122(3):456–62.

Bessede, T.; Sooriakumaran, P.; Takenaka, A.; Tewari, A. Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: Comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy. World J. Urol. 2016, 35, 549–565.

Porena, M.; Mearini, E.; Mearini, L.; Vianello, A.; Giannantoni, A. Voiding Dysfunction after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: More than External Urethral Sphincter Deficiency. Eur. Urol. 2007, 52, 38–45.

Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA, et al. Patient- and tumour- related prognostic factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(3):674–89.

Mandel P, Kretschmer A, Chandrasekar T, et al. The effect of BMI on clinicopathologic and functional outcomes after open radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(3):297–302.

Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary con- tinence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028–33.

Dell’Oglio P, Stabile A, Gandaglia G, et al. New surgical approaches for clinically high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17(11):1013–31.

Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, et al. Degree of preserva- tion of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatec- tomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):559–68.

Li Y, Xiao Y, Shen Z, Yang S, Li Z, Liao H, Zhou S. Recent Advances in Diagnosing and Treating Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug 31. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16110-1. Epub ahead of print. Erratum in: Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 12.

Rasmussen A, Mouritsen L, Dalgaard A, Frimodt-Møller C. Twenty-four hour pad weighing test: reproducibility and dependency of activity level and fluid intake. Neurourol Urodyn. 1994;13(3):261–5.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405–17.

Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot- assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the pasadena consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):368–81.

Holze S, Mende M, Healy KV, et al. Comparison of various continence definitions in a large group of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a multicentre, prospective study. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):70.

NakaneA,KubotaH,NodaY,etal.Improvement in earlyurinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy based on postoperative pelvic anatomic features: a retrospective review. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):87.

d’Altilia N, Mancini V, Falagario UG, et al. A matched-pair analysis after robotic and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a new definition of continence and the impact of different surgical techniques. Cancers. 2022.

Sandhu JS, Breyer B, Comiter C, et al. Incontinence after prostate treatment: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):369–78.

Cornu JN, Gacci M, Hashim H et al. EAU guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male LUTS. In: EAU Guidelines Published at the 38th EAU Annual Congress, Milan 2023. Arnhem

Hennessey DB, Hoag N, Gani J. Impact of bladder dysfunction in the management of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence-a review. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 2):S103–11.

Zhou L, Chen Y, Yuan X, Zeng L, Zhu J, Zheng J. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for continence after radical prosta- tectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1186067.

Alan C, Eren AE, Ersay AR, Kocoglu H, Basturk G, Demirci E. Efficacy of duloxetine in the early management of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol. 2015;8(1):43–8.

Kotecha P, Sahai A, Malde S. Use of Duloxetine for Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.Eur. Urol. Focus 2020, 7, 618–628.

Meisterhofer,K.; Herzog,S.A.; Strini,K.A.; Sebastianelli,L.; Bauer,R.; Dalpiaz,O. Male Slings for Postprostatectomy Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. Focus 2019, 6, 575–592.

Abrams, P.; Constable, L.D.; Cooper, D.; MacLennan, G.; Drake, M.J.; Harding, C.; Mundy, A.; McCormack, K.; McDonald, A.; Norrie, J.; et al. Outcomes of a Noninferiority Randomised Controlled Trial of Surgery for Men with Urodynamic Stress Incontinence After Prostate Surgery (MASTER). Eur. Urol. 2021, 79, 812–823.

Sacco, E.; Gandi, C.; Marino, F.; Totaro, A.; Di Gianfrancesco, L.; Palermo, G.; Pierconti, F.; Racioppi, M.; Bassi, P. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: A propensity score-matched study. BJU Int. 2020, 127, 229–237.

Khouri,R.K.,Jr.;Ortiz,N.M.;Baumgarten,A.S.;Ward,E.E.;VanDyke,M.E.;Hudak,S.J.;Morey,A.F.ArtificialUrinarySphincter Outperforms Sling for Moderate Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urology 2020, 141, 168–172.

Constable,L.;Abrams,P.;Cooper,D.;Kilonzo,M.;Cotterill,N.;Harding,C.;Drake,M.J.;Pardoe,M.N.;McDonald,A.;Smith, R.; et al. Synthetic sling or artificial urinary sphincter for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery: The MASTER non-inferiority RCT. Health Technol. Assess. 2022, 26, 1–152.

Bettez M, Tu le M, Carlson K et al. 2012 update: guidelines for adult urinary incontinence collaborative consensus document for the Canadiann Urological Association. Can Urol Assoc J 2012 Oct; 6: 354–63.

Angulo JC, Ruiz S, Lozano M, Arance I, Virseda M, Lora D. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) and male readjustment mechanical external (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence. World J Urol. 2021;39(4):1083–92.

Tricard T, Song QX, Munier P, et al. Adjustable continence therapy (proACT) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence post-prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023 update). World J Urol. 2023;41(7):1793–802.

Sacomani CAR, Zequi SC, Costa WHD, et al. Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post- prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44(1):114–20.

Walsh IK, Williams SG, Mahendra V, Nambirajan T, Stone AR. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient: safety, efficacy and satisfaction. BJU Int. 2002;89(4):364–8

Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681–9.

Chow PM, Agrawal-Patel S, Wood H, Angermeier K. Prior male sling does not affect outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter. BJU Int. 2024;133(5):564–9.

Munier P, Nicolas M, Tricard T, Droupy S, Costa P, SAÜSsine C. What if artificial urinary sphincter is not possible? Feasibility and effectiveness of ProACT for patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated by sling. Neurourol Urodynam. 2020;39(5):1417–22.

Plata,M.;Zuluaga,L.;Santander,J.;Salazar,M.;Castaño,J.C.;Benavides-Martínez,J.A.;Garzón,D.L.;Schlesinger,R.;Serrano,B.; Echeverry, M.; et al. Performance of the artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with urinary incontinence: Results from a contemporary long-term real-world nationwide analysis. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2022, 41, 1573–1581.

Tutolo,M.;Cornu,J.;Bauer,R.M.;Ahyai,S.;Bozzini,G.;Heesakkers,J.;Drake,M.J.;Tikkinen,K.;Launonen,E.;Larré,S.;etal. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AÜS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2018, 38, 710–718.