Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery
Özet
This chapter examines minimally invasive mitral valve surgery techniques. Right mini-thoracotomy is the most commonly used approach for mitral valve repair, utilizing small incisions and video-assisted surgery. Patient selection depends on surgical risks and the complexity of mitral valve pathology. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery offers benefits like reduced pain, faster recovery, and lower infection risk.
Bu bölüm, minimal invaziv mitral kapak cerrahisinin yöntemlerini ele almaktadır. Sağ mini-torakotomi, mitral kapak tamiri için en yaygın tercih edilen tekniktir. Bu yöntem, küçük insizyonlar ve video destekli cerrahi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilir. Hasta seçimi, cerrahi riskler ve mitral kapak patolojisinin karmaşıklığına göre yapılmalıdır. Minimal invaziv mitral kapak cerrahisi, daha az ağrı, kısa iyileşme süresi ve daha düşük enfeksiyon riski sunar.
Referanslar
Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdieneri JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of val- vular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–11.
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Levang OW, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2003;24(13):1231–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x
Chandrashekhar Y, Westaby S, Narula J. Mitral stenosis. Lancet [Internet]. 2009;374(9697):1271–83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60994-6
Enriquez-Sarano M, Akins CW, Vahanian A. Mitral regurgitation. Lancet [Internet]. 2009;373(9672):1382–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60692-9
Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, Buttenheim PM, Esposito R, Baumann FG, et al. Minimally invasive port access surgery reduces operative morbidity for valve replacement in the elderly. Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2(3):212–5.
Rosengart TK, Feldman T, Borger MA. Percutaneous and minimally invasive valve procedures. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovas- cular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group, and Quality of Care and Outcome Research Interdisciplinary Working group. Circulation. 2008; 117:1750–67.
Cuartas MM, Javadikasgari H, Pfannmueller B, Seeburger J, Gillinov AM, Suri RM, et al. Mitral valve repair: robotic and other minimally invasive approaches. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2017;60(3):394–404.
Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Aupècle B, Kieffer JP, Tournay D, Guibourt P, et al. Computer assisted open heart surgery. First case operated on with success. C R Acad Sci III. 1998;321(5):437–42.
Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM, Maziarz DM, Sorrell VL, Holbert D, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2003;75(2):438–42; discussion 443. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04554-x
Saunders PC, Grossi EA, Sharony R, Schwartz CF, Ribakove GH, Culliford AT, et al. Minimally invasive technology for mitral valve surgery via left thoracotomy: experience with forty cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2004;127(4):1026–31; discussion 1031-2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.053
Modi P, Rodriguez E, Hargrove WC 3rd, Hassan A, Szeto WY, Chitwood WR Jr. Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery: a 12-year, 2-center experience in 1178 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2009;137(6):1481–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.041
Aklog L, Adams DH, Couper GS, Gobezie R, Sears S, Cohn LH. Techniques and results of direct-access minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a paradigm for the future. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 1998;116(5):705–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)00448-6
Onnasch JF, Schneider F, Falk V, Mierzwa M, Bucerius J, Mohr FW. Five years of less inva- sive mitral valve surgery: from experimental to rou- tine approach. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(2):132–5.
Woo YJ, Rodriguez E, Atluri P, Chitwood WR Jr. Minimally invasive, robotic, and off-pump mitral valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2006 Summer;18(2):139–47. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2006.07.004
Chaney MA, Nikolov MP, Tuchek M, Bakhos M. An institution’s initial experience with port-access min- imally invasive cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12(6):617–9.
Wimmer-Greinecker G, Matheis G, Dogan S, Aybek T, Kessler P, Westphal K, et al. Complications of port-access cardiac surgery. J Card Surg [Internet]. 1999;14(4):240–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1999.tb00987.x
Saroul C, Keller G, Benaissa M, Lehot JJ. Anesthesia for minimally invasive cardiac procedure. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011;30(1):S38–43.
