Minimally Invasive Multi-Valve Surgery
Özet
This chapter discusses the development, techniques, and benefits of minimally invasive multi-valve surgery. Compared to traditional sternotomy, minimally invasive surgery uses smaller incisions, resulting in less trauma. This approach is particularly preferred when interventions on the mitral, tricuspid, and aortic valves are required simultaneously.
Advantages of minimally invasive multi-valve surgery include reduced blood loss, less pain, shorter hospital stays, and better cosmetic outcomes. However, the limited surgical field can make the procedure technically challenging. Preoperative evaluations must carefully assess the patient’s anatomy and any comorbid conditions. Anesthesia management and patient positioning are critical to surgical success.
During the procedure, femoral artery and venous cannulation are commonly used, though central cannulation may be necessary in some cases. Crystalloid cardioplegia is often utilized for myocardial protection. Surgeons may also employ video-assisted techniques during valve repair or replacement. Despite its complexity, minimally invasive multi-valve surgery has demonstrated excellent outcomes even in challenging cases.
Bu bölümde minimal invaziv çoklu kapak cerrahisinin gelişimi, teknikleri ve avantajları ele alınmaktadır. Minimal invaziv cerrahi, geleneksel sternotomiye kıyasla daha küçük kesilerle yapılmakta ve daha az travmaya neden olmaktadır. Bu yaklaşım, özellikle mitral, triküspit ve aort kapaklarının aynı anda müdahale edilmesi gereken durumlarda tercih edilmektedir.
Minimal invaziv çoklu kapak cerrahisinin avantajları arasında daha az kan kaybı, daha az ağrı, daha kısa hastanede kalış süresi ve daha iyi kozmetik sonuçlar yer alır. Ancak cerrahi alanın dar olması, işlemi teknik olarak zorlaştırabilir. Preoperatif değerlendirmede hastanın anatomik özellikleri ve eşlik eden hastalıklar dikkatle incelenmelidir. Anestezi yönetimi ve hastanın pozisyonlandırılması cerrahinin başarısı için kritik öneme sahiptir.
Cerrahi sırasında femoral arter ve venöz kanülasyon sıkça tercih edilirken, bazı durumlarda santral kanülasyon da uygulanabilir. Miyokard koruması için genellikle kristalloid kardiopleji kullanılır. Cerrahlar, kapak onarımı veya değişimi sırasında video yardımlı tekniklerden de faydalanabilir. Minimal invaziv çoklu kapak cerrahisi, karmaşık vakalarda bile başarılı sonuçlar verebilmektedir.
Referanslar
Aris A. Francisco Romero, the first heart surgeon. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64(3):870-871. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00760-1
Braile DM, Godoy MF de. History of heart surgery in the world. 1996. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc Orgao Of Soc Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012;27(1):125-136. doi:10.5935/1678-9741.20120019
Blatchford JW. Ludwig Rehn: the first successful cardiorrhaphy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;39(5):492-495. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)61972-8
Johnson PSL. The History of Cardiac Surgery, 1896-1955. The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1970.
Gıbbon JH Jr. Artificial maintenance of circulation during experimental occlusion of pulmonary artery. Arch Surg. 1937;34(6):1105-1131. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1937.01190120131008
Vineberg A. Coronary vascular anastomoses by internal mammary arter implantation. Can Med Assoc J. 1958;78(11):871-879.
Meyer JA. Werner Forssmann and catheterization of the heart, 1929. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49(3):497-499. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(90)90272-8
Tuffier T. Etat actuel de la chirurgie intra-thoracique: plevre, poumon, coeur et pericarde, aorte, oesophage. Masson;1914.
Cutler EC, Levine SA. Cardiotomy and Valvulotomy for Mitral Stenosis; Experimental Observations and Clinical Notes Concerning an Operated Case with Recovery. Boston Med Surg J. 1923;188(26):1023-1027. doi:10.1056/NEJM192306281882601
DiBardino DJ. The history and development of cardiac transplantation. Tex Heart Inst J. 1999;26(3):198-205.
Navia JL, Cosgrove DM. Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(5):1542-1544. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(96)00779-5
Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, Bichell DP, Rosborough DM, Sears SP et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg. 1997;226(4):421-426; discussion 427-428. doi:10.1097/00000658-199710000-00003
Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, Le Bret E, Haugades B, Dassier P et al. [Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success]. C R Acad Sci III. 1996;319(3):219-223.
