Kemiricilerde (Rodentia) Dil Papillalarının Morfolojik Özellikleri
Özet
Geçmişten günümüze kadar deneysel çalışmalarda en çok kullanılan hayvan türleri kemiriciler takımında yer almaktadır. Bu takımda yer alan türler, memeli hayvanlar arasında oldukça fazla bulunmaktadır. Hayvanlarda deneysel modellemeler yapılırken morfolojik özelliklerinin bilinmesi büyük önem arz etmektedir. Bu bölümde dil ve üzerinde bulunan dil papillalarının morfolojik özellikleri ele alınmıştır. Kemiricilerde dil üzerinde papilla filiformis, papilla conica, papilla fungiformis, papilla vallata ve papilla foliate olmak üzere beş tip dil papillası yer almaktadır. Bu papillalardan papilla filiformis ve papilla conica mekanik etkili papillalardır. Papilla fungiformis, papilla vallata ve papilla foliate ise tat duyusunu alan papillalardır. Kemirici türleri arasında bu papillalar morfolojik olarak karşılaştırıldığında büyük oranda benzerliklerin olduğu ancak bir takım farklılıkların da görüldüğü tespit edilmiştir. Bu benzerlik ve farklılıkların bilinmesi yapılacak olan deneysel çalışmalarda hayvanlara verilecek besinlerin seçimine yardımcı olacaktır. Ayrıca ağız yoluyla yapılacak uygulamalarda kolaylıklar sağlayacaktır.
From the past to the present, the most commonly used animal species in experimental studies are rodents. The species in this order are very common among mammals. It is of great importance to know the morphological characteristics of animals when performing experimental modeling. In this section, the morphological features of the tongue and the lingual papillae on it are handled. In rodents, there are five types of lingual papillae on the tongue: filiform papillae, conical papillae, fungiform papillae, vallate papillae and foliate papillae. Of these papillae, filiform papillae and conical papillae are mechanically effective papillae. Fungiform papillae, vallate papillae and foliate papillae are the papillae that receive the sense of taste. When these papillae were compared morphologically among rodent species, it was found that there were great similarities but some differences were also observed. Knowledge of these similarities and differences will help in the selection of nutrients to be given to animals in experimental studies. It will also provide convenience in oral administration.
Referanslar
İde, T. (2003) Hayvan Modelleri. In: Translation ed. Ide T, Laboratuvar Hayvanları Biliminin Temel İlkeleri Türkçe Çeviri, Zutphen LFM, Baumans V, Beynen AC. Chap 10. Ankara: Medipres Yayınları-Ozkan Matbaacılık.
Ergun, Y. Hayvan deneylerinde etik. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi, 2010: 19 (4), 220–235.
Carleton MD, Musser GG. Order Rodentia. In: Wilson, D.E., Reeder, D.M. (Eds.), Mammal Species of the World, A., Taxonomic, Geographic Reference, Johns Hopkins University, Press, Baltimore, 2005; pp. 745–752.
Karataş A. Türkiye’deki Kemirici (Mammalia: Rodentia) Türleri. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg 2011; 68 (2) suppl1. 7-18.
Dursun N. Veteriner Anatomi. Medisan Yayınevi; 2008.
König HE, Liebich HG: Veterinary anatomy of domestic animals. Textbook and Color Atlas.,7th edition. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart- New York;. pp.; 329, 2020.
Goździewska Harłajczuk K, Klećkowska Nawrot J, Barszcz K, et al. Biological aspects of the tongue morphology of wild captive WWCPS rats: a histological, histochemical and ultrastructural study. Anatomical Science International. 2018; 93: 514–532.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-018-0445-y
Hutanu E, Damian A, Micl ̆aus V, et al. Morphometric features and microanatomy of the lingual filiform papillae in the wistar rat. Biology. 2022; 11 (6): 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060920
Ciena AP, dos Santos AC, Vasconcelos BG, et al. Morphological characteristics of the papillae and lingual epithelium of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Acta Zoologica. 2019; 100 (1): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/azo.12230
Toprak B. Light and scanning microscopic structure of filiform papillae in mice. Veterinarski Arhiv. 2006; 76 (6): 555-562.
Toprak B, Kilinç, B. Anatomical and histological features of lingual papillae on tongue in squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). Slovenian Veterinary Research. 2024; 61 (4): 291-297. https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-1792-2023
Wihadmadyatami H, Saragih GR, Gunawan G, et al. Morphological study of the lingual papillae of Jentink’s flying squirrel (Hylopetes platyurus). The Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2020; 50 (2): 239-249.
