Servikal Yetmezlik

Thakur M, Jenkins SM, Mahajan K. Cervical Insufficiency. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK525954/ (2025, accessed 23 February 2025).

Practice Bulletin No. 142: Cerclage for the Management of Cervical Insufficiency. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014; 123: 372–379.

Miller HE, Mayo JA, Reddy RA, et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Insufficiency, Cervical Cerclage, and Preterm Birth. Journal of Women’s Health 2025; 34: 70–77.

Han Y, Li M, Ma H, et al. Cervical insufficiency: a noteworthy disease with controversies. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2020; 48: 648–655.

Nott JP, Bonney EA, Pickering JD, et al. The structure and function of the cervix during pregnancy. Translational Research in Anatomy 2016; 2: 1–7.

Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle M-F, et al. Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2013; 35: 1115–1127.

Monika Thakur SMJ Kunal Mahajan. Thakur M, Jenkins SM, Mahajan K. Cervical Insufficiency. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; October 6, 2024.

Khadija B, Haq W, Awan F, et al. EVALUATING THE ROLE OF CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT IN PREDICTING PRETERM BIRTH: A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS. Biol Clin Sci Res J 2024; 2024: 665.

El-Baradie S, Etman M, Ibrahim M. Cervical length as a predictor for preterm birth in low-risk women. Fayoum University Medical Journal 2023; 12: 10–18.

Dulay AT. Cervical Insufficiency. 2024, https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/gynecology-and-obstetrics/antenatal-complications/cervical-insufficiency (2024).

Wright GL, Wen T, Engel DJ, et al. Delivery Outcomes and Postpartum Readmissions Associated with Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41: e3045–e3051.

Tripathy S, Nallasamy S, Mahendroo M. Progesterone and its receptor signaling in cervical remodeling: Mechanisms of physiological actions and therapeutic implications. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2022; 223: 106137.

Iwahashi M, Muragaki Y, Ooshima A, et al. Decreased Type I Collagen Expression in Human Uterine Cervix during Pregnancy. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2003; 88: 2231–2235.

Ito A, Kitamura K, Mori Y, et al. The change in solubility of type I collagen in human uterine cervix in pregnancy at term. Biochemical Medicine 1979; 21: 262–270.

Yoshida K, Jiang H, Kim M, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Collagen Crosslinks and Corresponding Tensile Mechanical Properties in Mouse Cervical Tissue during Normal Pregnancy. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e112391.

Nallasamy S, Palacios HH, Setlem R, et al. Transcriptome and proteome dynamics of cervical remodeling in the mouse during pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 2021; 105: 1257–1271.

Peralta L, Rus G, Bochud N, et al. Mechanical assessment of cervical remodelling in pregnancy: insight from a synthetic model. Journal of Biomechanics 2015; 48: 1557–1565.

Morrione TG, Seifter S. ALTERATION IN THE COLLAGEN CONTENT OF THE HUMAN UTERUS DURING PREGNANCY AND POST PARTUM INVOLUTION. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 1962; 115: 357–365.

Rechberger T, Uldbjerg N, Oxlund H. Connective tissue changes in the cervix during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by cervical incompetence. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 563–567.

Monsanto SP, Daher S, Ono E, et al. Cervical cerclage placement decreases local levels of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with cervical insufficiency. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2017; 217: 455.e1-455.e8.

Wu S-P, Li R, DeMayo FJ. Progesterone Receptor Regulation of Uterine Adaptation for Pregnancy. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 2018; 29: 481–491.

Cope D, Monsivais D. Progesterone Receptor Signaling in the Uterus Is Essential for Pregnancy Success. Cells 2022; 11: 1474.

Voložonoka L, Bārdiņa L, Kornete A, et al. Unravelling the genetic landscape of cervical insufficiency: Insights into connective tissue dysfunction and hormonal pathways. PLoS ONE 2024; 19: e0310718.

Andersson S, Minjarez D, Yost NP, et al. Estrogen and Progesterone Metabolism in the Cervix during Pregnancy and Parturition. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2008; 93: 2366–2374.