Falk V, Walther T, Autschbach R, Diegeler A, Battellini R, Mohr FW. Robot-assisted minimally invasive solo mitral valve operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115(2):470-471. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70295-8
Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Aupècle B, Kieffer J P, Tournay D, Guibourt P et al. [Computer assisted open heart surgery. First case operated on with success]. C R Acad Sci III. 1998;321(5):437-442. doi:10.1016/s0764-4469(98)80309-0
Karpuzoglu OE, Ozay B, Sener T, Aydin NB, Ketenci B, Aksu T et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and off-pump coronary artery bypass in single-vessel disease. Heart Surg Forum. 2009;12(1):E39-43. doi:10.1532/HSF98.20081068
Kronzon I, Matros TG. Intraoperative echocardiography in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and novel cardiovascular surgical techniques. Am Heart Hosp J. 2004;2(4):198-204. doi:10.1111/j.1541-9215.2004.03048.x
Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(4):1499-1511. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060
Cheng DCH, Martin J, Lal A, Diegeler A, Folliguet TA, Nifong LW et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innov Phila Pa. 2011;6(2):84-103. doi:10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182167feb
Santana O, Larrauri-Reyes M, Zamora C, Mihos CG. Is a minimally invasive approach for mitral valve surgery more cost-effective than median sternotomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(1):97-100. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivv269
Lamelas J. Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the “Miami Method.” Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(1):33-37. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.08.17
Mihos CG, Pineda AM, Davila H, Larrauri-Reyes MC, Santana O. Combined Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery Performed via a Right Minithoracotomy Approach. Innov Phila Pa. 2015;10(5):304-308. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000191
Pfannmüller B, Davierwala P, Hirnle G, Borger MA, Misfeld M, Garbade J et al. Concomitant tricuspid valve repair in patients with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(6):758-764. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.10.01
Lio A, Miceli A, Ferrarini M, Glauber M. Minimally invasive approach for aortic and mitral valve surgery. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2016;50(6):1204-1205. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw208
Wang D, Wang Q, Yang X, Wu Q, Li Q. Mitral valve replacement through a minimal right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy versus standard median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(3):704-708. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.059
Zia K, Mangi AR, Bughio H, Tariq K, Chaudry PA, Karim M. Initial Experience of Minimally Invasive Concomitant Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement/Repair at a Tertiary Care Cardiac Centre of a Developing Country. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5707. doi:10.7759/cureus.5707
Xu C, Pan J, Zhou Q, Wang Q, Cao H, Fan F et al. Right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy for double valve replacement. J Card Surg. 2015;30(5):427-430. doi:10.1111/jocs.12516
Kim K, Ball C, Grady P, Mick S. Use of del Nido Cardioplegia for Adult Cardiac Surgery at the Cleveland Clinic: Perfusion Implications. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46(4):317-323.
Mujtaba SS, Clark SC. Extended trans-septal versus left atrial approach in mitral valve surgery: 1017 patients’ experience. Heart Asia. 2018;10(2):e011008. doi:10.1136/heartasia-2018-011008
el Saegh MM, Aly MA, el Sayegh T, Mostafa EA, Zaghloul T, Saber W. Transseptal approach for mitral valve surgery. A safe alternative when the need calls. Tex Heart Inst J. 1993;20(1):23-27.
Harky A, Kusu-Orkar TE, Chan JSK, Noshirwani A, Savarimuthu S, Pousios D et al. Left Atrial or Transeptal Approach for Mitral Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;46(3):100602. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100602
Nienaber JJ, Glower DD. Minitransseptal versus left atrial approach to the mitral valve: a comparison of outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(3):834-839; discussion 839. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.014
Boulemden A, Nadarajah D, Szafranek AA, Richens D. Permanent pacemaker insertion postmitral surgery: Do the atrial access and the origin of the sinoatrial node artery matter? J Card Surg. 2019;34(7):563-569. doi:10.1111/jocs.14074
Santana O, Reyna J, Benjo AM, Lamas GA, Lamelas J. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2012;42(4):648-652. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs098
Santana O, Reyna J, Grana R, Buendia M, Lamas GA, Lamelas J. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus standard sternotomy in obese patients undergoing isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(2):406-410. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.09.039
Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Khalpey Z, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH et al. Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(1):165-169. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.077
Lee R, Li S, Rankin JS, O'Brien SM, Gammie JS, Peterson ED et al. Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(3):677-684; discussion p 684. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.009
Vassileva CM, Li S, Thourani VH, Suri RM, Williams ML, Lee R et al. Outcome characteristics of multiple-valve surgery: comparison with single-valve procedures. Innov Phila Pa. 2014;9(1):27-32. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000028
Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(3):670-679.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.010
Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(6):455-462. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.053
Anyanwu AC, Adams DH. Should complex mitral valve repair be routinely performed using a minimally invasive approach? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012;27(2):118-124. doi:10.1097/HCO.0b013e328350214f
Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG. One Thousand Minimally Invasive Valve Operations. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):529-534. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000137141.55267.47
Borger MA, Moustafine V, Conradi L, Knosalla C, Richter M, Merk DR et al. A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Minimally Invasive Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(1):17-25. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.022
Pojar M, Karalko M, Dergel M, Vojacek J. Minimally invasive or sternotomy approach in mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):228. doi:10.1186/s13019-021-01578-9
Brown LJ, Mellor SL, Niranjan G, Harky A. Outcomes in minimally invasive double valve surgery. J Card Surg. 2020;35(12):3486-3502. doi:10.1111/jocs.14997