Beraldo-Massoli MC, Ribeiro PRQ, Vieira LG, et al. Morfologia da língua e características das papilas linguais de Cuniculus paca (Rodentia: Cuniculidae). Biotemas. 2013; 26 (4): 167-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2013v26n4p167
Emura S. Morphology of the lingual papillae of the Japanese lesser flying squirrel and four-toed. Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica. 2019; 96 (1): 23–26. https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj.96.23
Wolczuk K. Dorsal surface of the tongue of the hazel dormouse Muscardinus Avellanarius: scanning electron and light microscopic Studies. Zoologica Poloniae. 2014; 59/1-4: 35-47. https://doi.org/10.2478/zoop-2014-0004
Santos AC dos, Aro MM de, Bertassoli MB, et al. Morphological characteristics of the tongue of the rock cavy-Kerodon rupestris Wied, 1820 (Rodentia, Caviidae). Bioscience Journal. 2015; 1820: 1174–1182.
Cizek P, Hamouzova P, Jekl V, et al. Light and scanning electron microscopy of the tongue of degu (Octodon degus). Anatomical Science International. 2017; 92 (4): 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-016-0346-x
Davydova L, Tkach G, Tymoshenko A, et al. Anatomical and morphological aspects of papillae, epithelium, muscles, and glands of rats’ tongue: Light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopic study. Interventional Medicine & Applied Science. 2017; 9 (3): pp. 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.9.2017.21
Wannaprasert T. Morphological characteristics of the tongue and lingual papillae of the large bamboo rat (Rhizomys sumatrensis). Anatomical Science International. 2018; 93: 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-017-0414-x
Dinç G, Yilmaz S, Karan M, et al. Study by light and scanning electron microscopy of the fungiform papillae on tongue of the porcupine (Hystrix cristata). Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010; 24 (2); 99–102.
Obead WF, Kadhim AB, Zghair FS. Macroanatomical investigations on the oral cavity of male Porcupines (Hystrix cristata). Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2018; 10(3): 623-626.
Al-alshemkhi A, Mohammed ZS, Hussein RM, et al. Histological study of lingual papillae in male hamster, Mesocrictus auratus. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology . 2022; (Special Issue 1): 458-461.
Toprak B, Yılmaz S. Farelerde papilla fungiformislerin postnatal gelişimi üzerine ışık ve taramalı elektron mikroskobik (Sem) incelemeler. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2003; 17: 183-188.
Shindo J, Yoshimura K, Kobayashi K. comparative morphological study on the stereo-structure of the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores of the American Beaver (Castor Canadensis). Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica. 2006; 82 (4): 127–138. 10.2535/ofaj.82.127
Babaei M, Kalantari-Hesari A. Anatomical and histological study of tongue in ground squirrel. International Journal of Biology Reports. 2023; 1 (1): 65-74.
de Souza Reginato G, de Sousa Bolina C, Ii-sei Watanabe IS, et al. Three-dimensional aspects of the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores in the tongue of rats: a scanning electron microscope study. The Scientific World Journal. 2014; Article ID 841879, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/841879.
Igado OO, Adebayo AO, Oriji CC, et al. Macroscopic and microscopic analysis of the tongue of the greater cane rat (Thryonomys Swinderianus, Temminck). Journal of Morphological Science. 2021; 38: 9-15. https://doi.org/10.51929/jms.38.3.2021.
Watanabe IS, Haemmerle CAS, Dias FJ, et al. Structural characterization of the capybara (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) tongue by light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2013; 76: 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22145
Toprak B, Yılmaz S. Light and scanning electron microscopic ınvestigation of postnatal development of vallate papillae in the white laboratory mice. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016; 11 (2): 131-137. https://doi.org/10.17094/avbd.04368
Ciena AP, Bolina Cd.S, de Almeida SRY, et al. Structural and ultrastructural features of the agouti tongue (Dasyprocta aguti Linnaeus, 1766). Journal of Anatomy. 2013; 223: 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12065
Hussein Yousif N, Hashim Hazim N, Mahdi fathil N, et al. Histological study to the tongue for the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) in Iraq. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2022; 20(02): 226–233. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2022.20.2.0329
Ünsaldı E, Yılmaz S. Sincaplarda (Sciurus Vulgaris) papilla vallata’nın makroskobik ve ışık mikroskobik yapısı. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009; 23 (2): 83 – 88.
Toprak B, Yılmaz S. Investigations on postnatal development of the foliate papillae of the tongue by the light and scanning electron microscopy in the white laboratory mice. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire 2007; 10: 479–482.