Sharma D, Benwal D, Jhuriya D. Outcome of Pregnancy after Cerclage for Cervical Incompetence at a Tertiary Care Hospital, https://consensus.app/papers/outcome-of-pregnancy-after-cerclage-for-cervical-sharma-benwal/d741a1020a8654d099a8e064bd8ddc92/ (2020).

Meng L, Öberg S, Sandström A, et al. Identification of risk factors for incident cervical insufficiency in nulliparous and parous women: a population-based case-control study. BMC Med 2022; 20: 348.

McCarthy FP, Khashan AS, North RA, et al. Pregnancy loss managed by cervical dilatation and curettage increases the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Human Reproduction 2013; 28: 3197–3206.

Joubert M, Sibiude J, Bounan S, et al. Mid-trimester miscarriage and subsequent pregnancy outcomes: the role of cervical insufficiency in a cohort of 175 cases. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2022; 35: 4698–4703.

Wie JH, Lee JS, Hwang HS, et al. The risk of preterm birth in women with history of short cervix delivering at term in the previous pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 305: 1151–1158.

Harper LM, Owen J. Cervical Insufficiency. GLOWM. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: 10.3843/GLOWM.10190.

Brown JE, Thieme GA, Shah DM, et al. Transabdominal and transvaginal endosonography: Evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1986; 155: 721–726.

Dijkhuizen F. The Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Abnormalities. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996; 87: 345–349.

Burger M, Weber‐Rössler T, Willmann M. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability. Ultrasound in Obstet & Gyne 1997; 9: 188–193.

Roman A, Suhag A, Berghella V. Overview of Cervical Insufficiency: Diagnosis, Etiologies, and Risk Factors. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2016; 59: 237–240.

Yoo H-N, Park KH, Jung EY, et al. Non-invasive prediction of preterm birth in women with cervical insufficiency or an asymptomatic short cervix (≤25 mm) by measurement of biomarkers in the cervicovaginal fluid. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0180878.

Costantine MM, Ugwu L, Grobman WA, et al. Cervical length distribution and other sonographic ancillary findings of singleton nulliparous patients at midgestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021; 225: 181.e1-181.e11.

Berghella V, Hayes E, Visintine J, et al. Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Epub ahead of print 8 October 2008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006843.pub2.

Dalnikovskaya LA, Novikova SV, Logutova LS, et al. Diagnostic value of biochemical markers of isthmic-cervical insufficiency in determining the management tactics of pregnant women with a shortened cervix. Women’s Health and Reproduction; 58. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2023. DOI: 10.31550/2712-8598-ZhZiR-2023-3-3.

Di Salvo L, Cade T, Sheehan P, et al. Identification of biochemical biomarkers associated with premature cervical shortening in high-risk, asymptomatic pregnant women: a retrospective data analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2023; 43: 2212299.

Fang J, Lin Y, Chen Z, et al. The Association of Inflammatory Markers with Maternal-Neonatal Outcome After Cervical Cerclage. JIR 2023; Volume 16: 245–255.

Giouleka S, Boureka E, Tsakiridis I, et al. Cervical Cerclage: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2023; 78: 544–553.

Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ikechebelu JI, et al. Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2020. Epub ahead of print 24 September 2020. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012871.pub2.

Ikechebelu JI, Dim CC, Okpala BC, et al. Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes of History‐Indicated and Ultrasound‐Indicated Cervical Cerclage: A Retrospective Cohort Study. BioMed Research International 2023; 2023: 8782854.

Roman A, Rochelson B, Fox NS, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015; 212: 788.e1-788.e6.

Wu F-T, Chen Y-Y, Chen C-P, et al. Outcomes of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020; 59: 508–513.

Ehsanipoor RM, Seligman NS, Saccone G, et al. Physical Examination–Indicated Cerclage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2015; 126: 125–135.

Harger J. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency An evidence-based analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002; 100: 1313–1327.

Hessami K, Kyvernitakis I, Cozzolino M, et al. McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2022; 35: 6510–6517.