Casselman F, Aramendi J, Bentala M, Candolfi P, Coppoolse R, Gersak B, et al. Endoaortic clamping does not increase the risk of stroke in minimal access mitral valve surgery: A multicenter experience. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2015;100(4):1334–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.003
Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, Diegeler A, Battellini R, Autschbach R, et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 1999;67(6):1643–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00284-2
Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, van Son JA, Autschbach R. Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 1998;115(3):567–74; discussion 574-6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70320-4
Gulielmos V, Wagner FM, Waetzig B, Solowjowa N, Tugtekin SM, Schroeder C, et al. Clinical experience with minimally invasive coronary artery and mitral valve surgery with the advantage of cardio- pulm onary bypass and cardioplegic arrest using the port access technique. World J Surg. 1999;23(5):480–5.
Grossi EA, Zakow PK, Ribakove G, Kallenbach K, Ursomanno P, Gradek CE, et al. Comparison of post-operative pain, stress response, and quality of life in port access vs. standard sternotomy coronary bypass patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16 Suppl 2:S39-42.
Kowalewski M, Malvindi PG, Suwalski P, Raffa GM, Pawliszak W, Perlinski D, et al. Clinical safety and effectiveness of endoaortic as compared to transthoracic clamp for small thoracotomy mitral valve surgery: Meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2017;103(2):676–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.072
Sirin G. Surgical strategies for severely atherosclerotic (porcelain) aorta during coronary artery bypass grafting. World J Cardiol [Internet]. 2021;13(8):310–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v13.i8.310
Russell S, Butt S, Vohra HA. In search of optimal cardioplegia for minimally invasive valve surgery. Perfusion [Internet]. 2022;37(7):668–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02676591211012554
Dogan S, Aybek T, Risteski PS, Detho F, Rapp A, Wimmer-Greinecker G, et al. Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2005;79(2):492–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.066
Davierwala PM, Seeburger J, Pfannmueller B. Minimally-invasive mitral valve surgery: “the Leipzig experience.” Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(6):744–50.
Glauber M, Miceli A, Canarutto D, Lio A, Murzi M, Gilmanov D, et al. Early and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right minithoracotomy: a 10-year experience in 1604 patients. J Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 2015;10(1):181. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0390-y
McClure RS, Athanasopoulos LV, McGurk S, Davidson MJ, Couper GS, Cohn LH. One thousand minimally invasive mitral valve operations: early outcomes, late outcomes, and echocardiographic follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2013;145(5):1199–206. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.12.070
Lange R, Voss B, Kehl V, Mazzitelli D, Tassani-Prell P, Günther T. Right minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for mitral valve repair: A propensity matched comparison. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2017;103(2):573–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.055
Goldstone AB, Atluri P, Szeto WY, Trubelja A, Howard JL, MacArthur JW Jr, et al. Minimally invasive approach provides at least equivalent results for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2013;145(3):748–56. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.093
Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, Bichell DP, Rosborough DM, Sears SP, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg [Internet]. 1997;226(4):421–6; discussion 427-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199710000-00003
Glower DD, Landolfo KP, Clements F, Debruijn NP, Stafford-Smith M, Smith PK, et al. Mitral valve operation via Port Access versus median sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 1998;14 Suppl 1:S143-7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00123-7
Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, O’Brien SM, Rankin JS, Griffith BP. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: Trends and outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2010;90(5):1401-1410.e1.
Cheng DCH, Martin J, Lal A, Diegeler A, Folliguet TA, Nifong LW, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila) [Internet]. 2011;6(2):84–103. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182167feb
Cao C, Gupta S, Chandrakumar D, Nienaber TA, Indraratna P, Ang SC, et al. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve repair for patients with degenerative mitral disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 2013;2(6):693–703. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.11.08
Lamelas J, Williams RF, Mawad M, LaPietra A. Complications associated with femoral cannulation during minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2017;103(6):1927–32. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.098
Tutschka MP, Bainbridge D, Chu MWA, Kiaii B, Jones PM. Unilateral postoperative pulmonary edema after minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures: A case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2015;99(1):115–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.067
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. G Ital Cardiol (Rome) [Internet]. 2022;23(5 Suppl 1):e1–75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1714/3787.37722
Rao A, Tauber K, Szeto WY, Hargrove WC, Atluri P, Acker M, et al. Robotic and endoscopic mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 2022;11(6):614–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/acs-2022-rmvs-28
Bolling SF, Li S, O’Brien SM, Brennan JM, Prager RL, Gammie JS. Predictors of mitral valve repair: clinical and surgeon factors. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2010;90(6):1904–11; discussion 1912. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.062
Ellis FH. Surgery for Acquired Mitral Valve Disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1967.
