Polietereterketonun Yapısı, Özellikleri ve Diş Hekimliğinde Kullanımı
Özet
Polietereterketon (PEEK), diş hekimliği alanında giderek daha fazla kullanılan yüksek performanslı bir polimerdir. Biyouyumluluğu, hafifliği, düşük elastiklik modülü ve kimyasal dayanıklılığı nedeniyle metal alaşımlara alternatif olarak değerlendirilir. CAD/CAM teknolojisi ile işlenebilmesi, dijital diş hekimliği uygulamalarına uyum sağlamasına olanak tanır. PEEK, protezler, implant üst yapıları, restoratif uygulamalar ve ortodontik apareyler gibi birçok alanda kullanılır. Bununla birlikte, estetik sınırlamaları ve kemik ile biyolojik bağlanmasının yetersizliği, kullanımını kısıtlayan başlıca faktörlerdir. Bu kitap bölümü, PEEK'in kimyasal ve fiziksel özelliklerini, diş hekimliğindeki kullanım alanlarını, avantajlarını ve sınırlamalarını kapsamlı bir şekilde ele almaktadır.
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance polymer increasingly used in dentistry. Due to its biocompatibility, lightweight nature, low elastic modulus, and chemical resistance, it is considered an alternative to metal alloys. Its compatibility with CAD/CAM technology allows seamless integration into digital dentistry. PEEK is widely applied in prosthetics, implant abutments, restorative treatments, and orthodontic appliances. However, its aesthetic limitations and insufficient biological bonding with bone restrict its use. This book chapter comprehensively discusses the chemical and physical properties of PEEK, its applications in dentistry, and its advantages and limitations.
Referanslar
Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone—a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2013;101(7):1209-16.
Wiesli MG, Özcan M. High-performance polymers and their potential application as medical and oral implant materials: a review. Implant dentistry. 2015;24(4):448-57.
Panayotov IV, Orti V, Cuisinier F, Yachouh J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2016;27:1-11.
Staniland P, Wilde C, Bottino F, Di Pasquale G, Pollicino A, Recca A. Synthesis, characterization and study of the thermal properties of new polyarylene ethers. Polymer. 1992;33(9):1976-81.
Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845-69.
Nieminen T, Kallela I, Wuolijoki E, Kainulainen H, Hiidenheimo I, Rantala I. Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: Mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3‐year follow‐up. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2008;84(2):377-83.
Yurchenko ME, Huang J, Robisson A, McKinley GH, Hammond PT. Synthesis, mechanical properties and chemical/solvent resistance of crosslinked poly (aryl-ether–ether–ketones) at high temperatures. Polymer. 2010;51(9):1914-20.
Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. International journal of molecular sciences. 2014;15(4):5426-45.
Sheiko N, Kékicheff P, Marie P, Schmutz M, Jacomine L, Perrin-Schmitt F. PEEK (polyether-ether-ketone)-coated nitinol wire: Film stability for biocompatibility applications. Applied Surface Science. 2016;389:651-65.
Clarke IC, Donaldson T, Bowsher JG, Nasser S, Takahashi T. Current concepts of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Orthopedic Clinics. 2005;36(2):143-62.
Bathala L, Majeti V, Rachuri N, Singh N, Gedela S. The role of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) in dentistry–a review. Journal of medicine and life. 2019;12(1):5.
Kalaycı E, Avinç O, Yavaş A. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) fibers. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;38(2):168-86.
Hearle J. Physical structure and fibre properties. Regenerated cellulose fibres. 2001;18:199.
Sarot JR, Contar CMM, Cruz ACCd, de Souza Magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2010;21:2079-85.
Seferli Z, Sarıdağ S. PEEK polimerinin dişhekimliğinde kullanımı. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2020;7(2):354-63.
Nishigawa K, Bando E, Nakano M. Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2001;28(5):485-91.
Staines M, Robinson W, Hood J. Spherical indentation of tooth enamel. Journal of materials science. 1981;16:2551-6.
Wang B, Huang M, Dang P, Xie J, Zhang X, Yan X. PEEK in fixed dental prostheses: Application and adhesion improvement. Polymers. 2022;14(12):2323.
