Hayvan Refahının Kesimhane ve Et Muayenesi Süreçlerindeki Önemi ve Etkili Uygulamalar
Özet
Hayvan refahı, hayvanların fiziksel ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlarının karşılanmasını, stres ve acıdan korunmasını ve doğal davranışlarını sergileyebilecekleri koşulların sağlanmasını amaçlar. Bu gereklilikler, et kalitesi, gıda güvenliği ve ekonomik fayda açısından da önemlidir. Beş temel özgürlük ilkesine dayanan anlayış, hayvanların açlık, susuzluk, rahatsızlık, hastalık, stres ve kısıtlanmış davranışlardan uzak bir ortamda yaşamalarını öngörür. Nakliye, bekletme, bayıltma ve kesim süreçlerinde bu ilkelerin uygulanması kritik bir rol oynar. Bayıltma yöntemleri ve uygun barınma koşulları, hayvan refahını korurken, ürünlerin kalite standartlarına ulaşmasını sağlar. Uluslararası standartlar ve yasal düzenlemeler, etik uyumu zorunlu kılarken, artan kamu bilinci ve tüketici talepleri süreçlerin iyileştirilmesini desteklemektedir.
Animal welfare aims to meet the physical and psychological needs of animals, protect them from stress and pain, and provide conditions that allow them to exhibit natural behaviors. These requirements are also essential for meat quality, food safety, and economic benefits. The concept, based on the Five Freedoms principle, envisions an environment where animals are free from hunger, thirst, discomfort, disease, stress, and restricted behaviors. The implementation of these principles is critical during transport, lairage, stunning, and slaughter processes. Stunning methods and proper housing conditions not only protect animal welfare but also ensure that products meet quality standards. International standards and legal regulations mandate ethical compliance, while increasing public awareness and consumer demands support process improvements.
Referanslar
Atasever M, Alişarlı M. Helâl gıda, Journal of Halal Life Style. 2020; 2(2), 95-101.
FAWC. Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: Past, present and future. London: Farm animal welfare council, 2009.
Elischer M. The Five Freedoms: A history lesson in animal care and welfare. Michigan State University Extension; 2019. Erişim: https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/an_animal_welfare_history_lesson_on_the_five_freedoms
Fifty years of the Five Freedoms. Brooke; 2015. Erişim: https://www.thebrooke.org/news/fifty-years-five-freedoms.
Blokhuis HJ, Keeling LJ, Gavinelli A, Serratosa J. Animal welfare's impact on the food chain. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2008:19(Suppl. 1), 79–87.
Koknaroglu H, Akunal T. Animal welfare: An animal science approach. Meat Science, 2013:95(4), 821–827.
Tayar M, Atasever M. Et Muayenesi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Yayın Ünitesi; 2006.
Villarroel M, María GA, Sierra I, Sañudo C, Garćia-Belenguer S, Gebresenbet G. Critical points in the transport of cattle to slaughter in Spain that may compromise the animals' welfare. Veterinary Record, 2001:149(6), 173–176.
Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bock B, Roe E. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008:113(4), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.008
Elanor W, Anne MH, Michael C. Livestock welfare and consumer perceptions of welfare-friendly products. Animal Frontiers, 2018:8(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy003
European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 442: Attitudes of Europeans towards animal welfare. European Union. 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm
Miranda DL, Lama GC. Transport and pre-slaughter logistics: Definitions and current tendencies in animal welfare and meat quality. Veterinaria Mexico, 2013:44(1), 31–56.
Costa LN, Fiego DPL, Tassone F, Russo V. The relationship between carcass bruising in bulls and behaviour observed during pre-slaughter phases. Veterinary Research Communications, 2006: 30, 379–381.
Huertas S, Gil A, Piaggio J, Van Eerdenburg F. Transportation of beef cattle to slaughterhouses and how this relates to animal welfare and carcase bruising in an extensive production system. Animal Welfare, 2010:19(3), 281–285.
Jarvis AM, Selkirk L, Cockram MS. The influence of source, sex class and pre-slaughter handling on the bruising of cattle at two slaughterhouses. Livestock Production Science, 1995:43(3), 215–224.
Mcnally PW, Warriss PD. Recent bruising in cattle at abattoirs. Veterinary Record, 1996:138(6), 126–128.
Romero MH, Gutierrez C, Sanchez JA. Evaluation of bruises as an animal welfare indicator during pre-slaughter of beef cattle. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2012: 25(2), 267–275.
Strappini, AC, Metz JHM, Gallo C, Frankena K, Vargas R, de Freslon I, Kemp B. Bruises in culled cows: When, where and how are they inflicted? Animal, 2013:7(3), 485–491.
Weeks C, Mcnally P, Warriss P. Influence of the design of facilities at auction markets and animal handling procedures on bruising in cattle. Veterinary Record, 2002:150(24), 743–748.
Webster AJF. Animal welfare: Limping towards Eden. UFAW Animal Welfare Series. Wiley-Blackwell, 2005.
Keeling LJ, Gonyou HW. Social behaviour in farm animals. CABI Publishing, 2001.
Main DCJ, Clegg J, Spatz A, Green LE. Repeatability of a lameness scoring system for finishing pigs. Veterinary Record, 2000:147(20), 574-576. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.147.20.574.
March S, Brinkmann J, Winkler C. A new lameness scoring system for dairy cows. Proceedings of the 5th International Dairy Federation Animal Health and Welfare Conference, 2007:149-155.
Grandin, T. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. Journal of Animal Science, 1997:75(1), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.751249x
Weeks CA, Nicol CJ. Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal, 2006:62(2), 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933906000346
Cockram MS. A review of behavioural and physiological responses of sheep to stressors to identify potential behavioural signs of distress. Animal Welfare, 2004:13(4), 283-291.
Tarrant PV. Transportation of cattle by road. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1990:28(1-2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90053-Z
Broom DM. Welfare assessment and welfare problem areas during handling and transport. In Livestock handling and transport (2nd ed., pp. 43-61). CABI Publishing, 2000.
Knowles TG. A review of the road transport of cattle. Veterinary Record, 1999:144(8), 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.144.8.197
Alişarlı M. Kesim yöntemleri. DİB, Güncel Dini Meseleler İstişare Toplantısı-IV, Günümüzde Helâl Gıda, 26-28 Kasım, Afyonkarahisar, 2011.
European Food Safety Authority. Scientific opinion on the use of a low atmosphere pressure system (LAPS) for stunning poultry. EFSA Journal, 2017:15(12), 5056.
Martin JE, Christensen K, Vizzier-Thaxton Y, Mitchell MA, McKeegan DEF. Behavioural, brain and cardiac responses to hypobaric hypoxia in broiler chickens. Physiology & Behavior, 2016:163, 25-36.
Grandin T. Animal welfare and meat production. CABI Publishing, 2003.
Cockram MS, Lee RA. Some effects of transport on the health of sheep. Veterinary Record, 1991:128(7), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.128.7.128
World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. OIE. 2011. https://www.oie.int/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals
