Dişeti Retraksiyonu: Mekanik, Cerrahi, Kemomekanik ve Güncel Yaklaşımlar
Özet
Dişeti retraksiyonu, restoratif ve protetik diş hekimliğinde ölçü alımının doğruluğunu artırmak, hemostaz sağlamak ve preperasyon sınırlarını netleştirmek için uygulanan kritik bir prosedürdür. Bu süreçte mekanik, cerrahi, kemomekanik ve güncel yöntemler kullanılmaktadır. Mekanik teknikler fiziksel kuvvetle retraksiyon sağlarken, cerrahi yöntemler doğrudan doku uzaklaştırmaya yöneliktir. Kemomekanik yaklaşımlar ise kimyasal ajanların yardımıyla hemostazı destekler. Günümüzde, hasta konforunu artıran, daha az invaziv alternatifler de geliştirilmiştir. Bu kitap bölümü, dişeti retraksiyonunun temel prensiplerini, farklı tekniklerin avantajlarını ve klinik uygulamalarını detaylı bir şekilde ele almaktadır.
Gingival retraction is a crucial procedure in restorative and prosthetic dentistry to enhance impression accuracy, achieve hemostasis, and improve the visibility of preparation margins. Various techniques, including mechanical, surgical, chemomechanical, and modern approaches, are employed for this purpose. Mechanical methods rely on physical displacement, while surgical techniques involve direct tissue removal. Chemomechanical strategies incorporate chemical agents to support hemostasis. Recently, less invasive and more patient-friendly alternatives have been developed. This book chapter comprehensively explores the principles of gingival retraction, the advantages of different techniques, and their clinical applications.
Referanslar
Thomas MS, Joseph RM, Parolia A. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (15488578). 2011;32(5).
Benson B, Bomberg T, Hatch R, Hoffman Jr W. Tissue displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1986;55(2):175-81.
Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Jekki R, Won J. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. Dental Clinics. 2014;58(1):45-68.
Donovan T, Gandara B, Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1985;53(4):525-31.
Adnan S, Agwan MAS. Gingival retraction techniques: a review. Dental update. 2018;45(4):284-97.
Sorensen JA, Doherty FM, Newman MG, Flemmig TF. Gingival enhancement in fixed prosthodontics. Part I: Clinical findings. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1991;65(1):100-7.
La Forgia A. Mechanical-chemical and electrosurgical tissue retraction for fixed prosthesis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1964;14(6):1107-14.
Wassell R, Barker D, Walls A. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: impression materials and technique. British dental journal. 2002;192(12):679-90.
Ruel J, Schuessler PJ, Malament K, Mori D. Effect of retraction procedures on the periodontium in humans. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1980;44(5):508-15.
Al Hamad KQ, Azar WZ, Alwaeli HA, Said KN. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2008;35(12):1053-8.
Phatale S, Marawar P, Byakod G, Lagdive SB, Kalburge JV. Effect of retraction materials on gingival health: A histopathological study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2010;14(1):35-9.
Woycheshin FF. An evaluation of the drugs used for gingival retraction. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1964;14(4):769-76.
Anneroth G, Nordenram A. Reaction of the gingiva to the application of threads in the gingival pocket for taking impressions with elastic material. An experimental histological study. Odontologisk revy. 1969;20(3):301-10.
Baharav H, Kupershmidt I, Laufer B-Z, Cardash HS. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17(5).
Harrison JD. Effect of retraction materials on the gingival sulcus epithelium. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1961;11(3):514-21.
Feng J, Aboyoussef H, Weiner S, Singh S, Jandinski J. The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2006;15(2):108-12.
Ramadan F, El-Sadeek M, Hassanein E-S. Histopathologic response of gingival tissues to hemodent and aluminum chloride solutions as tissue displacement materials. Egyptian dental journal. 1972;18(4):337-52.
Scott A. Use of an erbium laser in lieu of retraction cord: a modern technique. General dentistry. 2005;53(2):116-9.
Parker S. The use of lasers in fixed prosthodontics. Dental Clinics. 2004;48(4):971-98.
Jetter C. Soft-tissue management using an Er, Cr: YSGG laser during restorative procedures. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2008;29(1):46-9.
Sulieman M. An overview of the use of lasers in general dental practice: 2. Laser wavelengths, soft and hard tissue clinical applications. Dental update. 2005;32(5):286-96.
Stuffken M, Vahidi F. Preimpression troughing with the diode laser: A preliminary study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016;115(4):441-6.
Magid KS, Strauss RA. Laser use for esthetic soft tissue modification. Dental Clinics of North America. 2007;51(2):525-45.
Brady WF. Periodontal and restorative considerations in rotary gingival curettage. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 1982;105(2):231-6.
Kamansky FW, Tempel TR, Post AC. Gingival tissue response to rotary curettage. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1984;52(3):380-3.
DeVitre R, Galburt RB, Maness WJ. Biometric comparison of bur and electrosurgical retraction methods. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1985;53(2):179-82.
Malone WF, Manning JL. Electrosurgery in restorative dentistry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1968;20(5):417-25.
D'Souza R. Pulpal and periapical immune response to electrosurgical contact of cervical metallic restorations in monkeys. Quintessence International. 1986;17(12).
Dawes JC, Mahabir RC, Hillier K, Cassidy M, De Haas W, Gillis AM. Electrosurgery in patients with pacemakers/implanted cardioverter defibrillators. Annals of plastic surgery. 2006;57(1):33-6.
Noble WH, McClatchey KD, Douglass GD. A histologic comparison of effects of electrosurgical resection using different electrodes. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1976;35(5):575-9.
Donovan TE, Chee WW. Current concepts in gingival displacement. Dental Clinics. 2004;48(2):433-44.
Ellestad M. Stress testing in asymptomatic patients. Stress testing principles and practice: FA Davis, Philadelphia; 1980.
Hansen PA, Tira DE, Barlow J. Current methods of finish‐line exposure by practicing prosthodontists. Journal of Prosthodontics. 1999;8(3):163-70.
Jokstad A. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords. The journal of Prosthetic dentistry. 1999;81(3):258-61.
Bowles W, Tardy S, Vahadi A. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents. Journal of dental research. 1991;70(11):1447-9.
Conrad HJ, Holtan JR. Internalized discoloration of dentin under porcelain crowns: a clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2009;101(3):153-7.
Gupta G, Kumar S, Rao H, Garg P, Kumar R, Sharma A, et al. Astringents in dentistry: a review. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and health sciences. 2012;2(3).
Hilley M, Milan S, Giescke Jr A, Giovannitti J. Fatality associated with the combined use of halothane and gingival retraction cord. Anesthesiology (Philadelphia). 1984;60(6):587-8.
Bailey JH, Fischer DE. Procedural hemostasis and sulcular fluid control: a prerequisite in modern dentistry. Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry: PPAD. 1995;7(4):65-75; quiz 6.
De Gennaro G, Landesman H, Calhoun J, Martinoff J. A comparison of gingival inflammation related to retraction cords. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1982;47(4):384-6.
Bennani V, Aarts JM, He LH. A comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement techniques. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2012;107(6):388-92.
Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Ercoli C. Tissue management with a new gingival retraction material: a preliminary clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1996;75(3):242-7.
Aldridge T, Brennan PA, Crosby-Jones A, Turner M. Use of a polyvinyl acetyl sponge (Merocel®) nasal pack to prevent kinking of the endotracheal tube used during laser excision. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013;51(3):268.