Skirbutis G, Dzingutė A, Masiliūnaitė V, Šulcaitė G, Žilinskas J. PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. A review. Stomatologija. 2018;20(2):54-8.
Kakkad N, Yadav NS, Hazari P, Narwani S, Somkuwar K, Basha S, et al. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of poly ether ether ketone (peek) and zirconia copings using resin cement with or without adhesive: An in vitro study. Materials. 2022;15(12):4167.
Beuer F, Steff B, Naumann M, Sorensen JA. Load‐bearing capacity of all‐ceramic three‐unit fixed partial dentures with different computer‐aided design (CAD)/computer‐aided manufacturing (CAM) fabricated framework materials. European journal of oral sciences. 2008;116(4):381-6.
Costa-Palau S, Torrents-Nicolas J, Brufau-de Barberà M, Cabratosa-Termes J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2014;112(3):680-2.
Pereira ALC, de Medeiros AKB, de Sousa Santos K, de Almeida ÉO, Barbosa GAS, Carreiro AdFP. Accuracy of CAD-CAM systems for removable partial denture framework fabrication: A systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2021;125(2):241-8.
Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Ferrari M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:1-11.
Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dental materials. 2012;28(3):273-8.
Benli M, Eker Gümüş B, Kahraman Y, Gökçen-Rohlig B, Evlioğlu G, Huck O, et al. Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers. Odontology. 2020;108:240-50.
Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clinical oral implants research. 1996;7(2):143-52.
Schwitalla A, Müller W-D. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2013;39(6):743-9.
Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, Kim SK, Kwon HB, Kim MJ. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly‐ether‐ether‐ketone dental implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2012;100(4):1044-52.
Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2016;60(1):12-9.
Gu X, Sun X, Sun Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Yu K, et al. Bioinspired modifications of PEEK implants for bone tissue engineering. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2021;8:631616.
Suphangul S, Rokaya D, Kanchanasobhana C, Rungsiyakull P, Chaijareenont P. PEEK biomaterial in long-term provisional implant restorations: a review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2022;13(2):33.
Koutouzis T, Richardson J, Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2011;37(sp1):174-82.
Meningaud J, Spahn F, Donsimoni J. After titanium, peek? Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale. 2012;113(5):407-10.
Han X, Gao W, Zhou Z, Yang S, Wang J, Shi R, et al. Application of biomolecules modification strategies on PEEK and its composites for osteogenesis and antibacterial properties. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2022;215:112492.
Khurshid Z, Nedumgottil BM, Ali RMM, Bencharit S, Najeeb S. Insufficient evidence to ascertain the long-term survival of PEEK dental prostheses: A systematic review of clinical studies. Polymers. 2022;14(12):2441.
Çulhaoğlu AK, Özkır SE, Şahin V, Yılmaz B, Kılıçarslan MA. Effect of various treatment modalities on surface characteristics and shear bond strengths of polyetheretherketone‐based core materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2020;29(2):136-41.
Tipton P. High performance polymers-Part one. Private Dentistry October. 2015:60-5.
Wimmer T, Huffmann AMS, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration. Dental Materials. 2016;32(6):e127-e36.
Gouveia DdNM, Razzoog ME, Sierraalta M, Alfaro MF. Effect of surface treatment and manufacturing process on the shear bond strength of veneering composite resin to polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2022;128(5):1061-6.
Bakar MA, Cheng M, Tang S, Yu S, Liao K, Tan C, et al. Tensile properties, tension–tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Biomaterials. 2003;24(13):2245-50.
Almasi D, Iqbal N, Sadeghi M, Sudin I, Abdul Kadir MR, Kamarul T. Preparation methods for improving PEEK’s bioactivity for orthopedic and dental application: a review. International journal of biomaterials. 2016;2016(1):8202653.
Lin G-m, Xie G-y, Sui G-x, Yang R. Hybrid effect of nanoparticles with carbon fibers on the mechanical and wear properties of polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2012;43(1):44-9.
Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, et al. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2014;112(6):1489-97.
Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller W-D, Schwitalla AD. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dental Materials. 2018;34(9):e246-e54.
