Brucella Enfeksiyonları
Özet
Hayvanlarda ve insanlarda enfeksiyonlara sebep olan bazı önemli bakteriyel etkenler ile bu etkenlerin oluşturduğu enfeksiyonların ele alındığı bu bölümde, Corynebacterium, Brucella, Erysipelothrix cinsleri içerisinde yer alan önemli bakteri türleri ile Mollicutes sınıfı içerisinde bulunan Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma ve Acholeplasma cinsleri içerisinde yer alan önemli bakteriyel etkenler yer almaktadır. Konular, mümkün olduğu kadar anlaşılır ve sade bir dil kullanılarak şekillendirilmiştir. Geniş bir bakış açısıyla ve detaylı olarak işlenmeye çalışılan güncel bilgi, sistematik bir sıra takip edilerek sunulmuştur. Böylece söz konusu enfeksiyonlar, genel bilgi, etiyoloji, patogenez, teşhis, koruma ve kontrol başlıkları altında toplanmıştır. Enfeksiyonların anlatımı sırasında, bazı konularda daha önceden elde edilmiş olan saha deneyimlerinden de istifade edilmiştir. Konular, öğrencilerden araştırmacılara, her seviyedeki okuyucuya hitap edebilecek şekilde sunulmuştur.
In this chapter, some critical bacterial agents that cause infections in animals and humans, and infections caused by these agents are explained. Essential bacterial species in the genera of Corynebacterium, Brucella, and Erysipelothrix and important bacterial agents in the genera of Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and Acholeplasma in the Mollicutes class are considered. The topics have been explained in as clear and plain language as possible. The current information, which is tried to be covered from a broad perspective and in detail, is presented systematically. Thus, the infections in question are grouped under the headings of general information, etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, protection, and control. During the presentation of the infections, previous field experiences were also utilized in some topics. The topics can appeal to readers at all levels, from undergraduate students to researchers.
Referanslar
Hu J, Hang B, Xu Y, Sun Y. Gram Negative Aerobe (Chapter 10), Hu J, Hang B, Xu Y, Sun Y. (Eds.), Animal Microbiology içinde. China: Science Press and Narosa Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.; 2020. p. 138-147.
Songer JG, Post KW. Veteriner Hekimlik Mikrobiyolojisi. (Özlem Anğ ve N. Yakut Özgür, Çev. Ed.). İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri; 2012. p. 200-207.
World Organisation For Animal Health (WOAH). Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, thirteenth edition (Updated 29/11/2024), Chapter 3.1.4. Brucellosis (Infection with B. abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis). 2024. (20.12.2024 tarihinde https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.01.04_BRUCELLOSIS.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
World Organisation For Animal Health (WOAH). Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, thirteenth edition (Updated 29/11/2024), Chapter 3.8.7. Ovine epididymitis (Brucella ovis). 2024. (20.12.2024 tarihinde https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.08.07_OVINE_EPID.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Lopez G, Escobar GI, Ayala SM, et al. Detection of antibodies to Brucella ovis in sheep milk using B. ovis and B. canis antigen. Veterinary Microbiology. 2006; 116: 232–238. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.03.023
Saytekin AM, Ak S. Direct diagnosis of Brucella species through multiplex PCR formed by a new method. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2018; 154: 86–94. doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.10.011
Yumuk Z, O’Callaghan D. Brucellosis in Turkey an overview. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2012; 16: 228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.011
Corbel MJ, Menachem B. Genus-1 Brucella, Garrity GM (Ed.), Bergey’s Manuel of Systematic Bacteriology Second Edition, Volume Two. The Proteobacteria Part C. The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilon proteobacteria içinde. The USA: Springer; 2005. p. 370-386.
Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, Verger JM. Techniques For The Brucellosis Laboratory. Paris: INRA; 1988.
Garrido-Abellan F, Blasco Martinez JM, Duran-Ferrer M, et al. Brucellosis in sheep and goats (Brucella melitensis). Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare, European Commission, SANCO.C.2/AH/R23/2001, 1-89. 2001. (20.12.2024 tarihinde https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-12/sci-m_scah_out59_en.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır)
Aydın N. Brucella İnfeksiyonları, Arda M. (Ed.), Özel Mikrobiyoloji (4. Baskı) içinde. Ankara: Medisan Yayın Evi; 1997. p. 110-125.
Farrell ID. The development of a new selective medium for the isolation of Brucella abortus from contaminated sources. Research in Veterinary Science. 1974; 16: 280–286. doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(18)33726-3
De Miguel MJ, Marin CM, Munoz PM, et al. Development of a selective culture medium for primary isolation of the main Brucella species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011; 49(4): 1458-1463. doi:10.1128/JCM.02301-10
Baily GG, Krahn JB, Drasar BS, et al. Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1992; 95: 271-275.
Romero C, Gamazo C, Pardo M, et al. Spesific detection of Brucella DNA by PCR. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 1995; 33(3): 615-617. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.615-617.1995
Mukherjee F, Jain J, Patel V, et al. Multiple genus-spesific markers in PCR assays improve the specifity and sensitivity of diagnosis of brucellosis in field animals. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2007; 56: 1309-1316. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47160-0
Lopez-Goni I, Garcia-Yoldi D, Marin CM, et al. Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay (Bruce-ladder) for molecular typing of all Brucella species and of the vaccine strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008; 46: 3484–3487. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00837-08
Godfroid J, Nielsen K, Saegerman C. Diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife. Croatian Medical Journal. 2010; 51: 296-305. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.296
Pouillot R, Garin–Bastuji B, Gerbier G, et al. The brucellin skin test as a tool to differentiate false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis. Veterinary Research. 1997; 28(4): 365–374.
Dieste-Perez L, Blasco JM, De Miguel MJ, et al. Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis. Veterinary Microbiology. 2014; 168: 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.10.024
Nicoletti P. Brucellosis: Past, present and future. Section of Biological and Medical Sciences and Arts. 2010; 31(1): 21-32.
Godfroid J, Scholz HC, Barbier T, et al. Brucellosis at the animal / ecosystem / human interface at the beginning of the 21st century. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2011; 102: 118-131. doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.007
Blasco JM. Existing and future vaccines against brucellosis in small ruminants. Small Ruminant Research. 2006; 62: 33-37. doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.034
Schurig GG, Sriranganathan N, Corbel NJ. Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future. Veterinary Microbiology. 2002; 90: 479-496. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00255-9
El Idrissi AH, Benkirane A, El Maadoudi M, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of Brucella abortus strain RB51 and Brucella melitensis Rev. 1 live vaccines against experimental infection with Brucella melitensis in pregnant ewes. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties. 2001; 20(3): 741-747. doi: 10.20506/rst.20.3.1305
İyisan AS, Akmaz Ö, Gökçe Düzgün S, ve ark. Türkiye’ de sığır ve koyunlarda brucellosisin seroepidemiyolojisi. Pendik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi. 2000; 31(1): 21-75.
Gıda ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü (GKGM). Brusellanın Konjuktival Aşı ile Kontrol ve Eradikasyonu Projesi, 2012/3 Nolu Genelge. 2012. (20. 12. 2024 tarihinde https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/Mevzuat/Genelgeler/BRUCELLA.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır)