Harken DE, Glidden EM. Experiments in intracardiac surgery. II. Intracardiac Visualization. J Thorac Surg. 1943;12:566–72.
Sakakibara H, Ichikawa T, Hattori J. An intraoperative method for observation of cardiac septal defect using a cardioscope. Operation. 1956;10:285–90.
Sakakibara S, Iikawa T, Hattori J, Inomata K. Direct visual operation for aortic stenosis: cardioscopic studies. J Int Coll Surg. 1958;29(5 Pt 1):548–62.
Kaneko Y, Kohno T, Ohtsuka T, Ohbuchi T, Furuse A, Konishi T. Video-assisted observation in mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 1996;111(1):279–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70430-0
Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A. Open heart operation under video surgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvulo- plasty) operated with success. C R Acad Sci. 1996;319:219–23.
Chitwood WR Jr, Wixon CL, Elbeery JR, Moran JF, Chapman WH, Lust RM. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 1997;114(5):773–80; discussion 780-2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70081-3
Chitwood WR Jr, Elbeery JR, Chapman WH, Moran JM, Lust RL, Wooden WA, et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: the “micro-mitral” operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 1997;113(2):413–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70341-6
Felger JE, Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Holbert D. Evolution of mitral valve surgery: toward a totally endoscopic approach. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2001;72(4):1203–8; discussion 1208-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02978-2
Casselman FP, Van Slycke S, Wellens F, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F, et al. Mitral valve surgery can now routinely be performed endoscopically. Circulation [Internet]. 2003;108 Suppl 1(10_suppl_1):II48-54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000087391.49121.ce
Mohr FW, Onnasch JF, Falk V. The evolution of minimally invasive valve surgery-2 year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:233–8.
Reichenspurner H, Boehm D, Reichart B. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using three-dimensional video and robotic assistance. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 1999;11(3):235–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1043-0679(99)70064-x
Vanermen H, Farhat F, Wellens F, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery: from Port-Access towards a totally endoscopic procedure. J Card Surg [Internet]. 2000;15(1):51–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2000.tb00444.x
Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Mohr FW. Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high volume center. Circulation. 2013;128:483–91.
Sardari Nia P, Daemen JHT, Maessen JG. Development of a high-fidelity minimally invasive mitral valve surgery simulator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2019;157(4):1567–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.014
Joyce DL, Dhillon TS, Caffarelli AD, Joyce DD, Tsirigotis DN, Burdon TA, et al. Simulation and skills training in mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2011;141(1):107–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.059
Verberkmoes NJ, Verberkmoes-Broeders EMPC. A novel low-fidelity simulator for both mitral valve and tricuspid valve surgery: the surgical skills trainer for classic open and minimally invasive techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2013;16(2):97–101. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs451
Hossien A. Low-fidelity simulation of mitral valve surgery: Simple and effective trainer. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2015;72(5):904–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.010
Greenhouse DG, Grossi EA, Dellis S, Park J, Yaffee DW, DeAnda A Jr, et al. Assessment of a mitral valve replacement skills trainer: a simplified, low-cost approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2013;145(1):54–9, 59.e1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.074
New mitral valve prolapse trainer (#1320) [Internet]. Thecgroup.com. [cited 2023 Apr 24]. Available from: https://www.thecgroup.com/product/new-mitral-valve-prolapse-trainer-1320/.