Pribadi A. The effectiveness of McDonald Transvaginal Cerclage in preventing preterm labor. MOG 2023; 31: 157–161.

Basbug A, Bayrak M, Doğan O, et al. McDonald versus modified Shirodkar rescue cerclage in women with prolapsed fetal membranes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2020; 33: 1075–1079.

Sun X, Ding X, Shi C, et al. [Analysis of clinical effect of McDonald cervical cerclage and the related risk factors]. Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi 2016; 51 2: 87–91.

Shennan A, Story L, the Royal College of Obstetricians, Gynaecologists. Cervical Cerclage: Green‐top Guideline No. 75. BJOG 2022; 129: 1178–1210.

Ikechebelu J, Dim C, Okpala B, et al. Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes of Triangular 3-Bites and McDonald Techniques of Cervical Cerclage in Women with Cervical Insufficiency: A Pilot Study. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 2023; 26: 630–635.

Hershkovitz R, Burstein E, Pinku A. Tightening McDonald cerclage suture under sonographic guidance. Ultrasound in Obstet & Gyne 2008; 31: 194–197.

Bonney E, Collins V, Gees E, et al. PPO.66 The Shirodkar procedure for cervical cerclage: a safe and effective alternative to the McDonald suture. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99: A171.3-A172.

Deshpande HG, Ansari AG, Choudhary PS, et al. A Comparative Study of Modified Shirodkar’s Cerclage and Mcdonald’s Cerclage in Cervical incompetence. Ind Jour of Obstet and Gyn Res 2016; 3: 143.

Hume H, Rebarber A, Saltzman DH, et al. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2012; 25: 2690–2692.

Sumners JE, Kuper SG, Foster TL. Transabdominal Cerclage. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2016; 59: 295–301.

Novy MJ. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for the management of repetitive abortion and premature delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1982; 143: 44–54.

Shennan A, Chandiramani M, Bennett P, et al. MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020; 222: 261.e1-261.e9.

Wafi A, Faron G, Parra J, et al. Influence of cervical cerclage interventions upon the incidence of neonatal death: a retrospective study comparing prophylactic versus rescue cerclages. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2018; 10: 29–36.

Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018; 218: 161–180.

Care A, Nevitt SJ, Medley N, et al. Interventions to prevent spontaneous preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy who are at high risk: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2022; e064547.

Romero R, Yeo L, Chaemsaithong P, et al. Progesterone to prevent spontaneous preterm birth. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2014; 19: 15–26.

Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth in pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix: clinical and public health implications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2016; 214: 235–242.

Heyborne K. Reassessing Preterm Birth Prevention After the Withdrawal of 17-α Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2023; 142: 493–501.

Aboulghar MM, Aboulghar MA, Amin YM, et al. The use of vaginal natural progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012; 25: 133–138.

Van Dijk CE, Van Gils AL, Van Zijl MD, et al. Cervical pessary versus vaginal progesterone in women with a singleton pregnancy, a short cervix, and no history of spontaneous preterm birth at less than 34 weeks’ gestation: open label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ 2024; e077033.

Kabiri D, Hamou Y, Gordon G, et al. Comparing the efficacy of vaginal micronized progesterone gel and capsule for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with short cervical length at midtrimester: an indirect comparison meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14: 1153013.

Qureshey EJ, Quiñones JN, Rochon M, et al. Comparison of management options for twin pregnancies with cervical shortening. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2022; 35: 39–45.

Story L, Shennan A. Cervical cerclage: An evolving evidence base. BJOG 2024; 131: 1579–1586.

Zhu J, Huang Y, Zeng H, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of twin pregnancies with cervical insufficiency undergoing cervical cerclage. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 27414.

Lotgering FK. Clinical aspects of cervical insufficiency. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007; 7 Suppl 1: S17.

Shennan A, Story L, Jacobsson B, et al. FIGO good practice recommendations on cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth. Intl J Gynecology & Obste 2021; 155: 19–22.

Zhang Y, Wang Q, Tan Z, et al. The Role of Amnioreduction in Emergency Cervical Cerclage with Bulging Membranes: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Front Surg 2022; 9: 928322.