Ürolojik Robotik Cerrahi
Özet
Ürolojik robotik cerrahi, minimal invaziv cerrahinin en ileri yöntemlerinden biri olup, özellikle prostat kanseri, böbrek tümörleri ve mesane cerrahisinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Da Vinci cerrahi sistemi gibi robotik platformlar, cerrahlara üç boyutlu görüntüleme, artırılmış hassasiyet ve daha az invaziv müdahale imkânı sunarak hastalar için daha hızlı iyileşme süreci, daha az kan kaybı ve daha düşük komplikasyon riski sağlamaktadır. Hemşirelik, robotik cerrahi sürecinin her aşamasında kritik bir rol oynar. Ameliyat sırasında hemşireler, robotik kolların yerleştirilmesi ve enstrümanların yönetimi konusunda cerrahi ekibe destek sağlar. Postoperatif dönemde ise hastaların ağrı yönetimi, enfeksiyon riskinin azaltılması ve mobilizasyonlarının sağlanması gibi bakım süreçlerinde aktif rol alırlar. Ayrıca, hemşireler hasta eğitimi ile taburculuk sürecini kolaylaştırarak komplikasyon riskini en aza indirir. Robotik cerrahinin gelişmesiyle birlikte, sağlık profesyonellerinin bu teknolojiye uyum sağlaması ve özel eğitimlerden geçmesi önemlidir.
Urological robotic surgery is one of the most advanced forms of minimally invasive surgery and is widely used for prostate cancer, kidney tumours and bladder surgery. Robotic platforms such as the Da Vinci Surgical System provide surgeons with three-dimensional imaging, increased precision and less invasive procedures, resulting in faster patient recovery, less blood loss and reduced risk of complications. Nursing plays a critical role at every stage of the robotic surgery process. During surgery, nurses assist the surgical team with the placement of the robotic arms and management of instruments. In the post-operative period, they play an active role in care processes such as pain management, reducing the risk of infection and ensuring patient mobilization. In addition, nurses minimise the risk of complications by facilitating the discharge process through patient education. With the development of robotic surgery, it is important that healthcare professionals adapt to this technology and receive specific training.
Referanslar
May DN, Saltzman AF, Krlin RR. Robotic urological surgery. In Kaye AD, Urman RD, eds. Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery. Cambridge University Press, 2017. pp. 88-99. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/perioperative-management-in-robotic-surgery/robotic-urological-surgery/4181158B2EABD71D2433D80B14BE6DD9 Erişim tarihi: 10 Kasım 2023
Schuessler Z, Scott Stiles A, Mancuso P. Perceptions and experiences of perioperative nurses and nurse anaesthetists in robotic‐assisted surgery. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2020;29(1-2):60-74.
Randell R, Honey S, Alvarado N, ve ark. Embedding robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication and decision making: a review of the experience of surgical teams. Cognition, Technology & Work. 2016;18:423-437.
Rassweiler JJ, Autorino R, Klein J,ve ark. Future of robotic surgery in urology. BJU International. 2017;120(6):822-841.
Morrell ALG, Morrell-Junior AC, Morrell AG, ve ark. The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões. 2021;48:e20202798.
Koukourikis P, Rha KH. Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2021;62(1):14.
Almujalhem A, Rha KH. Surgical robotic systems: What we have now? A urological perspective. BJU International Compass. 2020;1(5):152-159.
Shah AA, Bandari J, Pelzman D, ve ark. Diffusion and adoption of the surgical robot in urology. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2021;10(5):2151.
Honda M, Morizane S, Hikita K, ve ark. Current status of robotic surgery in urology. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. 2017;10(4):372-381.
Douissard J, Hagen ME, Morel P. The da Vinci surgical system. In Domen CE, Kim KC, Puy RV, Volpe P, eds. Bariatric robotic surgery: a comprehensive guide. 2019. p,13-27.
Azizian M, Liu M, Khalaji I, ve ark. The da Vinci surgical system.In Abedin-Nasab MH, ed. Handbook of Robotic and Image-Guided Surgery. Elsevier. 2020. pp. 39-55.
Runciman M, Darzi A, Mylonas GP. Soft robotics in minimally invasive surgery. Soft Robotics. 2019;6(4):423-443.
Van Brunschot S, Hollemans RA, Bakker OJ, ve ark. Minimally invasive and endoscopic versus open necrosectomy for necrotising pancreatitis: a pooled analysis of individual data for 1980 patients. Gut. 2018;67(4):697-706.
Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, ve ark. Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Surgery. 2018;267(6):1034-1046.
Jain S, Gautam G. Robotics in urologic oncology. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2015;11(1):40.
Jeong W, Kumar R, Menon M. Past, present and future of urological robotic surgery. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2016;57(2):75-83.
Sivaraman A, Sanchez-Salas R, Prapotnich D, ve ark. Robotics in urological surgery: evolution, current status and future perspectives. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2015;39(7):435-441.
Soputro NA, Olivares R. Current urological applications of the Hugo™ RAS system. World Journal of Urology. 2023;41(9):2555-2561.
Kaye DR, Mullins JK, Carter HB, ve ark. Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?. Nature Reviews Urology. 2015;12(1):55-60.
Musch M, Janowski M, Steves A, ve ark. Comparison of early postoperative morbidity after robot‐assisted and open radical cystectomy: results of a prospective observational study. BJU International. 2014;113(3):458-467.
Rassweiler JJ, Scheitlin W, Heidenreich A, ve ark. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? A European Perspective. European Urology. 2008;54(5):1004-1019.
Gkegkes ID, Karydis A, Tyritzis SI, ve ark. Ocular complications in robotic surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2015;11(3):269-274.
Frost EAM, Gevirtz CM. Perioperative complications of robotic surgery. In Kaye AD, Urman RD, eds. Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery. Cambridge University Press 2017. p:210-216. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/perioperative-management-in-robotic-surgery/perioperative-complications-of-robotic-surgery/D7A5094F521C070564F182A97A6CD340 Erişim tarihi: 10 Kasım 2023
Koc E, Canda AE. Robotic urologic surgery complications. Mini-invasive Surgery. 2018;2:7.
Kang MJ, De Gagne JC, Kang HS. Perioperative nurses’ work experience with robotic surgery: a focus group study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2016;34(4):152-158.
Uslu Y, Altınbaş Y, Özercan T, ve ark. The process of nurse adaptation to robotic surgery: A qualitative study. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2019;15(4):e1996.
Raheem AA, Song HJ, Chang KD, ve ark. Robotic nurse duties in the urology operative room: 11 years of experience. Asian Journal of Urology. 2017;4(2):116-123.,
Lim PC, Kang E. How to prepare the patient for robotic surgery: before and during the operation. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017;45:32-47.
Sugi M, Matsuda T, Yoshida T, ve ark. Introduction of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urologia Internationalis. 2017;99(2):194-200.
Xing MH, Hou SW, Gundeti MS. Robotics in pediatric urology-history, evolution, and future directions. Current Surgery Reports. 2023;11(11):291-299.
Hughes T, Rai B, Madaan S, ve ark. The availability, cost, limitations, learning curve and future of robotic systems in urology and prostate cancer surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(6):2268.
