Çalışma Belleği Müdahaleleri
Özet
Bu bölüm, çalışma belleği performansını geliştirmeye yönelik alanyazında etkili olduğu bildirilen müdahale programlarını ele almaktadır. Çalışma belleği, bireylerin bilgi işleme ve öğrenme süreçlerinde kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Çalışma belleğine ilişkin müdahaleler genellikle üç ana grupta toplanmaktadır. Bunlar; bilgisayar tabanlı programlar, sınıf düzenlemeleri ve strateji öğretimi müdahaleleridir. Bilgisayar tabanlı programlar arasında COGMED ve Jungle Memory gibi uygulamalar yer almaktadır. Sınıf içi düzenlemelerle yapılan müdahaleler ise dikkat ve yönerge yönetimi gibi basit ama etkili yöntemlerle belleği desteklemeyi hedeflemektedir. En etkili müdahalelerden biri ise öğrencilere kısa süreli ve çalışma belleği stratejilerinin öğretilmesidir. Bu stratejiler arasında tekrar, örgütleme, parçalama, hikâye oluşturma, zihinde canlandırma, çift kodlama gibi stratejiler bulunmaktadır. Özellikle öğrenme güçlüğü olan çocuklarda bu stratejilerin öğretimi, kalıcı öğrenmeyi desteklemektedir. Araştırmalar, strateji kullanımının etkili şekilde öğretildiğinde öğrenme performansını artırdığını göstermektedir.
Referanslar
Alizadeh, I. (2016). Vocabulary teaching techniques: A review of common practices. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1 (1), 24-30.
Alloway, T. P. ve Alloway R. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 20- 29.
Alloway, T., & Alloway, R. (2014). The working memory advantage: Train your brain to function stronger, smarter, faster. Simon and Schuster.
Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2013). Working memory in development. In Working Memory (pp. 63-82). Psychology Press.
Atkinson, R.C. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press. Pp. 89– 195.
Baddaley, A., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 4, 485-493.
Baddaley, A., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. A. Miyake ve P. Shah (Eds.). Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms Of Active Maintenance And Executive Control. (pp. 28- 61). Cambridge University Press.
Baddaley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 417- 422.
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action (Vol. 45). OUP Oxford.
Banikowski, A. K., & Mehring, T. A. (1999). Strategies to enhance memory based on brain research. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(2), 1-16.
Banikowski, A. K., & Mehring, T. A. (1999). Strategies to enhance memory based on brain research. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(2), 1-16.
Bauer, P. J. (2008). Toward a neuro‐developmental account of the development of declarative memory. Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 50(1), 19-31.
Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?. Progress in brain research, 169, 323-338.
Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2012). Current evidence does not support the claims made for CogMed working memory training.
Klingberg, T., Fernell, E., Olesen, P. J., Johnson, M., Gustafsson, P., Dahlström, K.,& Westerberg, H. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD-a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(2), 177-186.
Klingberg, T. (2009). The overflowing brain. Inforamtion overload and the limits of working memory. New York: Oxford University Press
Mastropieri, M. A., Sweda, J., & Scruggs, T. E. (2000). Putting mnemonic strategies to work in an inclusive classroom. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 69-74.
Mawjee, K., Woltering, S., & Tannock, R. (2015). Working memory training in postsecondary students with ADHD: a randomized controlled study. PloS one, 10(9).
McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory & Cognition, 29, 10–17.
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 138(2), 322.
Nemati, A. (2009). Memory vocabulary learning strategies and long-term retention. International journal of vocational and technical education, 1(2), 014-024.
O'malley, J. M., O'Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press.
Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. The modern language Journal, 73(4), 404-419.
Ritchie, D., & Karge, B. D. (1996). Making information memorable: Enhanced knowledge retention and recall through the elaboration process. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 41(1), 28-33.
Reid, R., & Lienemann, T. O. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development for students with learning disabilities, Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(1), 3-11.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1988). Acquisition and transfer of learning strategies by gifted and nongifted students. The Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 153-166.
Shapiro, A. M., & Waters, D. L. (2005). An investigation of the cognitive processes underlying the keyword method of foreign vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 9(2), 129-146.
Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2015). A synthesis of mathematical and cognitive performances of students with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 96-112.
Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Does working memory training generalize?. Psychologica Belgica, 50(3-4), 245-276.
Siegel, L. (2017). The effectiveness of the mnemonic keyword strategy on math vocabulary learning for students with learning disabilities. Rowan University
Söderqvist, S., Bergman Nutley, S., Ottersen, J., Grill, K. M., & Klingberg, T. (2012). Computerized training of non-verbal reasoning and working memory in children with intellectual disability. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6, 271.
Stull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learned-genarated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 808-820.
Swanson, H. L. (2000). Are working memory deficits in readers with learning disabilities hard to change. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 551- 566.
Swanson, H. L., Kehler, P. & Jerman, O. (2010). Working memory, strategy knowledge, and strategy instruction in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43 (1), 24- 47.
Swanson, H. L., Moran, A., Lussier, C., & Fung, W. (2014). The effect of explicit and direct generative strategy training and working memory on word problem-solving accuracy in children at risk for math difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 111-123.
Torgesen, J. K. (1988). Studies of children with learning disabilities who perform poorly on memory span tasks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(10), 605-612.
Turley-Ames, K. J., & Whitfield, M. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of memory and language, 49(4), 446-468.
Young, K. A. (2005). Direct from the source: the value of'think-aloud'data in understanding learning. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6 (1), 19-33.
Van der Molen, M., Van Luit, J. E. H., Van der Molen, M. W., Klugkist, I., & Jongmans, M. J. (2010). Effectiveness of a computerised working memory training in adolescents with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(5), 433-447.
Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. (2011). Self‐regulation and learning strategies. New directions for teaching and learning, 2011(126), 45-53.
Wyra, M., & Lawson, M. J. (2018). Foreign language vocabulary learning using the keyword method: strategy and meta-strategy knowledge. The Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 605-621.
Zahedi, Y., & Abdi, M. (2012). The effect of semantic mapping strategy on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2273-2280.
